The Xerox Paradox: How a Copy King Missed Copying the Future
kaizenomics
1 views
11 slides
Oct 10, 2025
Slide 1 of 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
About This Presentation
Xerox invented the mouse, the graphical user interface, and even the foundations of modern networking; but never reaped the rewards. This presentation tells the riveting story of how a copier empire fumbled the future, letting Apple, Microsoft, and Silicon Valley walk away with its crown jewels.
Fr...
Slide Content
The Blunder Vault
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this material.
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this material.
The Blunder Vault
The Xerox Paradox: How a Copy King Missed Copying the Future
The Company That Invented the Future - Then Accidentally Gave It
Away
Imagine creating the future in your basement, then walking upstairs to brag only
about your shiny new filing cabinet. That, in essence, was Xerox in the 1970s.
While the company’s engineers at PARC (Palo Alto Research Center) conjured
the mouse, the graphical user interface, Ethernet, and laser printing, Xerox
leadership seemed more interested in paper jams than paradigm shifts. The irony? Xerox invented much of modern computing - only to hand the glory
(and billions) to Apple, Microsoft, and the rest of Silicon Valley.
The Blunder Vault is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts
and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
>> Subscribe To The Blunder Vault <<
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
The Xerox Paradox: How a Copy King Missed Copying the Future
The Company That Invented the Future - Then Accidentally Gave It
Away
Imagine creating the future in your basement, then walking upstairs to brag only
about your shiny new filing cabinet. That, in essence, was Xerox in the 1970s.
While the company’s engineers at PARC (Palo Alto Research Center) conjured
the mouse, the graphical user interface, Ethernet, and laser printing, Xerox
leadership seemed more interested in paper jams than paradigm shifts. The irony? Xerox invented much of modern computing - only to hand the glory
(and billions) to Apple, Microsoft, and the rest of Silicon Valley.
The Blunder Vault is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts
and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
>> Subscribe To The Blunder Vault <<
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
The Blunder Vault
Act I - From Copy Machines to Copycats
The story of Xerox begins not in the digital glow of computer screens but in the
hum and whirr of office copiers. In the 1950s and 60s, Xerox was the undisputed
monarch of the “paper kingdom.” Its invention, the Xerox 914 - the first
plain-paper copier - wasn’t just a machine; it was a miracle.
Offices that once relied on carbon paper and mimeographs suddenly had the
ability to duplicate documents at lightning speed. By 1965, Xerox was pulling in
hundreds of millions annually, and its name had become a verb. People didn’t
just photocopy; they Xeroxed.
In business, that’s the holy grail: when your brand name becomes the product
itself. Coca-Cola dreams of it. Kleenex basks in it. Xerox lived it. And with that
kind of dominance came swagger. This was the company that controlled how
businesses created, stored, and shared information. To Xerox executives, they
weren’t just selling copiers - they were shaping the very rhythm of modern office
life. But success has a way of narrowing vision. Xerox defined itself as a “document
company.” That phrase sounds innocuous, maybe even visionary - until you
realize how limiting it was. They saw their empire not as part of the emerging
technology industry but as an extension of the paper industry. Ink, toner, filing
cabinets - this was their arena. Anything beyond was, at best, a distraction.
The irony? Xerox had the money to pursue almost any future it wanted. By the
late 1960s, its profits soared to Wall Street-dazzling heights. Flush with cash, it
diversified - not into computers, but into financial services, insurance, even
publishing. (Because, of course, nothing screams “future of technology” like
buying a stake in textbook printing.) Xerox executives, ensconced in East Coast
boardrooms, believed the future was just a shinier version of the present, filled
with more paper, more copiers, more copies of copies.
