1 | P a g e
Question 1 and 2
One of the most significant concepts in marketing analysis is the environment, where
not only internal actors but also external actors play an important role.
If the actors are close to the company, those who affect its ability to serve customers
– the company, suppliers, marketing intermediaries, customer market, competitors
and the public – then it is said to be micro-environmental actors. And if the actors are
larger societal forces such as the demographic, economic, natural, technological,
political and cultural forces, then it is said to be macro-environmental factors.
We believe both micro-environmental and macro-environmental factors have
affected Target´s overall performance in the past few years.
In microenvironment:
a) The company and its competitors
Prior the global recession, Target was not focusing in marketing concept, it was
rather product concept oriented. It was more concerned about company value and
brand positioning as it was well known to be successful due to its numerous designer
product lines. In comparison to Walmart, its biggest market competitor, Targets also
had cheaper prices but not cheaper than those of Walmart.
When Target noticed that its clientele was “pinching its pennies”, it decided to give
the company a new focus, which was the “Pay Less” part of its slogan in order to
keep the right balance between the two parts.
The company started with some operational changes, this included redesigning the
product itself, store brand promotion and advertising and product expansion. It even
designed a new brand name with much lower prices than other comparable brands.
b) Customers
Both Target and Walmart had the same line of merchandise, thus when the
unemployment rose due to the global recession, the consumers on one hand did not
think twice before shifting to Walmart since its prices were reasonable for them in
this period but on the other hand when Target realised it’s mistake and started
focusing on the “Pay Less” part of its slogan without compromising the quality of its
products, the situation started to get better since the consumers got Target´s
message and they were satisfied with the new prices since these prices were
reasoning with their budget.
c) Public
Target had a falling out among its various stakeholders, with the activist shareholder
William Ackman, whose company lost 85% of the $2 billion invested in Target.
Ackman not only chided target for being ineffectual in dealing with the abrupt
economic downturn but also accused the Target’s board of directors to be
inexperienced and so, went on to ask to control 5 of the board’s seats.