Use of New Antiepileptic Agents, Esteem Pharma

purebell71 7 views 100 slides Aug 28, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 100
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100

About This Presentation

Epilepsy


Slide Content

Use of the New Antiepileptic
Agents

Anthony Murro, M.D.

Research Support

* | currently received support for research
involving biravacetam from UCB

New Antiepileptic Agents

Lacosamide (Vimpat)
Rufinamide (Banzel)
Vigabatrin (Sabril)
Clobazam (Onfi)
Ezogabine (Potiga)

Lacosamide

* Adjunctive therapy in the treatment of
partial-onset seizures

« Functionalized amino acid

o «e

NY

Lacosamide - Mechanism

* Lacosamide facilitates slow inactivation of
voltage gated sodium ion channels

II Ill IV

outside cell

inside cell

Lacosamide - Slow inactivation

Membrane depolarization occurs

A relatively slower & more sustained ion
channel conformation occurs at a intra-
membrane channel site

This conformation blocks sodium ion flow
Lacosamide enhances slow inactivation
(Goldin, 2011)

Sodium lon Channel Fast
Inactivation

« Voltage gated sodium ion channel
conformation occurs post-depolarization

* An intracellular protein segment
(inactivating particle) binds to a docking site
& blocks sodium ion flow

* Carbamazepine, felbamate, lamotrigine,
phenytoin, oxcarbazepine, topiramate
enhance fast inactivation

* (Goldin, 2011)

Slow inactivation

Intra-membrane sites S5 & S6 block ion
channel

Il TI IV

outside cell

inside cell

Fast Inactivation

Intracellular loop between domains III & IV
blocks ion channel

II TI IV

outside cell

inside cell

CRMP-2 Binding

« Lacosamide also binds to a collapsin
response mediator protein-2 (CRMP-2)

[> es
à) SS y Y
SRA
TER ee or
ES
AY & es

CRMP-2 Binding

« This protein performs important roles that
include cytoskeletal, vesicle, and synaptic
functions in the developing brain.

* The significance of this binding is an area
of current research (Hensley et al., 2011)

Lacosamide Dosing

« Adult: 50 mg twice daily; may be increased
at weekly intervals by 100 mg/day

* Maintenance dose: 200-400 mg/day

Lacosamide Metabolism

* Linear kinetics 100-800 mg/d dose

+ Metabolism (CYP2C19) by de-methylation
to form O-desmethyl-lacosamide (inactive)

+ No significant induction/inhibition or P450
mediated interaction

(Chu et al, 2010)

Lacosamide Effectiveness
+ Multi-center randomized prospective
controlled trials
« > 400 patients per trial
* Age 16 years and older
« Adjunctive therapy with 1-3 anti-epileptic
medications

Lacosamide Median Sz Reduction
Group Ben-Menachem Halasz

Placebo 10% 20.5%
200 mg/d 26% 35.3%
400 mg/d 39% 36.4%

600 mg/d 40% ...

(Ben-Menachem et al, 2007, Halasz et al,
2009)

Lacosamide Effectiveness

« Dose of 600 mg/day not more effective but
did have increased side effect risk

« Events leading to discontinuation:
Dizziness, nausea, ataxia, vomiting,
nystagmus

« (Ben-Menachem et al, 2007)

Effect of Sodium Channel Blocker

Retrospective analysis suggests:

* Lacosamide will reduce seizure frequency
even when combined with a fast sodium
channel blocker (Sake et al., 2010,
Stephen et al., 2011)

Effect of Sodium Channel Blocker

Retrospective analysis suggests:

* Lacosamide with a sodium channel
blocker (e.g. phenytoin) will lead to less
seizure reduction & increased side effects

* Caution: Post-hoc analysis, small
samples, multiple comparisons, and
potential confounding factors.

(Sake et al., 2010, Stephen et al., 2011)

Lacosamide Pooled Analysis

Median Seizure Reduction

Group
Placebo

200 mg/d
400 mg/d
600 mg/d

Sodium Channel Blocker

Present Absent
18.9% 28%
33.3% 38%
39% 62.5%
42.7% 79%

Lacosamide Case Reports

+ Intravenous lacosamide has been used to
treat status epilepticus & seizure clusters.
Bolus of 200 mg IV at rate of 60 mg/min
(Hófler et al., 2011)

« Lacosamide has been used in primary
generalized epilepsy (Afra et al., 2012)

« Asingle report described worsening of
seizures in Lennox Gastaut syndrome with
lacosamide (Cuzzola et al., 2010)

Lacosamide Summary
Positive
* No significant drug interactions

« Common side effects are dose dependent
& easily managed with dose reduction

+ Infrequent need for serum drug levels
+ Low protein binding

Negative
* High cost

Role of Lacosamide

* The favorable profile makes lacosamide a
likely early choice for adjuvant drug
therapy of partial seizures

« Future research might confirm
effectiveness for primary generalized
epilepsy & status epilepticus.