It’s worth pausing here to compare Xerox’s mindset to IBM’s at roughly the same
time. IBM also sat atop a fortress of cash, dominating mainframes like Xerox
dominated copiers. But IBM, for all its bureaucratic blunders later, understood
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
Act I - From Copy Machines to Copycats
The story of Xerox begins not in the digital glow of computer screens but in the
hum and whirr of office copiers. In the 1950s and 60s, Xerox was the undisputed
monarch of the “paper kingdom.” Its invention, the Xerox 914 - the first
plain-paper copier - wasn’t just a machine; it was a miracle.
Offices that once relied on carbon paper and mimeographs suddenly had the
ability to duplicate documents at lightning speed. By 1965, Xerox was pulling in
hundreds of millions annually, and its name had become a verb. People didn’t
just photocopy; they Xeroxed.
In business, that’s the holy grail: when your brand name becomes the product
itself. Coca-Cola dreams of it. Kleenex basks in it. Xerox lived it. And with that
kind of dominance came swagger. This was the company that controlled how
businesses created, stored, and shared information. To Xerox executives, they
weren’t just selling copiers - they were shaping the very rhythm of modern office
life. But success has a way of narrowing vision. Xerox defined itself as a “document
company.” That phrase sounds innocuous, maybe even visionary - until you
realize how limiting it was. They saw their empire not as part of the emerging
technology industry but as an extension of the paper industry. Ink, toner, filing
cabinets - this was their arena. Anything beyond was, at best, a distraction.
The irony? Xerox had the money to pursue almost any future it wanted. By the
late 1960s, its profits soared to Wall Street-dazzling heights. Flush with cash, it
diversified - not into computers, but into financial services, insurance, even
publishing. (Because, of course, nothing screams “future of technology” like
buying a stake in textbook printing.) Xerox executives, ensconced in East Coast
boardrooms, believed the future was just a shinier version of the present, filled
with more paper, more copiers, more copies of copies.
It’s worth pausing here to compare Xerox’s mindset to IBM’s at roughly the same
time. IBM also sat atop a fortress of cash, dominating mainframes like Xerox
dominated copiers. But IBM, for all its bureaucratic blunders later, understood
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
The Blunder Vault
that computing was the next frontier. While IBM at least tried to wrestle with its
future - sometimes successfully, sometimes disastrously - Xerox almost willfully
ignored theirs. Their fortress wasn’t just fortified with money; it was walled off by
arrogance.
The tragic comedy of Xerox’s rise is that its executives couldn’t imagine a world
where documents weren’t physical, where information wasn’t something you
Xeroxed onto paper but something you manipulated on a screen. To them, the
computer was, at best, a tool for scientists and accountants. Ordinary office
workers wanted crisp black-and-white paper in their hands, not blinking cursors.
But markets are ruthless. The 1960s and 70s marked the beginning of a seismic
shift: the rise of personal computing. While Xerox executives toasted quarterly
profits from copier sales, an entire generation of hobbyists, hackers, and
visionary entrepreneurs in garages across California were asking a very different
question: What if the office of tomorrow doesn’t need paper at all?
Xerox had unwittingly set itself up as the perfect foil for the Silicon Valley
revolution that was brewing just beyond its periphery. They were rich,
comfortable, and dangerously complacent - the corporate equivalent of Kodak
sitting on the digital camera, or Blockbuster watching DVDs turn into streaming
while counting late fees.
And like those companies, Xerox didn’t yet realize that their greatest strength -
their domination of the paper office - was also the very blindfold that kept them
from seeing the paperless one coming.
Act II - The Wizards at PARC
If Act I was Xerox strutting around as the undisputed king of paper, Act II is
where the story takes a sharp turn into science fiction. Because in 1970, Xerox
decided to plant a strange outpost in the wilds of Palo Alto, California.
This wasn’t New York with its pinstriped suits and quarterly earnings calls - it was
the scrappy frontier of Silicon Valley, where long-haired PhDs and rebellious
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
that computing was the next frontier. While IBM at least tried to wrestle with its
future - sometimes successfully, sometimes disastrously - Xerox almost willfully
ignored theirs. Their fortress wasn’t just fortified with money; it was walled off by
arrogance.
