A study on factors affecting employee performance copy

Defines performance it's importance and provides an overview of factors that affect it. Analysis of various factors.

1. A Study on Factors Affecting Employee Performance at Sujala pipes Pvt.Ltd Under the Guidance of Prof. M Srinivasa Reddy By Shaik Tahura Fatima

2. Performance “Performance is completion of a task with application of knowledge, skills and abilities.” “Employee’s resultant behaviour on task which can be observed and evaluated”

3. Importance of an Employees performance in an organization To achieve g oals . Effective team building. Optimum Productivity. Establishing a good Customer base…..

4. Factors that Affect Employee Performance Most importantly the factor that affects employee performance is salary or incentives that are given to the employee. Apart from that there are other factors also Organizational culture Working Environment Training programs Motivation and work life balance

5. Industry Profile PVC – Polyvinyl Chloride(synthetic polymer) Third most used synthetic polymer after Polyethylene and Polypropylene “ A Synthetic Polymer inert to most chemicals and very tough with a durable nature.”

6. History: 1835- As a solid whose discovery was not yet understood. 1912- First industrial developments to utilize the PVC. 1932- First tubes were made using PVC. 1935- First production of PVC pipes. 1936 to 1949- Usage of PVC at residence started. 1950 to 1960- Decades of dramatic advancement in adopting PVC at residences.

7. Sectors where PVC pipes are used Estimated market for different PVC pipes

8. Company Profile Sujala Pipes Pvt Ltd. a flagship enterprise of Nandi group. Leading player in PVC, HDPE, CPVC, Suction and Gardening ,Drip irrigation pipes. Founder – “ S.P.Y.REDDY” (S. Pedda Yerikal Reddy) B.Tech mech . Established in 1984. Director - Sujala Sajjala

9. Quality policy Achieving continual growth through innovations for total customer satisfaction and meeting them by producing quality products & on time delivery at optimum cost and marketing with reasonable prices.

10. Objectives To identify the factors that affect the employee performance. To identify the changes or improvements in the factors that can improve the Employee performance

11. Research Methodology Research Design : Descriptive research design Data Sources Secondary Data source : Organizational Behaviour – Jit s Chandan Human Resource Management – Biswajeet Patnayak Primary Data Source : Employees of Sujala Pipes Pvt.Ltd Research Approach : Direct Approach Research Instrument : Questionnaire Sampling Plan Sample Frame : Sujala Pipes Pvt.Ltd Sample Size : 45 Sample Units : Employees of Sujala Pipes Pvt.Ltd Sampling Method : Sampling Statistical tool : ANOVA Test

12. Department distribution Department No. of respondents % HR 4 8.9 Maintenance 10 22.2 Accounting 4 8.9 Administration 3 6.7 Marketing 4 8.9 Quality control 10 22.2 Store outlets 10 22.2 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that sample consists of employees from different departments Table No:1

13. Age distribution Age No. of respondents % 20-30 9 20 30-40 24 53.3 40 and above 12 26.7 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that highest percentage of employees (53.3%) are of the age group 30-40. Table No:2

14. Qualification Qualification No. of respondents % SSC 10 22.2 Intermediate 8 17.8 Graduation 21 46.7 PG 6 13.3 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that highest percentage (46.70%) of Employees has finished their graduation. Table No:3

15. Awareness regarding Company policies No. of respondents % Yes 30 66.7 No 15 33.3 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that 66.7% of Employees have awareness regarding the Company policies. Table No:5

16. Management style Rating No. of respondents % 3*** 18 40 4**** 22 48.9 5***** 5 11.1 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that highest percentage(48.9%) of Employees have given a 4**** rating for management style. Table No:6

17. Employee Relations Rating No. of respondents % Very good 14 31.1 Good 24 53.3 Moderate 7 15.6 bad - Very bad - Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that the highest percentage of Employees(53.3%) were found to have good relation with Superiors and Subordinates. Table No:7