* Future research might confirm greater
benefit among patients not using sodium
channel blockers

Rufinamide

« Adjunctive therapy in the treatment of
generalized seizures of Lennox-Gastaut
syndrome (LGS)

Rufinamide Mechanism

« Rufinamide slows sodium ion channel
recovery from the inactivated state & limits
repetitive neuronal firing

II III IV

outside cell

inside cell

Rufinamide Dosing

Children: Initial: 10 mg/kg/day in 2 equally
divided doses; increase dose by ~10
mg/kg every other day to a target dose of
45 mg/kg/day or 3200 mg/day (whichever
is lower) in 2 equally divided doses
Adults: Initial: 400-800 mg/day in 2 equally
divided doses; increase dose by 400-800
mg/day every other day to a maximum
dose of 3200 mg/day in 2 equally divided
doses.

Rufinamide Oral Absorption

* Oral absorption increases with food due to
increased solubility (33% increase overall
absorption & 50% increase in peak
concentration).

* Keep relationship with meals constant.

Rufinamide Metabolism

* Carboxylesterase metabolism to inactive
metabolite

« Rufinamide is a weak CYP3A4 inducer
* Non-linear drug kinetics

Rufinamide Drug Levels

« Drug levels correlate with effectiveness
and frequency of adverse effects

* Mean plasma level causing a 50%
decrease of seizure frequency was 30
mg/l; range in studies: 5-55 mg/l.

Rufinamide Drug Interactions

* Mild increased clearance of oral
contraceptives (CYP3A4 induction)

* Phenobarbital, primidone, phenytoin,
carbamazepine induce carboxyesterase &
significantly increase rufinamide clearance

« Valproate significantly increases
rufinamide levels by 60-70%

Rufinamide Lennox Gastaut
Median Seizure Reduction

Group All Seizures Tonic-atonic
Placebo 11.7% -1.4%
45 mg/kg-d 32.7% 42.5%

(Glauser et al., 2007)

Rufinamide Partial Seizures
Median Seizure Reduction

Group Seizure Reduction
Placebo -1.6%

Rufinamide* 20.4%

Dose: 1200-3200 mg/d (mean 2800 mg/d)
(Brodie et al, 2007)

Adverse Effects

Most common: Dizziness, fatigue,
somnolence, nausea, headache

AED hypersensitivity syndrome (rash &
fever) has occurred 1-4 weeks after
therapy & more likely in children

No significant effects on working memory,
psychomotor speed, or attention

(Wheles et al. 2010)

Rufinamide QT shortening

* > 20 msec reduction in QT can occur but
in in study population had < 300 msec

+ Rufinamide should not be given to those
with familial short QT syndrome potassium
channelopathy

* Do not administer in situations with
reduced QT interval: digoxin,
hpercalcemia, hyperkalemia, acidosis

Myoclonic-astatic epilepsy
(Doose syndrome)

Onset age 1-6 years of age
Myoclonic, astatic, & myoclonic-astatic Sz
Normal development prior to seizures
Prognosis variable: spontaneous resolution
in some; prolonged non-convulsive status
epilepticus, cognitive impairments &
evolution to Lennox-Gastaut in others
EEG: 2-3 Hz generalized spike wave
MRI normal

Myoclonic-astatic epilepsy
& Rufinamide

* In a case series, rufinamide adjunctive
therapy reduced seizure frequency by
>75% in 6 of 7 cases

« Seizure reduction decreased for patients
followed over longer time intervals of 6-18
months (von Stúlpnagela et al. 2012)

Rufinamide Summary

Positive

* Most side effects are dose dependent &
easily managed with dose reduction

* Infrequent need for serum drug levels

« Low protein binding

Negative

* Significant drug interactions are possible
* High cost

Role of Rufinamide

« Rufinamide has features similar to many of
the approved drugs for Lennox-Gastaut
(e.g. lamotrigine, topiramate).

