This presentation looks at the maybe over used essay by Walter Benjamin, "The Work of Art in The Age of Mechanical Reproduction" and looks at its relevance to digital arts practice.
Size: 161.82 KB
Language: en
Added: Nov 24, 2009
Slides: 29 pages
Slide Content
Walter Benjamin and The Work of Art
in the Age of… (Mechanical
Reproduction?)
Benjamin, W., (1935). The work of art in the
age of mechanical reproduction is one of the
most reproduced essays of 20c
It is (maybe) still a essay but must be seen
inside a context. (written in 1935)
•Response to photography and cinema
•Photo 1839
•Cinema 1890s
The work of art in the age of…
The work of art in the age of…
By 1900 art has the chance to break away from, or to be
broken from magic ritual and religion
Photomechanical reproduction is perfected, swallowing up
the images of all previous art and generating its own
inimitable forms
The work of art in the age of…
Benjamin attempted new forms of writing – collage,
fragmentations - (most evident in his Arcades projects)
“ I think of it as collage; not as trying to argue
theoretically or philosophically from the top down but by
making certain things visible which then produce an idea
like a constellation where pieces seem to resonate with
each other and then out of it comes a kind of
illumination”
Morss, S.B., 1991. The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades
Project New edition., MIT Press.
Esther Leslie has argued that in fact that this essay about
reproduction could in fact have been designed for
reproduction
The essay for her concerns the translation of art – the
move of art from one time to another, from one space to
another
“ modern art is truly the advance guard; it ‘meets the
viewer half way’ it comes out of darkened niches, out of
the gallery, out of fixed time space coordinates. In the
age of technical reproducibility art is at least removed
figuratively and literally from its traditional spaces;
indeed art disintegrates and multiplies all at once”
Leslie, E., (2000). Walter Benjamin, Pluto Press.
The work of art in the age of
mechanical reproduction
“around 1900 technical reproduction had reached
a standard that not only permitted it to reproduce
all transmitted works of art and thus to cause the
most profound change in their impact upon the
public; it also had captured a place of its own
among the artistic processes. For the study of
this standard nothing is more revealing than the
nature of the repercussions that these two
different manifestations – the reproduction of
works of art and the art of film – have had on art
in its traditional form”
Benjamin, W., 1935. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction
The work of art in the age of
mechanical reproduction
“the technique of reproduction...loosens the
reproduced object from the domain of tradition.
In multiplying the reproduction, a unique
occurance is substituted for one that is of mass
nature. And in permitting the reproduction to
meet the receiver in his own particular situation,
it actualises the object reproduced”
Benjamin, W., 1935. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction
In resituating the artwork new contexts are
generated and new things come into view
An “optical unconscious” is disclosed and
new connections are made
So each new transmission of the artwork
makes it ‘actual’ again (significant)
The essay concerns itself with time and
space and also film. A number of themes
are explored
Aura
“Even the most perfect reproduction of a
work of art is lacking in one element: its
presence in time and space, its unique
existence at the place where it happens to
be. This unique existence of the work of
art determined the history to which it was
subject throughout the time of its
existence”
The presence of the original is the
prerequisite to the concept of authenticity
Manual reproduction usually branded as
forgery – the original preserved all its
authority
Technical reproduction is more independent
of the original than manual reproduction
In photography process reproduction can bring out
those aspects of the original that are
unattainable to the naked eye yet accessible to
the lens
Enlargement, slow motion
“The cathedral leaves its locale to be received in
the studio of a lover of art; the choral
production, performed in the auditorium or in the
open air, resounds in the drawing room”
Aura it seems depends on authenticity and
the authenticity of a thing is the ‘essence
of all that is transmissible from its
beginning…to the history which it has
experienced’
“The definition of aura as a ‘unique
phenomenon of a distance however close
it may be’ represents nothing but the
formulation of the cult value of the work of
art in categories of space and time
perception. Distance is the opposite of
closeness The essentially distant object is
the unapproachable one.
Unapproachability is indeed a major
quality of the cult image”
Links aura with cult and ritual – magical and
religious
This is the location of its original use value
Secularised in the cult of beauty
“With the advent of the first truly revolutionary
means of reproduction, photography,
simultaneously with the rise of socialism, art
sensed the approaching crisis which has
become evident a century later”
“Mechanical reproduction emancipates the work of
art from its parasitical dependence on ritual. To
an ever greater degree the work of art
reproduced becomes the work of art
designed for reproducibility”
It makes no sense to ask for the authentic prints
But argues Benjamin once authenticity ceases to
be applicable the function of art is reversed
Instead of being based on ritual, it begins to be
based on politics ????
