SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA

ssuser52ada61 1,671 views 113 slides Jun 03, 2022
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 113
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113

About This Presentation

Detailed Description about soft tissue sarcoma.
Deals with topics including etiology, histopathology,clinical presentation ,staging and prognostic factors and management methods including surgery and adjuvent therapy .

Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignant tumours derived from...


Slide Content

SOFT TISSUE   SARCOMA S5 UNIT

History 1 st referred in Papyrus Eberus in 1500 BC which recommends treatment with knife. Later Hippocrates , Celsus and Galen contributed Rudolf Virchow, Samuel Gross and Samuel Wilks laid the foundation of our modern day understanding of STS

Soft Tissue Sarcoma Soft tissue Connects,surrounds & support  skeletal system  Non-epithelial &            extra-skeletal Derived from mesoderm with neuroectoderm contributions Sarcoma Greek ‘Sarcos’ =fleshy Malignant tumours arising from  mesenchymal tissue younger age group  Fish flesh gross look with hemorrhage and necrosis Rapid growth ,early blood spread

Sarcoma Tumours of mesenchymal origin  Rare - < 1% of all cancers Arise from   bone - Osteosarcoma  soft tissue -Soft Tissue Sarcoma STS to bone sarcoma - 3:1 Sporadic- Origin is unknown. arise from pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells  somatic "driver" mutations in oncogenes/ suppressor genes

More common Older age group Arise from Sarcoma  Carcinoma  Origin  Mesenchymal(connective) tissue Epithelial tissue  Incidence  Less common  More common Age  Younger age  Older age  Vascularity  More vascular  Less vascular  Rate of growth  More rapid  Less rapid  Spread  Hematogenous spread  Lymphatic spread  Prognosis  More worse  Less worse

Soft Tissue Tumours Benign soft tissue tumors are 100 times more common than STS  Most of the sarcomas arise de novo . Benign tumour will not turn into malignancy

Soft Tissue Sarcomas  STS constitute heterogeneous group of malignant tumors derived from primitive mesenchymal cells. Aggressive tumours-locally invasive and recurrent Require multimodality therapeutic approach .

STS are named based on tissue which it resemble  Liposarcoma-Fat  Fibrosarcoma-fibroblast  Malignant fibrous histiocytoma-histiocyte              (Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma-UPS )  Leiomyosarcoma- smooth muscle  Rhabdomyosarcoma-skeletal muscle  Chondrosarcoma-chondroblast  Angiosarcoma-blood vessels

Incidence   Soft-tissue sarcomas are relatively uncommon cancers.    1% of adults malignancy    15% of pediatric malignancies This may be because cells in soft tissue are not continuously dividing cells.  However they cause 2% of all cancer mortality -> aggressive behavior-life threatening 

Epidemiology   GENDER -males : females -> 4:1   AGE – older age group  Bimodal distribution - 5th and 8th decades. Median age of diagnosis is 59 yrs .  

Mortality   40% of the newly diagnosed sarcomas eventually die   In Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER) data -> median age of death- 65yr Overall 5-year survival rate - 50% to 60%  Most will succumb within 2-3yrs of diagnosis.

Distribution Sarcoma has  > 50 histologic subtypes In adults UPS(MFH) and liposarcoma-15-45%   Rhabdomyosarcoma-10% Leiomyosarcoma 9-15% Synovial sarcoma-7% Malignant peripheral nerve sheath  tumour  (MPNST)-6%  Fibrosarcoma -5% In children Rhabdomyosarcoma  ,neuroblastoma 

RETROPERITONEUM LIPOSARCOMA VISCERAL (GIT)SARCOMA  LEIOMYOSARCOMA GENITOURINARY SYSTEM  LEIOMYOSARCOMA UTERUS LEIOMYOSARCOMA MYOCARDIUM ANGIOSARCOMA  HAND AND FOOT SYNOVIAL SARCOMA SKIN KAPOSI'S SARCOMA  HEAD AND NECK REGION ANGIOSARCOMA  SITE   COMMON TYPE  EXTREMITIES  MFH & LIPOSARCOMA

Anatomical location  Connective tissues seen throughout body so STS can occur anywhere  Extremities -  40%  (thigh-MC) Visceral - 19% Retroperitoneal - 15% Trunk/thoracic - 10%   Other- 13%

Distribution by location for adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma

