Argument Essay Samples

English 111 Evaluation Essay
An Argument Essay About Discrimination
The Critical Race Theory Essay example
Argumentative Essay On Memorials
Constructing An Argument Sample
Argumentative Essay On Empathy
Argumentative Essay On Privacy
What Makes An Effective Argument Ineffective?
Examples Of Ontological Argument
Argumentative Essay On Plagiarism
Argumentative Essay On Veganism
Argumentative Essay On Climate Change
Argumentative Essay On Evolution
Rhetoric and Argument Essays
Argument On Forensics
Argumentative Essay On Social Networking
Argument Essay On Equality
Examples Of Valid Arguments

1. English 111 Evaluation Essay
English 111 introduces students to critical thinking and the fundamentals of academic writing. This
is a prerequisite English class for higher–level English education. By the end of this course a student
will have gained a great deal of practice in the craft of writing. This essay will evaluate the English
111 textbooks, essays, self–reflections, the instructor, and what I personally learned. The English 111
textbook had effective sample essays and diagrams of outlines. The Successful College Writing
Textbook is the textbook used for the English 111 course. This textbook had great sample essays
because they showed useful examples of transition words and phrases. These sample essays also
gave a guideline for writing a proper essay. The diagrams in the textbook were extremely sufficient.
The diagrams were of the outline of a certain essay. These were remarkably helpful when mapping
out an essay. These sample essays and diagrams of outlines were excellent samples of writing. The
essays in English 111 consist of an argument essay, compare and contrast essay, and a research
essay. The argument essay is when you gather evidence and present a well–reasoned argument on a
debatable issue. On this essay I chose to do an argumentative paper on abortion. I listed the issues
with abortion and then stated my opinion. The main goal of an argument essay is setting out to
persuade the reader to agree with your position on a topic. The purpose of a compare and contrast
essay is to
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. An Argument Essay About Discrimination
Argument Essay
Some may say discrimination in America is a thing in the past, but is this a true statement? Are men
and women always seen and treated as equals in our new and reformed nation? I am sure there are
many debates out there proving or disproving this potential issue, but one in particular has caught
my eye. Our military is made up of many different sections, and the men and women who were
brave enough to raise their right hand and enlist in the service were given a skill to master
resulting in a job to perform up to the highest standard. The military has many job offerings, ranging
from supply specialist, which would be someone doing paper work and giving the other soldiers
what they need to get their job done, all the way to infantry, those who are trained to engage, fight,
and defeat the enemy in combat. Both men and women are authorized to enlist in the service, but
both are not allowed to train in all job positions.
It is no secret that when high controversy topics arise in the media, people have their personal
opinions, each one believing they are "right." Is there always a "right" or "wrong" answer, or can
the morally correct answer be a combination of both sides of the argument? Should women be
allowed to earn an infantry job in the military? When questioning those concerned with this topic the
answers will be mixed with yes and no, each having their own opinions to back up their argument. If
a woman wants and is able to perform to the training
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. The Critical Race Theory Essay example
Introduction
We live in a society where race is seen as a vital part of our personalities, the lack of racial identity
is very often an important factor which prevent people from not having their own identity (Omi &
Winant, 1993). Racism is extemely ingrained in our society and it seems ordinary (Delgado &
Stefanic, 2000), however, many people denounce the expression of any racist belief as immoral
(Miles & Brown, 2003) highlighting the complicated nature of racism. Critical Race Theory tries to
shed light on the issue of racism claiming that racism is ingrained in our society both in legal,
cultural, and psychological aspects of social life (Tate, 1997). This essay provides us the opportunity
to explore this theory and its...show more content...
Critical Race Theory (CRT) claims that racism is quite usual in social life and white superiority is
extremely ingrained in educational, legal, and political structures which is often unrecognizable
(Taylor, 2009). According to Delgado and Stefanic (2000):
''CRT begins with an a number of basic insticts. One is that racism is normal, not abberrant, in
American society. Because racism is an ingrained feature of our landscape, it looks ordinary and
natural to persons in the culture. Formal equal opportunity – rules and laws that insist on treating
blacks and whites (for example) alike – can thus remedy only the more extreme and shocking forms
of injustice, the ones that do stand out. It can do little about the business–as–usual forms of racism
that people of color confront every day and that account for much misery, alienation, and despair''
(Delgado & Stefanic, 2000: xvi).
Although, this theory began as a part of law sciences, nowadays, there is a great interest of CRT in
the field of education, helping people to understand some forms of discrimination which face the
non–white people in education (Delgado & Stefanic, 2001). Moreover, embraces a lot of academic
fields such as history, political science, anthropology etc (Delgado & Stefanic, 2001). CRT main
purpose is not only to understand the social structures that promote inequalities but to eliminate
them, it is clear that CRT targets on
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Argumentative Essay On Memorials
Memorializing events in the history of the world for any purpose has it's positives as well as the
negatives. Ranging from a memorial of a popular United States president from a loved one of a
family, memorials have generally served as a purpose of remembrance from the past of said event.
The purpose of the memorial is usually associated with a positive, uplifting feeling towards the
deceased individual or past event. While this is more or less simply defining what memorials are
for, what is the meaning behind them? What purpose do they serve besides the simplicity that they
are? Important messages from a few varied sources will give a differing viewpoint on memorials
from one to another. The first thought of memorials is the simple, generic...show more content...
Memorials are meant to be striking in the sense that you will notice said memorial and donate some
attention to it. The views of these see this attention capturing as exceedingly high for some purposes.
Some memorials are outstanding in their craftsmanship and aesthetics. This makes people wonder
what could be lurking inside the memorial, or what is near that memorial. What we've got here is a
formula, striking looks of the monument is almost guaranteed to attract some form of attention.
According to Source G, the analogy of tainting the planet with specific memorials are ridiculous, "I
imagined taking a knife and cutting into the earth, opening it up, an initial violence and pain that in
time would heal. The grass would grow back, but the initial cut would remain a pure flat surface in
the earth with a polished, mirrored surface, much like the surface on a geode when you cut it and
polish the edge. The need for the names to be on the memorial would become the memorial; there
was no need to embellish the design further. The people and their names would allow everyone to
respond and remember. The ideals of such nonsensical placements of the memorials are just irritable
at the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. Constructing An Argument Sample
Constructing an Argument Use the template and filled out example below to guide your work.
Guiding Question: (copy down the guiding question from your Investigational Design sheet)
Claim: (answer the question in a sentence that explains yes or no with your group's ranking of the
substances) Evidence: (provide the data you collected for your substances and then your
ranking)Justification: (explain why you ranked them that way and what that means for the relative
strength of electrical forces in each substance) Example: Guiding Question: What type of metal
are objects A, B, and C? Claim: Object A and B are tin, and Object C is lead. Evidence: The density
of objects A and B is 7.44 g/cm3 which is close to the density
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

