CDP-Course-1_EP PowerPoint Presentations

the contents of this presentation is the ecological profiling for CDP course

1. Ecological Profiling: Building LGU Database CDP+ Course 1 “ M atino, M ahusa y , at M aaasaha n ” KRISTINE CARMEN D. DIONES Bureau of Local Government Development Department of the Interior and Local Government

2. Course Objectives You are expected to develop the following competencies after this course: ✔ Organize, process, and analyze CDP data requirements ✔ Differentiate analytical tools and their uses in planning ✔ Identify and develop a list of appropriate indicators of development or underdevelopment for the LGU using the processed and analyzed CDP data requirements ✔ Create a baseline using the identified indicators in the CDP Data Process and Analysis

3. Course Outline Module 1: Ecological Profile Overview Module 2: Steps in Ecological Profile Module 3: Benchmarking of Indicators

4. of each sector and inform them of the result of the profile and validate the same. c Participate in all activities as identified in the approve workplan. Course Overview Major Activities Output Documents Lead Office/Persons 1. Ecological Profiling 1. Ecological Profile (Form 1c) 1. City/Municipal Planning a. Determining 2. Local Development Team vision-reality gap Indicator System/RaPIDS a. Correctly and b. Generating new (Form 1d) comprehensively profile information their respective sectors. c. Extracting intelligence b. Consult with members

5. Scenario 3 2. Analyze the LGU Situation a Sectoral studies (Volume 3) of the enhanced CLUP can be an alternative to the risk-informed EP. Scenario 4 Check whether risk and vulnerability information and analysis are included in the EP or CDP. If not, follow steps for Scenarios 1 and 2. Course Overview Planning Scenario Process Scenarios 1 and 2 1. Analyze the LGU situation a Integrate the CDRA results into the EP by embedding the CDRA results in each of the sectors and inserting the CDRA data as part of the EP.

6. Module 1: Ecological Profile Overview CDP+ Course 1 “ M atino, M ahusa y , at M aaasaha n ” KRISTINE CARMEN D. DIONES Bureau of Local Government Development Department of the Interior and Local Government

7. EP Formulation in the CDP Process

8. management Highlights the balance between socio-economic and physical development, and ecological and environmental Merger of the socio-economic and biophysical profiles of the study area and treat these subjects on equal footing Picture of the Current Realities of the Locality (A Picture, A Snapshot, A Selfie) Basic reference about all possible aspects of What is an Ecological Profile?

9. Importance of EP in Planning 4 Facilitates an evidence-based approach in identifying problems/issues 3 Determines current capacities (i.e. assets, resources, institutional structures, etc.) 2 Serves as an inventory of key baseline data and information of the locality 1 Primary function is to provide an overall picture of the current “reality” of the locality

10. operating Civil Society Organizations and The Academe NGAs within the locality All Barangays within LGU jurisdiction Sectoral or functional committees All LGU department/ offices/ units Key Actors in EP Formulation / Updating

11. Minimum Contents of the EP 5. Institutional Capability (Institutional Sector) 4. Geo Physical Environment (Environmental Sector) 3. Infrastructure, Facilities, Utilities (Infrastructure Sector) Five Development Sectors 2. Local Economy (Economic Sector) 1. Population and Social Profile (Social Sector)

12. Minimum Contents of the EP A . Population and Demography Profile • Social Composition and Characteristics • Population size and growth size B. Social Profile • Health and Nutrition • Education • Social Welfare and Development • Housing • Public Order and Safety • Sports and Recreation Population and Social Profile

13. Minimum Contents of the EP A . Primary Sector B. Secondary Sector (Manufacturing and Industry) C. Tertiary Sector Local Economy • Agriculture, Hunting and Forestry • Mining and Quarrying • Forestry • Manufacturing • Construction • Electricity, Gas, and Water • Commerce and Trade • Tourism

14. Minimum Contents of the EP A . Mobility and Circulation Network B. Communication Facilities D . Electric Power Supply C. Water Supply E. Flood Control and Drainage Facilities F . Other Infrastructure Facilities (public market, cemetery, slaughterhouse) Infrastructure and Physical Base

