SCM SCVehicle-Routing-and-Scheduling.ppt

mcjaya2024 11 views 31 slides Mar 02, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 31
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31

About This Presentation

Scheduling and routing


Slide Content

CHAPTER 7CHAPTER 7
VEHICLE ROUTING AND VEHICLE ROUTING AND
SCHEDULINGSCHEDULING


transportation: a key decision in
logistics mix

transportation absorbs a higher
percentage of logistics costs than any
other logistics activity

transportation decisions are

mode selection

carrier routing

vehicle scheduling, and

shipment consolidation

7.17.1
TRANSPORT TRANSPORT
SERVICE SELECTIONSERVICE SELECTION

Selection of Mode of
Transportation
depends on a variety of service characteristics

speed

time of delivery

inventory carried
from surveys that rank transport service
characteristics, shows that, except for cost,
speed and dependability are the most
important factors
cost of service, average transit time (speed),
and transit-time variability (dependability) are
the basis for transportation modal selection

7.1.17.1.1
Basic Cost Trade-OffsBasic Cost Trade-Offs

Basic Cost Trade-Offs

When transportation is not used to provide a
competitive advantage, the best choice is by trading off
the cost of using a particular transport service with the
indirect cost of inventory associated with the selected
transportation mode

speed and dependability affect

shippers and buyer’s inventory levels

the amount of inventory in transit between the
shipper and buyer’s locations

slower, less reliable services create more inventories in
the channel

inventory carrying cost may be trade-off with lower cost
for the transportation service

the favored service will be the one that offers the lowest
total cost consistent with customer service goals while
meeting customer service objectives

Example 1
The CarryAll Luggage Company

produces a line of luggage goods

finished goods inventories are kept at the plant site

goods are then shipped to field warehouses by common
carriers

rail is currently used

average transit time for rail shipments is T = 21 days

at each stocking point,

average of 100,000 units

average cost of C = $30 per unit

inventory carrying cost is I = 30% per unit cost per year

To select the mode of transportation that will minimize the
total costs

estimated that for every day that transit time can be reduced
from the current 21 days, average inventory levels can be
reduced by 1%

Demand, D = 700,000 units sold per year

Transport
service
Rates
($/unit)
Door-to-door
Transit Times
(days)
No. of
shipments per
year
Rail 0.10 21 10
Piggyback 0.15 14 20
Truck 0.2 5 20
Air 1.40 2 40
Procurement costs and transit-time variability is assumed to
be negligible.

$1,244,771$677,801$797,769$1,333,966Totals
(0.30)(31.4)(25,000)/2
= 117,750
(0.30)(30.2)(50,000)/2
= 226,500
(0.30)(30.15)(50,000)/2
= 226,125
(0.30)(30.1)(100,000)/2
= 451,500
IC’Q/2Field
inventory
(0.30)(30)(25,000)/2
= 112,500
(0.30)(30)(50,000)/2
= 225,000
(0.30)(30)(50,000)/2
= 225,000
(0.30)(30)(100,000)/2
= 450,000
ICQ/2Plant
inventory
(0.30)(30)(700,000)(2)
365
= 34,521
(0.30)(30)(700,000)(5)
365
= 86,301
(0.30)(30)(700,000)(14)
365
= 241,644
(0.30)(30)(700,000)(21)
365
= 362,466
ICDT
365
In-transit
Inventory
(1.40)(700,000)
= 980,000
(0.20)(700,000)
= 140,000
(0.15)(700,000)
= 105,000
(0.10)(700,000)
= 70,000
R X DTransportation
AirTruckPiggybackRailMethod of
Computatio
n
Cost Type
Table 7-2 Transportation Choice
Evaluations for the CarryAll Luggage
Company

7.1.27.1.2
Competitive Competitive
ConsiderationsConsiderations

Selection of transportation mode
to create a competitive service
advantage

when buyer purchases goods from >1 supplier, the
logistics service offered + the price, may influence the
supplier’s selection

if suppliers select the transport mode, they can control
this element and thus influence the buyer’s patronage

to buyer, better transport service (lower transit time and
transit-time variability) means

lower inventory levels and/or

operating schedules can be met with greater certainty

The buyer’s action is to shift its purchasing decision
toward the supplier offering the preferred transport
service

The profit may defray a premium transport service and
encourage supplier to seek the transport service
appealing to the buyer rather than simply the one
offering the lowest cost

transport service selection becomes a joint
decision between supplier and buyer
supplier competes for the buyer’s patronage
through the choice of a transport mode
buyer responds to the choice by offering the
supplier more business
more business will depend on the transport
service differential created among competing
suppliers
supplier will not settle on a single transport
service in a dynamic, competitive environment

