Early Christian Traditions
The history of the New Testament canon is even more colorful. During the first few
hundred years of the early Christian era, there was no official canon that the entire
Christian world recognized. The Eastern and Western church traditions each used a
differing list of books as scripture. Before 200 a.d., the Church fathers did not even
mention Philemon, 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, and Jude. The status of these books was
murky at best until after 400 a.d..
On the other hand, the Epistle of Barnabas, the Apocalypse of Peter, the Shepherd of
Hermas, the Didache, the Acts of Paul and the First Letter of Clement were
considered by many Church fathers to be part of the early Christian scriptures.
Early Christian Works Sometimes Considered Canonical ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Irenaeus, reacting to Marcion, tried to establish his own canon. Since there were a
number of gospels at that time, he decided that there should only be four because
there are only four winds and four corners of the earth. Other Church fathers who
followed Irenaeus accepted his decision. Eusebius of Caesarea (260 339 a.d.) listed
four categories of books.
1.The recognized books (the four gospels, Acts, fourteen letters of Paul, 1 Peter, 1
John, Revelation [?]).
2.The disputed books (James, 2 Peter, 2, 3 John, and Jude). Paul s authorship of
Hebrews is questioned by many modern Biblical scholars, in spite the fact that
Clement of Rome (quoted by Eusebius) said that the epistle to the Hebrews is Paul s.
Hebrews is theologically and conceptually connected with Paul while the same time,
the grammar and vocabulary are quite different from Paul s other books.
3.The spurious books (Acts of Paul, Shepherd of Hermas, Apocalypse of Peter,
Epistle of Barnabas, Didache, Gospel of Hebrews, Revelation [?]).
4.The heretical forgeries.
Eusebius accepted 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, and the letter to Hebrews. In fact, he was
the first to declare Hebrews legitimate. There are two possible options that explain
this historic