BNHS_2022-Q1.............-Dashboard.pptx

BNHS_2022-Q1.............-Dashboard.pp

1. COMPLETED STAFF CONFERENCE (CSW) WITH DIVISION QUALITY MANAGEMENT TEAMS (DQMTs) 2022 Quarter 1(2 nd Grading) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS

2. Regional Monitoring, Evaluation, and Adjustments Calendar Year 2022 Quarter 1 ___________________ Schools Division Superintendent Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS SCHOOLS DIVISION OF EASTERN SAMAR Place your School Logo here

3. ACCESS Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS

4. Place your School Logo here 1 st Grading SY 2021-2022 LEVEL 1ST Qtr. 2022 2 nd Grading SY 2021-2022 Percentage of Enrolment GAIN for the Quarter Reasons for the Gap SPED (Non-Graded) 325 Junior HS 325 100% _ _ 57 Senior HS 57 100% _ _ 382 TOTAL 382 100% _ _ ENROLMENT PROGRESS TRACKING (Public Schools) Data Source: Q1ProMEDS

5. Place your School Logo here ENROLMENT PROGRESS TRACKING Data Source: Q1 ProMEDS 1 st Grading SY 2021-2022 LEVEL 1 st Qtr. 2022 2 nd Grading SY 2021-2022 Percentage of Enrolment GAIN for the Quarter Reasons for the Gain Basic Literacy 382 Secondary 382 100% 382 Total 382 100%

6. Place your School Logo here Back to MAIN LEARNING SUPPORT AIDES (LSA) PROVISION PROGRESS TRACKING- Public Schools Data Source: Q1 ProMEDS LEVEL Number of Learners Provided with: Total Number of Learners in Need with LSA (Q1 2022 Database) Percentage of LSA Provision Variance against the Database LSA Volunteer Paid LSA TOTAL SPED Non-Graded Graded Junior HS 325 325 325 100% Senior HS 57 57 57 100% TOTAL/AVERAGE 382 382 382 100%

7. A. BETTER ACCESS TO BASIC EDUCATION Situational Analysis Performance Indicator: Percentage of Learners Kept in School Key Stage: G7-G10 Performance Gap: 94% of learners are kept in school Key Practices: M&E on schools schemes. Learning & Development : ICT: Institutionalization of the DepEd Computerization Program Materials & Equipment: 17 for quality assurance teacher-made audio-video materials for all learning areas for Grades 7 to G10, respectively. Repairs of classrooms. SDO TA and supervision: Technical assistance to schools through the DFTACT on the implementation of BE-LCP External Factors: Active participation of schools and the community in the conduct of Brigada Eskwela and Oplan Balik Eskwela . Donations of school supplies, equipment and other materials used for repair by external stakeholders.

8. ACCESS Situational Analysis STRENGTHS : 1 . Teachers are grouped to ensure that all Learners from the different barangays are closely monitored 2. Teachers follow the home-visitation and Monitoring schedule 3. Regular feedbacking conducted to respond to adversities concerning the learners 4. Strong commitment of teachers that contribute to the successful implementation of LCP WEAKNESSES: 1. Conflict of schedules in doing the different tasks OPPORTUNITIES: 1. Supportive barangay council and Parent-leaders who are always willing to help in the implementation of programs and projects of the school THREATS : 1.Some learners preferred to other schools because of employment

9. ACCESS STRATEGIC OPTIONS STRATEGIC OPTIONS CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDED EXPECTED TA PROVIDERS SW: Proper scheduling of activities Prioritize activities for learners welfare Teachers & School head Availability of resources and technical know how on various apps engagement DFTACT SO: Strengthen tie-up with stakeholders Conduct more FGDs with stakeholders Teachers & School head Availability of resources and technical know how on various apps engagement DFTACT ST: Have the exact location of learners concerned so that monitoring could be done as scheduled Teachers & School head Availability of resources and technical know how on various apps engagement DFTACT WO: Develop stronger linkages with other agencies of the government and non-government organizations Teachers & School head Availability of resources and technical know how on various apps engagement DFTACT WT: Do the task immediately Teachers & School head Availability of resources and technical know how on various apps engagement DFTACT

10. Place your School Logo here Number of 2 nd Grading Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas by Grade levels for Quality Assurance Data Source: Q1 ProMEDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS G7 G8 G9 G10 SPED English 1 1 Science 1 1 Mathematics 1 1 1 1 Filipino 1 Aral. Pan. 1 1 TLE 1 1 1 MAPEH 1 1 EsP

11. Place your School Logo here Number of Quality Assured 2 nd Grading Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas by Grade levels Data Source: Q1 ProMEDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS G7 G8 G9 G10 English Science Mathematics Filipino Aral. Pan. TLE MAPEH EsP

