The Transportation and Land Use Connection

ctspencer2 16 views 33 slides Jun 22, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 33
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33

About This Presentation

The connection between transportation infrastructure and land use


Slide Content

USP 181 Public Transportation Paul Curcio August 2023 Class 6: The Transportation and Land Use Connection

Agenda L ecture material: Connections New Urbanism and Places New Urbanism Transit Oriented Development Unbundling Parking R eading reflection 5, “ Micro Transit and Trip Matching ” B reak Peter Katz, guest speaker Tammy Harpster, guest speaker Closing Discussion

Walker - Chapter 13 From Connections to Networks to Places

Walker - Chapter 13 Transit isn’t just about getting from point A to point B; but also about connecting to point C Two Aspects of Point C Timing Environment The Pulse Connection Way of providing fast connections even among services that aren’t very frequent

Walker - Chapter 13 The Grid Allows for travel from any place to any other place by a reasonably direct path at a high frequency Entails a set of parallel transit lines, each far enough apart so that everyone can walk to them, and other set of the same lines perpendicular to them

Walker - Chapter 13 Two Types of Grid Rectangular Grid pattern of parallel and perpendicular lines, running continuously all the way across a dense area Ideal for large and continuous density with many scattered activity center Spiderweb Grid consisting of lines radiating from the central district with circular lines orbiting it Radiating lines are called radials, while circular lines are called orbitals or crosstowns

Walker - Chapter 14 There is no established way to serve transit-unfriendly suburbs with the same quality and cost-effectiveness that’s easily achieved in transit-friendly places Most important decision about transit is the decision about where to locate: “Be on the way!”  Four Assumptions Urban Civilization will continue Transit in the developed world will continue to be expensive to provide Cost-effectiveness will still matter Ridership will still matter Transit’s Geometry Problem

How growth is perceived SANDAG’s mapping of population distribution

SANDAG Projections (2050) Assumptions: Increase concentration of residential density Increase concentration of job density Most of the added population is  centered around existing developments

Where is the growth?

Alternative Land Use Concepts

Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) California’s Department of Transportation definition of TOD : Moderate to high-density development Generally a mix of residential, employment, and shopping opportunities Located within an easy walk to a major transit stop Residents drive less and own fewer vehicles

Other definitions: a walk score greater than 70, and a gross housing density greater than 8 units per acre Transit Adjacent Development: low-density, auto-oriented land uses Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)

TOD vs. TAD

TOD vs. TAD

Cost of Free Parking

What should we do?

USP 181 19 - Integrated?

Urban Form & Transport Back to the Future: Redux of a Valiant Effort - 1986 Quality, mobility, prosperity, > clear goals Transit, TDM, Land Guidance > strong tools Bureaucracy, auto centricity and short termism> restraining forces History of the Future: Redux of a Systems Problem - 2020 Globalization, demographics, automation > mindset of problems Congestion, infrastructure, debt > goal displacement Isolationism, minority rule, system lock in > downward A Vision of Resiliency: Redux of AD Hoc Optimization - 2030 Hope not optimism> truth and consequences Experiments not models > cycle time compressed Harnessing exponential change > abundancy mindset USP 181 20

Technology and the Economy Each high-tech job creates 2.7 local services jobs Local service jobs pay more with a greater high-tech share In most places the extra pay outweighs higher housing costs USP 181 21

Solutions? District-based parking Unbundling parking Encourage short-term parking Deregulating mandatory parking (let developers control the supply of parking) Demand-based, locally-calibrated parking Utilize shared-parking

Lessons Parking is very expensive Developers may see transit as inconsequential

 Reading Reflection #5 Micro Transit and Trip Matching

 Peter Katz CEO of SmartGO Network  Urbanism Author

 Tammy Harpster CFO  Cobalt Funds

New Urbanism Video https ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pErk61t1N70 Built to Last https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HirpffHocUY  The Human City