TRIVIAL IRRITATION IN MARRIAGE DOES NOT AMOUNT TO CRUELTY.pdf

Minor quarrels and trivial irritations don’t amount to cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Courts distinguish between normal marital disagreements and conduct that makes living together unbearable. Learn how Indian judiciary approaches cruelty in matrimonial law.

1. Page 1 of 3

Trivial Irritation In Marriage Does Not Amount To Cruelty

1. INTRODUCTION
Marriage, as a social institution, requires patience, tolerance, and mutual
adjustment. No two individuals can live together without some disagreements or
irritations. The law recognizes that minor quarrels or petty disagreements are part
of ordinary married life. Courts in India have consistently held that trivial
irritation or normal wear and tear of marital life does not amount to "cruelty"
under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

2. UNDERSTANDING CRUELTY IN MATRIMONIAL LAW
Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 provides that a marriage may
be dissolved by a decree of divorce if either spouse has treated the other with
cruelty. However, the law does not define cruelty in rigid terms. Instead, courts
have developed a contextual understanding of what constitutes cruelty.

2. Page 2 of 3

Cruelty includes both physical and mental cruelty. While physical cruelty is easier
to identify, mental cruelty requires careful evaluation of conduct, duration, and
impact on the aggrieved spouse. The Supreme Court has clarified that cruelty
must be serious enough to cause a reasonable apprehension in the mind of the
spouse that living together is not possible.

3. TRIVIAL IRRITATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE CRUELTY
Indian courts have repeatedly observed that ordinary quarrels, trivial irritations,
or casual arguments cannot be stretched to mean cruelty. Marriage is built on
adjustment, and small disputes are a normal part of the relationship.

4. THE JUDICIAL APPROACH
Courts take a balanced approach in cruelty cases. They examine whether the
conduct complained of is only a minor irritation or whether it crosses the
threshold into cruelty. For example, a spouse raising their voice in an argument
or expressing dissatisfaction occasionally cannot be treated as cruelty. But
continuous insults, humiliation, or baseless accusations may amount to mental
cruelty.

The Delhi High Court has also held that trivial incidents, if taken in isolation,
cannot justify divorce. Only a sustained pattern of conduct that makes married
life unbearable can qualify as cruelty.

3. Page 3 of 3

5. IMPORTANCE OF TOLERANCE IN MARRIAGE
The judiciary’s approach highlights the importance of tolerance and adjustment.
If trivial irritations are accepted as cruelty, almost every marriage would be at
risk. A mature outlook is expected from both partners, where they understand that
differences in opinion or behavior are natural in human relationships.