6. Argumentative Essay On Empathy
Empathy is the ability to understand and experience the feelings of others, particularly others'
suffering. Humanity's gift of understanding complex emotions ushers in a new way of understanding
ourselves and how we react to stimuli. This ultimately leads to questioning of everything, leading us
to one strong notion: Does empathy guide or hinder moral action? One common misconception
while considering empathetic influence is how it compares with sympathy. The two are a
dichotomy, and must be differentiated. To sympathize is to feel sorry for someone, therefore making
the victim suffer even more. Empathy empowers the victim, allowing company to play a role in how
humans naturally interact with one another to bond and heal. With the...show more content...
Furthermore, during empathizing, emotional reaction in the observer correlates with the fact that
connections between the person's mental state and his or her behavior are not always governed by
lawful conduct of emotion. The response to the other person's mental state creates a gap between
systemizing and empathizing, for without empathetic response, one could only have a very small or
inaccurate reading of a person's emotion. The systemizer only expects that the person's mental state
will at least constrain their behavior. The level of empathy one has is greatly affected by how
systematic they are.
Now, taking into account the SQ/EQ, we can determine how individuals would respond to regular
situations. The response to stimuli is heavily weighted on self and our own experiences – as we are a
product of our environment. However, fifty percent of one's own personality is determined
genetically, within one's very own alleles. This is why people act so much like their parents.
Mothers can actually pass down a gene to their sons that makes them dangerously unempathetic. This
exact gene is what causes more men than women to become serial killers. In addition to the basis of
human structure, men also have a higher tendency to be aggressive, rendering most empathetic
responses null, and barely thought about. Since males are more likely to be systemizers, their
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