12. Place your School Logo here Number of Learners Provided with Learning Resource Data Source: Q1 ProMEDS G7 G8 G9 G10 Total JHS 59 61 77 128 325 SHS 57

13. Place your School Logo here Data Source: Q1ProMEDS   PUBLIC SCHOOLS GA STEM HUMSS ABM TVL SPORTS ARTS & DESIGN TOTAL GRADE 11 Core Subjects                7 Applied Subjects                2 GRADE 12 Core Subjects                 Applied Subjects                 SPECIALIZATION SUBJECTS                 Averages vs. Enrolment by Strand by Grade Level Number of 2 nd Grading Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas by Grade levels for Quality Assurance

14. Place your School Logo here Data Source: Q1ProMEDS   PUBLIC SCHOOLS GA STEM HUMSS ABM TVL SPORTS ARTS & DESIGN TOTAL GRADE 11 Core Subjects                 Applied Subjects                 GRADE 12 Core Subjects                 Applied Subjects                 SPECIALIZATION SUBJECTS                 Averages vs. Enrolment by Strand by Grade Level Number of QUALITY ASSURED 1 st Grading Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas by Grade levels

15. Place your School Logo here Back to MAIN Data Source: Q1ProMEDS Learning Delivery Modality implemented by the school during the 1 st Quarter of SY 2021-2022 (2 nd Grading) PUBLIC SCHOOLS Digital modular distance learning Online distance learning Educational TV Radio-based Instruction Blended distance learning Printed Modular Distance Learning Modular & Online Modular & TV/RBI Online & TV/RBI JUNIOR HIGH / Refers to the number of implementing schools SENIOR HIGH /

16. Place your School Logo here Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q4 ProMEDS Number of Audio-Video Materials across Learning Strands by levels for Quality Assurance BLP Strand 1 Strand 2 Strand 3 Strand 4 Strand 5 Strand 6 Total BLP               A&E - Lower Elementary               A&E - Advanced Elementary               A&E - Junior HS               A&E- SHS              

17. Place your School Logo here Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Number of QUALITY ASSURED Audio-Video Materials across Learning Strands by levels BLP Strand 1 Strand 2 Strand 3 Strand 4 Strand 5 Strand 6 Total BLP               A&E - Lower Elementary               A&E - Advanced Elementary               A&E - Junior HS               A&E- SHS              

18. QUALITY Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS

19. Place your School Logo here PERCENTAGE OF JUNIOR HS LEARNERS WHO HAVE COMPLETELY COMPLIED WITH ALL THE MODULES Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q4 ProMEDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRIVATE SCHOOLS G7 G8 G9 G10 OVERALL % G7 G8 G9 G10 OVERALL % English 100 100 100 100 100 Science 100 100 100 100 100 Mathematics 100 100 100 100 100 Filipino 100 100 100 100 100 Aral. Pan. 100 100 100 100 100 TLE 100 100 100 100 100 MAPEH 100 100 100 100 100 EsP 100 100 100 100 100 AVERAGE 100 100 100 100 100

20. Place your School Logo here Back to MAIN Data Source: Q1ProMEDS   PUBLIC SCHOOLS GA STEM HUMSS ABM TVL SPORTS ARTS & DESIGN OVERALL % GRADE 11                 Core Subjects      100          100 Applied Subjects      100          100 Specialization Subjects                 GRADE 12                 Core Subjects                 Applied Subjects                 Specialization Subjects                 PERCENTAGE OF SENIOR HS LEARNERS WHO HAVE COMPLETELY COMPLIED WITH ALL THE MODULES BY SUBJECT BY GRADE LEVEL (vs. Q1 Enrolment- 1st SEMESTER) Averages vs. Enrolment by Strand by Grade Level

21. Place your School Logo here Back to MAIN Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q4 ProMEDS   PUBLIC SCHOOLS GA STEM HUMSS ABM TVL SPORTS ARTS & DESIGN OVERALL % GRADE 11                 Core Subjects                 Applied Subjects                 Specialization Subjects                 GRADE 12                 Core Subjects                 Applied Subjects                 Specialization Subjects                 PERCENTAGE OF SENIOR HS LEARNERS WHO HAVE COMPLETELY COMPLIED WITH ALL THE LAS BY SUBJECT BY GRADE LEVEL (vs. Q4 Enrolment- 1st SEMESTER) Averages vs. Enrolment by Strand by Grade Level

22. Place your School Logo here AVERAGE SECOND GRADING GRADES OF JUNIOR HS LEARNERS Data Source: Q1ProMEDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS G7 G8 G9 G10 AVERAGE English 85 84 84 85 84.50 Science 85 84 84 84 84.25 Mathematics 85 84 85 85 84.75 Filipino 86 87 84 84 85.25 Aral. Pan. 85 85 86 87 85.75 TLE 85 85 86 87 85.75 MAPEH 87 85 87 87 86.50 EsP 88 86 85 85 86 AVERAGE 85.75 85 85.125 85.5 85.34