AETIOLOGY By R i s h i ke s h  T h a m p i   

Aetiology Genetic factors Exposure to radiation Chemicals Viral infection Others

      Genetic Disorders                       Disorder                          Cause Neurofibromatosis Gardner syndrome Mutation in gene NF1 Defect in gene APC Li- Fraumeni syndrome Werners Syndrome Defect in gene TP53 Defect in gene  RECQL2 Gorlin syndrome  Retinoblastoma Defect in PTC gene Defect in gene  RB1

1.Ne u r o fi b r o m a t o s i s Benign tumors under the skin and in other parts of the body Also known as von Recklinghausen disease. 5% have risk of developing nerve sheath tumour

2 . Gardner syndrome Syndrome get many polyps in the colon and have a high risk of getting colon cancer. It also causes desmoid  tumors

3. Li-Fraumeni syndrome  H igh risk cancer, such breast   cancer, brain tumors, and sarcomas

4. Werner syndrome These include clogged heart arteries (arteriosclerosis) which can lead  to heart attacks, cataracts , and skin changes.  R isk of soft tissue   sarcomas.

5. Gorlin syndrome Also called nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome

6 .Retinoblastoma  R isk of developing bone           or soft tissue sarcomas

  Effects of  R adiation 8 to 50-fold increase in the incidence of STS is reported in patients who are treated for cancer of the breast, cervix and ovary by radiation.

C hem icals PVC T etrachlorodibenzodioxin   Arsen ic Thoratrast Pesticides Thorium oxide

Viral HIV in Kaposi's sarcoma    C           ytomegalovirus

Osteogenic sarcoma in Paget's disease of bone/exposure to radium Lymphangiosarcoma in post-mastectomy Lymphodema - Stewart   Treves syndrome.    Others

Histopathological classification  By Rishla  Sherin V.P 

Classification A) Tumour and tumour like lesions of fibrous tissu e           Fibrosarcoma B) Fibrohistiocytic tumors                 Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberance           Pleomorphic sarcoma       C) Tumours of adipose tissue                  Atypical lipoma                 Liposarcoma     D) Smooth muscle tumours                 Leiomyosarcoma                 Epitheloid leiomyosarcoma

E) Skeletal muscle tumours            Rhabdomyosarcoma            Rhabdomyosarcoma with ganglionic differentiation F) Tumour of blood vessels & lymphatics            Hemangiopericytoma            Angiosarcoma & lymphangiosarcoma            Kaposi’s sarcoma G) Tumours of peripheral nerves           Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour H)  Tumours of uncertain histiogenesis           Synovial sarcoma           Alveolar soft part sarcoma           Clear cell sarcoma

Topics for discussion Pleomorphic sarcoma  Leiomyosarcoma Liposarcoma Synovial sarcoma Fibrosarcoma Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor 

High grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma Malignant fibrous histiocytoma Grossly,         multilobulated         well circumscribed          firm,fleshy mass.

WHO categories:      a)Storiform        b)Inflammatory      c)Giant cell      d)Myxoid Histologically ,               Admixture of  Spindle shaped fibroblast like cells              & mononuclear histiocyte like cells.

Leiomyosarcoma Grossly,     diffuse,bulky,soft & fleshy mass      or a polypoid mass projecting into lumen

Histologically,      Whorled arrangement of Spindle shaped smooth muscle cell             With large & hyperchromic nuclei. Diagnostic criteria,     more than 10 mitosis per HPF

Liposarcoma Grossly,            Nodular circumscribed mass             But it is infiltrative 

Histologically ,           Variable number of lipoblasts- univacuolated  /                                 multivacuolated - Hallmark  of diagnosis .               4 Major histologic varieties are          1.Well differentiated             2.Myxoid.          3.Round cell                              4.Pleomorphic Click to add text

Synovial sarcoma Grossly , Variable size Multilobulated       Encapsulated.   Fish flesh like sarcomatous appearance  with foci of                          calcification                          cystic spaces  areas of hemorrhage necrosis.

Histologically , Biphasic cellular pattern Clefts or gland like structure cuboidal to columnar epithelial like cells           & spindle cells. Myxoid matrix, calcification,hyalination are present in stroma.