15. Minimum Contents of the EP A . Geo-Physical Environment • Geographical Location • Political Boundaries • Topography • Geology • Climate Projections • Natural Hazards/Constraints and Climate Adjusted Hazards Environment and Natural Resource Management

16. Minimum Contents of the EP Environment and Natural Resource Management B. Natural Resources • Land Resources • Mineral Resources • Freshwater resources • Coastal Resources C. Environmental Management • NIPAS • Surface water by class • Solid Waste Management • Wastewater • Air Quality • Green House Gas Emissions

17. Minimum Contents of the EP D . LGU-CSO Private Sector Linkages Institutional Development A . Local Government Structure • Organization structure of the LGU • Staffing of LGU offices/departments • Local Special Bodies • NGAs operating in the LGU B. Local Fiscal Management • Status of financial health • Revenues by sources • Actual expenditures by general account C. Development Legislation • Inventory of resolutions/ordinances passed/enacted • Inventory of outputs of Sanggunian • List of all partners

18. Sample Outline of an EP Chapter I. History Chapter II. Geo-Physical Environment Chapter III. Population and Social Profile Chapter IV. Local Economy Chapter V. Infrastructure/Utilities/Facilities Chapter VI. Local Institutional Capability Chapter VII. Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment Information

19. Possible Sources of Data Day-to-day transactional and functional activities the LGUs/Barangays Inventories Surveys Census Community-based Monitoring System (CBMS) of 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Plan and Post-Project Monitoring and Evaluation (M & E) Results Data Generated by Other LGU Offices/Departments and National Government Agencies Donor-funded Project Reports 7. 8. Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment (CDRA) Seal of Good Local Governance 9. 10.

20. 2019 or the evidence-based An organized process of data collection and processing at the local level and of integration of data in local planning, program implementation, and impact monitoring required to be established in all cities and municipalities according RA 11315 of CBMS Act A system that promotes policymaking and policy-option identification Community-Based Monitoring System

21. Basic Needs C o r e Indica t ors A. Health P r oportion of child r en under 5 y ears old w ho died P r oportion of w omen w ho died due t o p r egnanc y - r ela t ed causes B. Nutrition P r oportion of child r en aged 0-5 y ears old w ho a r e malnourished C. Housing P r oportion of households l i ving in ma k eshift housing P r oportion of households w ho a r e in f ormal settlers D . W a t er and Sanitation P r oportion of households without access t o sa f e w a t er supp l y P r oportion of households without access t o sanitary t oilet f acilities E. E ducation P r oportion of child r en aged 6-11 y ears old w ho a r e not at t ending elementary school P r oportion of child r en aged 12-15 y ears old w ho a r e not at t ending secondary school P r oportion of child r en aged 6-15 y ears old w ho a r e not at t ending school F . Income P r oportion of households with income bel o w the p o v erty th r eshold P r oportion of households with income bel o w the f ood (subsis t ence) th r eshold P r oportion of households w ho e xperienced hunger due t o f ood shortage G. Empl o yment P r oportion of persons in the labor f o r ce w ho a r e unempl o y ed H. P eace and O r der P r oportion of persons w ho a r e victims of crimes Community-Based Monitoring System

22. The EP serves as the main entry point for DRR-CCA mainstreaming. Determines the situation of the LGU as reflected by the five development sectors. Making the EP risk-informed will provide a more comprehensive scenario for the LGU especially as to how risk and vulnerability affect the planning area. Some of the tools used include CDRA, Impact Chain, etc. EP as Main Entry Point for Risk-Informed CDP

23. ● Assessing Current Situation Identify elements (systems of interest) vulnerable to impacts of climate change, and at-risk to various hazards as part of existing capacities (supply side) Consider vulnerable and high-risk elements identified in the CDRA results as part of the demand side in the demand analyses Integrate proposed interventions for each decision area in the demand analyses (i.e. When proposed intervention is relocation, additional new housing constructions must be considered as part of the housing backlog) ● Projecting Future Requirements Calculate future demand requirements based on the CDRA-adjusted baseline data and information ○ Integrate CDRA benchmarks and targets in projecting future requirements Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment

24. Sector/Sub-Sector Classification Moderate to High-Risk Area Population and Social Profile - Education Primary Schools 8.03 ha Secondary Schools 1.32 ha Population and Social Profile - Health Barangay Health Stations (BHS) 2 facilities Population and Social Profile - Health Burial Grounds 7.44 ha Population and Social Profile - Housing Housing Areas 51.78 ha Local Economy - The Secondary Sector Industrial Areas 0.78 ha Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment

25. Module 2: Steps in Ecological Profile CDP+ Course 1 “ M atino, M ahusa y , at M aaasaha n ” KRISTINE CARMEN D. DIONES Bureau of Local Government Development Department of the Interior and Local Government

26. 1. Prepare a CDP data checklist (includes all the minimum data requirements for CDP). 2. Set a meeting with the Planning Team to validate the availability of the needed data. 3. Discuss with the Planning Team the possible data sources for each sector. 4. After the meeting, each department shall collect/generate and process all the assigned data for their department. 5 The Municipal/City Planning and Development Office shall consolidate all the collected data. 6 If necessary, conduct a consultation meeting with stakeholders to verify the collected data. 7. Analyze the data using the prescribed tools. 8. Determine the current and future requirements for each sector. Suggested process in Formulating LGUs EP

27. Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

28. analytical tool that portrays information dimensions: in three (3) Sectoral / Spatial Dimension Dimension Dimension An Topical/ Geographical Temporal Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

29. Share LDIS are expressed in terms of: Ratio Proportion Percentage Average Per Capita Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

30. NGAs / Commitments Issues per Sector Development and LDIS can generate and determine: Level of Underdevelopment and Sub-Sector Success Indicator each Vision Descriptor Indicators from International Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

31. Rationalized Planning Indicator Data Sets (RaPIDS)

32. RaPIDs system is ONLY a set of indicators and datasets. LDIs is a ❑ of helping planners analyze planning indicators RaPIDs will still follow the general template of the LDIS. been ❑ The only difference is that the list of indicators has grouped concerns based on area characteristics and priority Rationalized Planning Indicator Data Set (RaPIDS)

33. It also added several indicators required by recent ❑ used to articulate certain thematic and sectoral Indicators for specific ecosystems are also identified ❑ RaPIDS aims to address the issue on data gathering ❑ and those that they really needed as compared to gathering very challenging at the onset. statutes such as DRR/CCA indicators and indicators concerns such as gender and conflict sensitivity. (Lowland, Upland, Coastal, etc.) by helping planners identify indicators that apply to them prescribing a one size fits all data set which makes data Rationalized Planning Indicator Data Set (RaPIDS)

34. Rationalized Planning Indicator Data Set (RaPIDS)

35. 3 “I”s in Analysis Item, Statistics, Indicators Information Intelligence

36. U N I T ANN EX B C D P P r e p ara t i on T e m p l a t e F o rm 1 d L oc a l D e v e l o p m e n t I n d i c a t o r S y s t e mlf3 � P I Q § L o c a l D e ve l o p m e n t I n d i ca t o r T a b l e U N I T S O F P LA N N I NG S E C T O R I S U B- I N D I C A T O R O F D EV E L O P M E N T P LA N N I NG C O R E C O N C E RN S S P A TI A L 1 . S O C I A L D e m o g r a p h y • • P o p u l a t i o n Si ze P opu la t i o n s iz e ( a l l censu s yea r s a v a i l ab le i n c l u d i n g l a t es t ) G r o wt h r a t e , u rb an a n d r u r a l , s h ort - t e rm m e d i u m t e rm , l o n g t e r m ( f o rm u l a u s ed ) G r oss p o pu l a t i o n d en s i t y , 2 r e f e r e n c e yea r s N e t p o p u la t i o n d e n sity , 2 r e f e r e n c e yea r s P e r ce n t o f u r b an p op u l a t i o n , 2 r e f e r e n c e y e a r s U r ban p o p u l a t i on d e ns i t y , 2 r e f e r e n c e yea r s P r o po rt i o n o f 6 - 1 2 yea r o l d c h i l d r e n w h o a r e n o t i n e l e m en t a ry s c h o o l , b y s e x , l a t es t P r o po rt i o n o f 1 3 - 1 6 y e a r o l d s w h o a r e n ot i n s e co n d a ry s c h o o l , b y s e x , l a t e s t P e r ce n t o f h o us e ho l d s w i t h o u t P opu l ati o n G r o wt h R a t e P opu l a t i o n D i s t r i bu t i o n • • • • • L e v e l o f W e l l - B e i ng A cces s t o e d u c a t i o n • • A cce s s t o h e a l t h LA RG E R S MA LLE R S PA TI A L S E C T O R O R U N DE RD EVE LO P M E N T A REA A R EA 1 2 3 . . . n Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