23. Place your School Logo here AVERAGE SECOND GRADING GRADES OF SENIOR HS LEARNERS   PUBLIC SCHOOLS Grade 11 Grade 12 AVERAGE Core Subjects  86              86 Applied Subjects  86              86 GA STEM HUMSS ABM TVL SPORTS ARTS & DESIGN Specialization Subjects  86              86

24. Place your School Logo here AVERAGE FINAL GRADES OF JUNIOR HS LEARNERS Data Source: Q1ProMEDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS G7 G8 G9 G10 AVERAGE English 85 84 84 85 84.50 Science 85 84 84 84 84.25 Mathematics 85 84 85 85 84.75 Filipino 86 87 84 84 85.25 Aral. Pan. 85 85 86 87 85.75 TLE 85 85 86 87 85.75 MAPEH 87 85 87 87 86.50 EsP 88 86 85 85 86 AVERAGE 85.75 85 85.125 85.5 85.34

25. Place your School Logo here AVERAGE FINAL GRADES OF SENIOR HS LEARNERS   PUBLIC SCHOOLS Grade 11 Grade 12 AVERAGE Core Subjects  86              86 Applied Subjects  86              86 GA STEM HUMSS ABM TVL SPORTS ARTS & DESIGN Specialization Subjects  86              86

26. Place your School Logo here Data Source: Q1ProMEDS Percentage of SENIOR HS Learners by Grade Range by Subject Group vs. Q1 Enrolment (2 ND Grading Performance) PUBLIC SCHOOLS Outstanding Very Satisfactory (85-89) Satisfactory (80-84) Fairly Satisfactory (75-79) Did not Meet Expectation (below 75) At Risk of Failing in the Next Quarter Overall % (98-100) (95-97) (90-94) CORE SUBJECTS Grade 11 14 21 23 57 Grade 12 APPLIED SUBJECTS Grade 11 17 36 4 57 Grade 12 Averages vs. Q4 Enrolment by Grade Level

27. Place your School Logo here Data Source: Q1ProMEDS Percentage of SENIOR HS Learners by Grade Range by TVL Specialization vs. Q1 Enrolment (2 ND Grading Performance) PUBLIC SCHOOLS Outstanding Very Satisfactory (85-89) Satisfactory (80-84) Fairly Satisfactory (75-79) Did not Meet Expectation (below 75) At Risk of Failing in the Next Quarter Overall % (98-100) (95-97) (90-94) SPECIALIZATIONS - TVL Agri -Fishery Arts Home Economics Industrial Arts ICT Maritime Averages vs. Q4 Enrolment by TVL Specialization

28. B. PROVIDE QUALITY BASIC EDUCATION Situational Analysis Performance Indicator: Percentage of JUNIOR HS Learners by Grade Range by Subject vs. Q1 Enrolment (2 nd Grading Performance) Key Stage: G7-10 Performance Gap: 4.2% of learners are still under fairly satisfactory level (75-79%) Key Practices: Constant Monitoring/Mentoring Learning & Development : ICT: Institutionalization of the DepEd Computerization Program Materials & Equipment: Home Visitation Form, VL, Activity Sheets Assessment: Evaluation of parallel test and other intervention tools SDO TA and supervision: Technical assistance to schools through the DFTACT on the implementation of BE-LCP External Factors: Active participation of community during home visitation and mentoring

29. QUALITY Situational Analysis STRENGTHS 1. Teachers regularly monitor and do the monitoring of learners 2. Utilization of video lessons to support learning 3. Providing activity sheets to struggling learners WEAKNESSES 1. Time constraints OPPORTUNITIES 1. Supportive stakeholders THREATS 1. Prone to floods

30. QUALITY STRATEGIC OPTIONS STRATEGIC OPTIONS CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDED EXPECTED TA PROVIDERS SW: Utilization of schedules in monitoring/monitoring sessions Conducted LAC session on increasing competence in making VL Stronger partnership with stakeholders Teachers,SH Availability of resources and technical know how on various Apps engagement Evaluation tool for vl DFTACT ICT EXPERTS SO: Strengthen partnership with stakeholders Teachers,SH MONITORING & EVALUATION DFTACT ST: Identify struggling learners, monitor and mentor them in their respected barangays incase of interruption of classes due to flood. Teachers,SH MONITORING & EVALUATION DFTACT WO: Stronger partnership with stakeholders Teachers,SH MONITORING & EVALUATION DFTACT WT: Tap stakeholders in making canals Teachers,SH MONITORING & EVALUATION DFTACT