Fibrosarcoma Grossly ,           Lobulated & circumscribed            soft , fish flesh like ,with foci of necrosis &                  hemorrhage

Histologically ,         uniform spindle shaped fibroblast arranged in   intersecting    fascicles. In well differentiated tumour produce herring bone pattern

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour Grossly , an unencapsulated fusiform enlargement of a nerve. Histologically , It resemble fibrosarcoma. Triton tumor :Rhabdomyosarcoma, cartilage, bone

CLINICAL FEATURES & DIAGNOSIS By Rose Tom

CLINICAL FEATURES Depends on anatomical site and depth of tumor Asymptomatic swelling – short duration – progressive increase in size 33% may complain of pain Occasionally may affect function

Extremity STS  Small painless mass Retroperitonial  sarcoma Large mass – compress/invade contiguous structures

CLINICAL EVALUATION Assess the size Plane Relation to neurovascular structures and bone Look for LNs and visceral  mets DDs : hematoma, pulled up muscle

Warning Signs Larger than 5 cm Increasing in size Painful Deep to the fascia Recurrence after previous excision Each factor has a 25% risk of malignancy

METASTASIS / SPREAD Alveolar soft part sarcoma Advanced extremity myxoid liposarcoma Retroperitoneal Overall + Extremity STS Malignant fibrous histiocytoma Angiosarcoma Rhabdomyosarcoma Clear cell sarcoma Epithelial Synovial sarcoma HEMATOGENOUS SPREAD LYMPHATIC SPREAD

DIAGNOSIS Evaluation begins with a comprehensive history and physical examination

INVESTIGATIONS DIAGNOSTIC METASTATIC PRE-OPERATIVE BLOOD INVESTIGATION Blood routine Urine routine RFT LFT IMAGING MRI CT Abdomen Chest X-Ray CT Chest CT Abdomen PATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION Core/Trucut biopsy Incision biopsy Excision biopsy

RADIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS Goals - accurately define the local extent of a tumor & exclude metastatic disease. Major Modalities: MRI CT

MRI Imaging technique of choice for soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities, except in patients in whom MRI is contraindicated. Accurately delineates muscle groups and distinguishes between bone, vascular structures, neurologic structures and tumor. Sagittal and coronal views allow three-dimensional evaluation of anatomical compartments.

CT CT remains the imaging technique of choice for RPSs.  Only complementary role in extremity STS Help to detect calcification within the lesion or bone involvement better than MRI. In addition to giving invaluable information about: anatomic considerations radiologic subtleties between the various histologic types  

PATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION In an adult any symptomatic and enlarging mass, any superficial mass >5cm, any deep mass-  should be biopsied 3 methods : Core needle biopsy Incision biopsy Excision biopsy FNAC has no significance in STS

RULES FOR BIOPSY Use a biopsy track that can be excised at the time of definitive surgery Plan the incision very well Most superficial part of the mass Along the long axis of the limb Without raising flaps Avoiding hematoma

Core needle Biopsy Biopsy of Choice 83% of initial biopsy is adequate for diagnosis 95% of these correlated well with final histology Repeat under image guidance

Incision Biopsy Performed as a last resort when core biopsy specimens are nondiagnostic. If core needle biopsy fails 2 times , plan incision biopsy Incisional biopsy is indicated for deep tumors or for superficial soft tissue tumors larger than 3cm Open biopsy is a reliable diagnostic method that allows adequate tissue to be sampled for definitive and specific histologic identification 

Excision Biopsy Recommended only for superficial tumors, <5 cm

Metastatic Investigations Chest X Ray & CT Chest  R/o  Blood born metastasis to lungs in extremity STS All patients with soft-tissue sarcoma should have a CXR Chest CT reserved for patients with a suspicious lesion on CXR or for patients with a high-risk tumor (large tumor size [>5 cm], deep tumor location, or intermediate/high-grade histology) CT Abdomen  Done along with primary R/o liver metastasis in retroperitoneal & visceral STS Extremity myxoid liposarcoma – mets to fatty tissue of abdomen & retroperitoneum

STAGING & PROGNOSTIC FACTORS By S Surya Sujith

Soft tissue sarcoma is an aggressive, Invasive  destructive tumour high recurrence and distant metastases rate. Grade is the single most important factor in staging  It denotes the “biological aggressiveness” and likelihood of metastasis

       AJCC STAGING   SYSTEM It includes: Histopathologic grade (G) Tumor size (T) Nodal involvement (N) Distant metastases (M)

Changes in AJCC 8 th edition soft-tissue sarcomas are divided into the different staging systems by anatomical site head and neck, extremity and trunk, abdomen/thoracic visceral organs retroperitoneum

