V06 orif acetabulum

pelvis and hip

1. Acetabular Fractures:
Surgical Management
Philip J. Kregor, MD
Orthopedic Traumatology
University of Mississippi Med Center
Jackson, Mississippi
Created March 2004; Reviewed January 2007

2. Objectives
•Goal of Operative Management
•Specific Approaches for Specific Fractures
•Indications for Kocher-Langenbeck Approach
•Indications for Ilioinguinal Approach
•Reduction Strategies

3. Letournel School
•Thorough Understanding of Plain Films
•Optimize One Surgical Approach
•Goal of Perfect Concentric Reduction

4. GOAL: Anatomic Reduction

5. EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR

6. Timing of Surgery: Criteria
•Well - resuscitated patient
•Appropriate radiological work-up
•Appropriate understanding of fracture
•Appropriate operative team

7. Matta 1996
Timing of Surgery and
Anatomical Reductions
•0-7 Days 74%
•8-14 Days71%
•15-21 Days57%

8. Surgical Emergencies: Rare
•Open Acetabular Fracture
•New-Onset Sciatic Nerve Palsy after closed
reduction of Hip dislocation

9. Surgical Urgencies: Infrequent
•Irreducible Posterior Hip Dislocation
•Medial Dislocation of Femoral Head
against cancellous bone surface of intact
Ilium

10. Matta 1996
NOT Predictive of
CLINICAL OUTCOME
•Type of fracture pattern
•Posterior dislocation
•Initial displacement
•Presence of intra-articular fragments
•Presence of acetabular impaction

11. Matta 1996
Predictive of
CLINICAL OUTCOME
•Injury to Cartilage or Bone of Femoral
Head
–Damage: 60% Good / Excellent Result
–No Damage: 80% Good / Excellent Result
•Anatomic Reduction
•Age of Patient …….. But only in that it
predicts the ability to achieve an anatomic
reduction

12. Approaches to the Acetabulum
•Posterior: Kocher - Langenbeck
•Anterior: Ilioinguinal
•Extensile: Extended Iliofemoral

13. Letournel Classification
•Anterior Wall
•Anterior Column
•Posterior Wall
•Posterior Column
•Transverse

14. Letournel Classification
•Posterior Column / Posterior Wall
•Transverse / Posterior Wall
•“T-type”
•Anterior Column / Posterior Hemitransverse
•Both Column

15. Kocher-Langenbeck Approach
•Langenbeck (1874): Superior Limb
•Kocher (1904): Inferior Limb
•Judet and Lagrange (1958)
•Letournel

16. Indications in Acute
Acetabular Fxs
•Posterior Wall Fractures
•Posterior Column Fractures
•Posterior Column / Posterior Wall Fractures
•Juxta-tectal / Infra-tectal Transverse or
Transverse with Posterior Wall Fractures
•Some “T-type” Fractures

17. Access: Kocher-Langenbeck
•Entire Posterior Column
•Greater and Lesser Sciatic Notches
•Ischial Spine
•Retro-Acetabular Surface
•Ischial Tuberosity
•Ischio-Pubic Ramus

19. Complications with KL
•Sciatic Nerve Palsy 10%
•Infection 3%

20. Limitations: Kocher-Langenbeck
•Superior Acetabular Region
•Anterior Column
•Fractures High in Greater Sciatic Notch

21. Prone Position
•Aids in Reduction of Ischiopubic Segment
•Facilitates Palpation of Quadrilateral
Surface
•Allows Clamp Placement through Greater
Sciatic Notch
•Easier Prep and Drape

22. Judet Table

23. Posterior Wall Fractures

24. Posterior Wall Fxs:
Surgical Keys
•Avoid Devascularization of Fragment/s
•Remove Intra-articular Fragments
•Address Marginal Impaction
•Provide adequate buttress
•Avoid Over-Contouring of Plate

