transgenic breeding

ChandaKumari19 3,200 views 83 slides Mar 15, 2021
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 83
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83

About This Presentation

recombinant dna technology or transgenic technology in crop plants


Slide Content

Submitted By Chanda kumari Submitted to Dr . Anant Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding Lovely Professional University, Punjab AN ASSIGNMENT on Transgenics

What is a transgenic? Transgene E x otic g en e added t o a speci e s t h r ough r eco mb i na n t DNA technology Th e o r g anism t h a t d e v el op a f t e r succ e s s f u l t r an s f or m a t i on - transgenic BT COTTON GOLDEN RICE FLAVR SAVR TOMATO  Introduct ion

What is Transgenic Breeding ? Genetic improvement of crop plants, domestic animals, microbes through Biotechnology. What is Transgenics ? A genotype developed by the process of genetic engineering. Or A genotype containing foreign gene or modified gene of different species transferred by process of genetic engineering. What is Transgene ? Foreign gene or modified gene of any species which is used for development of transgenics. These may be from related wild species, microbes (Bacteria, viruses and fungi) or unrelated species.

Fig 1: A diagram re-drawn from Harlan and de Wet (1971) to include a description of gene pools as they relate to the use of transgenes . Circles are representations of the primary- (GP-1), secondary- (GP-2), tertiary- (GP-3), and quaternary-gene pools (GP-4)

Global area (Million Hectares) of Biotech crops, 1996-2016 by Country and Mega-Countries Source: ISAAA, 2016

Global Adoption Rates (%) for Principal Biotech Crops 201 7 (Million Hectares) Trait Distribution in Approved Events, 1992-2016

Status of Biosafety Research Trails of Biotech Crops in India, 2016 Source: MOEF&CC, 2016, Analyzed by ISAAA, 2016

Why Create Transgenic Plants? Improve agricultural value of plant increase yield (herbicide-resistance, pest-resistance) enhance nutrition enhance taste Plants can produce proteins for human needs (pharmaceutics) Modified plants can be used to study effects of genes An entire plant can be regenerated from a single cell ***TOTIPOTENCY*** No separation of germ and somatic cells

Overview of The Process There are five major steps involved in genetically engineering plants. These are DNA isolation, single gene cloning, gene designing, cell transformation, and backcross breeding. DNA is extracted from an organism that has the desired trait. The desired gene is located and copied. The gene is inserted into a single plant cell using a transformation method. If the transgene successfully lands in the cells nucleus and is incorporated into one of the chromosomes, then the trait that it codes for will be expressed in the cell's offspring. The cell multiplies and grows a new plant that contains the transgene in all of its cells. Through backcross breeding the transgenic plant is crossed with a plant from a high yielding line. The resulting hybrids are the genetically modified plants that can enter the marketplace.

General procedure of recombinant DNA technology

APPLICATION OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS Resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses

Improving crop yield and nutritional value

Help in alleviating poverty and hunger

Contribute to food, feed and fiber security

Transgenic plants as bioreactors for recombinant proteins

Provide better environment

Conserve biodiversity

GENE CONSTRUCT A typical plant gene Promoters /enhancers Reporter genes

M ETHODS FOR PLANT GENE TRANSFER INDIRECT METHODS (VECTOR-BASED) DIRECT METHODS (VECTOR-LESS ) Agroba c terium mediated transfromation Bacterial transformation Conjugation Phage transduction Retroviral transduction Transposition IN PLANTA T RA N SF O RM A T I O N Physical methods Particle b o mb a rdm e nt Electroporation Microinjection Liposome mediated DNA transfer Silicon Carbide fibre mediated DNA transfer Chemical method PEG-mediated DNA transfer Floral Dip Vacuum i n fi l tr a ti o n Agro injection

Figure: A biolistic microprojectile gun. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_gun (cc) DNA- or RNA-coated gold/tungsten particles are loaded into the gun and you pull the trigger.

PARTICLE BOMBARDMENT (BIOLISTICS) The micro projectile bombardment method was initially named as biolistics by its inventor Sanford (1988). Biolistics is a combination of biological and ballistics. There are other names for this technique- particle gun, gene gun, bio blaster. Foreign DNA containing the genes to be transferred is coated onto the surface of minute gold or tungsten particles (1-3 micrometers) and bombarded onto the target tissue or cells using a particle gun. Two types of plant tissue are commonly used for particle bombardment- Primary explants and the proliferating embryonic tissues. Successfully used for the transformation of many cereals, e.g. rice, wheat, maize. A commercially produced particle bombardment apparatus namely PDS-1000/HE is widely used these days.

