School PIRPA Template ldvdkdjxbzbzndvbdvddk hi ldlfhidlhdkrbgadbfkdkodkdodlfjhdnkdys
Size: 8.95 MB
Language: en
Added: Oct 21, 2025
Slides: 63 pages
Slide Content
Mabuhay Elementary School School Logo Francisco Andrade School Head
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Grade Level No. of Recipient Learners Percentage ([No. of Recipient Learners/Total number of learners in the grade level]x100) K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 TOTAL SBFP (School-Based Feeding Program for Dropou t Reduction and Academic Performance )
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment CLASSROOMS Grade Level No. of Classrooms In Good Condition Needing Minor Repair Needing Major Repair On-going Construction For Demolition/Condemnation K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 ALS Others Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment BUILDINGS (Not utilized as classroom) Grade Level No. of Classrooms In Good Condition Needing Minor Repair Needing Major Repair On-going Construction For Demolition/Condemnation K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 ALS Others Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Community Learning Center (CLC) Type No. of C LC In Good Condition Needing Minor Repair Needing Major Repair On-going Construction For Demolition/Condemnation Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment TEXTBOOKS/LEARNING MATERIALS Grade Level No. of Textbooks/Learning Materials Available New Used but in Great Condition Fair Poor K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 Others (Please specify) Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment TEXTBOOKS/LEARNING MATERIALS ALS No. of Textbooks/Learning Materials Available New Used but in Great Condition Fair Poor BLP Lower Elem Elem JHS FELP BYOB WBL Others (Please specify) Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment SCHOOL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT Grade Level No. of Learners No. of Usable Chairs Learner- Chair Ratio DCP Inventory No. of TVL Tools and Equipment Package No. of Learners Benefitted TVL Tools and Equipment Package No. of Science & Math Tools and Equipment Package No. of Learners Benefitted Science & Math Tools and Equipment Package No. of Multime-dia Package With Connection to Electricity (Y/N) With Connection to Internet (Y/N) With Water Source (Y/N) With Comfort Rooms (y/N) With Hand Washing Facilities (Y/N) K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 ALS Others Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment SCHOOL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT Grade Level No. of Learners No. of Usable Chairs Learner- Chair Ratio DCP Inventory No. of TVL Tools and Equipment Package No. of Learners Benefitted TVL Tools and Equipment Package No. of Science & Math Tools and Equipment Package No. of Learners Benefitted Science & Math Tools and Equipment Package No. of Multime-dia Package With Connection to Electricity (Y/N) With Connection to Internet (Y/N) With Water Source (Y/N) With Comfort Rooms (y/N) With Hand Washing Facilities (Y/N) G7 G8 G9 G10 ALS-SHS Others Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment ENROLMENT Note: Please indicate if it MG class Male : 665 Female : 525 Total Enrolment : 1191
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment ENROLMENT Note: Please indicate if it MG class Male : 665 Female : 525 Total Enrolment : 1191
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment LEAVERS Note: Please indicate if it MG class Male : 665 Female : 525 Total Enrolment : 1191
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment LEAVERS Note: Please indicate if it MG class Male : 665 Female : 525 Total Enrolment : 1191
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment REASONS/CAUSES (School Leavers) Grade Level No. of Domestic-Related Factors No. of Individual-Related Factors No. Of School-Related Factors No. of Geographic/Environmental Factors No. of Financial-Related Others (Specify) K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 ALS Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment ECCD RESULT (Pre-Test) Section ENROLMENT NO. OF LEARNERS TESTED NO. OF LEARNERS TESTED NO. OF LEARNERS BASED ON THE INTERPRETATION OF THE STANDARD OF THE DEVELOPMENT INDEX Significant Delay Slight Delay Delay Slightly Advanced Highly Advanced Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment PERFORMANCE INDICATOR INDICATOR MALE FEMALE TOTAL PERCENTAGE TOTAL NUMBER Enrolment Rate Participation Rate (Out-of-School) Transition Rate Graduation Rate Completion rate Leaver Rate Promotion Rate
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Grade Level Percentage Enrolment Participation (Out-of-School) Transition GRADUATION Completion A&E Passers Regular SPED MG ALS MEP Regular ALS Regular ALS Regular ALS K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 ALS Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Indicators MALE FEMALE TOTAL TOTAL NUMBER No, of Learners with National Certification for SHS No. of Learners affected/displaced by natural and man-made hazards/ disasters No. of Learners who reported violence committed against them by other learners (bullying) based on intake sheets No. of Learners who reported violence committed against them by adults (child abuse) based on intake sheets No. of Learners with normal nutritional status A & E Passers (Elementary) A & E Passers (JHS) ALS Program BLP Completers ALS Program JHS Completers ALS Program SHS Graduates ALS FELP Completers ALS BYOB Completers
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment ARAL PROGRAM Grade Level No. of ARAL Learners No. of ARAL Tutors ARAL Basic ARAL Plus DepED Non-DepEd Total K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 TOTAL
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment ARAL PROGRAM Grade Level Check-in Conducted 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 G12 TOTAL
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment ARAL PROGRAM Grade Level No. of ARAL Learners No. of ARAL Tutors ARAL Basic ARAL Plus DepED Non-DepEd Total G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 G12 TOTAL
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment ARAL PROGRAM Grade Level Check-in Conducted 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 G12 TOTAL
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment LITERACY Indicator Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Percentage of Grade 3 learners achieving nearly proficient or better in English based on CRLA (Transitioning Level) Percentage of Grade 6 learners achieving nearly proficient or better in English based on Phil-IRI (Approaching Independent) Percentage of Grade 10 learners achieving nearly proficient or better in English based on Phil-IRI (Approaching Independent) Percentage of Grade 12 learners attaining nearly proficient level or better in stage 4 SHS areas based on Modified Phil-IRI
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment NUMERACY Indicator Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Percentage of Grade 3 learners achieving nearly proficient or better in Numeracy Percentage of Grade 6 learners attaining nearly proficient level or better in stage 2 numeracy standards Percentage of Grade 10 learners attaining nearly proficient level or better in stage 3 numeracy standards Percentage of Grade 12 learners attaining nearly proficient level or better in stage 4 SHS areas
