Annex C-1_PMES Tool for Beginning Towards Proficient Teachers (TI-TIII).pdf

PMES Tools Source: DepEd

1. PMES TOOL FOR
BEGINNING TOWARDS
PROFICIENT TEACHERS (TEACHERS I-III)
S.Y. 2025-2026

2. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
1. Applied
knowledge of
content within and
across curriculum
teaching areas
(PPST 1.1.2)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet or Inter-
Observer
Agreement Form
Quality Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in COT
rating sheet /
inter-observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 3 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 2 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

3. INDICATOR
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
2. Used a range of
teaching strategies
that enhance
learner
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy skills
(PPST 1.4.2)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet or Inter-
Observer
Agreement Form
Quality Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in COT
rating sheet /
inter-observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 3 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 2 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
OBJECTIVE
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

4. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
3. Applied a range
of teaching
strategies to
develop critical
and creative
thinking, as well as
other higher-order
thinking skills
(PPST 1.5.2)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet or Inter-
Observer
Agreement Form
Quality Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in COT
rating sheet /
inter-observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 3 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 2 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

5. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
4. Managed
classroom
structure to
engage learners,
individually or in
groups, in
meaningful
exploration,
discovery and
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments
(PPST 2.3.2)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet or Inter-
Observer
Agreement Form
Quality Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in COT
rating sheet /
inter-observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 3 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 2 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 2: Learning Environment
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

6. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
5. Managed
learner behavior
constructively by
applying positive
and non-violent
discipline to
ensure learning-
focused
environments
(PPST 2.6.2)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet or Inter-
Observer
Agreement Form
Quality Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in COT
rating sheet /
inter-observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 3 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 2 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 2: Learning Environment
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

7. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
6. Used
differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate
learning
experiences to
address learners’
gender, needs,
strengths,
interests and
experiences
(PPST 3.1.2)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet or Inter-
Observer
Agreement Form
Quality Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in COT
rating sheet /
inter-observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 3 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 2 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 3: Diversity of Learners
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

8. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
7. Planned,
managed and
implemented
developmentally
sequenced
teaching and
learning processes
to meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts
(PPST 4.1.2)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet or Inter-
Observer
Agreement Form
Quality Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in COT
rating sheet /
inter-observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 3 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 2 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 4: Curriculum and Planning
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

9. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
8. Participated in
collegial
discussions that
use teacher and
learner feedback
to enrich
teaching
practice.
(PPST 4.4.2)
Any of the following
documents:
1.Proof/s of
attendance in LAC
sessions/
meetings/other
collegial
discussions related
to the indicator
2.Learning journal
showing the
teacher’s reflection
on enriching his/her
teaching practice
based on the LAC
sessions/ meetings/
other collegial
discussions on
teacher and learner
feedback, with
proof/s of
attendance
3.Accomplishment
report/minutes of
LAC sessions or
other collegial
discussions,
highlighting the
teacher’s
contribution in the
professional
collaboration
Quality Shared insights
and/or
suggestions on
the effective
use of teacher
and
learner
feedback
during LAC
sessions/meeti
ngs/other
collegial
discussions to
enrich teaching
practice, as
evidenced by
MOV 3
Reflected on
the use of
teacher and
learner
feedback
obtained from
the LAC
sessions/
meetings/ other
collegial
discussions
attended to
enrich teaching
practice, as
evidenced by
MOV 2
Completed
LAC
sessions/
meetings/other
collegial
discussions on
using teacher
and learner
feedback to
enrich
teaching
practice, as
evidenced by
MOV 1
Attended but
did not
complete the
LAC sessions/
meetings/ other
collegial
discussions on
using teacher
and learner
feedback to
enrich
teaching
practice, as
evidenced by
MOV 1
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Timeliness Participated in
collegial
discussions on
teacher
and learner
feedback
across
4 quarters
Participated in
collegial
discussions on
teacher
and learner
feedback
across
3 quarters
Participated in
collegial
discussions on
teacher
and learner
feedback
across
2 quarters
Participated in
a collegial
discussion on
teacher
and learner
feedback in
only
1 quarter
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 4: Curriculum and Planning
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 4)

10. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
9. Selected,
developed,
organized and
used appropriate
teaching and
learning
resources,
including ICT, to
address learning
goals
(PPST 4.5.2)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet or Inter-
Observer
Agreement Form
Quality Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in COT
rating sheet /
inter-observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 3 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 2 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 4: Curriculum and Planning
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

11. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
10. Designed,
selected,
organized and
used diagnostic,
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements
(PPST 5.1.2)
Classroom
Observation Tool
(COT) Rating
Sheet or Inter-
Observer
Agreement Form
Quality Demonstrated
Level 6 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in the
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 5 in
the PPST
Indicator as
shown in COT
rating sheet /
inter-observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 4 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 3 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Demonstrated
Level 2 in the
PPST Indicator
as shown in
COT rating
sheet / inter-
observer
agreement
form presented
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 4: Curriculum and Planning
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

12. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
11. Monitored
and evaluated
learner
progress and
achievement
using learner
attainment data
(PPST 5.2.2)
Any one (1) of the
following documents:
1.Class Record
2.Test Result and
Analysis
3.Remedial and
Intervention
Program Plan
4.Report on
Remedial and
Intervention
Program
Quality Implemented
the intervention
plan based on
learner
attainment
data, as
evidenced by
MOV 4
Developed an
intervention
plan based on
learner
attainment
data, as
evidenced by
MOV 3
Monitored and
evaluated
learner
progress and
achievement
with interpreted
learner
attainment
data, as
evidenced by
MOV 2
Monitored
learner
progress and
achievement
with available
recorded
learner
attainment
data, as
evidenced by
MOV 1
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 5: Assessment and Reporting
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

13. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
12. Communicated
promptly and
clearly the
learners needs,
progress and
achievement to
key stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians
(PPST 5.4.2)
Any of the following
documents:
Sample of corrected
test paper of a learner
in a learning area with
the parent’s or
guardian’s signature,
date of receipt, and
feedback
Narrative
documentation/minutes
of meetings with key
stakeholders (e.g., PTA,
SGC, SPT, CPC, etc.)
Report card with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature and feedback
in all quarters
supported by minutes
of meeting
Communication log with
key stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU, etc.)
using various modalities
Others (please specify
and provide
annotations)
Quality Secured
commitment and
agreement from
key stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians, on the
communicated
learners needs,
progress, and
achievement, as
evidenced by the
MOV/s presented
Solicited feedback
from key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians, on the
communicated
learners needs,
progress, and
achievement, as
evidenced by the
MOV/s presented
Communicated
promptly and
clearly the learners
needs, progress
and achievement to
key stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians, as
evidenced by the
MOV/s presented
Communicated learners
needs, progress, and
achievement to key
stakeholders, including
parents/ guardians, but
with inadequate details
of information, as
evidenced by the
MOV/s presented
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency Presented four (4)
acceptable MOVs
Presented three (3)
acceptable MOVs
Presented two (2)
acceptable MOVs
Presented one (1)
acceptable MOV
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Timeliness MOV/s presented
showed prompt
communication of
learners’ needs,
progress, and
achievement
across 4 quarters
MOV/s presented
showed prompt
communication of
learners’ needs,
progress, and
achievement
across 4 quarters
MOV/s presented
showed prompt
communication of
learners’ needs,
progress, and
achievement
across 3 quarters
MOV/s presented
showed prompt
communication of
learners’ needs,
progress, and
achievement across 2
quarters
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 5: Assessment and Reporting
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 4)

14. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
13. Applied a
personal
philosophy of
teaching that is
learner-
centered
(PPST 7.1.2)
Any of the following
crafted and used by
the Proficient
teacher in actual
classroom
instruction:
Lesson Plan
Activity Sheet
Visual
aids/Instructional
materials
Assessment
materials
Others (specify)
with annotation
describing the
application of a
personal philosophy
of teaching that is
learner-centered
Quality Demonstrated a
clear, theory-
informed
learner-
centered
philosophy and
justified how it
shaped the
design of
instructional
materials, with
strong
alignment
shown through
specific and
reflective
annotations
Articulated a
learner-
centered
philosophy and
explained how
it informed the
design and
choice of
instructional
strategies, with
evident links in
the annotation
Applied a
personal
philosophy of
teaching that is
learner-
centered and
described its
connection to
the instructional
materials
through general
reflection
Mentioned a
teaching
philosophy with
a limited or
unclear
connection to
learner-
centered
practices or
instructional
materials
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 7: Personal Growth and Professional Development
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)

15. OBJECTIVE
MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QET
OUTSTANDING
(5)
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
UNSATISFACTORY
(2)
POOR
(1)
14. Set
professional
development
goals based on
the Philippine
Professional
Standards for
Teachers
(PPST 7.5.2)
Any one (1) of the
following:
1.Certification
from the ICT
Coordinator /
School Head /
Focal Person in
charge of e-SAT
2.IPCRF-DP
3.Mid-year Review
Form (MRF)
4.Updated IPCRF-
DP from Phase II
Quality Updated
professional
development
goals during
Phase II of the
PMES Cycle as
evidenced by
MOV 4
Discussed
progress on
professional
development
goals with the
rater during the
mid-year
review, as
evidenced by
MOV 3
Set
professional
development
goals based on
e-SAT results
as evidenced
by MOV 2
Accomplished
the e-SAT at
the beginning
of the
school year as
evidenced by
MOV 1
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency Presented four
(4) acceptable
MOVs
Presented
three (3)
acceptable
MOVs
Presented two
(2) acceptable
MOVs
Presented one
(1) acceptable
MOV
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Timeliness All four (4)
presented
MOVs were
accomplished
within the
prescribed
PMES Phase
All three (3)
presented
MOVs were
accomplished
within the
prescribed
PMES Phase
All two (2)
presented
MOVs were
accomplished
within the
prescribed
PMES Phase
Only one (1)
presented MOV
was
accomplished
within the
prescribed
PMES Phase
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Beginning Towards Proficient
KRA 7: Personal Growth and Professional Development
(Maximum no. of crosscutting MOV to be presented: 1)