CHRISTOLOGY 2.pptx (CHRISTOLOGY Jesus as the Messiah and the Savior)

9bzgsfdm8g 1 views 178 slides Oct 09, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 257
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113
Slide 114
114
Slide 115
115
Slide 116
116
Slide 117
117
Slide 118
118
Slide 119
119
Slide 120
120
Slide 121
121
Slide 122
122
Slide 123
123
Slide 124
124
Slide 125
125
Slide 126
126
Slide 127
127
Slide 128
128
Slide 129
129
Slide 130
130
Slide 131
131
Slide 132
132
Slide 133
133
Slide 134
134
Slide 135
135
Slide 136
136
Slide 137
137
Slide 138
138
Slide 139
139
Slide 140
140
Slide 141
141
Slide 142
142
Slide 143
143
Slide 144
144
Slide 145
145
Slide 146
146
Slide 147
147
Slide 148
148
Slide 149
149
Slide 150
150
Slide 151
151
Slide 152
152
Slide 153
153
Slide 154
154
Slide 155
155
Slide 156
156
Slide 157
157
Slide 158
158
Slide 159
159
Slide 160
160
Slide 161
161
Slide 162
162
Slide 163
163
Slide 164
164
Slide 165
165
Slide 166
166
Slide 167
167
Slide 168
168
Slide 169
169
Slide 170
170
Slide 171
171
Slide 172
172
Slide 173
173
Slide 174
174
Slide 175
175
Slide 176
176
Slide 177
177
Slide 178
178
Slide 179
179
Slide 180
180
Slide 181
181
Slide 182
182
Slide 183
183
Slide 184
184
Slide 185
185
Slide 186
186
Slide 187
187
Slide 188
188
Slide 189
189
Slide 190
190
Slide 191
191
Slide 192
192
Slide 193
193
Slide 194
194
Slide 195
195
Slide 196
196
Slide 197
197
Slide 198
198
Slide 199
199
Slide 200
200
Slide 201
201
Slide 202
202
Slide 203
203
Slide 204
204
Slide 205
205
Slide 206
206
Slide 207
207
Slide 208
208
Slide 209
209
Slide 210
210
Slide 211
211
Slide 212
212
Slide 213
213
Slide 214
214
Slide 215
215
Slide 216
216
Slide 217
217
Slide 218
218
Slide 219
219
Slide 220
220
Slide 221
221
Slide 222
222
Slide 223
223
Slide 224
224
Slide 225
225
Slide 226
226
Slide 227
227
Slide 228
228
Slide 229
229
Slide 230
230
Slide 231
231
Slide 232
232
Slide 233
233
Slide 234
234
Slide 235
235
Slide 236
236
Slide 237
237
Slide 238
238
Slide 239
239
Slide 240
240
Slide 241
241
Slide 242
242
Slide 243
243
Slide 244
244
Slide 245
245
Slide 246
246
Slide 247
247
Slide 248
248
Slide 249
249
Slide 250
250
Slide 251
251
Slide 252
252
Slide 253
253
Slide 254
254
Slide 255
255
Slide 256
256
Slide 257
257

About This Presentation

Jesus the Messiah and the Savior


Slide Content

CHRISTOLOGY

IMAGES WE HAVE OF JESUS For two thousand years, in Western Culture and history has been accorded such exalted titles as JESUS. Few years after his death, unusual

things were told about his person and life: he was born of a virgin; he was a miracle worker; he rose from the dead; he appeared to his followers to

encourage and comfort them; he disappeared in to the skies. Towards the end of the first century, he was given grand titles like Son of God,

Messiah, Savior, the word becoming flesh, bread of life, light of the world, and others. For the next seventeen centuries, he

dominated the culture of the West. Western religion, art, architecture, music, ethical norms, politics and even economics are, to a great extent ,

influenced by this figure. For Christians, the reason for the interest goes beyond purely intellectual curiosity. More than just a

historical person, Jesus is the central figure of Christianity. Jesus is “Lord and Savior”. In the Filipino situation, Jesus is “ Panginoong Hesukristo ”, “Anak ng

Diyos ”, and “ Poong Tagapagligtas ”. That “Jesus” is a familiar name in many parts of the world and that many Christians see him as important for

human life is a fact. That he has become somebody to be worshipped in the Christian world cannot be denied. Yet, who he was as a historical person is usually not understood.

A. JESUS AS UNDERSTOOD IN POPULAR CHRISTIANITY Jesus is popularly seen as divine Savior. He is thought of as God’s Son whose mission is to die for the sins of the world. His main message is about who

he is and the importance of believing in him. The divine Savior image is everywhere in the Christian world. It is also

Dominant in Filipino religious thinking and practice. When we look at the Filipino Christian experience, we see five popular portraits of Jesus that,

when taken together, present Jesus as mainly a divine Savior. The Catechism for Filipino Catholics gives us a sketch of these popular images.

Dominant view of Jesus among many Filipino C hristians 1. Jesus as the Son of God and Son of Mary Filipinos are family-oriented. The anak-magulang relationship is very important.

The terms Ama, ina , and anak are significant to us because we value so much our attachment to members of our family. The family becomes the main

source of our happiness. Our filial attachment does not apply only to our immediate family, but also to our extended family. This family-centered

attitude gives us a sense of belonging , stability and security. It is because we are family-oriented that we like to picture Jesus as Anak

both the Son of God and the Son of Mary. Devotion to the Sto.Nino is widespread among Filipino Catholics. We find pictures or images of the

Santo Nino everywhere. This is a testimony to the Filipino Christians attraction to Jesus as Son of God and Son of Mary.