The tragic comedy of Xerox’s rise is that its executives couldn’t imagine a world
where documents weren’t physical, where information wasn’t something you
Xeroxed onto paper but something you manipulated on a screen. To them, the
computer was, at best, a tool for scientists and accountants. Ordinary office
workers wanted crisp black-and-white paper in their hands, not blinking cursors.
But markets are ruthless. The 1960s and 70s marked the beginning of a seismic
shift: the rise of personal computing. While Xerox executives toasted quarterly
profits from copier sales, an entire generation of hobbyists, hackers, and
visionary entrepreneurs in garages across California were asking a very different
question: What if the office of tomorrow doesn’t need paper at all?
Xerox had unwittingly set itself up as the perfect foil for the Silicon Valley
revolution that was brewing just beyond its periphery. They were rich,
comfortable, and dangerously complacent - the corporate equivalent of Kodak
sitting on the digital camera, or Blockbuster watching DVDs turn into streaming
while counting late fees.
And like those companies, Xerox didn’t yet realize that their greatest strength -
their domination of the paper office - was also the very blindfold that kept them
from seeing the paperless one coming.
Act II - The Wizards at PARC
If Act I was Xerox strutting around as the undisputed king of paper, Act II is
where the story takes a sharp turn into science fiction. Because in 1970, Xerox
decided to plant a strange outpost in the wilds of Palo Alto, California.
This wasn’t New York with its pinstriped suits and quarterly earnings calls - it was
the scrappy frontier of Silicon Valley, where long-haired PhDs and rebellious
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
The Blunder Vault
engineers spent more time dreaming of futures than filing reports. They called it
PARC: Palo Alto Research Center.
And here’s the kicker: PARC actually delivered the future. Not hypotheticals, not
prototypes that fizzled, but inventions that would go on to define modern
computing. Think of it like Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory, except the
Oompa-Loompas were Stanford-trained scientists, and instead of Everlasting
Gobstoppers they were inventing Ethernet, laser printing, and the graphical user
interface. At the heart of it all was the Xerox Alto. Released in 1973, the Alto wasn’t some
clunky, command-line machine. It had a screen with windows, icons, and a
pointer that moved because of this curious little device called a mouse. You could
click, drag, and drop.
You could connect multiple Altos across a network and share files - like the
internet before the internet. And yet, when Xerox executives saw it, many
shrugged. It was too expensive, too weird, too far removed from the comforting
smell of toner.
The irony writes itself: Xerox had built a time machine, peered into the 21st
century, and then filed the blueprints under “miscellaneous.”
Why? Because the wizards at PARC and the bureaucrats back east lived in
different universes. PARC engineers believed they were building tools that would
fundamentally change how humans interacted with information. Xerox executives
believed they were building machines to sell more paper.
When PARC showed them a future without paper, it was like showing an oil
tycoon a prototype for solar panels: interesting, yes, but also terrifyingly irrelevant
to their empire.
It’s tempting to cast Xerox as uniquely shortsighted here, but let’s be fair: history
is littered with corporations that trip over their own golden goose. IBM invented
the relational database but let Oracle eat its lunch. Kodak invented the digital
camera but stuck with film until it was too late.
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
engineers spent more time dreaming of futures than filing reports. They called it
PARC: Palo Alto Research Center.
And here’s the kicker: PARC actually delivered the future. Not hypotheticals, not
prototypes that fizzled, but inventions that would go on to define modern
computing. Think of it like Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory, except the
Oompa-Loompas were Stanford-trained scientists, and instead of Everlasting
Gobstoppers they were inventing Ethernet, laser printing, and the graphical user
interface. At the heart of it all was the Xerox Alto. Released in 1973, the Alto wasn’t some
clunky, command-line machine. It had a screen with windows, icons, and a
pointer that moved because of this curious little device called a mouse. You could
click, drag, and drop.