« Future research might confirm the
beneficial effect of rufinamide for treatment
of myoclonic-astatic epilepsy.

Vigabatrin

« Adjunctive treatment for infantile spasms and
adult refractory complex partial seizure

NH,
OK re

OH

Vigabatrin Mechanism

* Irreversible & competitive binding to GABA
transaminase (Chu-Shore et al., 2010)

Vigabatrin Mechanism

* Possibly also might stimulate GABA
release

« Brain GABA increases by 40% at 2 hours
post-dose

« (Chu-Shore et al., 2010)

Vigabatrin

Linear dose relationship
Reduces phenytoin level by 20%

Dosage adjustment for decreased renal
clearance

(Chu-Shore et al., 2010)

Vigabatrin Dosing Complex Partial
Seizures

+ Adults: Initial: 500 mg twice daily; increase
daily dose by 500 mg at weekly intervals
based on response and tolerability.
Recommended dose: 3 g/day

+ Children: Oral: Initial: 40 mg/kg/day
divided twice daily; maintenance dosages
based on patient weight

Vigabatrin Dosing Infantile Soasm

* Initial dosing: 50 mg/kg/day divided twice
daily; may titrate upwards by 25-50
mg/kg/day every 3 days to a maximum of
150 mg/kg/day

Vigabatrin Effectiveness Complex
Partial Seizures

Table 4. Median Monthly Frequency of Complex Partial Seizures+

N Baseline Endstudy
Placebo 45 9.0 8.8
1 g/day SABRIL 45 8.5 u
B g/day SABRIL 41 8.5 a7
6 g/day SABRIL 43 8.5 4.5*
*P<0.05 compared to placebo=Including one patient with simple partial seizures with
secondary generalization only

(Dean et al., 1999)

Vigabatrin Effectiveness Complex
Partial Seizures

Table 5. Median Monthly Frequency of Complex

Partial Seizures
N Baseline Endstudy
Placebo | 90 9.0 7.5
3 g/day SABRIL 92 8.3 5.5*

*P<0.05 compared to placebo

(French et al., 1996)

Vigabatrin Treats Infantile Soasms
Tuberous Sclerosis Responds Best

Group % Spasm Free day 14
Vigabatrin low dose 11%
Vigabatrin high dose 36%
« Tuberous sclerosis 52%
+ Cryptogenic 27%
+ Symptomatic 10%

Low: 18-36 mg/kg-d; High: 100-148 mg/kg-d
(Elterman et al., 2001)

Hormonal Therapy Better Early
Response For Non-Tuberous
Sclerosis Cases
Percent Spasm Free
Group 2wks* 12-14 months
Hormonal 73% 75%
Vigabatrin 54% 76%

* Significant difference (Lux et al., 2005)
Tuberous sclerosis cases were excluded

Better Cognitive Outcome: Hormonal
Treatment Cryptogenic Cases

Outcome at 12-14 months Following Treatment
Symptomatic Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale

Hormonal 70.8

Vigabatrin 75.9

Cryptogenic* Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale
Hormonal 88.2**

Vigabatrin 78.9**

« Significant difference (Lux et al., 2005)
Tuberous sclerosis cases were excluded

Better Cognitive Outcome: Hormonal
Treatment Cryptogenic Cases

Outcome at 4 years Following Treatment
Symptomatic Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale
Hormonal 45

Vigabatrin 50

Cryptogenic* Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale
Hormonal 96

Vigabatrin 63

* Significant difference (Darke et al., 2005)
Tuberous sclerosis cases were excluded

Vigabatrin Effectively Treats
Tuberous Sclerosis

Practice Parameter: Medical Treatment of
Infantile Spasms:

“Overall cessation of spasms was seen in 41
of 45 (91%) of children treated with
vigabatrin, with a 100% response rate
seen in five studies.”

(Mackay et al. 2004)

Vigabatrin Visual Adverse Effects

* Bilateral irreversible concentric peripheral
field defects occur in 30-50% of cases

* Most with defects were treated for at least
6 months; often stable after 2 years

* Defects often asymptomatic but might
impair driving (Chu-Shore et al., 2010)

Vigabatrin Visual Adverse Effects

+ Adults: visual testing done at baseline &
each 6 months

* Infants: visual testing done at baseline €
test each 3 months for 18 months, then
each 6 months (sedate for
electroretinogram)

(Chu-Shore et al., 2010)

Vigabatrin Visual Effects

+ Common approach is treatment for a
duration under 3 months; consider
discontinuation after 6 months, if seizures
are effectively controlled (Kossoff EH,
2010).