2. This staging system is applied to all extremity and trunk STS except desmoid and Kaposi sarcoma  3.  Superficial and deep location has been removed 4. T categories have increased from 2 to 4 5.  The term NX should not be used

6. N1 and M1 are stage 4

desmoid tumors /deep fibromatosis and Kaposi sarcoma are excluded from the sarcoma staging system GIST continues to have a unique staging system which is now classified under the soft-tissue sarcoma section

T-TUMOUR(T) TX -Primary tumor cannot be assessed TO - No evidence of primary tumor T1 – Tumor  </= 5cm  T2 -Tumor > 5 cm and </=10 cm  T3 -Tumor >10 cm and </=15 cm  T4 -Tumor >15 cm 

N-NODES (N) N0 - No regional lymph node metastases or unknown lymph node status  N1  -Regional lymph node metastasis Presence of positive nodes is considered Stage IV

Soft tissue sarcomas with nodal metastasis (< 3% of adult STS) Synovial sarcoma Ewing’s sarcoma Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma Epithelioid sarcoma  Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma Clear cell sarcoma  Angiosarcoma Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) It has poor prognosis

M-Distant Metastasis (M) M0: No distant metastasis  M1: Presence of distant metastasis Sites of metastasis 70% of extremity sarcomas metastasize to lung Retroperitoneal or visceral lesions metastasize to liver parenchyma Brain metastasis is seen in leiomyosarcoma,alveolar sarcoma and angiosarcoma

G-Histological Grading (G) GX -Grade cannot be assessed G1 -low grade (Tumour differentiation, mitotic count and necrosis score of 2 or 3 ) G2 - intermediate grade (score of 4 or 5 ) G3 -high grade (score of 6, 7, or 8 )

FNCLCC GRADE FNCLCC (Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte contre le Cancer)grade is determined by three parameters 1. Differentiation(1-3) 2. Mitotic activity(1-3) 3. Extent of necrosis(0-2)  The scores are added to determine the grade

1. Tumor Differentiation score 1 - closely resembling normal adult mesenchymal tissue  2-  histologic typing is certain  3-Embryonal and undifferentiated sarcomas, sarcomas of doubtful type

2. Mitotic Count Score 1: 0-9 mitoses per 10 HPF  2: 10-19 mitoses per 10 HPF  3: >=20 mitoses per 10 HPF  

3. Tumor  Necrosis Score 0-No necrosis 1-50%  tumor  necrosis 2- >=50%  tumor  necrosis.

STAGING STAGE T N  M GRADE I A T1 N0 M0 G1/Gx I B T2,T3,T4 N0 M0 G1/Gx II T1 N0 M0 G2/G3 IIIA T2 N0 M0 G2/G3 IIIB T3,T4 N0 M0 G2/G3 IV Any T N1 / Any N M0/ M1 Any G

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre(MSKCC) Staging Based on three POOR prognostic factors : 1.High grade - 1 point 2. Tumor size >5 cm - 1 point  3. Deep tumor - 1 point 

MSKCC Staging Stage 0: no poor prognostic feature Stage  1 :  1  poor prognostic feature  Stage  2 :  2  poor prognostic feature  Stage  3 :  3  poor prognostic feature  Stage 4: Metastatic carcinoma 

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS Prognostic factors for overall survival include: tumor size >5cm Location (head/neck or deep tumors ) Age > 65 years Histologic subtype and higher grade of tumor Inadequate clearance margin Multifocality Lung secondaries, nodal metastasis More than one compartment involvement Click to add text Click to add text

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT Sabarinath s SURGICAL MANAGEMENT                                              By Sabarinath S

        SURGICAL TREATMENT Surgery - main treatment modality.  Amputation rate for STS has reduced from 50% in 1960 to 5% at present.  Also due to proper adjuvant radio therapy following function/limb sparing complete excision, application of microvascular surgeries. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, perioperative /postoperative RT also play a major role.

Enneking classification 1.INTRALESIONAL EXCISION 2.MARGINAL EXCISION 3.WIDE EXCISION 4.RADICAL EXCISION

Intralesional excision It is done inside the pseudocapsule   Very high recurrence – upto 100% Not done  

Marginal excision En bloc resection through the reactive zone High recurrence rate-70%

Wide excision Wide excision means en bloc resection done through normal tissues beyond the reactive zone  it has local recurrence rate of 30%.