Advantages : Gene transfer can be efficiently done in organized tissues. Different species of plants can be used to develop transgenic plants. Limitations : iii. The major complication is the production of high transgene copy number. This may result in instability of transgene expression due to gene silencing. The target tissue may often get damaged due to lack of control of bombardment velocity. Sometimes, undesirable chimeric plants may be regenerated.

VECTORS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS Plasmid vectors Ti plasmid co integrative vector Binary vectors Plant virus vectors

Bacillus Shigetane Ishiwatari (1901), first isolated thuringiensis. Bt is commonly abbreviated as Bacillus thuringiensis,is a gram-positive, facultative aerobic, rod-like, motile and sporulating bacterium. Bt is a naturally-occurring soil borne bacterium that is found worldwide Ubiquitous in nature. Produces crystals of endotoxin (Cry protien or delta toxin) - toxic to insect mainly in their larval stage, thus they act as insecticides. Bacillus thuringiensis

These crystal proteins (Cry proteins) are insect stomach poisons. Insects stop feeding within two hours of a first bite and, if enough toxin is eaten, die within two or three days Important biological insect control agent. Bt crystals, sometimes referred as insecticidal crystal proteins (ICP), are protein crystals formed during sporulation in some Bt strains coded by cry genes. C onti.....

1. Ingestion 2. So l ubli z a t i on & p r o t eol y t i c a c t i v a tion 3. Binding to target site 4. Formation of toxic lesions HOW Bt WORKS ?

Mode of Action of Bt Toxin in Insect Gut

Development of GM Crop/ Transgenics Identify gene(s) giving a desired trait Make copies of the gene Transfer to plant tissue Regenerate plants Lab analysis and safety testing Development of a variety Field tests Approval by Government agencies Commercialization Monitoring of efficacy and safety

Schematic Diagram of Bt Crop Improvement

Delivering the Gene to the Plant Transformation cassettes are developed in the lab They are then introduced into a plant Two major delivery methods Agrobacterium Tissue culture required to generate transgenic plants Gene Gun

The Lab Steps

Cell Culture and Somatic Embryogenesis, a Means to Obtain Transgenic Plants Scheiden and Schwann made a critical observation, that plants possess a remarkable ability to generate free-living cells from plant tissues. Plant cell and tissue culture using sterile technique and in vitro (within glass) conditions are key elements to obtaining transgenic crop plants. Somatic Embryogenesis Totipotentcy : plant cell or cells are able to live independently, and also possess the ability to regenerate into a whole plant under the right environmental conditions. The first methodology of generating plants from cell culture is through the process of somatic embryo formation, whereby somatic cells (those not involved in sexual reproduction), produce an embryo similar to one produced by zygotic embryogenesis it is called somatic embryogenesis. Somatic embryos formed with root and shoot apical meristems are termed a bipolar embryo, and germinate into whole plants (Parrott, 2000). Organogenesis The second methodology of regenerating single cells into whole plants is termed organogenesis, where a meristematic cell from a root or shoot primordiums used to form organs (e.g. shoots, leaves or roots); these recovered organs can then be cultured into whole plants. Cell culture and transformation

Transgenic Crops: Development Objectives First-generation GM crops Herbicide resistance:- Corn,Soybean,rice,and Sugar beet Insect Pest resistance:- Corn, rice tomato and potato Viral resistance:- Papaya, Squash and potato Slow ripening and softening- Tomato and melon Improved oil quality -Canola and soybean Male sterility - Canola and corn

Second generation of GM crops Increased levels of protein Modified and healthier fats Modified carbohydrates Improved flavor characteristics Increased levels of micronutrients Third generation of GM crops Resistance to abiotic stress “Pharmaplants” Conti..

