The-------Interview-----------Part-1.pptx

This jsjsbjdhdbdksjsvdijs

1. The Interview – Part 1 By Christopher Silvester Presented by: Ravinder Singh PGT English Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Patiala

2. What is an Interview? An interview is a structured conversation between two or more people where questions are asked by the interviewer to obtain information, opinions, or insights from the interviewee. It serves as a fundamental tool for gathering first-hand information and understanding different perspectives on various subjects. Interviews have become an essential part of modern communication, appearing in journalism, employment processes, research studies, and media interactions. They provide a direct channel for exchanging ideas and revealing personal thoughts that might otherwise remain unexpressed.

3. Defining the Interview Journalistic Definition A method of gathering information through direct questioning, where a reporter seeks facts, opinions, and insights from a subject for publication or broadcast. Academic Definition A systematic data collection technique used in research to obtain detailed information about experiences, beliefs, and perspectives from participants. Professional Definition A formal conversation designed to assess qualifications, suitability, or gather specific information for decision-making purposes in various fields. These definitions highlight the versatility of interviews across different domains, from media and research to professional settings.

4. Features and Nature of Interviews Interactive Communication Interviews involve dynamic two-way communication where both parties exchange information, ideas, and responses in real-time. Purpose-Driven Structure Every interview has a specific objective, whether to inform, evaluate, investigate, or entertain the audience. Revelatory Process Interviews often uncover hidden aspects of personality, thought processes, and experiences that might not emerge in other formats. Time-Bound Format Most interviews operate within specific time constraints, requiring efficient questioning and focused responses.

5. Different Forms of Interviews Face-to-Face Interviews Traditional in-person interviews allow for complete non-verbal communication, creating deeper connections and more authentic exchanges. They enable interviewers to observe body language, facial expressions, and immediate reactions. Telephonic Interviews Voice-only conversations that focus purely on verbal communication. While they lack visual cues, they can be more convenient and less intimidating for some participants, allowing for broader geographical reach. Online Interviews Digital interviews conducted via video conferencing platforms combine visual and audio elements while offering flexibility and accessibility. They have become increasingly popular, especially in professional and academic settings.

6. Positive Aspects of Interviews 1 Authentic Information Interviews provide direct access to first-hand accounts and personal experiences, offering authenticity that secondary sources cannot match. 2 Personal Connection They create intimate moments of human connection, allowing audiences to understand the person behind public figures or expert opinions. 3 Clarification Opportunity Interviews enable immediate clarification of complex ideas and allow for follow-up questions that deepen understanding. 4 Diverse Perspectives They bring multiple viewpoints to light, enriching public discourse and promoting comprehensive understanding of issues.

7. Criticisms and Negative Aspects Privacy Invasion Interviews can sometimes cross boundaries of personal privacy, forcing individuals to discuss sensitive or uncomfortable topics publicly. Misrepresentation Risk Editing and selective quotation can distort the original meaning, leading to misunderstandings or unfair portrayals of the interviewee. Power Imbalance The interviewer often holds significant control over the conversation's direction and the final presentation of information. Performance Pressure The formal setting and public nature of interviews can create anxiety, potentially affecting the authenticity of responses. Time Limitations Brief interviews may oversimplify complex issues or fail to provide adequate context for nuanced topics.

8. Authors' Views: V. S. Naipaul Nobel Prize Winner's Perspective "Some people are wounded by interviews and lose a part of themselves." V. S. Naipaul, the Trinidad-born British author and Nobel Prize winner, expressed deep concern about the potentially harmful effects of interviews. He believed that the interview process could be invasive and damaging to the interviewee's sense of self. Naipaul's perspective highlights the psychological impact interviews can have, suggesting that the exposure and scrutiny involved may fundamentally alter or diminish the person being interviewed.

9. Authors' Views: Lewis Carroll The Alice in Wonderland Creator's Opinion "I never give interviews. It is a matter of principle with me." Lewis Carroll, the renowned author of "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland," maintained a strict policy against giving interviews throughout his career. He viewed this as a fundamental principle, believing that his work should speak for itself. Carroll's stance reflects a desire to maintain privacy and let his literary creations represent him rather than personal revelations. His approach suggests that some artists prefer to keep their personal lives separate from their public work.

10. Conclusion: The Complex Nature of Interviews Balanced Perspective Interviews serve as valuable tools for information gathering while raising important questions about privacy and representation. Varying Opinions Different authors and personalities hold contrasting views about the value and ethics of the interview process. Ongoing Debate The discussion about interviews' benefits and drawbacks continues to evolve in our media-saturated world. Mutual Respect The key lies in conducting interviews with sensitivity, preparation, and respect for all parties involved. Christopher Silvester's exploration of interviews reveals their dual nature as both illuminating and potentially intrusive. Understanding these complexities helps us appreciate interviews as sophisticated communication tools that require careful consideration and ethical practice.