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment RESEARCH /INNOVATION Learning Area No . of Action Research Stud/ies Status (Completed/Ongoing, to be implemented) Reason/s for over/underper-formance No. of Basic Research Stud/ies Status (Completed/Ongoing, to be implemented ) Reason/s for over/under-performance No. of Innovation /s Status (Completed/Ongoing, to be implemented) Reason/s for over/underperformance Total Number of Researches/Innovations English Filipino Mathematics Science TLE/TVL MAPEH ESP Araling Panlipunan SHS Subjects ALS LS
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in English No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least learned competencies K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in English No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least learned competencies G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in Filipino No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least learned competencies K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in Filipino No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 Least Mastered Competencies G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in Science No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 Least Mastered Competencies K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in Science No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least learned competencies G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in Mathematics No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 Least mastered competencies K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in Mathematics No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least learned competencies G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in MAPEH No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least mastered competencies K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in MAPEH No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 Least mastered competencies G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in TLE/TVL No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least learned competencies K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in TLE/TVL No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least learned competencies G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in EsP No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least learned competencies K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in EsP No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least learned competencies G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in Araling Panlipunan No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least learned competencies G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in Araling Panlipunan No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 Least Mastered COmpetencies G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in SHS Core Subjects No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least learned competencies by strand G11 G12 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015 Top 3 Least mastered competencies by strand
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Learners’ Progress and Achievement in SHS Applied Subjects No. of Learners under the following description Grade Level Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fairly Satisfactory Did Not Meet Expectations Top 3 least mastered competencies by strand G11 G12 TOTAL Reference: DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Implementation of LCP Implementation of LCP Yes No Approved printed LCP Orientation on LCP with stakeholders Recalibration of LCP incosideration of the experiences due to severe Typhoon Opong
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Special Curricular Program Special Curricular Program Enrolment No. of Teachers Date Established M F T M F T Special Program for Journalism Special Program for Sports Special Program for Arts Science, Technology, and Engineering Special Science for Elementary Schools N OTE: Please write NOT APPLICABLE if not implementing the program
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment ADM-OHSS & Night Class No. of Learners M F T NOTE: Please write NOT APPLICABLE if not implementing the program No. of Tablet Received Utilization of Downloaded PSF (in percent)
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Degree of Manifestation of SBM Practice Dimension Degree of Manifestation Percentage of indicators that are Always manifested Percentage of indicators Frequently manifested Percentage of indicators Rarely manifested Percentage of indicators Not yet manifested Curriculum and Teaching Learning Environment Leadership Governance and Accountability Human Resource and Team Development Finance and Resource Management and Mobilization Total Percentage
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment Programs, Projects, and Activities Project (AIP) Pillar Project Objectives (AIP) Output (AIP) Performance Indicator Physical Target Physical Accomplish- ment Financial Target Financial Accomplish- ment Reason/s for over/underper- formance
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment SCHOOL PERSONNEL Grade Level No. of Personnel Teacher I-III Master Teacher 1-4 SPET I-IV Special Science Teacher I-IV ALS Teacher Community ALS Implementers (CAIs) ALIVE Teacher Head Teacher I-VI (Department Head) ADAS I-III AO II Principal I-IV HT (Dept/Sch, not SH) HT (SH) TIC OIC K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 Others Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment SCHOOL PERSONNEL Grade Level No. of Personnel Teacher I-III Master Teacher 1-4 SPET I-IV Special Science Teacher I-IV ALS Teacher Community ALS Implementers (CAIs) ALIVE Teacher Head Teacher I-VI (Department Head) ADAS I-III AO II Principal I-IV HT (Dept/Sch, not SH) HT (SH) TIC OIC G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 G12 Total
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment SCHOOL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT Grade Level No. of Learners No. of Usable Chairs Learner- Chair Ratio DCP Inventory No. of TVL Tools and Equipment Package No. of Learners Benefitted TVL Tools and Equipment Package No. of Science & Math Tools and Equipment Package No. of Learners Benefitted Science & Math Tools and Equipment Package No. of Multime-dia Package With Connection to Electricity (Y/N) With Connection to Internet (Y/N) With Water Source (Y/N) With Comfort Rooms (y/N) With Hand Washing Facilities (Y/N) K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 ALS Others Total
FINANCIAL REPORT
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment SOURCE OF FUND TYPE OF FUND TOTAL ALLOCATION/FUND REMAINING FUND % of UTILIZATION LIQUIDATION SUBMITTED (Y/N)) REMARKS MOOE School Canteen Donation SEF OTHERS (Specify)
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment CY 2025 OVERALL – SCHOOL BUDGET UTILIZATION RATE (for MOOE) as of September 31, 2025 ADJUSTED ALLOTMENT OBLIGATION RATE DISBURSEMENT RATE P 1,000,00.00 50.21 % 32.89%
CY 2025 Q3 INITIATIVES, QUICK WINS, AND BEST PRACTICES CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment School Pic
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment INITIATIVES
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment QUICK WINS (Immediate impactful results)
CY 2025 Program Implementation and Performance Assessment BEST PRACTICES
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 09123456781 Francisco.Andrade@deped,gov.ph Mabuhay, Looc, Masbate Pic Pic