some destinations where immigrants, who have come from outside themselves, are raising
their voice, saying: ‘No more tourists please’.
Majority and minority communities – Many destinations contain one or more minority
groups, whose culture and interests may be different to that of the majority community.
Often, the minority groups are not involved in decision making.
External residents with an interest in the community – There are people who, while they do
not live in a certain tourist-area, do legitimately have a right to be involved in what happens.
These could be: people who have property in the area, people who own businesses in the
area, people who were born in the area, have moved, but are still involved in the area.
Elite and democratic systems – The idea of a ‘community’ implies an element of democracy.
However, we know that in many communities around the world, this is not the case. In many
communities, it is small, political or economic elite that takes the decisions or even a
dictatorship, where the dictator was never even elected.
One population, many different interest groups – One would be inclined to think that host
populations have the same interests. This is not the case. Within any community, there is a
whole range of groups with very different interests, who will take different positions where it
concerns tourism. For example, there are * those who own tourism enterprises * those who
are employed in the industry * other entrepreneurs, not involved in tourism * those who are
living in the area, not affected by tourism * those who are living in the area and whose lives
are affected by tourism in a negative way.
The myth of community and consensus
The idea of community is a comfortable idea, where people, living in an area, share the same
identity. It suggests stability and consensus.
However, if we want to make progress with the concept of sustainable tourism, we have to
recognize that there is generally no such thing as one community. In reality there are always
several host communities, rather than one single host community. And all have different
interests. We can imagine that the interests of employers and employees and of young people and
old people are far from the same. We need to be aware of the fact that communities are
represented by ‘community leaders’. Sometimes, these leaders are chosen (by a minority or by
the whole community?), other times, they are self-appointed. Do they always represent the
‘community-views’? Policy makers need to be aware of this.
Why Community Involvement?
However difficult, community involvement is a positive and fair aspect of sustainable tourism
development and planning
It follows the concept of democracy
It gives a voice to those who are most affected by tourism
It makes use of local knowledge to make sure that decisions are made well
It aims to reduce potential conflict between tourists and the host community, by involving
local people in the way in which tourism develops.
The scope of community involvement
33