Unit-11-Case-Studies-and-Landmark-Legal-Decisions (1).pptx

useraniza 26 views 8 slides Jun 26, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 8
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8

About This Presentation

this presentation covers Case Studies and Landmark Legal Decisions
- Review of significant legal cases related to constitutional interpretation
- Impact of judicial activism on constitutional governance
- Role of Supreme Court in upholding constitutional principles


Slide Content

Unit 11: Case Studies and Landmark Legal Decisions Review of significant legal cases related to constitutional interpretation 2. Impact of judicial activism on constitutional governance 3. Role of Supreme Court in upholding constitutional principles Submitted By : Group No.3 Aniza (54552) S2 Laiba (56441) S2 Malaika (58154) S2 Tyba (60343) S1 Hamna (60588) S1

Landmark Legal Cases in Pakistan Pakistan has a rich history of landmark legal cases that have shaped the country's constitutional and legal landscape. This presentation will explore some of the most significant rulings that have had a profound impact on the nation.

This case centered on a dispute between the Speaker of the Constituent Assembly and the Governor-General over the control of the Assembly's property and funds. Strengthening Executive Authority The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Governor-General, establishing the executive's supremacy over the legislative branch. Lasting Impact The case set a precedent for the judiciary's deference to the executive, which had significant implications for Pakistan's future constitutional development. 1.Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan Case (1954) Legislative Power Clash

2. Asma Jilani vs. Government of Punjab (1972) Challenging Martial Law Asma Jilani, a prominent lawyer, filed a petition challenging the legitimacy of Martial Law imposed by Yahya Khan's regime. Judiciary's Role The Supreme Court, in a landmark ruling, held that the Martial Law was unconstitutional, asserting the judiciary's role in upholding the rule of law. Impact on Democracy The case highlighted the judiciary's capacity to check executive overreach and paved the way for the restoration of democratic rule in Pakistan.

3. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Case (1979) 1 Controversial Trial Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the former Prime Minister, was tried and convicted for the murder of a political opponent by the military regime. 2 Judicial Overreach The case raised concerns about the judiciary's impartiality and its susceptibility to political influence under the military government. 3 Lasting Debate The legality and fairness of Bhutto's trial continue to be a subject of intense debate, highlighting the complex relationship between law and politics in Pakistan.

4. Benazir Bhutto vs. Federation of Pakistan (1988) Political Struggle Benazir Bhutto, the daughter of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, challenged the dissolution of the National Assembly and the holding of new elections. J udicial Intervention The Supreme Court, in a landmark ruling, restored the National Assembly and paved the way for Bhutto's return to power. Democratic Transition The case demonstrated the judiciary's ability to facilitate the peaceful transfer of power and uphold democratic principles. Lasting Legacy The ruling further cemented the role of the judiciary in safeguarding the democratic process in Pakistan.

5. Pakistan Lawyers' Movement (2007) Judicial Independence The lawyers' movement was a nationwide protest against the military government's attempts to undermine the independence of the judiciary. Rule of Law The movement succeeded in restoring the Chief Justice and asserting the judiciary's role as a check on executive power. Constitutional Safeguards The case highlighted the importance of constitutional safeguards and the need to protect the judiciary's independence.

6. 18th Amendment Case (2010) Scope The 18th Amendment significantly expanded the powers of the Parliament and reduced the President's authority. Judicial Challenge The amendment was challenged in the Supreme Court, which ultimately upheld its constitutionality. Significance The case reinforced the judiciary's role in interpreting and safeguarding the constitution, while also respecting the legislative process.
Tags