18. Culture Rating No. of respondents % 3*** 10 22.2 4**** 16 35.6 5***** 19 42.2 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that the highest percentage(42.2%) of Employees has given 5***** rating for the Culture. Table No:9

19. Infrastructure Rating No. of respondents % 2** 11 24.4 3*** 30 66.7 4**** 4 8.9 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that the highest percentage(66.7%) of Employees has given 3*** rating for the Infrastructure. Table No:10

20. Technology Rating No. of respondents % 2** 16 22.2 3*** 19 35.6 4**** 10 42.2 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that the highest percentage(42.2%) of Employees has given 4**** rating for the technology used. Table No:11

21. Health Facilities Rating No. of respondents % 3*** 18 40 4**** 23 51.1 5***** 4 8.9 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that the highest percentage(51.1%) of Employees has given 4**** rating for the health facilities provided. Table No:12

22. Hygiene Rating No. of respondents % 2** 10 22.2 3*** 24 53.4 4**** 11 24.4 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that the highest percentage(53.4%) of Employees has given 3*** rating for the hygiene maintenance. Table No:13

23. Overall rating of the Working Environment Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that the highest percentage(60%) of Employees have given a 3*** rating for the Working environment. Rating No. of respondents % 2** 10 22.2 3*** 27 60 4**** 8 17.8 Total 45 100 Table No:14

24. Frequency of Training Programs Time period No. of respondents % Once in 3 mnths 5 11.1 Once in 6 mnths 12 26.7 Onc e a year 3 6 Rarely 25 55.6 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that the percentage of employees receiving Training rarely(55.6%) is the highest. Table No:15

25. Types of Training Programs Type No. of respondents % On the Job 22 48.9 Off the Job 11 24.5 Technical 6 13.3 Skill management 6 13.3 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that the percentage of Employees that Want to have a on the job training(48.9%) are the highest. Table No:16

26. Effectiveness of Training Programs Rating No. of respondents % 2** 14 31.1 3*** 17 37.8 4**** 8 17.8 5***** 6 13.3 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that the percentage of Employees(37.8) has given a 3*** rating for the effectiveness of the training programs conducted. Table No:17

27. Satisfaction level of Training Programs Rating No. of respondents % 2** 10 22.2 3*** 19 42.2 4**** 11 24.5 5***** 5 11.1 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that Highest percentage of Employees(42.2) has given 3***rating for the training programs conducted. Table No:18

28. Feeling Work Stress No. of respondents % Yes 23 51.1 No 22 48.9 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that the percentage of employees feeling Stress(51.1%) is slightly greater than the percentage of Employees with no stress(48.9%) . Table No:19

29. Motivational programs No. of respondents % Yes No 45 100 Total 45 100 Interpretation: From the above data it is clear that, no special motivational programs are Conducted. Table No:20

30. H O : There is no significant difference between the ratings of Organizational Culture and Working Environment. ANOVA TEST D f = (r-1)(c-1) = (3-1)(3-1) =2*2 = 4 Rating 3*** 4**** 5***** Total 2** 1 5 4 10 3*** 9 8 10 27 4**** 3 5 8 Total 10 16 19 45

31. Source Value D f Mean value F-ratio SSBC 7 3-1=2 3.50 0.2360 SSWC 89 9-3=6 14.83 TSS 96 9-1=8 Inference: The F(calculated)=0.2360 is less than the table value F(2,2) 19.000 at 5% level of significance. we reject the null hypothesis. Hence, we conclude that the there is significant difference between the ratings of the Culture and Working environment.

32. Findings Most of the employees were found to be graduates. Employees were found to maintain Good relations with their peers. Among the four factors considered employees were satisfied with the company culture comparatively.

33. Suggestions Training programs needed to be implemented for achieving a better employee performance. Motivational programs if conducted can improve the employee morale . Infrastructure needs to be improved for better employee performance.

34. Conclusion The performance of the Employees is considered to be the most important part in the Organization’s functioning. But when observed it can be seen that the performance of employees fluctuated which can be due to many factors. Some of that can be controlled while others can’t be.

35. Thank you