31. Place your School Logo here Q4 Tracking on the Status of Learners’ Numeracy Level vs. Q1 Enrolment (2 nd Grading Performance)- Public Schools NUMERACY LEVEL Number of Learners by Numeracy Level by Grade G7 G8 G9 G10 Highly Numerate 17 22 27 34 Moderately Numerate 34 31 43 89 Non-Numerate 8 8 7 5 Percentage of Learners by Numeracy Level by Grade G7 G8 G9 G10 Highly Numerate 30 36 35 27 Moderately Numerate 60 51 56 70 Non-Numerate 14 13 9 4

32. Place your School Logo here Data Source: Q1 ProMEDS Literacy Assessment Result through Phil-IRI (Public Schools) ENGLISH - Post Test READING LEVEL Number of Learners by Reading Level by Grade G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL No. of Learners Assessed 59 61 77 128 325 Independent 10 8 15 25 58 Instructional 41 45 51 88 225 Frustration 8 8 11 15 42 Percentage of Learners by Reading Level by Grade G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL Independent 18 13 19 20 18 Instructional 72 74 66 69 69 Frustration 14 13 14 12 13

33. Place your School Logo here Data Source: Q1 ProMEDS Literacy Assessment Result through Phil-IRI (Public Schools) FILIPINO- Post Test READING LEVEL Number of Learners by Reading Level by Grade G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL No. of Learners Assessed 59 61 77 128 325 Independent 8 10 11 16 45 Instructional 48 50 66 110 274 Frustration 3 1 2 6 Percentage of Learners by Reading Level by Grade G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL Independent 14 16 14 13 14 Instructional 84 82 86 86 84 Frustration 5 2 2 2

34. GOVERNANCE Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS

35. Place your School Logo here Data Source: Q1 ProMEDS Status on the Provision of Instructional Supervision (IS) in the Quarter IS Providers Total Number of IS Provided Total Number of IS Provider Average Number of IS Provided in the Quarter ELEM JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS CLC ELEM JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS CLC ELEM JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS CLC School Head 66 66 1 1 PSDS/DICs/PICs EPSs Head Teachers Master Teachers Place your School Logo here

36. Place your School Logo here Data Source: Q1 ProMEDS Status on the Implementation of Capability Buildings (CBs) in the Quarter CBs Total Number of CBs conducted Total Number of Teachers Trained Total Number of Parents Trained ELEM JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS CLC ELEM JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS CLC ELEM JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS CLC School LAC Sessions 6 6 15 2 3 INSET on: Content and Pedagogy Assessment Contextualization of LRs Learning Delivery Program/System Implementation

37. Place your School Logo here SERVICES ENGAGED: Carpentry–Private Individual – 3/01/2022 Painting–Private Individual – 3/01/2022 Electrical-Private Individual-3/12/2022 Data Source: Q1 ProMEDS Status on Stakeholders’ Donation (Partnership) Total Cash Donation Total Amount of In Kind Donation Converted to Cash ELEMENTARY JUNIOR HS Php 6,565 SENIOR HS 2,400 CLC TOTAL Php 8,965

38. Place your School Logo here Data Source: Q1 ProMEDS SMEA Result ( Based on LCP/SIP Implementation) PUBLIC SCHOOLS Physical Accomplishment Financial Accomplishment Quarter Physical Targets Actual Accomplishment % of Accomplishment Financial Target Amount Utilized % of Utilization ELEMENTARY JUNIOR HS 50% 35% 70% SENIOR HS 50% 35% 70% CLC

39. C. GOVERNANCE IN BASIC EDUCATION Situational Analysis Performance Indicator: SMEA Result ( Based on LCP/SIP Implementation) Key Stage: G7-10 Performance Gap: 30 % of physical accomplishment are not yet realized Key Practices: Quarterly SMEA Reporting Resource Management: Donations,MOOE ICT: Materials & Equipment: SMEA Tool,DPDS SDO TA and supervision: Technical assistance to schools through the DFTACT on the implementation of BE-LCP External Factors: Active participation of stakeholders especially in BE

40. GOVERNANCE Situational Analysis STRENGTHS : 1.Commitment of teachers 2.Strong participation of stakeholders WEAKNESSES: 1. MOOE does not arrive on time OPPORTUNITIES: 1.Supportive stakeholders THREATS : 1.Prone to flash floods

41. GOVERNANCE STRATEGIC OPTIONS STRATEGIC OPTIONS CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDED EXPECTED TA PROVIDERS SW: Seek for donations from other agencies Teachers,SH MONITORING & EVALUATION DFTACT SO: Tie-up with stakeholders in improving school Teachers,SH MONITORING & EVALUATION DFTACT ST: Organize activities eg.tree plating and gulayan sa bakuran Teachers,SH MONITORING & EVALUATION DFTACT WO: Seek the help of stakeholders eg.BE,pentakasi Teachers,SH MONITORING & EVALUATION DFTACT WT: Set-in during barangay assembly to present the problem in school Teachers,SH MONITORING & EVALUATION DFTACT