Example 2

A manufacturer purchases 3,000 cases of plastic
parts valued at $100 per case from two suppliers

purchases are currently divided equally between
the suppliers

supplier uses rail transport and achieves the same
average delivery time

if for each day that a supplier can reduce the
average delivery time, the manufacturer will shift
5% of its total purchases, or 150 cases, to the
supplier

supplier earns a margin of 20% per case before
transportation charges

Supplier A would like to consider whether it would
be beneficial to switch from rail to air or truck
modes

Transport
Mode
Transport RateDelivery Time
Rail $2.50/case 7 days
Truck 6.00 4
Air 10.35 2

Transport
Mode
Cases
Sold
Gross
Profit
Transport costNet profit
Rail 1,500 $30,000.00- $ 3,750.00
=
$26,250.00
Truck 1,950 $39,000.00- $11,700.00 =$27,300.00
Air 2,250 $45,000.00- $23,287.50 =$21,712.50
Profit comparison for Supplier A’s
Transport Modal Choices

7.1.37.1.3
Appraisal of Selection Appraisal of Selection
MethodsMethods

Methods for transport
service selection
need to account for the indirect
effect that transportation choice
has on inventory costs
the patronage of the shippers and
consignees
there are other factors which are
not under the control of the
logistics manager

1. Effective Cooperation
between Supplier and Buyer
a reasonable knowledge of each party’s cost is
available
if they are separate legal entities, doubt that
perfect cost information is possible unless
some information exchange is worked out
Sensitivity

to the other party’s reactions to a transport service
choice
or
to the degree of patronage
should indicate the direction of cooperation

2. Competing suppliers in
the distribution channel

buyer and the supplier should act
rationally to gain optimum cost-
transport service trade
­offs

rationality among the parties can
not be guaranteed.

3. Price effects

supplier might raise product price
to provide a higher-quality
transportation service than the
competitor

buyer should consider both price
and transport performance when
determining patronage

4. Transport rate

changes because of changes in
product mix and inventory cost

adds a dynamic element to the
problem that is not directly
considered

5. Indirect effects of transport
choice on supplier inventories

suppliers and buyers may
experience increased or decreased
inventory levels as a result of the
shipment size associated with the
transport choice

suppliers may adjust price to
reflect this, which, in turn, will
affect transport choice

7.27.2
VEHICLE ROUTINGVEHICLE ROUTING

VEHICLE ROUTING

transportation costs range between 1/3 to 2/3 of logistics costs

improve efficiency through maximum utilization of
transportation equipment and personnel is a major concern

length of time that goods are in tran
­sit reflects on the number
of shipments a vehicle can made within a given period of time

to reduce transportation costs and improve customer service,
finding the best path to minimize the time or distance of
travel, is an important consideration

many variations of routing problems

find a path through a network where the origin point is
different from the destination point

find a path which involves multiple origin and destination
points

find a path where origin and destination points are the
same

7.2.1Separate and Single
Origin and Destination Points

problem of routing a vehicle
through a network can be solved
by many methods

the simplest and most
straightforward method is the
shortest route method

Example 3

7.2.2Multiple Origin and
Destination Points
multiple source points that may serve multiple
destination points
commonly occurs when there is more than one
vendor, plant, or warehouse to serve more than
one customer for the same product
further complicated when the source points
are restricted in the amount of the total
customer demand that can be supplied from
each location
solved by transportation method
Example 4

7.2.3 Coincident Origin and
Destination Points

origin point is the same as the destination point

commonly occurs when transport vehicles are privately
owned, e.g.

routing of delivery trucks from a warehouse to retail
points and return to the warehouse

local delivery trucks from retail stores to customers

routing of school buses, newspaper delivery trucks,
garbage collection trucks, and cars making deliveries
of meals to offices

the objective is to find the sequence in which the points
should be visited that will minimize to
­tal travel time or
distance

known as the “traveling salesman” problem

cognitive and heuristic solution procedures are used to
solve these problems

(a)Points Are Spatially
Related
solutions can be found by using the pattern
recognition capabilities of the human mind
good stop sequences are formed when the
paths of the route do not cross
the shape of the route will usually bulge, or
form a teardrop shape, where possible
illustrated in Figure 7-6
based on these two principles, an analyst can
quickly sketch out a route plan that might
require a computer many hours to find


alternatively, a computer model can be used to find the
stop sequences on a route

better choice when the spatial relationship between
stops does not represent their true travel time or
distance, e.g

travel barriers

one-way streets, or

traffic congestion present

locating stops geographically, e.g. coordinate points, can
reduce the amount of data

the computer is assigned the task of estimating the
distances or times

computational procedures have been developed that
rapidly solve the problem and produce results that are
close to optimum

Example 5
(a)Points Are Spatially
Related

(b)Points Are Not Spatially
Related

where it is not easy to establish the spatial
relationship between stops on the tour, or

where the spatial relationships become
distorted because of exact distances, or times,
should be specified between stop pairs

cognitive procedures are less applicable

must resort to a mathematical procedures to
treat this problem

although the inter-stop distances, or times, can
be exact, solution procedures tend to gives
approximate answers

example 6
Tags