7. Argumentative Essay On Privacy
Prasanna Kumar Bezavada
Online English 3000(Section–07)
Patricia Raburn
29–10–17
Privacy++
"The only truly secure system is one that is powered off, cast in a block of concrete and sealed in a
lead–lined room with armed guards."(Spafford). The word privacy has become a buzz word in the
current decade compared to how it used to be talked about in the last decade. As we all are aware
of the recent happenings around the world with regards to privacy, we all should be worried that
nothing is safe in the times we are living in, as every bit of information is getting snatched
somehow or the other through different channels. This information can be something that is related
to our personal, family or professional life. I believe that individual privacy outweighs money or
anything at this moment in the world right now. If we lose money or property, we can regain it
somehow, but if we lose our personal information to someone or an agency, it's challenging to get it
back before it gets misused.
Danial J. Solove is an eminent author and a law professor at University of George Washington law
school. Dr. Solove introduces the article why privacy matters if you have "Nothing to Hide" in an
interesting way that, In his introduction of the eassy, he puts a valid question to the audience
regarding their current privacy standards. He starts off this article by presenting the views of
various people on the most debated topic around the world at present which is "Nothing to Hide."
All throughout the article, Solove tries to make an argument both in a positive and negative tone. He
also supports his arguments with so many valid examples that, it makes you wonder, which side of
the coin he stands.
Firstly, after seeing the collective inferences made by the people in the initial paragraphs of the
article, Solove explains us in which form should we look at the argument "Nothing to Hide." If we
extremely see the argument, for example, If a person says he has nothing to hide, another person
comes and means, since you have nothing to hide can I take a nude picture of yours and show it to
everyone which is an extreme form of taking that argument. Dr.Solove feels that taking an argument
in an exaggerated form isn't a good thing because
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

8. What Makes An Effective Argument Ineffective?
1.The basic parts of an effective argument are a stated clearly defined issue, makes a claim, and
offers support for that claim. Sometimes an argument may also recognize opposing viewpoints and
incorporate them into the argument
2.What makes an argument ineffective is when using emotional appeals to distract a reader from a
lack of evidence. Also the use of faulty reasoning, and inaccurate facts.
3.An issue is a problem, controversy, or an idea that people can have different viewpoints about.
The term claim is a point in which a writer is trying to prove. This is typically the writer's viewpoint
on the issue. A refutation is recognizing and auguring against opposing viewpoints.
4.A claim of value focuses on an opinion or judgment about
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

9. Examples Of Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument is a deductive argument in that it endeavors to demonstrate that its
premises lead to a logical conclusion which can't be doubted. For this situation, rationalists have
endeavored to demonstrate that the expression 'God Exists' is an analytic proclamation in that it is
logically incomprehensible for it not to be the situation, generally as it is outlandish for a lone wolf
to not be an unmarried man. This sort of argument is known as 'from the earlier' on the grounds that
it depends on logical reasoning. Descartes' ontological argument is both a standout amongst the most
interesting and inadequately comprehended parts of his philosophy. Interest with the argument
originates from the push to demonstrate God's existence...show more content...
For both men, the meaning of God is urgent to the argument. Anselm had expressed that 'God is that
than which nothing more noteworthy can be imagined'. By this, he implied that it was impractical to
consider anything more prominent than God and logically, it must be better for this God to exist in
reality and not simply in the psyche. Along these lines, in the event that we acknowledge this
definition, and Anselm felt that even Atheists would, we should logically presume that the best
conceivable being must exist in reality, generally there would be the likelihood of something more
prominent existing. In this manner, logically, God exists! Anselm's second type of the argument
concentrated on God's 'important existence', again covering with subjects later proposed by
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

10. Argumentative Essay On Plagiarism
Bloemker
If you were asked to picture a plagiarist, what would be the first image to pop into your head?
Would you think of someone lazy, trying to get through with little effort, purposely taking the words
and thoughts of others and hoping to pass them off as their own undetected? Would you picture a
hard working student, doing their best but forgetting to properly document their sources? Or would
you think of someone like a politician, an author, or a journalist who borrowed ideas from others
without crediting them? It does not matter which one you imagined because these are all examples of
plagiarism. What exactly is plagiarism? As students, most have heard about it and have been
cautioned by their instructors to be aware of and avoid plagiarism. But how many people
understand what plagiarism actually consists of? How many know how to avoid plagiarism in
their individual writings? The best way to avoid plagiarism is to be mindful of each aspect of what
would be considered plagiarized work and to know how to properly cite the ideas of others. To
simply define plagiarism would be to say that it is stealing the ideas or words of another and passing
it off as your own ("Plagiarize"). According to the Merriam–Webster Dictionary, "plagiarize comes
from the Latin plagiarius "kidnapper." This word, derived from the Latin plaga (a net used by
hunters to catch game,) extended its meaning in Latin to include a person who stole the words,
rather than the children, of
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

