BASIC DEBATE TRAININGsbbsnsnsbsbsnsbnsnsc.pptx

xj

1. BASIC DEBATE TRAINING -debating 101-

2. Debate itu apa sih ? Argumentasi Bercerita / Narasi Persuasi Terbuka dalam diskusi Berpikir dari sudut pandang lain

3. ISTILAH-ISTILAH DALAM DEBAT ROLE-CALL MATCH-UP MOTION CASEBUILIDING POI VICTORY POINT SPEAKER SCORE UNANIMOUS DECISION SPLIT DECISION BREAKING ANNOUNCEMENT

4. DEBATE TOURNAMENT WUDC NUDC ALSA – UI IVED JOVED EJVED SOVED DIPO-OPEN ATMA-OPEN GANEHSA OPEN ALSA – UNPAD EIA OPEN IDEA DEBATE ETC.

5. Type of Debate ASIAN PARLIAMENTARY BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY

6. Asian Parliamentary PRIME MINISTER (PM) DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER (DPM) GOVERNMENT WHIP (GW) REPLY SPEAKER LEADER OF OPPOSITION (LO) DEPUTY LEADER OF OPPOSITION (DLO) OPPOSITION WHIP (OW) REPLY SPEAKER GOVERNMENT OPPOSITION

7. British Parliamentary PRIME MINISTER (PM) DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER (DPM) MEMBER GOVERNMENT (MG) GOVERNMENT WHIP (GW) LEADER OF OPPOSITION (LO) DEPUTY LEADER OF OPPOSITION (DLO) MEMBER OPPOSITION (MO) OPPOSITION WHIP (OW) OPENING GOVERNMENT OPENING OPPOSITION CLOSING OPPOSITION CLOSING GOVERNMENT

8. Speaker Role - PM Set – Up the Debate Argumentation

9. Speaker Role - DPM Clarification Rebuttals Argumentation

10. Speaker Role - LO Negation Rebuttals Argumentation

11. Speaker Role - DLO Clarification Rebuttals Argumentation

12. Speaker Role - MG Clarification Mapping Rebuttals Argumentation

13. Speaker Role - GW Clarification Clash

14. Speaker Role - MO Clarification Mapping Rebuttals Argumentation

15. Speaker Role - OW Clarification Clash

16. MOTION Proposal Motion This House Would Ban Smoking Value Judgement Motion This House Believe That a world without extreme emotions (falling madly in love, extreme grief, boiling rage) is a better world This House Regret the narrative that suffering will make you stronger Actor Debate Motion As Indonesian left, THW cooperate with hard-line religious conservatives (including but not limited to, FPI)

17. GOVERNMENT OPPOSITION

18. Burden of Proof In competitive debating, BOPs are questions that occur in the your head, your opponents, and adjudicators to understand the debate and lay out the discourse.

19. THW ban smoking THW legalize prostitution In a policy debate, the BOP is usually to explain: What is the main problem that is faced by the government, Will the proposal solve the problem? Is implementing the proposal morally justified? What are the implications of the proposal? How is the social change important to the government

20. The Opposition BOP is up to the stance that opposition decides to take. Opposition can choose between:  a) defending status quo or; b) proposing a counter proposal.  If you chose (a), you believe that the solution (affirmative stance) is not exclusive to the efforts that’s already done by the government. Then you have to prove: Is the problem as bad as what the affirmative believe?  How can SQ can solve the problem organically? Is the condition improving? Why choosing to implement the motion worsen the condition of SQ? or hamper progress THW ban smoking THW legalize prostitution

21. Or if you chose (b) In what way can your counter-proposal can better solve the mentioned problem? and why is it more morally right? What rights are you defending? With either stance (a) or (b) the opposition have to refute the government case by proving: Why implementing affirmative stance is morally wrong? Why implementing the motion would create another harm? THW ban smoking THW legalize prostitution

22. THW LEGALIZE EUTHANASIA

23. THBT states should allow single parents to raise their children in prison Its BOP is usually to explain: Is it morally correct for X to do Y? Why is it good/bad if X do Y? Notice that this type of motions uses the lens of 3 rd party actor. This means that the argument is not only limited to why doing Y would be good/bad for X but also cover how the action of X doing Y will affect other actors.

24. Its BOP is usually to explain: Will the proposal achieve X’s interest? Is implementing the proposal morally acceptable from X’s perspective? TH as Western Countries would stop selling arms to Saudi Arabia

25. TYPE OF ARGUMENT PRINCIPLE PRACTICAL Right / Wrong Good / Bad