« An experimental animal study found that
taurine prevented the visual adverse effect
(Firas et al, 2009)

Vigabatrin White Matter Changes

Lesions were asymptomatic & reversible
Age: 9 months - 18 years (median 5.4 yrs)
8 of 23 (34%) subjects were affected

T2/DWI scans show lesions in basal
ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, & dentate
nucleus (Pearl et al., 2009)

Vigabatrin White Matter Changes

Feature WithLesions Without Lesions

Number 8 subjects 15 subjects
Age 11 months 5 years
Duration 3 months 12 months

Dose 170 mg/kg-d 87 mg/kg-d

(Pearl et al., 2009)

Vigabatrin White Matter Changes

Vigabatrin Summary

Positive
« High effectiveness for infantile spasms

« Few significant drug interactions; exception is
phenytoin

* Infrequent need for serum drug levels
« Low protein binding

Negative

+ Irreversible visual field defects

« White matter lesions

« High cost

Role of Vigabatrin

+ Vigabatrin is likely to be among the last
choices for adjuvant treatment of partial
seizures

+ Vigabatrin is a good 15! choice for infantile
spasms from tuberous sclerosis (TS)

* Hormonal therapy might provide more
effective early control for non-TS cases &
better cognitive outcome for cryptogenic
infantile spasms

Clobazam

Adjunctive treatment of seizures associated
with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

\ _o
N
ER
O

Clobazam Mechanism
+ Allosteric activation of GABAa receptor

Clobazam Mechanism

« Allosteric activation of GABAa receptor

* Up-regulation GABA transporters 1 to 3
(GAT1 to GATS)

+ Clobazam has decreased affinity for
GABAa subunits that mediate sedative
effects

Clobazam Dosing

+ $30 kg: Initial: 5 mg once daily for 21
week, then increase to 5 mg twice daily for
21 week, then increase to 10 mg twice
daily thereafter

>30 kg: Initial: 5 mg twice daily for 21
week, then increase to 10 mg twice daily
for 21 week, then increase to 20 mg twice
daily thereafter

Clobazam Dosing

CYP2C19 poor metabolizers:

<30 kg: Initial: 5 mg once daily for 22
weeks, then increase to 5 mg twice daily;
after 21 week may increase to 10 mg twice
daily

>30 kg: Initial: 5 mg once daily for >1
week, then increase to 5 mg twice daily for
21 week, then increase to 10 mg twice
daily; after 21 week may increase to 20
mg twice daily

Clobazam Metabolism
Hepatic via CYP3A4 and to a lesser extent via
CYP2C19 and 2B6
N-demethylation to active metabolite [N-
desmethyl] with ~20% activity of clobazam.

CYP2C19 primarily mediates subsequent
hydroxylation of the N-desmethyl metabolite.
Carbamazepine reduces clobazam level, &
clobazam decreases valproate (Riss et al, 2008)
Many other potential drug interactions

Clobazam

* Placebo controlled trial in 238 cases
(age 2-60 years) with Lennox-Gastaut
syndrome (Ng YT et al, 2011)

* Treatment groups: placebo, 0.25
mg/kg-d, 0.5 mg/kg-d, 1.0 mg/kg-d.

« Weekly seizure rate reduction
showed a dose response effect

« Side effects: somnolence, pyrexia,
respiratory infections, lethargy,
behavioral problems.

Clobazam Treatment Response

Group Drop Attack Reduction
Placebo 12.1%
0.25 mg/kg-d (max 10 mg/d) 41.2%
0.5 mg/kg-d (max 20 mg/d) 49.4%
1.0 mg/kg-d (max 40 mg/d) 68.3%
(Ng YT et al, 2011)

Clobazam Side Effects

Somnolence
Fever
Lethargy
Drooling
Constipation

Clobazam Other Studies

« Retrospective studies involving refractory
partial seizures reported an early
improvement in seizure reduction.

« Many could not tolerate the drug due to
somnolence.