You could connect multiple Altos across a network and share files - like the
internet before the internet. And yet, when Xerox executives saw it, many
shrugged. It was too expensive, too weird, too far removed from the comforting
smell of toner.
The irony writes itself: Xerox had built a time machine, peered into the 21st
century, and then filed the blueprints under “miscellaneous.”
Why? Because the wizards at PARC and the bureaucrats back east lived in
different universes. PARC engineers believed they were building tools that would
fundamentally change how humans interacted with information. Xerox executives
believed they were building machines to sell more paper.
When PARC showed them a future without paper, it was like showing an oil
tycoon a prototype for solar panels: interesting, yes, but also terrifyingly irrelevant
to their empire.
It’s tempting to cast Xerox as uniquely shortsighted here, but let’s be fair: history
is littered with corporations that trip over their own golden goose. IBM invented
the relational database but let Oracle eat its lunch. Kodak invented the digital
camera but stuck with film until it was too late.
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
The Blunder Vault
Nokia practically created the modern cellphone, only to be blindsided by Apple’s
iPhone. In all these cases, the innovation was there—the courage to blow up
your own business model wasn’t.
Still, Xerox’s case is particularly tragic because they weren’t just one or two steps
ahead - they were decades ahead. Imagine a world in which Xerox, not Apple,
launched the first truly personal computer. A world where “Xerox Office” was a
household name instead of Microsoft Office.
Where we were all “Xeroxing” our emails instead of sending them. It’s not
far-fetched. The Alto had everything - it just didn’t have champions in Xerox’s
C-suite willing to risk the copier cash cow for it.
Instead, Xerox kept PARC on a kind of corporate leash. They funded it, tolerated
it, even bragged about it at times, but they never truly listened to it. The result
was a surreal dynamic: the most advanced computing lab in the world shackled
to a parent company obsessed with paper jams and lease renewals. It’s the
business equivalent of adopting Mozart and then telling him to keep it down while
you balance your checkbook. And so, while PARC’s wizards were sketching out the digital future, Xerox
executives were effectively saying: “Lovely work, gentlemen. Now, how can we
use it to sell more copiers?” Spoiler: you couldn’t. And that blind spot would open
the door for outsiders - especially one charismatic Californian in a black
turtleneck - to come knocking.
Act III - Apple Knocks on the Door
By the late 1970s, Xerox’s Palo Alto Research Center had already cracked the
code of modern computing. The Alto, Ethernet, WYSIWYG text editors - it was all
there, humming quietly in the labs while Xerox headquarters remained busy
counting copier profits. But you know what happens to neglected treasure:
eventually, someone else digs it up.
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
Nokia practically created the modern cellphone, only to be blindsided by Apple’s
iPhone. In all these cases, the innovation was there—the courage to blow up
your own business model wasn’t.
Still, Xerox’s case is particularly tragic because they weren’t just one or two steps
ahead - they were decades ahead. Imagine a world in which Xerox, not Apple,
launched the first truly personal computer. A world where “Xerox Office” was a
household name instead of Microsoft Office.
Where we were all “Xeroxing” our emails instead of sending them. It’s not
far-fetched. The Alto had everything - it just didn’t have champions in Xerox’s
C-suite willing to risk the copier cash cow for it.
Instead, Xerox kept PARC on a kind of corporate leash. They funded it, tolerated
it, even bragged about it at times, but they never truly listened to it. The result
was a surreal dynamic: the most advanced computing lab in the world shackled
to a parent company obsessed with paper jams and lease renewals. It’s the
business equivalent of adopting Mozart and then telling him to keep it down while
you balance your checkbook. And so, while PARC’s wizards were sketching out the digital future, Xerox
executives were effectively saying: “Lovely work, gentlemen. Now, how can we
use it to sell more copiers?” Spoiler: you couldn’t. And that blind spot would open
the door for outsiders - especially one charismatic Californian in a black
turtleneck - to come knocking.
