Small bowel imaging small bowel AIIMS .ppt

karanmedi628 70 views 88 slides May 27, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 88
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88

About This Presentation

Presentation on small bowel imaging


Slide Content

SMALL BOWEL
IMAGING
Candidate:Shivani Pahwa
Moderator: Dr Sanjay Thulkar

Imaging Modalities
•X rays
•Barium studies
•CT
•MRI
•Angiography
•PET
•Sonography

Plain radiographs
Initial investigation in casualty

Suspected
perforation

Obstruction

Barium Studies
Indirect
•Small bowel follow
through
•Small bowel meal
•Peroral
pneumocolon
•Reflux examination
Direct
•Enteroclysis(small
bowel enema)

BMFT
•Two types
Conventional (radiographic)
Fluoroscopic
•Preparation
Dulcolax-afternoon before study
Abstain from food and drink in the
morning
Metoclopramide

BMFT
C/I of Metoclopramide
High grade obstruction
H/O allergy
Reduces lumen diameter
?disadvantage

BMFT
•Barium suspension-40%-50% w/v
•Limitations
Underdistention spurious nodularity
Low grade obstrn
Early mural infiltrn MISSED

BMFT
•Fluoroscopic FT after double contrast
UGI examn-AVOID
•Double contrast follow through
•Peroral pneumocolon
•Retrograde small bowel enema
•See through small bowel study

Small bowel follow through
Jejunum ileum
Thickness of
folds
2-3 mm 1-2 mm
Diameter of
lumen
Upto3 cm Upto2 cm

Enteroclysis
•Single contrast
-28-42% Ba @ 75ml/min
•Biphasic enteroclysis
-Methylcellulose ,air
-Maglinte method-50% w/v Ba
-Harlinger method-80% w/v Ba

Advantages of enteroclysis
•Pylorus bypassed
•Tests luminal distensibility
•Induces hypotonia
simultaneous display of all dilated loops
•Completed in 20-30 min

Enteroclysis
•Disadvantages
-Discomfort of intubation
-technical problems
High flow rate
poor distension
reflux into stomach & duodenum
Low flow rate
hypotonia,retardedprogress

Enteroclysis
Jejunum Ileum
Folds per inch
length
4-7 2-4
Thickness of folds1-2 mm 1-1.5 mm
Diameter of lumen Upto4 cmUpto3 cm
Wall thickness 1-1.5 mm 1-1.5 mm

CT Enteroclysis
Kloppel and colleagues (1992)
•Barium studies mucosal details
• CT extraluminal abnormalities
•CT Enteroclysis both

CT Enteroclysis
Contrast agents
Neutral
•0.5% methylcellulose
•Water
•Low density
Barium(VoLumen)
•Polyethylene glycol
Positive
•4 –15% water
soluble contrast
•Dilute 6% Barium

CT Enteroclysis-Neutral contrast

CT Enteroclysis
Indications for neutral contrast
No e/o obstruction on plain radiographs
Unexplained GI bleed or anemia
Staging of known Crohn’s disease
Unexplained pain abdomen
Alternate examination before/after capsule
endoscopy

CT Enteroclysis -Positive contrast

CT enteroclysis
Indications for positive contrast
C/I to IV contrast
Suspected recurrent small bowel obstruction
inconclusive conventional studies
Suspected small bowel disease
inconclusive conventional studies
Suspected obstruction
H/O surgery
H/O radiotherapy

CT Enteroclysis
Fluoroscopic Phase
Small balloon catheter (9 F Maglinte
Minicatheter)-positioned distal to DJ
flexure
0.3 mg glucagon IV
Infuse 1.5L of water at 100 ml/min
RCNA 2007

CT Enteroclysis
CT phase
0.3 mg glucagon IV
1.5 L contrast @ 100 ml/min
IV contrast 4ml/sec,150 ml
Acquisition at 50 sec delay
RCNA 2007

CT Parameters
40 channel CT
Source :40 x 0.625 mm
Reformat:2.0 mm @ 1.0 mm recon interval
Neutral contrast
window width = 360 HU
window level = 40HU
Positive contrast
window width = 1200HU
window level =200 HU

CT Enterography
•Patient Preparation
•Oral contrast 0.1% w/v Ba solution with
sorbitol
•Volume-900 to 1800 ml over 30 min to 1hr
•metoclopramide +/-
•1 mg glucagon (i/m,i/v)