By the emphasis on its exhibition value the
work of art becomes a creation with
entirely new functions – the artistic one
may be recognised as incidental
Photography and film become important
Benjamin argues that the futile discussions
of whether photography is an art missed
the point
“the primary question –whether the very
invention of photography had not
transformed the entire nature of art- was
not raised”
Reproducibility
Mechanical reproduction is inherent in the very
technique of film production
The camera that presents the performance of the
film actor to the public need not respect the
performance as an integral whole
The film responds to the shrivelling of the aura with
an artificial build up of the ‘personality’ outside
the studio
He seems to be arguing that film is more
democratic
“it is inherent in the technique of the film as
well as that of sports that everybody who
witnesses its accomplishments is
somewhat of an expert”
The distinction between author and public is about
to lose its basic character – at any moment the
reader is ready to turn into a writer
Importantly he makes a distinction between Russia
and Western Europe
“In Western Europe the capitalist exploitation of
the film denies consideration to modern man’s
legitimate claim to being reproduced. Under
these instances the film industry is trying hard to
spur the interest of the masses through illusion
promoting spectacles and dubious speculations”
Technological Change
“The equipment free aspect of reality here has
become the height of artifice; the sight of
immediate reality has become an orchid in the
land of technology”
This is a very confusing passage. It seems now to
be rather contradictory - isn’t this what the
classical Hollywood cinema does
“There is a tremendous difference between
the pictures they obtain. That of the
painter is a total one, that of the
cameraman consists of multiple fragments
which are assembled under a new law”
He argues that film is more significant to
contemporary man (link with the city)
Painting simply is in no position to present an object for
simultaneous collective experience
“By close-up of things around us, by focusing on hidden
details of familiar objects by exploring common place
milieus under the ingenious guise of the camera the film,
on the one hand, extends our comprehension of the
necessities which rule our lives…with the close-up space
expands; with slow-motion movement is extended. The
enlargement of a snapshot does not simply render
more precise what in any case was visible though
unclear: it reveals entirely new structural formations
of the subject.”
“The film is the art form that is in keeping with
the increased threat to his life which modern
man has to face. Man’s need to expose himself
to shock effects is his adjustment to the dangers
threatening him. The film corresponds to
profound changes in the appreciative apparatus
– changes that are experienced on an individual
scale by the man in the street in big city traffic,
on a historical scale by every present-day
citizen”
Politics
Finally Benjamin argues against the introduction of
aesthetics into political life Fascism. This seems
to stem from his discussion of mass culture and
the growing proletarianization of modern man.
Triumph of the Will had already been released
Is he saying that technology cannot be neutral?
“this is the situation of politics which Fascism
is rendering aesthetic. Communism
responds by politicising art”
In the Age of Digital
Reproduction
“The guardians of traditional modernism (not traditional
classicism) have deprived art of its climax, exactly as the
theory of coitus interruptus, foistered on poor Christian
lovers in the middle ages, deprived intercourse. When
we insist that High Art can only speak to Everyman (or to
the Ages), we rob it of vulgar, sweating specificity. Art
can't happen now, between you and me, only tomorrow,
or the day after, to everyone. It's worse when we insist--
as Walter Benjamin insisted--on the sacred "aura" of the
original. You must stand in front of the Mona Lisa or
else. You can't fall in love with her reproduction, no, no,
no--that's masturbation. You have to fly to the Louvre in
Paris and stand, forever, in line.”
Davis, D. The work of art in the age of digital reproduction : An Evolving
Thesis/1991-1995, [available at http://cristine.org/]
In the Age of Digital
Reproduction
“The work of art in the age of digital reproduction is
physically and formally chameleon. There is no
distinction now between "original" and
"reproduction" in virtually any medium based in film,
electronics, or telecommunications.”
Davis, D. The work of art in the age of digital reproduction : An Evolving
Thesis/1991-1995, [available at http://cristine.org/]
“The aura, supple and elastic, has stretched far
beyond the boundaries of Benjamin's prophecy, into
the rich realm of reproduction itself.”
Davis, D. The work of art in the age of digital reproduction : An Evolving
Thesis/1991-1995, [available at http://cristine.org/]
In the Age of Digital
Reproduction
“Analogue signals may be compared to a wave
breaking on a beach, breaking over and over but
never precisely in the same form. That is why
"copying" an audio signal or video signal in the
past always involved a loss in clarity. But digital
bits, compatible at last to the new generation of
tools that see, hear, speak, and compute, march
in precise, soldierly fashion, one figure after
another.”
Davis, D. The work of art in the age of digital reproduction : An Evolving
Thesis/1991-1995, [available at http://cristine.org/]