37. 1. Items, Statistics, and, Indicators Planning Larger Sector Indicator Area Spatial Unit Smaller Spatial Units A B C D Socia Population growth rate 2017-2020 3.2% 2.8% 2.7% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 2020-2022 3.0% 2.9% 3.0% 2.1& 2.5% 2.9% Literacy Rate 2017 95% 87% 98% 90% 88% 92% 2022 97% 88% 95% 92% 89% 94% Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

38. 2. Getting Information Planning Larger Sector Indicator Area Spatial Unit Smaller Spatial Units A B C D Socia Population growth rate 2017-2020 3.2% 2.8% 2.7% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 2020-2022 3.0% 2.9% 3.0% 2.1& 2.5% 2.9% Literacy Rate 2017 95% 87% 98% 90% 88% 92% 2022 97% 88% 95% 92% 89% 94% Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

39. 2. Getting Information Planning Larger Sector Indicator Area Spatial Unit Smaller Spatial Units A B C D Social Population 3.2% 2.8% 2.7% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% growth rate Literacy Rate 95% 87% 98% 90% 88% 92% Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

40. 4. ExploUing Implications – AsNing TXestion “so wKat” D Analysis can be extended further into determining appropriate policy interventions D If negative implications predominate, then the observed condition can be regarded as a problem. )ormulate policies that either mitigate the inconvenience or solve the problem permanentl y . D If positive implications predominate, then the observed condition may be regarded as a potential. Local Development InGicatoU System (LDIS)

41. Module 3: Benchmarking of Indicators CDP+ Course 1 “ M atino, M ahusa y , at M aaasaha n ” .RISTIN( &$RM(N '. 'ION(S Bureau of Local Government Development Department of the Interior and Local Government

42. Y e s Benchmarking Process

43. 3. Extracting Intelligence - Asking question "WHY" Sector Indicator Planning Area Standard/ Benchmark Social Classroom-Students Ratio 1:60 1:40 Malnutrition Incidence to 7% years old Crime Rate Index - % % Non-Index - 12% 12% Benchmarking Process

44. ❑ International Commitments (e.g. SDGs)* ❑ Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) Indicators * As applicable ❑ Standards/Benchmarks set by National Government Agencies ❑ Targets set by the Province / Region (PDPFP / RDP)* ❑ Targets set in the Philippine Development Plan* Sources of Benchmarks/Standards

45. Demo Video: Benchmarking Indicators

46. T ASKS: 1. Based on your E P , CDRA, and other database, accomplish the LDIS 2. Identify and accomplish at least 3 indicators per Sector FORM: CDP Form 1d: LDIS REFERENCES: RaPIDS, E P , CDRA, CBMS, etc. DUR A TION: 1 hr Simulation Exercise!

47. Lecture Video

48. THANK YOU! 25 F or mo r e in f ormation: Bu r eau of Local G o v ernment D e v elopment Department of the In t erior and Local G o v ernment th Floo r , DI L G- N APO L C OM Cen t e r , ED S A corner Quezon A v enue, W est T rian g le, Quezon City T runkline: [phone] local 4102 T el No. [phone] / 927-7852 ww w .dilg.g o v .ph