* Tolerance occurred; seizures re-occurred
in subjects that had improved initially
(Shimizu et al., 2003, da Silveira et al.,
2006)

Clobazam Summary

Positive

* High level of effectiveness for a difficult to
treat seizure disorder

* Common side effects are dose dependent
& easily managed with dose reduction

+ Parent compound & metabolite have long
half life

Clobazam Summary

Negative

* High cost

+ High protein binding

* Active metabolite 8 potentially significant
drug interactions

Role of Clobazam

* Clobazam is likely to be a useful drug for
adjuvant therapy of Lennox Gastaut

* Limiting factors are likely to be cost and
occurrence of drug related side effects

« Research might confirm the benefit of this
drug for refractory partial seizures.

Ezogabine (Retigabine)

Adjuvant treatment of partial-onset seizures

H
SON
Lye
F

« Binds to
KCNQ2/3
KCNQ3/5
potassium
channels

Ezogabine

« Ezogabine binds to KCNQ2/3 8 KCNQ3/5
potassium channels at a hydrophobic
pocket near channel gate

* This binding stabilizes the open KCNQ2/3
8 KCNQ3/5 potassium channels

« This causes membrane hyperpolarization
(Gunthorpe et al. 2012)

Ezogabine

« At high concentrations: blocks sodium
voltage gated sodium & calcium channels
and increases GABA synthesis (Czuczwar
et al., 2010)

Autosomal Dominant Neonatal

Epilepsy

Loss of function mutation KCNQ2/3

Focal or generalized tonic-clonic seizures

on day 3; seizures remit by 1 month

10-15% develop epilepsy

Therapy resistant epileptic

encephalopathy might occur (Kurahashi et

al., 2009)

Ezogabine Dosing

* Initial: 100 mg 3 times/day; may increase
at weekly intervals in increments of $150
mg/day to a maintenance dose of 200-400
mg 3 times/day (maximum: 1200 mg/day)

Ezogabine Metabolism

No P450 metabolism
Glucuronidation via UGT1A4, UGT1A1,
UGT1A3, and UGT1A9

Acetylation via NAT2 to an N-acetyl active
metabolite (NAMR) and other inactive
metabolites (eg, N-glucuronides, N-
glucoside)

Linear drug kinetics (Weisenberg et al,,
2011)

Ezogabine Drug Interactions

* No effect on oral contraceptive clearance

« Lamotrigine decreases ezogabine
clearance slightly; ezogabine increases
lamotrigine clearance slightly

Ezogabine Effectiveness
Group Seizure Reduction
Placebo 13.1%
600 mg/d 23.4%
900 mg/d 29.3%
1200 mg/d 35.2%

(Porter et al., 2007)

Ezogabine Effectiveness
Group Seizure Reduction
Placebo 15.9%
600 mg/d 27.9%
900 mg/d 39.9%

(Brodie et al., 2010)

Ezogabine Effectiveness

Group Seizure Reduction
Placebo 17.5%
1200 mg/d 44.3%

(French et al., 2011)

Ezogabine Side Effectts

Somnolence
Fatigue
Confusion
Dizziness
Headache
Dysarthria
Ataxia
Blurred vision

Ezogabine Summary

Positive

* Minimal drug interactions

« Common side effects are dose dependent
& easily managed with dose reduction

* Infrequent need for serum drug levels

* Unique drug mechanism

Negative
« High cost

Role of Ezogabine

« Ezogabine is likely to be a useful drug for
adjuvant therapy for refractory partial
seizures

* Limiting factors are likely to be cost and
occurrence of drug related side effects

Cumulative Summary

Lacosamide, & ezogabine are likely to be
considered early choices for adjuvant drug
therapy of partial seizure because:

« Minimal drug interactions

* Novel mechanisms of action

« Relatively safe side effect profile.

Cumulative Summary

Vigabatrin has a specialized role:

« First choice therapy for infantile spasms
among those with tuberous sclerosis

« Adjuvant therapy in otherwise refractory
infantile spasm cases.

« ACTH may be a better choice in select
infantile cases.

+ Vigabatrin is likely to be among the later
choices for refractory partial seizures due
to its risk of visual loss.

Cumulative Summary

Rufinamide and clobazam have a
specialized role as adjuvant therapy for
Lennox-Gastaut.

« Drug interactions are more complex with
these medications.

+ Side effects might limit the use of these
medications in some cases

Pharmacokinetic Properties
Drug Tmax T1/2 %PB
Lacosamide 1-2hr 13 hr <19%
Rufinamide 4-6 hr 6-10 hr 34%
Vigabatrin 2 hr 5-8 hr 0%
Clobazam 1-2hr 10-30 hr 82-90%
Clobazam** --- 36-46 hr ---
Ezogabine 1-2hr 810hr <80%
** desmethylclobazam active metabolite
(Chu et al, 2010)

References

Afra P, Adamolekun B. Lacosamide treatment of
juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Seizure. 2012 Jan
24.