25. Controlled Distraction
of Hip Joint
• Femoral Distractor
• Traction Table

30. Posterior Wall Fx
63 Y.O. Male

31. L.W. 00.09.23

32. L.W. 00.09.23

33. L.W. 00.09.23

34. L.W. 00.09.23

35. L.W. 00.10.25

36. L.W. 00.10.25

37. L.W. 00.10.25

38. Special Case:
Extended Posterior Wall
??? Ganz Trochanteric Flip Osteotomy
to Visualize Fracture
without Devitalizing Abductors

39. T.D. 00.02.01

40. T.D. 00.02.01

41. T.D. 00.02.01

42. T.D. 00.02.01

43. T.D. 00.02.17

44. T.D. 00.02.08

45. Reduction Aids: Kocher-
Langenbeck Approach
•Distal Femoral Traction
•Distraction of Hip Joint
•Ischial Tuberosity Schantz Pin
•Quadrangular Clamp through Greater
Sciatic Notch
•Farabeuf Clamp

47. FAERBEUF CLAMPS

48. M.M. 98.10.27

49. M.M 98.10.29

50. M.M. 98.11.04

51. M.M. 98.11.05

52. M.M. 98.11.05

53. Letournel 1993
Optimal Screw Placement

56. Transtectal Tranverse
Acetabular Fx
18 Y.O. Male
Isolated Injury
Skinny Patient / Treated Early

57. W.M. 99.11.27

58. W.M. 99.11.27

59. W.M. 99.11.27

60. W.M. 99.11.27

61. W.M. 00.01.12

62. W.M. 00.01.12

63. W.M. 00.01.12

64. Ilioinguinal Approach:
Indications
•Anterior Wall
•Anterior Column
•Transverse with significant Anterior
Displacement
•Anterior Column / Posterior Hemitransverse
•Both Column

65. Ilioinguinal Approach: Access

66. II Complications
•Direct Hernia 1%
•Significant LFC nerve numbness23%
•External iliac artery thrombosis
1%

67. II Complications
•Hematoma 5%
•Infection 2%

68. Ilioinguinal Approach

69. Anterior Column Fx
Isolated Injury
73 Y.O. Male

70. J.W. 00.10.14

71. J.W. 00.10.14

72. J.W. 00.10.14

73. Reduction of Anterior Column
to Intact Ilium
Clamp Placement
Lag Screw Placement

74. J.W. 00.10.19

75. J.W. 00.11.02

76. J.W. 00.10.19

77. Anterior Column /
Posterior Hemitransverse
Anterior Wall or Column
Posterior Half of Transverse Fracture

78. Anterior Column Fractures

79. Anterior Wall Fracture

80. Jeff Mast, M.D.

81. R.M. 98.08.15

82. R.M. 98.08.15

83. R.M. 98.08.15

84. R.M. 98.08.15

85. R.M. 98.08.15

86. R.M. 98.08.15

87. R.M. 98.08.15

88. R.M. 98.08.24

89. R.H. 98.11.22

90. R.M. 99.02.17

91. R.M. 99.02.17

92. R.M. 99.02.17

93. Both Column
Acetabular Fracture
18 Y.O. Female
Isolated Injury

94. R.C. 00.03.09

95. R.C. 00.03.09

96. R.C. 00.03.09
SPUR
SIGN

97. R.C. 00.03.09

98. R.C. 00.03.09

100. A.S.I.S.
SYMPHYSIS

101. EXT.
OBL.
A.S.I.S.
EXT. INGUINAL RING

102. A.S.I.S.
L.F.C.N.
PSOAS
EXT
.
OB
L.
EXT.
OBL.
CONJOINT TENDON

108. Completion of Iliac Fracture

111. Reduction of Anterior Column
to Intact Ilium

117. Reduction of Posterior Column

118. INTACT ILIUM

123. R.C. 00.03.10

124. Extended Iliofemoral Approach
•“T” Type Fractures
•Trans-tectal Transverse Fractures
•Delayed Reconstruction

125. EIF Complications
•Sciatic nerve palsy1%
•Hematoma 8%
•Infection 1%

126. Extended Iliofemoral Approach

127. R.H. 98.11.21

128. R.H. 98.11.21

129. R.H. 98.11.22

130. Special Case
“T-Type” Acetabular Fracture
Proximal Femur Fracture
14 y.o. Male
Sequential K-L / Ilioinguinal
Approaches

