Sotatercept_HYPERION_Full_Presentation (1).pptx

kalyanpavurala 10 views 35 slides Nov 01, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 35
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35

About This Presentation

Hxhxjxjxjffjjf


Slide Content

Title Slide Sotatercept for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension within the First Year after Diagnosis HYPERION Trial – NEJM 2025 Presenter: [Your Name] PG Dept. of General Medicine, PSIMS Institution: PSIMS & RF Date: [Insert Date]

Introduction PAH is progressive, life-threatening Leads to RV failure and death Despite therapy, outcomes remain poor Need for novel disease-modifying approach

Therapeutic Landscape ERAs PDE5 inhibitors sGC stimulators Prostacyclin analogues/receptor agonists Combination regimens improve outcomes

Sotatercept – Mechanism Activin-signaling inhibitor Targets TGF-β superfamily ligands Restores vascular signaling balance Reduces remodeling and resistance

Study Rationale Prior trials enrolled chronic PAH Early PAH may be reversible Unclear efficacy early Aim: Assess sotatercept <1 year from diagnosis

Study Design Phase 3 RCT Parallel-group, event-driven Add-on sotatercept vs placebo Subcutaneous every 21 days Median follow-up 13.2 months

Ethics & Oversight Good Clinical Practice Independent committees Merck Sharp & Dohme sponsor ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04811092

Randomization 1:1 (WHO FC II vs III; double/triple therapy) 0.3→0.7 mg/kg every 3 wks Adjusted for Hb, platelets Option for open-label SOTERIA study

Inclusion Criteria Adults ≥18 yrs, WHO FC II/III Group 1 PAH (idiopathic, CTD, drug-induced) Diagnosis <1 year Intermediate/high risk (REVEAL ≥6 or COMPERA ≥2)

Exclusion Criteria Portal HTN, HIV, veno-occlusive PAH LV EF <50%, valve disease Severe comorbidities Bleeding or abnormal labs

Primary Endpoint Time to first clinical worsening event Composite: death, hospitalization, septostomy, transplant, or ↓ exercise capacity

Secondary Endpoints Multicomponent improvement @24w Low REVEAL ≤5 Low French risk Change in NT-proBNP, 6MWD, WHO FC Overall survival

Statistics Planned 444 pts, 121 events (90% power) HR target 0.55 Early stop after ZENITH results Alpha 0.025 (1-sided)

Baseline Demographics N=320 (160 each) Mean age 56, 73% female Idiopathic 59%, CTD 30% Mean duration 7 months

Clinical Profile Double therapy 72%, triple 28% 6MWD 355 m NT-proBNP 956 pg/mL 78% WHO FC III

Primary Results Clinical worsening 10.6% vs 36.9% HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.14–0.41, P<0.001) Follow-up 13.2 months Benefit seen by 12 wks

Components 6MWD decline + symptoms 5% vs 29% Hospitalization 2% vs 9% Death 4.4% vs 3.8% No transplants or septostomy

Kaplan–Meier Summary Early curve separation by 12 wks Sustained benefit ARR 22% NNT = 5 for one event/year

Secondary Outcomes Multicomponent improvement 29% vs 15% (P=0.003) REVEAL ≤5 60% vs 48% (P=0.04) French risk NS NT-proBNP ↓199 vs ↓10

Functional Outcomes WHO FC I/II 55% vs 39% 6MWD ↑21 m Mortality 4.4% vs 3.8% Suggests disease-modifying potential

Safety Summary Any AE ~90% Serious AE 24% vs 28% Discontinuation 3% (sotatercept) Deaths 2.5% vs 3.1%

Common AEs Epistaxis 31.9% vs 6.9% Telangiectasia 26.2% vs 11.2% ↑Hb 11% vs 1% Bleeding 41% vs 16% (mostly mild)

Lab Findings Hb ↑1.2 g/dL Platelets stable BP ↑6.9% vs 1.9% No hepatic/renal toxicity

Mechanistic Insights Activin inhibition → SMAD1/5/8 activation ↓ endothelial proliferation ↑ repair, ↓ RV strain ↓ NT-proBNP parallels improvement

Discussion – Efficacy 76% reduction in clinical worsening Consistent across subgroups Early measurable benefit (3 doses) Comparable to STELLAR/ZENITH

Discussion – Safety Consistent with prior data Epistaxis, telangiectasia manageable Hb rise expected Overall tolerable profile

Limitations Early termination → shorter follow-up 33 pts <24w Limited QoL data Secondary endpoints underpowered

Clinical Implications First disease-modifying therapy Safe addition to standard therapy Delays progression, reduces hospitalizations Supports early initiation

Future Directions Long-term SOTERIA data awaited Evaluate 1st-line use Hb & safety monitoring Cost-effectiveness, real-world validation

Key Takeaways (1) HR 0.24; 76% risk reduction Early benefit @12 wks Safe and consistent efficacy NNT = 5 (1 event prevented per 5 treated)

Key Takeaways (2) Main AEs: epistaxis, telangiectasia, ↑Hb Integrable early in therapy Validates TGF-β pathway target Potential paradigm shift

Limitations Recap Early stop limited duration Mortality underpowered QoL data insufficient Need for ongoing safety data

Research Gaps Long-term effect durability Hb/bleeding risk trends Efficacy in FC IV or low-risk PAH Affordability/access studies needed

Conclusion Sotatercept early in PAH ↓ clinical worsening HR 0.24 vs placebo Safe, effective, paradigm-shifting New era in PAH therapy

References McLaughlin VV et al. NEJM 2025 STELLAR Trial – NEJM 2023 ZENITH Trial – NEJM 2024 ESC/ERS Guidelines 2022