TRANSPOSON TAGGING

23,891 views 36 slides Jan 23, 2018
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 36
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36

About This Presentation

Seminar helpful for postgraduates. covers all aspects of transposon tagging and mapping.


Slide Content

Welcome

GENE TAGGING Gene tagging is referred to assigning some known DNA sequences in or into the vicinity of a gene of interest such that the gene can be found with the help of assigned sequences. Tag Gene of Interest

Types of Gene Tagging Marker based gene tagging T-DNA tagging Transposon tagging Epitope tagging

Transposon Mediated G ene T agging In Plants

TRANSPOSON These are discrete sequences in the genome that are mobile and are able to transport themselves within the genome. Jumping Genes Junk DNA Spam DNA Genomic Parasite Selfish DNA

Why these kernels are spotted?

Somatic Excision of Ds from C Wild type Colorless Variegated

Types: CLASS I or RETROELEMENTS: Copy and paste mechanism Move via RNA intermediate Used for tagging in mammals and yeast E.g. - Ty1, Copia , Gypsy, LINES, SINES CLASS II or DNA-TYPE ELEMETS: Cut and paste mechanism Used for tagging in plants, bacteria, drosophila and C. elegans E.g. – IS elements, Ac/Ds elements, Sleeping beauty, Mu elements, En/ Spm elements

TE composition in different crop plants

Transposon tagging Transposon tagging describes isolation of novel genes using transposable elements as tags The transposon sequence is used to identify the flanking sequences after insertional mutagenesis The strategy was initially developed to clone the drosophila white locus (Bingham et al.1981) In plants, this strategy was first used to identify and clone bronze1 (bz1)locus in maize ( Federoff et al. 1984)

Transposons used PLANTS: Ac/Ds (Activator/Dissociation) – Maize ( Zea mays ) En/ Spm (Enhancer/Suppressor- mutator ) – Maize ( Zea mays ) Mu ( Mutator ) – Maize ( Zea mays ) Tam3 – Snapdragon ( Antirrhinum majus ) ANIMALS: Sleeping beauty – Salmon ( salmo salar ) Tol2 – M edaka ( Oryzias latipes )

APPROCHES: TARGETED GENE TAGGING Tagging of a specific gene for which the mutant is already available. NON TARGETED GENE TAGGING Tagging any random gene(s) and then studying the resultant mutant.

Directed-Gene Tagging Directed tagging identifies the transposon-induced alleles by crossing transposon active plants with a reference homozygous mutants. The mutable alleles are separated from the reference allele by crossing to a standard line(hybrid, inbred or tester). To identify co-segregating transposon, the mutable allele is backcrossed to the standard line, and the backcrossed progeny is selfed .

Non-directed Gene Tagging In this technique one has to go for M2 population as compared to F1 in targeted gene tagging. The main advantage of this technique is that it can also be used to study lethal or infertile mutants, ultimately identifying the gene responsible for it. But targeted tagging is only restricted to mutants non essential for a plant to complete its life cycle.

Transposon active stocks are crossed with a standard line and the resulting progeny is self pollinated. The self pollinated progeny is screened for recessive mutants and segregating populations is generated by crossing with the standard line for studying co-segregation of transposon along with mutant phenotype. The most common method for co-segregation analysis is insertion mutagenized sites (AIMS) protocol (Frey et al. 1998)

IDENTIFICATION RFLP followed by SOUTHERN HYBRIDISATION Restriction enzyme employed should be such that it do not cut within the transposon used. G el electrophoresis Analysis by southern blotting. Probes are used for the transposon. RESULTS Heterologous system: band present in mutant and absent in wild type Endogenous system: bands found in both mutant and wild type.

INVERSE-PCR Ligation of fragment ends Amplifying flanking region of transposon Flanking region used as probe in wild type DNA CONFIRMATION REQUIRED

CONFIRMATION COMPLEMENTATION TEST T he mutant is again transformed with the functional copy of the gene for which the mutant is expected. RESULT Function restored: mutation by tagged gene. Function not restored: mutation by some other reason. REVERTANTS T he mutant obtained is either selfed (endogenous system) or crossed with mutant transgenic line with autonomous transposable element (heterologous system). RESULT Revertants obtained: Gene confirmed Revertants not obtained: mutation by some other reason.

Endogenous system

Endogenous vs. Heterologous Endogenous System No transformation experiment needed Have high copy no. of transposon being used High rate of mutation is observed Identification of tagged gene responsible for mutation is difficult E.g. maize, snapdragon Heterologous system Transformation experiments needed Low copy no. of transposons Low rate of mutation is observed Identification of tagged gene responsible for mutation is easy E.g. potato, tomato

Outline: Cf-9 gene was known to provide resistance against leaf mould fungus Cladosporium fulvum in tomato Cf-9 gene was already mapped on short arm of chromosome 1 Avr9 genes were characterised in race 5 of fungus C. fulvum Plant defenses are often activated by specific interaction between the product of a disease resistance (R) gene in the plant and the product of a corresponding avirulence ( Avr ) gene in the pathogen. Without either of these genes, plant defenses are not activated and infection by the pathogen is permitted.

Materials: A transgenic tomato line carrying a Ds element located 3 centimorgans from the Cf-9 locus A stable line containing genetically unlinked Ac ( sAc ), itself incapable of transposition A line homozygous for Cf-9 A line homozygous for Avr9

A total of at least 37 independent Ds insertions into Cf-9. Of these, 28 have been mapped to the same 3-kb region of the tomato genome All stable mutants were susceptible to race 5 of C. fulvum Correlation between multiple independent mutations of Cf-9 and multiple independent Ds insertions in a defined region In plants which carried sAc in heterozygous state, they found revertants , thus confirming the gene tagged was correct.

Y1 allele is responsible for yellow endosperm color while y1 result in white color. They used Mu3 transposon to tag Y1 allele

Revertants

Conclusion Initially only transposon sequence is required Used to identify and clone numerous genes having visible phenotypes. Aid in mutation studies Any specific as well as random genes can be targeted by this method Can be used to produce an allelic series of a gene.

THANK YOU