Transgenic Breeding for Insect Resistance Crop Gene i n s e r t e d Resistance to Vector Achievement Year 1) Cotton Cry gene complex Bollworm complex Ag r oba c t eri u m tumefacience 1 st Bt cotton in world by Monsanto Ltd. USA. 1 st Bt cotton in india - 1996 by MAHYCO - Monsanto Ltd. 1987 1996 2) Brinjal Cry 1 Ab Fruit and shoot borer Ag r oba c t eri u m tumefacience 1) 1 st transgenic (Bt) Brinjal in world ( USA) 2004 3) Cabbage Cry gene complex Cabbage worm and cabbage looper Ag r oba c t eri u m tumefacience 1) 1 st transgenic (Bt) Cabbage in world (USA) 2002 4)Maize Cry gene complex European Corn Borer Agrobacterium tumefacience 1) 1 st Transgenic maize in world is Maximizer (Spain) by Company Ciba Geigy 1995 5)Okra Cry 1 Ab Fruit and shoot borer Ag r oba c t eri u m tumefacience 1) 1 st Transgenic okra in world by U.S.A. 2002

Crop Gene inserted Resistance to Vector Achievement Year 6) Potato Cry-gene complex Colorado potato beetle Ag r oba c t eri u m tumefacience First transgenic potato in world – Monsanto Ltd. U.S.A. 1995 7) Apple Cry-1-Ac Codling moth Ag r oba c t eri u m tumefacience First transgenic Apple in world by U.S.A. 2000 8) Soybean Cry-1-Ac Leaf eating c a t t er p illar Ag r oba c t eri u m tumefacience First transgenic Soybean in world – Monsanto Ltd. U.S.A. 1996 9) Sugar cane Cry-1-Ab Stem borer Agrobacterium tumefacience First transgenic Sugar cane in world – U.S.A. DNA plant technology company 1997 10) Tomato Cry-1-Ac Tobacco horn worm Ag r oba c t eri u m tumefacience First transgenic Tomato in world – U.S.A by Calgene company 1987 11)Tobacco Trypsin inhibitor gene from cowpea Leaf eating c a t t er p illar Ag r oba c t eri u m tumefacience First transgenic tobacco resistant to leaf eating catterpillar was developed in USA. 2001. Source – Esseentials of Plant Breeding

Transgenic breeding for keeping quality Crop Gene inserted Traits Vector Achievement 1) Tomato - a) Delay ripening Ag r obac t er i um tum e f ac i e n c e Antisense RNA technology Ag r obac t er i um tumefacience a) Variety : Endless summer by DNA plant technology company 1995 b) Delay fruit s of t e n i ng b ) Fl a vr S a vr b y Calgene company in 1994 c) Thicker skin and Alter pectin content c) By Zeneca c omp a n y 1995

Crop Gene inserted Traits Vector Achievement 2) Apple ACC oxidase gene Delay ripening Ag r obac t er i um tumefacience In scion cultivar ROYAL GALA is developed 3) Banana ACC gene Delay ripening Ag r obac t er i um tumefacience Cavendish 1 4) Mango Rol C gene Storage and delay ripening Ag r obac t er i um tumefacience Golden yellow ( Source - AGROBIAS Newsletter. 2006).

Transgenic breeding for disease resistance Crop Gene inserted Resistance to Vector Achievement 1) Potato PLRV-R PVX, PVY, PLRV Agrobacterium tumefacience First transgenic potato in world by – Monsanto Ltd. U.S.A. 2000 2) Cumcumber GUS and Markar gene NPT II CMV, ZYMV, WMV 2 Ag r obac t e r i um tumefacience First resistance variety Beit alpha MR 3) Faba bean Chitinase gene from Seratica marcescence Chocolate spot disease Plasmid First resistance variety in 2002 4) Banana FR gene Panama wilt Plasmid First resistance variety isCavendish 5) Papaya PRVR gene Papaya ring spot virus Plasmid First resistance variety is Sunup and second variety is Rainbow in 1999 Hawai.

Transgenic breeding for Herbicide Resistance Crop Gene transfer resistance to Vector Achivement 1.Rice Bar chimeric gene Hygromycine Plasmid Oryza sativa cv. IR 72 2.Nilgiri (Eucalyptus) Cry 3A Glufosinate a mm oni um( Li b erty@6 l/ha) Ag r oba c t eri u m tumefacience Variety-Ecofriend 3.Sugarcane PPTR( ph o s p inot h rici n e resistant gene) Phosphinothricine Ag r oba c t eri u m tumefacience I st herbicide resistant sugarcane was developed in USA . 4.Cotton Phosphinothric acetyl transeferase All non selective herbicides Particle gun b om b a r dm e n t method I st variety was releasedIn year 2000.