11. Argumentative Essay On Veganism
Running head: RESEARCH ESSAY
In today's society, there are many different diets that people can follow. One of those diets is
called veganism. People who follow this diet refuse to consume meat or other animal products,
including eggs and dairy. Veganism is becoming more and more popular for a number of reasons.
Some people go vegan because they do not want to be responsible for cruelty against animals. Others
choose the vegan diet for their health or to help protect the environment. No matter what the reason,
the truth is clear: the vegan diet is simply the best choice. It is better for animals, better for us, and
better for the Earth.
Farm animals' lives are degrading, painful, and they endure a lot of abuse. The majority of our meat
...show more content...
In addition to their clean consciences, vegans can boast of healthy bodies. A meat–heavy diet can be
disastrous for one's health. The World Health Organization, for instance, has linked red and
processed meats to colorectal cancer (O'Connor, October 2015). Plant–based diets, on the other hand,
benefit our bodies in many ways. The advantages of avoiding meat are summarized in a recent
article from The Duke Health Medicine
News: "Vegetarian dietary patterns are associated with lower body mass, lower prevalence and
incidence of diabetes mellitus, lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components
(abdominal obesity, elevated blood pressure and fasting blood sugar, high triglycerides and low
HDL cholesterol levels), lower hypertension, lower all–cause mortality, and in some cases, lower risk
of cancer" ("Vegetarian Diets", 2015, p.
4). A vegan diet offers all of the above benefits, as well as several that aren't associated with
vegetarianism:
"Compared to lacto–ovo–vegetarian diets, vegan diets seem to provide some added protection
against obesity, hypertension, type–2 diabetes; and cardiovascular mortality" (Le & SabatГ©, 2014,
p. 2142). Despite these facts, many people remain skeptical. That vegans can obtain all the nutrients
their bodies need, such as protein. This skepticism is unfounded: legumes, tofu, and other staples of
the vegan diet provide plenty of protein. For example, according to the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

12. Argumentative Essay On Climate Change
Climate change can be traced down to since the mid–1800s, when the industrial revolution first
started taking place all around the world. Lives of human and animal species have been negatively
affected since then, with events such as natural disasters, the melting of ice in polar regions, and
change in weather and living conditions. Climate change in polar regions, in particular, has faced
the most damage compared to any other region because of its location in regard to the sun. Climate
change holds many different views and opinions about the effects, and even the existence itself, but
evidence is clear and unmistakable in global ramifications and local impact in polar regions.
"...Climate change [is] the 'greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people'", skeptics like
Senator Inhofe of Oklahoma like to say. Climate change is change in climate patterns due to an
increase in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases produced by certain human activity.
According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center, data taken by satellite has shown that the
Arctic cover has decreased by 30% over the past 30 years, and this change, which also include
change in sea ice and permafrost, in artic weather and climate is caused by humans. Although
numerous scientists have confirmed the legitimacy of climate change, there are different views on
whether climate change is real or not. Government officials like Senator Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma or
Senator Marco Rubio of Florida have explicitly stated that they do not believe climate change is
neither real, nor caused by humans (Tom McCarthy, 2014). On the other hand, mainstream media
and other media outlets, such as The Independent and The Economist, have reported their findings
of climate change and its legitimacy. The Independent (Conner, S. 2011) reported that records of
these changes were taken by military submarines, land measurements, and satellite data to prove ice
in polar regions are melting faster and faster. Satellites have tracked sea ice since the 1970s and by
nuclear submarines since the Cold War,
according to Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University and it was predicted that by September
2015, there would be no more sea ice. (Conner, S. 2011). Luckily, sea ice has not
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

