What is Rogerian Argument? Developed by psychologist Carl Rogers (1902 – 1987) Emphasizes problem-solving and/or coming to consensus Allows the author to appear open-minded or even objective Appropriate in contexts where you need to convince a resistant opponent to at least respect your views Helps one show sympathetic understanding of opposition by recognizing valid spots and the overall goodwill of their detractor’s ideas
Toulmin Model Adversarial tone Although concessions may be made, arguments mostly based on refutation Opponent is “wrong” and will be overcome by evidence “I am right, and you are wrong” Rogerian Model Nonconfrontational , collegial, friendly tone Respects other’s views and allows for more than one truth Seeks to achieve common ground, not to convince 100 % “You have a good point, and you may be right in some circumstances. As a review, let’s compare Toulmin Argument to Rogerian Argument
Toulmin Argument, in a simple visual Claim Data Qualifier Warrant Backing Rebuttal
Rogerian Argument, in a simple visual Consensus
So how am I supposed to write this paper, anyway? Introduction: statement of problem to be solved or question to be answered Statement & Explanation of your position/opinion Statement of Context: describes contexts in which your position applies/works well Summary of Opposing Views: described using a seemingly objective persona Statement of Understanding: concedes circumstances under which opposing views might be valid Statement of Benefits/Compromise: appeals to self-interest of readers who may not yet agree with you; Develops a solution in which both parties benefit
Rogerian Argument Key words Consensus Agreement Minimal Threat Trust understanding “ Person centered approach”