CT Enterography-Scanning
Techniques
•Single phase imaging
-”Enteric phase” -45 sec
-espfor Crohn’sDs & obstn
•Multiphasicimaging
for Obscure GI bleed
1.Arterial phase-6 sec
2.Enteric phase-20-25 sec
3.Delayed phase-70-75 sec

MR Imaging
Specific advantages
Better evaluation of fistulas
Evaluation of bowel distensibility
multiphasic imaging
MR fluoroscopy

Enteric Contrast Agents
•Negative
•Positive
•Biphasic

Negative Contrast Agents
•Super paramagnetic particles
•Perfluorooctyl bromide
•Ferumoxide oral suspension
•Oral magnetic particles
•Low signal intensity on T1 w and T2w

Advantages
•Bowel wall thickening -T1w
•Bowel wall enhancement
•Inflammation in surrounding fat-T2w
•Inter loop abscesses –more conspicuous

Pitfalls
GI side effects-5-15%
Imaging artefacts
Cost
Paradoxical High intensity if not
homogenously distributed

Positive Contrast Agents
Paramagnetic substances-
•Gadolinium chelates
•Manganese ions
•Ferrous ions
•Natural substances-milk,oil,ice cream,green
tea,blueberry juice

Pearls and pitfalls
Demonstrate wall thickness well on T1w
Inter loop abscesses shown well on T1w
-abscess has low signal intensity on T1
High signal intensity in lumen-masks bowel
wall enhancement or intraluminal masses after
I/V contrast

Biphasic Contrast Agents
•T1w –low signal intensity
T2w-high signal intensity
•Agents in use-
-water
-polyethylene glycol
-low Hounsfield Barium

Technical issues
•Enteroclysis vs enterography
•Pulse sequences
T2 w
single shot HASTE
True-FISP,
balanced fast field echo
T1 w contrast enhanced gradient echo
sequences with fat supression-2D or 3D

MR Enteroclysis

Angiography
•To detect Obscure GI bleed,massive acute
bleed
•Selective catheterisaation of coeliac
axis,SMA,IMA

Radionucleide studies
•Acute lower GI bleed
-Technetium 99 sulphur
colloid
-technetium 99 labelled
RBC’s-better
•Meckel’sdiverticulum
-Technetium 99 pertechnate
•Inflammatory bowel disease
-Indium 111 labelledWBC’s

Small bowel pathology
Inflammatory
Neoplastic
miscallaneous

Tuberculosis
Barium studies
First stage
-accelerated transit
-chicken intestine
-precipitation of barium
-crenated,spiculated contour
-thick folds

Tuberculosis
Second stage
•Ulcerations +
Third stage
•absent mucosal relief
•Short ‘hour glass’
stenosis
•Multiple strictures
•Fixed, matted loops
•Signs of malabsorption

IC tuberculosis
•Fleischner/inverted
umbrella sign
•Napkin ring stenosis
•Goose neck
deformity
•Purse string stenosis
•Stierlin’s sign
•String sign

USG
•Extramucosal changes
•Thickened bowel wall
>5 mm -non-distended
>3mm -distended
•Pseudo-kidney
•Club sign

Tuberculosis
CT
Mural thickening of IC area-
concentric
Low density areas in bowel
wall
Skip areas
Enlarged mesenteric lymph
nodes
-with central low attenuation
areas
Obstruction
D/D-Crohn’s

Crohn’s Disease
•Small bowel involved in 80%
•Diagnosisand evaluation of early disease
-Barium studies
-Colonoscopy
•Advanced disease
-CT
-MRI

Crohn’s Disease
Early disease
•Smooth symmetrical thickening of mucosal
folds
•Coarse villous pattern
•Aphthoid ulcers 1-3mm
Twoor more signs +
Increased likelihood of Crohn’s

Crohn’s disease
Intermediate disease
•Obliteration,distortio
nof mucosal folds
•Stellate/rosethorn
appearance
•Linear ulcers
,retraction of
mesenteric border
•sacculationof
redundant border

Crohn’s Disease
Advanced disease
•Deep linear
ulcers/fissures
•Pseudopolyps
•Cobblestone /
ulceronodular
appearance
•Anti mesenteric
redundancy-
disappears
•Fat wrapping

Crohn’s disease-CT

Crohn’s Disease

Crohn’s Disease-MR

Neoplasms-malignant

Adenocarcinoma
•40% of malignant small bowel tumors
•Duodenum/proximal jejunum
•Barium-narrowing

Adenocarcinoma
Eccentric focal mass
Asymmetric
thickening
metastasis
lymph nodes
mesentry

Lymphoma-NHL
Barium
Aneurysmal
Constrictive
Nodular
Ulcerative
Mesenteric
Sprue
endoexoenteric