Transgenic breeding for adding Male sterility Crop Gene inserted Source of gene 1.Rapeseed mustard msi (male sterility iducing gene) Bacillus a m y lo l iq u e f ac i e n c e Source – Essentials of Plant Breeding , Transgenic breeding for drought resistance 1.Drought resistance in sorghum Gene transformed mlt D gene Vector Agrobacterium tumefacience Developed at CRIDA, Hyderabad Number of transgenics released 14.

2. Drought resistance in Wheat 1. Crop American bread wheat 2.Genes transformed mlt D and HVA 1. 3.Source of gene Osmotin gene complex from Atriplex numularia 4. By Microprojectile bombardment system Transgenic breeding for changing morphological character 1. Crop Petunia 2. Character modified Orange flower colour 3.Gene transferred Dihydroflavanal 4 reductase (FR) gene. 4.Source of gene Zea mays L. (Corn) Original Petunia Modified Petunia

Insect resistant cotton – Bt toxin kills the cotton boll worm transgene = Bt protein I n se c t r esi s t a n t c orn – B t t o xin kills the European corn borer transgene = Bt protein Agriculture Transgenics On the Market

Herbicide resistant crops Now: soybean, corn, canola transgene = modified EPSP synthase or phosphinothricin-N-acetyltransferase Virus resistant papaya transgene = virus coat protein

Next Generation of Ag Biotech Products Golden Rice – increased Vitamin A content t r ans g en e = t h r e e p a t hw a y enzymes Su n flo w e r – wh i t e m o l d resistance transgene = oxalate oxidase from wheat

Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops In 2017, the accumulated biotech crop area (planted since 1996) surged to a record 2.3 billion hectares or 5.8 billion acres .Of the total number of 24 countries planting biotech crops in 2017, 19 were developing countries and 5 industrialized countries . To put the 2017 global area of biotech crops into context, 189.8 million hectares of biotech crops is equivalent to almost 20% of the total land area of China (956 million hectares) or the USA (937 million hectares) and more than 7 times the land area of the United Kingdom (24.4 million hectares). The 3% increase between 2016 and 2017 is equivalent to 4.7 million hectares or 11.6 million acres.( Source: ISAAA, 2017).

Global Adoption of Biotech Soybean, Maize, Cotton, and Canola The most planted biotech crops in 2017 were soybean, maize, cotton, and canola. Although there was only 3% increase in the planting of biotech soybean, it maintained its high adoption rate of 50% of the global biotech crops or 94.1 million hectares. This area is 80% of the total soybean production worldwide . Biotech maize occupied 59.7 million hectares globally, which was 32% of the global maize production in 2017. A slight decline (1%) in the biotech maize area from 2016 is due to the unfavorable weather conditions in Latin America, low market price, lesser pest incidence, high year-end stocks .

Biotech cotton was planted to 24.1 million hectares in 2017, which indicates a decrease by 8% from 2016. The 8% increase in total biotech cotton area globally was due mainly to the improved global market value and the high adoption rate of insect resistant/herbicide tolerant cotton in 2017. Biotech canola increased by 19% from 8.6 million hectares in 2016 to 10.2 million hectares in 2016. This raise is attributed to the two- digit increases in biotech canola plantings in the USA, Canada, and Australia, addressing the demand for edible oil.

Discussion Questions What are regulations supposed to achieve? With GM crops spreading so quickly, how are we assured of their health and environmental safety? How is genetic engineering (biotechnology) regulated? How do the risks posed by products of biotechnology compare to those posed by conventional technologies? How does biotechnology threaten biosafety? How do different countries regulate products of biotechnology?

Environmental concern And Bio- safety Issues Related to BT gene

Bio-safety of human and animal health Labeling GM and non-GM food Antibiotic resistance genes in GM food Environmental concerns Gene transfer Effects on bio-diversity Public awareness Socio-economic issues Major concerns related to Bt gene / transgenic crops :

Safety of source organism and genes safety of inserted DNA safety of DNA safety of antibiotic resistance marker Safety issue of newly developed product potential for toxicity (protein product) potential of allergencity(protein product) safety of any unintended effects Equivalence of composition 4.Retention of nutritional value 5.The human dietary exposure Food safety issues

With the kind of concerns witnessed among the public, keeping GM and non GM products separately with appropriate labelling , perhaps also through colour codes for illiterate people, may be absolutely necessary. The related issue is the need for a certification agency specializing in certifying the GM nature of a product. However, labeling may create confusion among consumers and add to the cost of GM products. Labeling GM and non GM Food

