Tympanoplasty

49,612 views 29 slides May 22, 2012
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 29
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29

About This Presentation

No description available for this slideshow.


Slide Content

Tympanoplasty

•Definition
•Classification

•Definition
–Surgery for reconstruction of tympnic
membrane and/or ossicles
•Classification
–Wullstein (1956)
–Austin and Kartush

Wullstein
1
2
3
4
5

Middle ear risk index
•MERI to predict the success rate.
•For accurate prediction of the results of
ossiculoplasty the status of middle ear and
its ossicles must be ascertained.
–Austine Kartush classification
–TM perforation
–Cholesteatoma
–Belluci classification

Austine Kartush
•Group A - Malleus and stapes present
•Group B - Malleus and foot plate of stapes
present
•Group C - Malleus absent and stapes
present
•Group D - Malleus and stapes
suprastructure absent

Austine Kartush
•Kartush added 3 more classes as a
modification of this scheme in include
ossicular fixity even when all three
ossicles are present.
•O - Intact ossicular chain
•E - Ossicular head fixation
•F - Stapes fixation

Belluci classification

MERI

•Indications
•What are you trying to achieve?

Indication
–TypeI-perf/ discharge/
conductive loss/
–Types II-IV-perf/
significant conductive
loss/ part of middle ear
surgery for
cholesteotoma/
CSOM/
–TypeV-stapes
footplate fixation
Contracindiction
–no cochlear function
–Neoplasm of middle
ear or EAC
–Malignant OE
–Only hearing ear or sig
better H Ear
•Relative contra
–EU dysfunction, very
young
–Chonic ear discharge
–If no sig hearing
improvement possible
with no hx of CSOM
–Pt factors-smoker etc,
diabetes

•Patient assessment
–History
–Examination
–Investigations

What is:
•Belfast rule of thumb?
•Glasgow benefit plot

What are these?
What is a TORP? PORP?

Common situations - options
•Simple perforation (1)
•Austin A M+S+ (1)
•Austin B M+S- (?)
•Footplate fixed (3)
•Austin D M-S- (4)

•What are prognostic factors?
–Black SPITES
–Or MER

Prognosis
Risk Factor Risk Value
Otorrhea (Belucci)
I. Dry 0
II. Occasionally wet 1
III. Persistently wet 2
IV. Wet, cleft palate 3
Perforation
Absent 0
Present 1
Cholesteatoma
Absent 0
Present 1

Ossicular status (Austin/Kartush)
O: M+I+S+ (intact ossicular chain) 0
A: M+S+ (malleus present, stapes present) 1
B: M+S- (malleus present, stapes absent) 2
C: M-S+ (malleus absent, stapes present) 3
D: M-S- (malleus absent, stapes absent) 4
E: Ossicle head fixation 2
F: Stapes fixation 3

Middle ear - Granulations or effusion
No 0
Yes 1
Previous surgery
None 0
Staged 1
Revision 2

Prognosis/Risk MER Index
Best prognosis (normal ear) 0
Mild risk 2
Moderate risk 5
Severe risk 7
Worst prognosis (end stage) 12

•Postoperative care
•Results
•Complications
Tags