Lymphoma –Non-Hodgkin’s
CT
Circumferential
Cavitary
Mesenteric
Value in treatment
planning & post-
therapy follow up

Lymphoma-Hodgkin’s
•Extremely rare
•Barium
-tapered,eccenteric narrowing
-displacement of bowel loops by nodal mass

Leiomyosarcoma

Leiomyosarcoma
Ileum (50%) jejunum
(33%)
Barium
Separation of loops
Ulceration, barium
filled cavities
Tethering
Shape altered by
compression

Leiomyosarcoma
CT
Bulky , eccenteric
lesion
Calcification +/-
Significant
enhancement with IV
contrast
Metastasis to
liver,omentum

Carcinoid
•Appendix ,terminal
ileum
Barium
Less than 2 cm-
incidental submucosal
nodule
Mesenteric
involvement-
-crowding of folds
-kinking of bowel wall
-separation of loops
-narrowing of lumen

Carcinoid
CT
desmoplasticrxn
Mesenteric mass
with curvilinear
strands extending to
bowel loops-stellate
appearance
Adenopathy
Liver metastasis
Calcification-50%

Somatostatin receptor scanning-Indium
111 pentetreotide

Metastasis
Intraperitoneal
Bowel
Ovary
Uterus
Hematogenous
Malignant melanoma-Bull’s eye/ target
Bronchogenicca
Breast ca
Local

Neoplasms -benign
Adenoma
Leiomyoma
Lipoma
Haemangioma

Imaging in Small Bowel Obstruction
20% of patients presenting with acute
abdomen
1
st
investigation-plain radiographs

Enteroclysis –Method of choice
Low grade/intermittent obstruction
Unsuspected closed loop obstruction
H/O laparotomy for malignancy
Radiation enteropathy
Strictures in Crohn’s ds

Enteroclysis –C/I
Acute & complete or high grade obstruction
Suspicion of strangulated obstruction
Suspected perforation

CT
Level of obstruction
Cause
Method of choice in-
Acute,complete obstruction
Adynamic ileus
Prolonged high grade obstruction
Suspicion of strangulation
Suspicion of inflammatory process

Obstruction
Beak sign
Whirl sign

Obstruction
Strangul ation
Closed loop
obstruction

Obstruction
Adhesions
Hernias

Obstruction-intussuception

Obstruction
Radiationenteropathy

Obstruction
Malignancy
Metastasis

Obstruction
Inflammatory
Gall stone ileus

Mesenteric Ischemia
•Rapid radiographic evolution
•Plain X rays
-thickened valvulae conniventes
-dilated gas filled bowel loops
-thickening of bowel wall
-thumbprinting-occassionally
-air in intestinal wall/hepatic veins

Mesenteric Ischemia
conventional

Mesenteric Ischemia-CT
•Neutral oral & IV contrast
•Arterial phase
•Venous phase

Mesenteric ischemia-CT
Thin Axial images-
-proximal arterial patency
Sagittalprojection
-to evaluate origin & proximal portion of
mesenteric arteries
-to identify anatomic variants
Volume rendering-coronal/coroblique
-distal branches
MIP
-smallest branches

Mesenteric Ischemia
Findings
Bowel dilatation
Mesnteric edema
Vascular changes

Mesenteric Ischemia
Bowel dilatation
Bowel thickening
>8mm
transmuralinfarct -
paper thin
Bowel wall attenuation
low density edema
high density hge

Pneumatosis/portomese
ntericvenous gas

Mesenteric Ischemia
Abnormal enhancement patterns
delayed on early phase;persistenton late phase
Complete absence of enhancement
very specific
very rare
Hyperemia-good prognosis
CT Angiography

Malabsorption
Role of radiology
To determine the cause
Possible complications
CT and MR-complementary
Specific pattern
Bacterial overgrowth syndromes
Adult coeliacds
Adult CF
ZES
Short bowel synd

Modifications in Barium techniques
•Enteroclysis –prefd
•Balloon-kept in distal duodenum
•Larger amt of barium (more than 300ml)
•Faster injection
•Early compression spot films reqd

Coeliac disease
•Lumen dilatation
•Fold thickening
•Less than 3
folds/inch -jejunum
•4-6 folds/inch
-ileum
jejunisation

Conclusion
barium studies –still 1
st
line of investigation
CT –can demonstrate extra-luminal
abnormalities
MR –upcoming,esp where repeated imaging is
required and radiation issues are a concern

Thank you
Tags