Another concern is the transfer of antibiotic resistance from the GM food consumed by people into the bacteria inhabiting the human gut, which might result in a disease causing bacterial population to become resistant to antibiotics. The transgenic developers should continue to remove more rapidly all such markers from GM plants and utilize alternative markers for the selection of new varieties. Resistance to Antibiotics

Effect of transgenic plants on population dynamics of target and non target pests Secondary pest problems Insect sensitivity Evolution of new insect biotypes Environmental influence on gene expression Development of resistance in insect population Development of resistance to herbicide Environmental Concerns

Direct effects on non-target organisms In May 1999, it was reported that pollen from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) insect resistant corn had a negative impact on Monarch butterfly larvae. This report raised concerns and questions about potential risks to Monarchs and perhaps other non- target organisms.

Development of insect resistance The use of Bt crops is that it will lead to the development of insect resistance to Bt Insect resistance management plans have been developed by government, industry, and scientists to address this issue – These plans include a requirement that every field of insect-resistant crops must have an associated refuge of non-GM crops in order for the insects to develop without selection to the insect resistant varieties.

Gene flow Accidental c r o s s b r e e d i ng GM O p l a n ts and between t r adi t ional pollen V ari e t i es transfer t h r ough c a n c o n t a m i n a t e th e t r a di t ion a l local varieties with GMO genes resulting in the loss of traditional varieties of the farmers.

Increased weediness Weediness means the tendency of the plant to sp r e a d b e y o n d the fie l d w he r e i t w a s fi r s t planted. There are apprehensions about GM crops becoming weeds. For example, a salt tolerant GM crop if escapes into marine areas could become a potent weed . There is also fear about the development of superweeds i.e. a weed that has acquired the herbicide tolerant gene due to genetic Contamination. With a herbicide tolerance GMO through in field cross breeding to related species or through horizontal gene transfer.

GM crops could lead to erosion of biodiversity and 'pollute' gene pools of endangered plant species. The large acreage of elite varieties have pushed and will continue to push the landraces out of cultivation The potential transfer of a transgene to local flora to and its any possible subsequent impact on specific plant species is thus an issue that needs to be kept in view before commercial release of specific transgenes. Effect on Biodiversity

Consumer response depends on perceptions about risks and benefits of genetically modified foods. In order to maximize the trust, it is essential that relevant and reliable information about the genetically modified food is communicated to the consumers and stake holders. The media, individuals, scientists and administrators, politicians and NGO have the responsibility to educate the people about the benefits of GM foods. Public Attitude

Potential benefits to the consumers and farmers. Due to increasing seed market, the developing countries may get dependent on few suppliers. Countries with effective and efficient technology will obtain and sustain advantage of international market. Reservation of E.U. for acceptance of GM crops. Socio economic issues

Genetic engineering creates novel genetic combinations All GMOs are tested for potential environmental impacts prior to sale influence on soil and water composition insect resistance management gene/trait transfer to weedy relatives interactions with agricultural environment GMO Crops Have Many Significant Environmental Benefits Reduced chemical pesticide and herbicide use More sustainable pest management Better erosion control through no-till practices GMOs-Impacts Analysis and Benefits

R egi s t r a tion o f t r a n s g enic a g ricultu r al organisms

The Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and products thereof are regulated articles in India in view of potential risks to human health and environment by indiscriminate use under “Rules for Manufacture, Use, Import, Export and Storage of Hazardous Microorganisms/Genetically engineered organisms or cells, 1989 under the EPA (1986)”. India has ratified the Biosafety Protocol in January 2003 Biosafety Framework Government Commitment

The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity has been ratified and signed by 171 parties (Fabruary 2018). According to the Cartagena Protocol, field trials and all other activities involving genetically modified organisms must be regulated and approved by national governments. Regulatory and Approval system for release of GM plant

The European Community (EC) and Development O r g ani z a t io n f or E c o nom i c Co o pe r a t i on (OECD) WHO/FAO Working Group on Biosafety o n th e E n vi r o n m e n t and Uni t e d N a t i ons C o n f e r ence Development (UNCED) Codex Alimentarius Commission Biosafety Regulating Agencies of the World