Radical excision If the margin is more than 5 cm outside the reactive zone.

Defines a curative margin as a margin of more than 5 cm outside the reactive zone   A  wide margin as a margin of 1-4 cm Wide margins classified into 2 subgroups:  1)Adequate    - Margin of 2 cm or more  2)Inadequate - Margin of 1–2 cm  Kawaguchi  Rule

Other procedures 1.Compartmental excision 2.Vascular resection with Vascular reconstruction 3.Amputation

Compartment Excision Radical limb saving procedure. Muscle group of 1 compartment resected from origin to insertion with tumour   Done only when tumour is intracompartmental . Not suitable when  extracompartmental  /many compartments involved / Encased to major neurovascular bundle.

Amputation Done in large tumours of upper or lower limbs. Radical amputation is done as disease has not spread systemically  In metastatic disease-no need for amputation as long-term survival is not possible

Indications for amputation 1)Major neurovascular encasement 2)Bone involvement 3)Multiple compartment involvement 4)Limb itself is diseased like lymphoedema 5)Recurrence with multicentricity

RETROPERITONEAL SARCOMA In retroperitoneal sarcoma,  Debulking surgery followed by radiation therapy  is used

CONSIDERATIONS IN SURGERY Do not raise flaps  Include previous biopsy site in area of surgery Minimum manipulation to avoid seeding Do not use drain ,If used ,the area should be included under radiation

RADIOTHERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY By Sachin Sanu

Radiotherapy External beam radiotherapy        IMRT - Intensity modulated radiotherapy       3- Dimension conformal radiotherapy Brachytherapy     Temporary-  loading  catheter                                                       iridium 192  Permanent - radio active seeds and deposited in the tumor (iridium 192)                                                        

Radiotherapy approaches Neoadjuvant (preoperatively) Intraoperative radiotherapy Adjuvant (postoperatively) Primary (radiotherapy alone)

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy Indication If the tumor is >5cm If tumor <5cm –not given    unless     a clearance margin of <1cm is expected                    close proximity to neurovascular bundle     Dose 45-50.4 Gy EQD2(Equivalent dose in 2 Gray fraction

Merits   of Neoadjuvant radiotherapy Vascularised tumor so outcome more Better peripheral sterilization Reduce the seeding of tumor during surgical manipulation Pseudocapsule may thicken and become acellular easing resection Tumor itself displaces the normal structures and protect them from radiation exposure

Demerits of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy wound complication  -acute toxicity ( post operatively) delay the surgery (3-6week after surgery) Mark probable scar area and give reduced dose there to minimize wound complication

Adjuvant radiotherapy  Indications If tumor >5cm If tumor <5cm Not given unless margins are positive Within 1-2month after surgery Dose 60-66Gy in EQD2

Merits   Can tailor the shape of radiation based on the kind of tumor it is Get idea about the tumor shape, extend, & histologic subtype                    Demerits   greater area and dose  Lymphedema Joint stiffness Cutaneous fibrosis

Neoadjuant radiotherapy Prefered

  Retroperitonial sarcomas If margin positive after wide excision following post operative radiotherapy In non operable lung metastasis Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Intraoperative Radiotherapy Primary Radiotherapy

Chemotherapy   Indications      High grade liposarcoma       High grade synovial sarcoma      Ewing’s sarcoma      Rhabdomyosarcoma

Single agent Doxorubicin Ifosfamide Dacarbazine   Ifosfamide - hemorrhagic cystitis   Mesna (2mercapto ethane sulfonate NA) is used along ifosfamide to reduce side effect  Combination Agents   Gemcitabine and docetaxel     MIAD regimen ( mesna , adriamycin , ifosfamide , dacarbazine)

ISOLATED LIMB PERFUSION   To deliver high dose of chemotherapy directly to the affected limb gives a much more targeted and higher dose of chemotherapy uses cytotoxic drugs and tumour necrosis factor with hyperthermia

RECURRENT DISEASE For extremity sarcomas lung - only site of recurrence(50%).  If  resectable  -> thoracotomy and resection If unresectable palliative CT is given Local recurrence in extremity sarcoma –> 6-20 % Median interval for local recurrence -> 18 months 80% local recurrence can be treated by limb salvage WLE

Follow up History and clinical examination every 3-6month for 1 st 2 years 6 monthly for 3 rd to 5 th year  Later on annually   CT/MRI of primary site  CT chest  Evaluations for Rehabilitation