131. P.J. 00.12.16

132. P.J. 00.12.16

133. P.J. 00.12.16

134. P.J. 00.12.16

135. Initial Kocher-Langenbeck
Approach

136. P.J. 00.12.18

137. P.J. 00.12.18

138. Subsequent Ilioinguinal
Approach

139. P.J. 00.12.22

140. Intra-Operative Assessment of
Reduction
•Visual Assessment of Fracture Reduction
•Palpation of Fracture
–Quadrilateral surface through Greater Sciatic
Notch
–Anterior Column
•C-Arm assessment
•Plain A.P. Radiograph
•Assurance that all Screws are out of Joint

141. Assessment of Reduction
•Restoration of Pelvic Lines
•Concentric Reduction on all 3 Views
•Goal of Anatomic Reduction

142. Complications: Early
•9 / 262 Nerve Palsies
–2 Sciatic Nerves
–1 Femoral Nerve
–6 Peroneal Nerves
•13 / 262 Wound Infections
–5 Extra-articular
–8 Intra-articular
•13 / 262 “Wear of femoral head”
Letournel 1993
12.2 % Pre-Op Deficits

143. Letournel 1993
Complications: Long-term
•0.7 % Nonunion
•1% Cartilage Necrosis
•3.1% Avascular Necrosis
•Osteoarthritis
–10.2 % after perfect reduction
–35.7 % after imperfect reduction

144. Letournel 1993
Avascular Necrosis
“In our opinion avascular necrosis is a diagnosis much too often
put forward to explain a post-operative complication. Since it is
known that there is nothing we can do about it, as the trauma is
considered solely responsible for it, there is much too great a
tendency to blame necrosis for what is really a wearing of the
femoral head against a malreduced fracture line. If wear takes
place there is disappearance of a segment of the head but no
sequestrum formation, and the shape of the loss of substance is
the negative imprint of the shape responsible for the wear: the
step in the acetabular reconstruction. For instance, wearing
against a transverse fracture line appears on the antero-posterior
view as an orange-slice-shaped missing part of the head without
any sequestrum.”

145. Heterotopic Ossification:
Brooker Classification
•I: Islands of bone less than 1 cm in diameter
•II: Larger islands of bone, leaving at least 1 cm
free space between the two bones of the hip
•III: Free space between the ossification and the
pelvis or the femur is less than 1 cm
•IV:Apparent ankylosis of the joint by a bony
bridge uniting the pelvis and the femur

146. Heterotopic Ossification
•Classification does not predict mobility
•Approach:
–34% Grade III / IV Extended Iliofemoral
–11% Grade III / IV Kocher-Langenbeck
–1 % Grade III / IV Ilioinguinal
•“Ectopic bone formation appears early on
radiography, and maturity is reached 6
months to 1 year after operation.”

147. Significant HO
(0 , 90° Hip Flexion)
•KL 8%
•II 2%
•EIF 20%

148. Prophylaxis for HO
•Indomethacin
•700 cGy radiation
•Combination

149. DVT Prophylaxis
•Controversial
•Mechanical devices
•Pharmacologic (I.e. LMWH)

150. Conclusions
•Good Understanding of the Fracture
•Know the Anatomy
•Optimize One Surgical Approach
•Goal of Perfect Reduction

151. THANK YOU
Return to
Pelvis
Index
E-mail OTA
about
Questions/Comments
If you would like to volunteer as an author for
the Resident Slide Project or recommend updates
to any of the following slides, please send an e-
mail to [email protected]