Act III - Apple Knocks on the Door
By the late 1970s, Xerox’s Palo Alto Research Center had already cracked the
code of modern computing. The Alto, Ethernet, WYSIWYG text editors - it was all
there, humming quietly in the labs while Xerox headquarters remained busy
counting copier profits. But you know what happens to neglected treasure:
eventually, someone else digs it up.
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
The Blunder Vault
Enter Steve Jobs, a man who made a career out of spotting brilliance that others
dismissed.
The story has since taken on the glow of Silicon Valley mythology. In 1979,
Xerox, hoping to cozy up to the upstart Apple Computer, struck a deal: Apple
employees could get a demo at PARC in exchange for Xerox being allowed to
buy Apple stock at a bargain. To Xerox, this seemed like a harmless trade - after
all, what could these shaggy-haired kids from Cupertino possibly do with Xerox’s
futuristic “toys”? Jobs walked into PARC and, as legend has it, walked out practically levitating.
The mouse. The icons. The windows. The graphical interface. He later admitted:
“They showed me three things, but I was so blinded by the first one - the
graphical user interface - that I couldn’t even see the other two.” What Xerox
executives saw as a curious science project, Jobs saw as the blueprint for the
next computing revolution. Here’s where the corporate comedy turns Shakespearean. Xerox had the chance
to be Apple before Apple. They had the talent, the prototypes, the visionaries.
But they lacked the imagination - and more importantly, the stomach - to turn
those ideas into products.
Apple, on the other hand, was scrappy, hungry, and had nothing to lose. While
Xerox feared cannibalizing copier sales, Jobs was ready to cannibalize anything,
including his own products, if it meant leaping ahead.
This contrast - Xerox’s risk aversion versus Apple’s risk appetite - explains why
one became a footnote and the other a trillion-dollar icon. It’s the same dynamic
that later doomed Blockbuster against Netflix, or BlackBerry against the iPhone:
incumbents protect the past; disruptors bet everything on the future.
To be fair, not everyone at Xerox was blind. Engineers at PARC knew they had
created something transformative. But inside the company, there was no
Jobs-like figure willing to champion it, fight for it, and drag executives kicking and
screaming toward the future. Xerox had brains in California but no believers in
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
Enter Steve Jobs, a man who made a career out of spotting brilliance that others
dismissed.
The story has since taken on the glow of Silicon Valley mythology. In 1979,
Xerox, hoping to cozy up to the upstart Apple Computer, struck a deal: Apple
employees could get a demo at PARC in exchange for Xerox being allowed to
buy Apple stock at a bargain. To Xerox, this seemed like a harmless trade - after
all, what could these shaggy-haired kids from Cupertino possibly do with Xerox’s
futuristic “toys”? Jobs walked into PARC and, as legend has it, walked out practically levitating.
The mouse. The icons. The windows. The graphical interface. He later admitted:
“They showed me three things, but I was so blinded by the first one - the
graphical user interface - that I couldn’t even see the other two.” What Xerox
executives saw as a curious science project, Jobs saw as the blueprint for the
next computing revolution. Here’s where the corporate comedy turns Shakespearean. Xerox had the chance
to be Apple before Apple. They had the talent, the prototypes, the visionaries.
But they lacked the imagination - and more importantly, the stomach - to turn
those ideas into products.
Apple, on the other hand, was scrappy, hungry, and had nothing to lose. While
Xerox feared cannibalizing copier sales, Jobs was ready to cannibalize anything,
including his own products, if it meant leaping ahead.
This contrast - Xerox’s risk aversion versus Apple’s risk appetite - explains why
one became a footnote and the other a trillion-dollar icon. It’s the same dynamic
that later doomed Blockbuster against Netflix, or BlackBerry against the iPhone:
incumbents protect the past; disruptors bet everything on the future.
