Agent-Based Genetic Algorithm for Global Numerical Optimization… 21
b-2) Comparison of CAGA and AGA
Table 2.5 and Table 2.6 show the feature selection capability of CAGA compared with
AGA based on database 1 and database 2 respectively.
From these tables, we can see: for low dimensional feature selection, although the
number of features from two algorithms is similar, but the selection result of CAGA has
higher fitness value than that of AGA, it is same and very stable all the 4 times experiments.
For high dimensional feature selection, the advantage of CAGA is very apparent. The
selection result of CAGA is much better than that of AGA all the 4 times experiments. The
number of features of CAGA is much less than that of AGA, even half of that of AGA all the
4 times experiments. It is noted that for the dimensional feature selection, the NG is 10.
Because the stop criterion is10k>, that means SGAE ends searching from the beginning,
falling into premature convergence.
Table 2.5. Comparison of feature selection capability of AGA and CAGA based on
database 1
ET AGA CAGA
NG NF SF BF RT(s) NG NF SF BF RT(s)
1 37 9 7-12,14-
16
17.6897 41.031 25 10 5,7-
12,14-16
17.9449 33.2650
2 44 10 5,7-
12,14-16
17.9449 50.078 18 10 5,7-
12,14-16
17.9449 21.5150
3 30 9 5-
9,11,12,
14,15
17.1921 19.484 23 10 5,7-
12,14-16
17.9449 30.1410
4 25 10 1,7-
12,14-16
17.6629 27.641 18 10 5,7-
12,14-16
17.9449 22.3430
Table 2.6. Comparison of feature selection capability of AGA and CAGA based on
database 2
ET AGA CAGA
NG NF SF BF RT(s) NG NF SF BF RT(s)
1 10 21 1-3,6,9-
11,13,16,18,20,
22,24-
27,29,31,33,34,
39
-
0.5034
18.531 60 14 9-
11,18,21,2
2,27,28,31
,33,34,36,
37,40
1.5467 92.391
2 10 21 1,3,8,10,11,17-
21,23,24,26,28,
30,31,34,36,38-
40
0.0130 19.859 70 9 9-
11,20,21,2
8,31,33,35
1.6144 81.157
3 11 17 6,9,11,13,14,17
,20,22,23,25-
27,33,35,37,39,
40
-
0.2093
20.500 16 14 2,10,11,17
,21-23,27-
29,33-
35,38
0.9615 25.313
4 10 14 6,7,9,11,12,17,
22,23,29,32,34,
36,37,39
-
0.0493
17.453 76 7 9-
11,20,32,3
5,38
1.6469 90.156
Agent-Based Computing, edited by Duarte Bouca, and Amaro Gafagnao, Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated, 2010. ProQuest Ebook Central,
Copyright © 2010. Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated. All rights reserved.