SPREAD SPECTRUM

4,907 views 17 slides Nov 05, 2011
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 17
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17

About This Presentation

SPREAD SPECTRUM


Slide Content

M cGraw-Hill ©The M cGraw-Hill C ompanies, I nc., 2000
1
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
SPREAD SPECTRUM
UNIT 3
PART 2

6.2
3-2 SPREAD SPECTRUM3-2 SPREAD SPECTRUM
In spread spectrum (SS), we combine signals from In spread spectrum (SS), we combine signals from
different sources to fit into a larger bandwidth, different sources to fit into a larger bandwidth,
but our goals are to prevent eavesdropping and but our goals are to prevent eavesdropping and
jamming. To achieve these goals, spread spectrum jamming. To achieve these goals, spread spectrum
techniques add redundancy.techniques add redundancy.
Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS)
Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS)
Topics discussed in this section:Topics discussed in this section:

6.3
Spread Spectrum
A signal that occupies a bandwidth of B,
is spread out to occupy a bandwidth of B
ss
All signals are spread to occupy the same
bandwidth B
ss
Signals are spread with different codes so
that they can be separated at the receivers.
Signals can be spread in the frequency
domain or in the time domain.

6.4
Figure 3.21 Spread spectrum

6.5
Figure 3.22 Frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS)

6.6
Figure 3.23 Frequency selection in FHSS

6.7
Figure 3.24 FHSS cycles

6.8
Figure 3.25 Bandwidth sharing

6.9
Figure 3.26 DSSS

6.10
DSSS MODULATION

6.11
DSSS DEMODULATION

6.12
Figure 3.27 DSSS example

M cGraw-Hill ©The M cGraw-Hill C ompanies, I nc., 2000
DS-SS Vs FH-SS
PERFORMANCE
ISSUES
6.13

14
FHSS vs DSSS
l DSSS is more susceptible to narrow band noise.
4 DSSS channel is 22 Mhz wide whereas
4 FHSS is 79 Mhz wide.
l The FCC regulated that DSSS use a maximum of 1 watt
of transmitter power in Pt-to-Multipoint system.
l DSSS costs less then FHSS
l FHSS can have more systems co-located than
DSSS.
4 DSSS systems have the advantage in throughput
l The Wi-Fi alliance tests for DSSS compatibility
4 No such testing alliance exists for FHSS.

15
FHSS vs DSSS contd
l DSSS generally has a throughput of 5-6 Mbps
while FHSS is generally between 1-2 Mbps.
l Both FHSS and DHSS are equally insecure.
lDSSS has gained much wider acceptance due to
its low cost, high speed and interoperability.
4This market acceptance is expected to
accelerate.
4 FHSS advancement includes HomeRF and 802.15
(WPAN) (Bluetooth), however, it is expected to not
advance into the enterprise.

Copyright
2005 All Rights
Reserved
16February
2005
Co-location Comparison
1 5 10 15 20
10
20
30
40
Number of Co-located Systems
11 Mbps DSSS
3 Mbps FHSS (sync.)
3 Mbps FHSS (no sync.)
Date Rate in Mbps

M cGraw-Hill ©The M cGraw-Hill C ompanies, I nc., 2000
UNIT - 3
THE END
6.17