To be fair, not everyone at Xerox was blind. Engineers at PARC knew they had
created something transformative. But inside the company, there was no
Jobs-like figure willing to champion it, fight for it, and drag executives kicking and
screaming toward the future. Xerox had brains in California but no believers in
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
The Blunder Vault
Connecticut. And so, when Jobs saw the Alto, he didn’t just see technology - he
saw a vacuum of leadership, and he filled it.
The result? Apple took PARC’s innovations, refined them, and launched the Lisa
in 1983, followed by the Macintosh in 1984. The Lisa was too expensive, but the
Mac - marketed with that famous “1984” Super Bowl ad - became a cultural
moment, a shot across IBM’s bow, and the dawn of the era where ordinary
people, not just corporations, used computers.
Meanwhile, Xerox… went back to selling copiers.
This is where the irony bites hardest. Xerox had invited Jobs in thinking they
were the powerful patron helping a young startup. In reality, they handed over the
crown jewels of modern computing. It’s the corporate equivalent of the British
Empire giving George Washington a free musket.
And yet, before we mock Xerox too harshly, it’s worth asking: would they have
succeeded even if they tried? The Xerox brand was synonymous with office
machines, not personal empowerment or creativity. Apple, with its counterculture
ethos and Jobs’ messianic marketing, was built to sell dreams as much as
devices.
Xerox sold toner contracts; Apple sold “the future in a box.” Maybe Xerox’s
tragedy wasn’t just blindness - it was that they had the wrong DNA to make the
leap.
Still, it’s hard not to wonder: what if Xerox had taken the Alto to market, owned
the graphical interface, and built the first true consumer computer empire? Would
we today talk about “Xerox Stores” instead of Apple Stores? Would kids line up
every September to see the next “XeroxBook”?
Instead, they let Jobs knock, walk in, and walk out with their destiny tucked under
his arm.
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
Connecticut. And so, when Jobs saw the Alto, he didn’t just see technology - he
saw a vacuum of leadership, and he filled it.
The result? Apple took PARC’s innovations, refined them, and launched the Lisa
in 1983, followed by the Macintosh in 1984. The Lisa was too expensive, but the
Mac - marketed with that famous “1984” Super Bowl ad - became a cultural
moment, a shot across IBM’s bow, and the dawn of the era where ordinary
people, not just corporations, used computers.
Meanwhile, Xerox… went back to selling copiers.
This is where the irony bites hardest. Xerox had invited Jobs in thinking they
were the powerful patron helping a young startup. In reality, they handed over the
crown jewels of modern computing. It’s the corporate equivalent of the British
Empire giving George Washington a free musket.
And yet, before we mock Xerox too harshly, it’s worth asking: would they have
succeeded even if they tried? The Xerox brand was synonymous with office
machines, not personal empowerment or creativity. Apple, with its counterculture
ethos and Jobs’ messianic marketing, was built to sell dreams as much as
devices.
Xerox sold toner contracts; Apple sold “the future in a box.” Maybe Xerox’s
tragedy wasn’t just blindness - it was that they had the wrong DNA to make the
leap.
Still, it’s hard not to wonder: what if Xerox had taken the Alto to market, owned
the graphical interface, and built the first true consumer computer empire? Would
we today talk about “Xerox Stores” instead of Apple Stores? Would kids line up
every September to see the next “XeroxBook”?
Instead, they let Jobs knock, walk in, and walk out with their destiny tucked under
his arm.
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
The Blunder Vault
Act IV - Why Xerox Failed
So, why did Xerox - this titan that literally had the future flickering on its lab
monitors - manage to fumble so spectacularly? The answer isn’t one fatal
blunder but a cocktail of arrogance, fear, and corporate tunnel vision. It’s a
masterclass in how to choke while holding a royal flush.