13. Sample Argumentative Essay
Skills vs. Knowledge in Education
Jonan Donaldson
Introduction
Main Idea One: The Other Side – Learning Information is needed for tests a) Tests are the best way
to compare students b) Tests measure if you understand something c) Not all students can have the
same skills, but all can have the same knowledge
Main Idea Two: My Side 1 –Education is about understanding a) Knowledge is limited, but
imagination encircles the world (creativity) b) Knowledge is what other people think about
something, but understanding is what you think. c) Everybody sees, hears, feels, and thinks
differently, so each person will have a different understanding of the same thing.
Main Idea Three:...show more content...
If a person knows many facts, it is impressive, but not very useful. It is of much greater importance
to be able to find information quickly, organize that information, analyze and understand the main
ideas, put different pieces of information together (synthesize), and create new information. Together
these skills make what we call information management and innovation, the skills which are most
desired in the business world. Most people in the world believe that education is about remembering
things to take tests which measure one's performance against other people who have studied the
same information. However, this idea no longer matches the reality of the modern world in which
knowledge is less important than creativity and deep understanding. To be successful in the age of
technology, education must focus on helping students gain information management and innovation
skills.
Sources Cited
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York,
NY: Basic Books.
Needle, Andrew, et al. (2007). Combining art and science in 'arts and sciences' education. College
Teaching
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

14. Argumentative Essay On Evolution
Madison Wenig
Mr. Kellerman
Honors Biology 2
19 May 2017
Evolution
There always has been a controversy whether evolution really did happen or not. Many evolutionists,
philosophers and biologists have presented sufficient evidence that evolution is true. Yet there is still
debate about this contentious topic. With the facts and findings of fossil records of earlier species,
ideas of initial theorists, and our own genetics and DNA, evolution can be hard to prove wrong.
Evolution is not just a change over time, but that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor. This
process is occurring in our lives right now. What exactly is evolution? Evolution is "the process
through which the characteristics of organisms change over successive generations, by means of
genetic variation". (What is evolution) Simply, descent with modification. Charles Darwin was the
first person with the acceptable explanation of evolution. Although his theory gave forth too many
tremendous advances, he did not build this theory on his own. He learned and built off earlier
theorists, like Jean–Baptiste Lamarck, "who indorsed linear evolution". (evolution) As well as
Aristotle, a Greek philosopher, with his concept of Scala Nature. These early theorists served as a
foundation for Charles Darwin's theory. Although Darwin's theory was important, a greater
attribution to evolution was founded. That is the uncovering of fossils. Fossils are significant to the
evolution because they show how life on Earth was
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

15. Rhetoric and Argument Essays
ENG122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument English 122: Composition II An Introduction
to Argument Argument and Rhetoric An argument can take many forms. It is, at its root, a method
for communicating a singular position with evidence, logic, and persuasion. There are essential
elements to all valid arguments, though they may take different forms. 1. Claim 2. Evidence 3.
Counterargument 4. Rebuttal A successful argument depends upon the delicate balance between
these elements. Imagine a teeter–totter at the playground. The claim is the basis of the argument,
much like the base of the teeter–totter. A big opposing viewpoint, called the counterargument, is
constantly pushing down on one side or the other. Balance can only be...show more content...
Section One: Introduction and Thesis–Your introduction should describe the rhetorical situation and
give a clear forecast of the material you will cover in your essay. Your thesis statement should
make a clear, limited, descriptive assertion and explain why your stance matters. Example: Failure
to pass the recent gun law is a bad move for public safety because inexperienced, mentally ill, and
unethical people will continue to have access to firearms. Section Two: Present the position that you
most agree with. Then, give ample evidence to support why you hold this view. (Do not use
first–person. Use third–person narrative). Section Three: Present the position that you most disagree
with. Then, validate the perspective with a circumstance or situation in which that viewpoint could
or might be correct. Section Four: While remaining non–offensive in language and style, provide a
rebuttal of the opposition's stance by pointing out its fallacies or lack of logos and ethos. Section
Five: Conclusion–Provide a sound but brief explanation of your argument and further direction for
your reader. Page |2 ENG122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument Consensual (Rogerian)
Argument The consensual or Rogerian method is based on the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

16. Argument On Forensics
I believe my argument was compelling, and should sway Board members toward investing in the
development of a forensic lab. The biggest difference between corporate investigation and law
enforcement investigation is the individual leading the charge. Dedicated forensic specialists can
recover evidences across multiple platforms and work within the guidelines of forensic laws to
unearth the truth. Public law should provide the blueprint to which organization create company
policy. During an investigation, forensic specialist must follow federal, state and city statue; while
adhering to company mandate. In closing, presenting facts in a professional manner carries as much
weight as the fact–finding
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