Appleton RE, Peters ACB, Mumford JP, Shaw
DE. Randomized, pao -controlled study of
vigabatrin as first-line treatment of infantile
spasms. Epilepsia. 1999;40:1627-1633.
Ben-Menachem E, Biton V, Jatuzis D, Abou-
Khalil B, Doty P, Rudd GD. Efficacy and safety
of oral lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in
adults with partial-onset seizures. Epilepsia.
2007 Jul;48(7):1308-17.

References

« Brodie M.J., W.E. Rosenfeld, B. Vazquez et al.
Rufinamide for the adjunctive treatment of partial
seizures in adults and adolescents: A randomized
placebo-controlled trial Epilepsia, 50 (2009), pp. 1899-
1909

« Brodie MJ, Lerche H, Gil-Nagel A, Elger C, Hall S, Shin
P, Nohria V, Mansbach H; RESTORE 2 Study Group.
Efficacy and safety of adjunctive ezogabine (retigabine)
in refractory partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2010 Nov
16;75(20):1817-24.

« Chiron C, Dulac O, Beaumont D, Palacios L, Pajot N,
Mumford J. Therapeutic trial of vigabatrin in refractory
infantile spasms. J Child Neurol. 1991;6 Suppl 2:2552—
2859.

References

Chiron C, Dulac O, Beaumont D, Palacios L, Pajot N,
Mumford J. Therapeutic trial of vigabatrin in refractory
infantile spasms. J Child Neurol. 1991;6 Suppl 2:2552—
2859.

Chu-Shore CJ, Thiele EA. New drugs for pediatric
epilepsy. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2010 Dec;17(4):214-23.
Cuzzola A, Ferlazzo E, Italiano D, Calabro RS, Bramanti
P, Genton P. Does lacosamide aggravate Lennox-
Gastaut syndrome? Report on three consecutive cases.
Epilepsy Behav. 2010 Dec;19(4):650-1

Czuczwar P, Wojtak A, Cioczek-Czuczwar A et al.
Retigabine: The newer potential antiepileptic drug
Pharmacol Rep, 62 (2010), pp. 211-219

References

« Darke K, Edwards SW, Hancock E, Johnson AL,

Kennedy CR, Lux AL, Newton RW, O'Callaghan Fu,
Verity CM, Osborne JP; trial steering committee on
behalf of participating investigators. Deve Rene) and
epilepsy outcomes at age 4 years in the UKISS trial
comparing hormonal treatments to vigabatrin for infantile
spasms: a multi-centre randomised trial.Arch Dis Child.
2010 May;95(5):382-6.

* da Silveira MRM , Montenegro MA, Franzon RC,
Guerreiro CAM, Guerreiro MM. Effectiveness of
clobazam as add-on therapy in children with refractory
focal epilepsy. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2006;64(3-B):705-710

« Dean C, Mosier M, Penry K. Dose-response study of
vigabatrin as add-on inerapy in patients with
uncontrolled complex partial seizures. Epilepsia, 40
(1999), pp. 74-82

References

« Elger C.E. , H. Stefan, A. Mann et al. A 24-week
multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group,
dose-ranging study of Rufinamide in adults and
adolescents with inadequately controlled partial seizures.
Epilepsy Res, 88 (2010), pp. 255-263

« Elterman RD, Shields WD, Mansfield KA, et al; US
Infantile Spasms Vigabatrin Study Group. Randomized
trial of vigabatrin in patients with infantile spasms.
Neurology. 2001;57:1416-1421.

« French JA, M. Mosier, S. Walker et al. A double-blind,
placebo-controlled study of vigabatrin three g/day in
patients with uncontrolled complex partial
seizuresVigabatrin Protocol 024 Investigative Cohort
Neurology, 46 (1996), pp. 54-61

References

French JA, Abou-Khalil BW, Leroy RF, Yacubian EM,
Shin P, Hall S, Mansbach H, Nohria V; RESTORE
1/Study 301 Investigators. Randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial of ezogabine (retigabine) in
partial epilepsy.

Neurology. 2011 May 3;76(18):1555-63.