First, let’s talk corporate myopia. Xerox never thought of itself as a technology
company in the mold of IBM or, later, Apple. It was a “document company.” That
phrase became their mantra, their compass, their curse. Anything that didn’t sell
more paper or toner got shoved into the “irrelevant” drawer.
The irony? The very innovations at PARC - the Alto, Ethernet, the GUI - were
designed to eliminate paper. Xerox had funded the architects of their own
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
Act IV - Why Xerox Failed
So, why did Xerox - this titan that literally had the future flickering on its lab
monitors - manage to fumble so spectacularly? The answer isn’t one fatal
blunder but a cocktail of arrogance, fear, and corporate tunnel vision. It’s a
masterclass in how to choke while holding a royal flush.
First, let’s talk corporate myopia. Xerox never thought of itself as a technology
company in the mold of IBM or, later, Apple. It was a “document company.” That
phrase became their mantra, their compass, their curse. Anything that didn’t sell
more paper or toner got shoved into the “irrelevant” drawer.
The irony? The very innovations at PARC - the Alto, Ethernet, the GUI - were
designed to eliminate paper. Xerox had funded the architects of their own
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
The Blunder Vault
obsolescence, then decided not to move in because the blueprints didn’t have
enough filing cabinets.
Click here to read the rest of this compelling business story,
The Xerox Paradox: How a Copy King Missed Copying the Future
The Blunder Vault
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
obsolescence, then decided not to move in because the blueprints didn’t have
enough filing cabinets.
Click here to read the rest of this compelling business story,
The Xerox Paradox: How a Copy King Missed Copying the Future
The Blunder Vault
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
The Blunder Vault
Disclaimer
Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and fairness of the
information presented in this story. The narrative is based on publicly available sources,
historical records, and reasonable interpretations of key events.
While care has been taken to present factual and balanced reporting, some sections
may contain humor, satire, or speculation intended for storytelling and entertainment
purposes.
The Blunder Vault and its authors are not responsible for any errors, omissions, or
interpretations made by readers. All content is provided “as is”, and no warranties are
implied or expressed. The Blunder Vault shall not be held liable for any loss, damage, or
inconvenience arising directly or indirectly from the use of this material.
References to real companies, people, or events are for illustrative and educational
purposes only. Trademarks, logos, and images remain the property of their respective
owners.
If you believe any part of this story requires correction, please contact us. We welcome
constructive feedback and updates.
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
Disclaimer
Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and fairness of the
information presented in this story. The narrative is based on publicly available sources,
historical records, and reasonable interpretations of key events.
While care has been taken to present factual and balanced reporting, some sections
may contain humor, satire, or speculation intended for storytelling and entertainment
purposes.
The Blunder Vault and its authors are not responsible for any errors, omissions, or
interpretations made by readers. All content is provided “as is”, and no warranties are
implied or expressed. The Blunder Vault shall not be held liable for any loss, damage, or
inconvenience arising directly or indirectly from the use of this material.
References to real companies, people, or events are for illustrative and educational
purposes only. Trademarks, logos, and images remain the property of their respective
owners.
If you believe any part of this story requires correction, please contact us. We welcome
constructive feedback and updates.
© Copyright 2025 The Blunder Vault. All rights reserved. You have personal use rights only to this
material.
Categories
BusinessDownload
Download Slideshow Get the original presentation fileQuick Actions
Statistics
- Views 1
- Slides 11
- Age 52 days
Related Slideshows
1
DTI BPI Pivot Small Business - BUSINESS START UP PLAN
MeljunCortes
28 views
1
CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL Corporate Responsibilities
MeljunCortes
30 views
11
Karin Schaupp – Evocation; lançamento: 2000
alfeuRIO
28 views
10
Pillars of Biblical Oneness in the Book of Acts
JanParon
26 views
31
7-10. STP + Branding and Product & Services Strategies.pptx
itsyash298
27 views
44
Business Legislation PPT - UNIT 1 jimllpkggg
slogeshk98
29 views