SD_Monitoring and Evaluation Learning.pdf

Monitoring and Evaluation

1. February 26 –March 1, 2024
Golden Valley Hotel, Cebu City
ORIENTATION WORKSHOP ON
THEMONITORING AND EVALUATION OF
THEMATATAG CURRICULUM TRAINING
FORTEACHERS AND SCHOOL LEADERS

2. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF
LEARNING
Sarah Jane C. Atienza
EPS II, NEAP-QAD

3. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation DivisionNEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
07
09
08
06
Session 6:
M&E on Governance and
Management
Session 7:
M&E LearningManagement
Session 8:
MATATAG M&E Data Consolidation and
Submission
Session 9:
M&E Reports for the
MATATAGCurriculum Training
Session 10:
R&R of M&E Officers and M&E
Focal(Coordinators) on MATATAG
CurriculumTraining Implementation
SESSION
ROADMAP
10

4. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
4
Session Objective
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
•Understand the four levels of evaluation
in the Kirkpatrick Model: Reaction,
Learning, Behavior, and Results

5. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level 4
Results
THE KIRKPATRICK MODEL
Level 3
Behavior
The degree to which targeted outcomes
occur as a result of the training and
support and accountability package.
The degree to which participants apply
what they learned during training when
they are back on the job.
NEAP as an Academy/training institution/organization
for Learning, adapts the M&E principles focused on
learning based on Kirkpatrick’s Model

6. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level 2
Learning
Level 1
Reaction
The degree to which participants acquire
the intended knowledge, skills, attitude,
confidence, and commitment based on
their participation in the training.
The degree to which participants find the
training favorable, engaging, and relevant
to their jobs.

7. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division

8. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Objectives
Level 4 –Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
Aligned on results
objectives
Level 3 –Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
Application
objectives
Level 2 –Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
Terminal and
Enabling objectives
Level 1 –Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
Daily/Session
Objectives
What will be measured?

9. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Methods and tools
Level 4 –Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
Impact
Level 3 –Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
WAP
Level 2 –Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
Pre and post
assessment
Level 1 –Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
End-of-the day
evaluation
What methods/tools will be used to collect data?

10. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Data Sources
Level 4 –Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
Level 3 –Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
WAP result
Level 2 –Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
Pre and post
assessment result
Level 1 –Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
End-of-the day
evaluation result
Who and/or what documents will provide data or evidences on the
indicators?

11. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Schedule of M&E
Level 4 –Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
1 year or more than
Level 3 –Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
6 months or more
Level 2 –Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
End of the training
program
Level 1 –Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
End-of-the day
program
When will M&E activities be undertaken?

12. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Person Responsible
Level 4 –Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
Program Manager/ Top
Management
Level 3 –Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
Program Manager/
Immediate Supervisor/
M&E Officer
Level 2 –Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
Program Manager/
M&E Coordinator
Level 1 –Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
Program Manager/
M&E Coordinator
Who will be accountable for ensuring that M&E activities are done?

13. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Support Needed
Level 4 –Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training and
support and accountability package)
Funding, assessment
form and tool
Level 3 –Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
Funding, assessment
form and tool
Level 2 –Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
Level 2 M&E, strong
internet connection,
laptop & mobile
phone
Level 1 –Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging,
and relevant to their jobs)
Level 1 M&E, strong
internet connection,
Laptop & Mobile
phone
What resources are needed to implement M&E activities?

14. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E User of M&E Data
Level 4 –Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
School, Division,
Region, Deped CO
Level 3 –Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
PMT, DepEd –
NEAP, Division,
Region
Level 2 –Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
PMT (Program
Manager, M&E
Coordinator), DepEd -
NEAP
Level 1 –Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
PMT (Program
Manager, M&E
Coordinator), DepEd -
NEAP
Who will use the data gathered?

15. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Instructions:
1.Answer the pre-testthat will be
used in the MATATAG Curriculum
Training.
2.DO NOT SCREENSHOT/TAKE A
PHOTO, SHARE THE PRETEST, POST IT
IN ANY SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM.

16. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
https://bit.ly/MEPRETEST

17. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
https://bit.ly/EODEvalSample

18. NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division