Firas Jammoul,, Qingping Wang, et al. Taurine deficiency
is a cause of vigabatrin-induced retinal phototoxicity.
Ann Neurol. 2009 January ; 65(1): 98-107

Glauser T, Kluger G, Sachdeo R et al. Rufinamide for
generalized seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut
syndrome. Neurology, 70 (2008), pp. 1950-1958

References

Goldin AL. Mechanisms of sodium channel inactivation.
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Jun;13(3):284-90.
Gunthorpe MJ, Large CH, Sankar R, The mechanism of
action of retigabine (ezogabine), a first-in-class K+
channel opener for the treatment of epilepsy. Epilepsia,
1-13, 2012.

Halasz P, Kälviäinen R, Mazurkiewicz-Beldzinska M,
Rosenow F, Doty P, Hebert D, Sullivan T; SP755 Study
Group.l Adjunctive lacosamide for partial-onset seizures:
Efficacy and safety results from a randomized controlled
trial. Epilepsia. 2009 Mar;50(3):443-53

Hensley K, Venkova K, Christov A, Gunning W, Park J.
Collapsin response mediator protein-2: an emerging
pathologic feature and therapeutic target for
neurodisease indications. Mol Neurobiol. 2011
Jun;43(3):180-91

References

Höfler J, Unterberger |, Dobesberger J,
Kuchukhidze G, Walser G, Trinka E.
Intravenous lacosamide in status epilepticus and
seizure clusters. Epilepsia. 2011
Oct;52(10):e148-52.

Kossoff EH, Infantile Soasms. The Neurologist
2010;16: 69-75.

Kurahashi H, Wang JW, Ishii A et al. Deletions
involving both KCNQ2 and CHRNA4 present
with benign familial neonatal seizures.
Neurology, 73 (2009), pp. 1214-1217

References

« Lux AL, Edwards SW, et al. The United Kingdom Infantile
Spasms Study (UKISS) comparing hormone treatment
with vigabatrin on developmental and epilepsy outcomes
to age 14 months: a multicentre randomised trial The
Lancet Neurology. Volume 4, Issue 11, November 2005,
Pages 712-717.

« M.T. Mackay, S. K. Weiss, T. Adams-Webber, et al.
Practice Parameter: Medical Treatment of Infantile
Spasms : Report of the American Academy of Neurology
and the Child Neurology Neurology Society .
2004;62;1668

« Ng YT, Conry JA, Drummond R, Stolle J, Weinberg MA;
OV-1012 Study Investigators. Randomized, phase III
study results of clobazam in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.
Neurology. 2011 Oct 11;77(15):1473-81.

References

Pearl PL, Vezina LG et al.,Cerebral MRI abnormalities
associated with vigabatrin therapy. Epilepsia,
50(2):184-194, 2009.

Riss J, Cloyd J, Gates J, Collins S. Benzodiazepines in
epilepsy: pharmacology and pharmacokinetics. Acta
Neurol Scand. 2008 Aug;118(2):69-86.

Sake JK, Hebert D, Isojárvi J, Doty P, De Backer M,
Davies K, Eggert-Formella A, Zackheim J. A pooled
analysis of lacosamide clinical trial data grouped by
mechanism of action of concomitant antiepileptic drugs.
Shimizu H, Kawasaki J, Yuasa S, Tarao Y, Kumagai S,
Kanemoto K. Use of clobazam for the treatment of
refractory complex partial seizures. Seizure. 2003
Jul;12(5):282-6.

References

Stephen LJ, Kelly K, Parker P, Brodie MJ. Adjunctive
lacosamide in clinical practice: sodium blockade with a
difference? Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Nov;22(3):499-504
CNS Drugs. 2010 Dec;24(12):1055-68

von Stúlpnagel C. , Coppolab G. , P. Strianoc, A. Múllera,
M. Staudta, d, G. Kluger. First long-term experience with
the orphan drug rufinamide in children with myoclonic-
astatic epilepsy (Doose syndrome) European Journal of
Paediatric Neurology 2012 Jan 20

Weisenberg JL, Wong M. Profile of ezogabine
vetigabine) and its potential as an adjunctive treatment
or patients with partial-onset seizures. Neuropsychiatr
Dis Treat. 2011;7:409-14.

Wheless JW, Vazquez B. Rufinamide: a novel broad-
spect an antiepileptic drug. Epilepsy Curr. 2010
Jan;10(1):1-6.