Government of India Department of Biotechnology Ministry of Environment ,forest & Climate Change R D A C R C GM G E A C Institutional Biosafety Committee State Biotechnology Coordination Committee District Level Committee Indian biosafety regulatory framework

Procedure for GEAC approval for field trials and environmental release of transgenic crops. Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBSC) (Forwarding applications for approval of RCGM) Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM) (green house experiments, contained field trails i.e .in –house trial /intial hybrid trial, generation of data on gene stability and expression , biosafety data) RCGM ( approval for conduct of multi-location field trials on selected varieties )/hybrid)and biosafety data) Evaluation of field trails by Monitoring –Cum-Evaluation Committee (MEC) Through SAUs

Genetic Engineering Approval Committee(GEAC) Seed production 10 ha ICAR trials 1 St year Large Scale Trials (LST) Large Scale Trials (LST) Seed production 100 ha ICAR trials 2 St year MEC GEAC ( Enviornmental clearance of the event/gene in a given backgrounnd ) Material cleared from Enviornmental sensitivity by MoEF/ or otherwise C onti.....

Future Prospects Future envisaged applications of GMOs are diverse and include drugs in food, bananas that produce human vaccines against infectious diseases such as Hepatitis B, metabolically engineered fish that mature more quickly, fruit and nut trees that yield years earlier, and plants that produce new plastics with unique properties. While their practicality or efficacy in commercial production has yet to be fully tested, the next decade may see exponential increases in GM product development as researchers gain increasing access to genomic resources that are applicable to organisms beyond the scope of individual projects. Safety testing of these products will also at the same time be necessary to ensure that the perceived benefits will indeed outweigh the perceived and hidden costs of development .

Biotech crops is not a panacea; but they have the potential to make a substantial contribution in cutting poverty by half, by optimizing crop productivity, which can be achieved by public- private sector partnerships.

Conclusion The development of Transgenic plants is the result of integrated application of rDNA technology,Gene transfer methods and Tissue culture techniques. Transgenic plants are designed to acquire useful quality attributes such as insect resistance, herbicide tolerance, abiotic stress tolerance, disease resistance, high nutritional quality, high yield po t e n tia l , de l a y ed r i peni n g , enh a n c ed o r name nt al v alue, ma l e transgenic crops before sterility, and production of edible vaccines. Biosafety regulations required to assess the safety of its release in to environment . “ The controversy about the health safety of Transgenic foods is complex and good science and its communication are required in order to find solutions”

Case studies : 1. Socio-Economic Impact of Bt Cotton — A Case Study of Karnataka V.R. Kiresur and Manjunath Ichangi University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580 005, Karnataka The performance Bt technology and its impact on farming community have been assessed in northern Karnataka based mainly on primary data processed using production functions, decomposition analysis and logit model. On an average, per farm area under Bt cotton was 2.21 ha, accounting for 66 per cent of the total landholding. With a yield of 24 q/ha, Bt cotton has registered 31 per cent higher yield and 151 per cent higher net return over non-Bt, the net additional benefit being ` 18429/ha. The non-Bt cotton farmers use chemical fertilizers, organic manures and bullock labour excessively which result in a lower net returns. Technology has been found the major contributor to the total productivity difference between Bt and nonBt cottons. Seed cost, yield of Bt cotton and cost of plant protection have been found to greatly influence the probability of adoption of Bt cotton.

Non-availability of quality seeds and in required quantity have been identified as the most important factors constraining Bt technology adoption. The impact of Bt cotton, as perceived by the farmers, has been in terms of enhanced yield; reduced pest and disease incidence; increased income, employment, education and standard of living; and reduced health risk. To foster adoption, availability of quality and quantity of Bt cotton seed to farmers needs greater attention of development agencies, while researchers’ attention is called for incorporating resistance/ tolerance to Spodoptera and pink bollworms. 2.Genetically Modified Crops in India: The Bt Brinjal Controversy The Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC)5 announced approval for large scale field trials for Bt brinjal6 in September 2007, and probably its commercialization by early 2009. It also cleared proposals for biosafety studies for other food crops such as okra (lady's finger), rice, and tomatoes. In February 2008, the apex legislative body in India, the Supreme Court, revoked the ban it had earlier placed on the approval of large scale field trials of transgenic crops. Following this announcement, Bt brinjal became a hotly debated topic among activists, scientists, farmers and Multi National Companies (MNCs).

Than k You
Tags