The terran in the yarn while the shuttle isin either box, does
not remain completely static between picks. There are tension peaks
‘associated with the lateral contraction of fabric as the reed leaves
the shed. This effect may be seen in the weft tension traces starting
from the point where beat-up takes place. A secondary effect here
is the withdrawal of yarn from the shuttle as the sley undergoes its
back swing, thus increasing the distance from selvedge to shuttle
‘eye. With side weft motion, there is a small peak tension immediately
after the shuttle enters the box (approx. 335°)
A variation in tension during the complete unwinding of a pim
is shown in Fig. 4.12. The width of the trace arises from the rapid
variation in tension as unwinding proceeds in rapid succession from
the nose and shoukler of a pim. At first the magnitude of tension is
low but as unwinding proceeds, the average tension increases and
eventually reaches a value of about 6-5 times iis value at the
beginning. it is this abrupt tension change from the end of the pim
10 the beginning of next that give rise in some fabrics to the well
knovm cop change defect. On an automatic pim changing loom, the
welt on the first pick of a pim is not fully threaded and the tension
is as low as 2g.
The way in which the tension towards the end of a pirn comes
about is as follows : When unwinding starts from a full pirn the yam
ballouns away fram the axis of pim, but as it proceeds the ballon
lengihens and there is some licking of the yam round the pirn. As the
‘unwinding continues the licking extends over a greater length of
empty pirn and it is this that is mainly responsible for rise in tension
on account of the Trictional resistance to the movement of the yam.
thas been found that the best way of reducing the rise in the
tension is to use a conical base pim or inside of the shuttle be glued
with a nylon loop strips (23-24) or fur. Use of 5 monofilament nylon
loops al an angle of 30-45° to the shuttle walls also helps in
controlling tension. The diameters of monofilament nylon yams are
08 10 1.0 mm. for medium and coarse counts and 0.4 to 0.6 mm for
fine and superfine counts.
REFERENCES
1. > Fox, T.W. The Mechanism of Weaving, Macmilan Co. Ltd,
1961, p. 329.
2. Vincent, JA, J. Text. Inst. 30, 1939, T 103;
3. Vincent J.J., and Catlow, MG. J. Text, tnst., 42, 1951 T 413.
4. Hanton, W.A., Mechanics for Textile Students, The Textile
Institute, Manchester, 1954.
5. Thomas, 1H, and Vincent, Ja, J. Text Inst. 40, 1949, T1.
6. Hamed, HA.K. and Lord, P.R., Text. Recorder, May, 1965.
pad
7. Talukdar M.K., PhD. ‘Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology,
Delhi, 1980.
P.B., Proc. 18th Jt, Tech.
Venkataraman, C.G. and hala, a
© Con. ATIRA, BTRA and SITRA, 1977, 14.1
o. Catlow, MG., J. Text. Inst. 49, 1958, T. 424
10. Lord PA, J of Engg, for industries. ASME Series B. 97, 1975.
st Pen end Mohammed MH. Text. Mir, 1964, 390.
12. Metwally, AH., M.Se. Thesis, Manchester University, 1963.
8. Ashour, MH. and Poonawalla, L.., Text. Rec. Feb. 80, 1966.
p59.
14, Grushin, VAN, et al, Tekh Tekstil Prom., 1973, 94 (2), 152.
15. Morison, D., Proc. Inst, Mech. Engg. 1962, P14- ;
16. Lord P.R. and Mohammed, M.H., Conversion of yam to Fabric,
Merrow Publication, 1973, p211 j
17. Gorkov, V.K., Tech. Text. Industry, USSR, 1962, No. 5, p85
. Greenwood, K. and Vaughan, G.J., Text. Inst. 47, 1956 T. 241
19. Townsand, M.W.H., J. Text. Inst. 46, 1958, p699.
20. Foster, A. J. Text. Inst. 50, 1959, p7. |
is UK, 1967.
|. De, D., Ph.D. Thesis UMIST, UK,
2 et al, In. Text Res. Jr. 5, 1980, March pi
22. Hokambe, 8. ; m
23. BTRA, ive Jes Manag in Weaving GSP j
24. Palwal, MG. and Kimalhi,P.0., Process Control In Weaving
" ATIRA Publication, 1974, p118.