17. Argumentative Essay On Social Networking
Social networking has more benefits than you think. Some don't like social networking while others
are all for it. There are many people who have debated the benefits and detriments to society,
students, and family. Example of social networking would be Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and
Youtube. Although social networking has some issues, many are easily taken care of, making it a
benefit and improvement to society. The first argument those against social networking mention is
cyberbullying. "Cyber Bullying is deliberately using digital media to communicate false,
embarrassing, or hostile information about another person." (O'Keefe). Cyber Bullying can be a
problem especially with insecure people who get it too young, but the majority of people are fine
with a little bit of crud and joking. The article, Bullycide: A brief history of the Phoebe Prince
phenomenon is all about the kids who got cyber bullied. They have a collection of real stories of
people getting cyberbullied. There are many examples of people getting bullied and committing
suicide. This article said, "By many accounts, it's getting worse, as social networking and
text–messaging have expanded the bullies toolkit: Studies show that 33 to 42 percent of kids have
been attacked or humiliated online." ("Bullycide"). Although bullying has been a problem in the
past, sites now let the user to either accept or decline friend requests, not allow them to send you
stuff, or block them. This can stop cyber bullying in
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

18. Argument Essay On Equality
Equality Argument Essay "THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal." these are
the first words read in the short story, "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut. The story is about
a future where everyone in the world is, "not only equal in front of God and the law", but also
equal in every which way, like knowledge and looks and physical ability. In the story, a couple is
watching tv and witness their arrested son break into a ballet and dance a wonderful dance only to
be shot dead by the handicapper general herself. That leaves a question, what the reader can easily
tell from the story is that the author believes that equality is a bad thing. To end, I believe that
equality is not what we should need one hundred percent but give everyone an equal chance and see
where they take it.
To start, why would equality be so bad? From the first view, equality sounds like a good thing.
Everyone gets equal treatment, pay, etc. But what about when a serial killer gets the same
treatment a veterinarian. How fair would it be for someone who saves animals lives to be treated
the same publically as someone who's murdered, multiple people? After seeing this, equality can
seem fairly split, but there's also a difference, there's equality then there's equity. Equality would be
people treated equal, especially socially and equal opportunities, while equity is definite fairness.
That means people brought down or up to meet the same level. What I believe was exhibited in the
story "Harrison Bergeron", was not equality, but actually equity. This can be seen by them bringing
people down from their abilities or up to meet a standard to make everyone equal. As the story
states, "A little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times",
that means they are bringing some people down to the same level but at the same time not bringing
people up to that level. "Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else", the idea of this, in
theory, seems clever. Everyone equal in every single way, even mentally. But the more the reader
may think of it, they see little holes. There's no drive to get better, no devotion to beat something,
there's just what it is and the reader can't do anything to get
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

19. Examples Of Valid Arguments
1.A valid argument is an argument which has a conclusion that follows its premises. The premises
can be true or false. When one or both premises are false it is possible that the argument seems
completely valid, but it has false conclusion. An example for a valid argument which has a false
premise is:
Permise1: If dog can fly.
Permise2: Terrier is a kind of dog
Conclusion: terrier can fly
(Here the argument is valid, but the first premise is false, and makes the argument unsound.
A valid argument can have true premises which lead to a true conclusion as well. For example:
Permise1: Human needs water to stay alive.
Permise2: John is human.
Conclusion: John needs water to stay alive.
This kind of argument is valid and sound because it has...show more content...
Aristotle argues that practice virtues, and learning from virtuous people enable us to flourish. To
become a good person, we must practice virtuous acts regularly. Gradually, these acts become our
habits. Good habits and moral virtues are the principle to have a good and happy life. Virtuous
people train us how to be more virtuous. Aristotle explains that if we want to achieve moral
excellence, we need to practice the virtues. Moreover, we need virtues friends, and a moral exemplar
to imitate them to improve our virtues. As we develop our moral behavior, we gradually will find
more happiness in our lives. Although Aristotle admits that health, success, and money play an
important role to make a person happy, he argues that the virtues are the most important factors that
determine one is truly happy or not. So, just thinking of virtues is not
Get more content on HelpWriting.net