2. Jesus as Host Filipinos are meal-oriented. Filipinos consider almost everyone as part of their family, for we are known for being

gracious hosts and grateful guests. Serving our guest with the best we have is an inborn value to us, whether we are rich or poor.

Jesus as host is not only presiding at the Last Supper and our Eucharistic celebrations, he is not only the bread and drink of life, but even the guest of

every gathering. The New Testament refers more than 25 times to eating. Eating together in table fellowship with the presence of the risen Christ

(Cor 10:17), communion in other words constitutes the core witness of the early Church as eucharistic community. One of the familiar images

In a Filipino home, the Last Supper, witnesses to Filipino attraction to the images of Jesus as host.

3. Jesus as Suffering Servant suffering servant Filipinos are kundiman-oriented. The kundiman is a Filipino song about love, especially wounded love. Filipinos are naturally attracted to heroes sacrificing

everything for love. We are patient and forgiving even if we are hurting badly inside. This acceptance of suffering shows a deep , positive, value of the

Filipinos’s kalooban . Jesus, the Suffering Servant, is portrayed through our favorite images of Padre Hesus Nazareno , the Crucified Christ, the

Santo Intierro , or the Sacred Heart. Through these images, Jesus appears as on of the “little ones”; the hungry, the thirsty, the naked, the sick , the lonely,

Stranger and the prisoner (Mt.25:31-46)Jesus, the Suffering Servant, can reach out to us as a healing and forgiving Savior who understands our

Weaknesses, our failures, our feelings of depression, fear and loneliness. 4. Jesus as Christ the King Filipinos are optimistic. For all our

Patience and tolerance, we will not accept ultimate failure and defeat. We will always look forward to another chance, a better tomorrow .

The Filipino optimism in the midst of difficulties make the image of Christ as a conquering King dear to us. We see Jesus as the one who was sent to do

the Father’s will. His death was not a defeat but the beginning of God’s justice and peace in society. Jesus is now enthroned as king because of his

ultimate victory over evil. Our admiration for a victorious hero is seen in a thriving devotion to Christ, our mighty king .

5. Jesus , The Miracle W orker Filipinos are spirit-oriented. We have a deep-seated belief in the supernatural and in all kinds of spirits dwelling in individual persons, places, and things.

Filipinos continue to invoke the spirits in various undertakings, especially in faith-healings and exorcisms. Jesus the miracle worker, promised

to send his spirit to his disciples to give them his new life. We see Jesus’ spirit as drawing us into a community where superstition and enslaving magic

are overcome by authentic worship to God. We believe that this spirit is given to each of us and works in and through us for the common good.

The five popular images correspond to the five dominants traits Filipinos consider meaningful, namely: being family-oriented, love for celebration and hospitality

willingness to sacrifice for others, optimism, and being in touch with the spirits. It appears that these traits are projected and transferred to the person of Jesus who

becomes the Santo Nino, the Host, the Bayani, the Cristo Rey and the Miracle worker. These five images, have something positive to contribute to the Filipino

search for meaning, for salvation. They contain elements that can promote justice, peace, and solidarity in Filipino society. Care for family, a welcoming attitude

towards others, optimism amidst difficulties, and undying hope in God’s graciousness are virtues that we can associate with these popular images.

THE HISTORICAL CRITICAL IMAGE This is the portrait of Jesus reconstructed by biblical scholars. Using the gospels as their main sources, these scholars worked hard to come up with a picture of Jesus that

is closer to history. The quest was largely the product of the developing culture of the Enlightenment where everything including

Church teachings and beliefs, was questioned. The search came up with various images. One scholar, presented Jesus as a great

teacher of right living. However, something went wrong. He was attracted by his fellow Jews into the dream of freeing Israel from foreign domination and corrupt

governance and he was killed for this. His followers were disappointed but did not give up their dream for independence. To keep this dream going and to avoid

Embarrassment, the followers stole Jesus’ body, invented the story of resurrection, and set up the Church. Another argued that if we

remove the myth and disregard the miraculous elements in the gospels we discover a Jesus who is a great philosopher. He described Jesus as a thinker who taught ways of chaning

the corrupt and social and political order. At the beginning of the 20 th century, Albert Schweitzer, a theologian and doctor, set out

to reconstruct his own picture of Jesus based on a careful study of the Jewish society in Jesus’ time. He said that the Jews at that time were expecting the of the present

corrupt world and the beginning of God’s reign of justice. Jesus was completely influenced by this expectation and he believed that he had a role to play in the coming of

G od’s kingdom. But the end did not come as Jesus expected. Though Schweitzer’s description created a sensation and still strikes many as unacceptable

when they first hear it, this image of Jesus as prophet of the end time slowly influenced much of the 20 th century biblical research.

DISCERN A. THE CONTEMPORARY SEARCH FOR SALVATION The search for well being is not an individual concern. We become fully human only in so

far as we relate with others. We are rational beings. Our life, our well being, is so closely linked with those of the others. We cannot help but build relationship with our

surroundings, even with our very own self. There are six aspects of this relationship building that we have to focus on if we are to experience genuine well being or

fuller humanity. These six aspects are interconnected dimensions or value centers called the anthropological constants. We have to build meaningful relationships with

our body , with nature, and cosmos, with other persons; with the community , society, institutions, and structures; with culture and history; with our thoughts and actions with

the Ultimate. Christians, believe that the experience of the disciples with Jesus can lead us on the way towards salvation .

B.THE WAY OF THE DISCIPLES The way of the disciples was the gradual process by which the early followers came to identify Jesus, based on an experience of salvation. The way of the disciples invites

us to follow three steps: The Disciples Meet Jesus of Nazareth Christianity started with this search for well being. The

disciples met a young man from Nazareth who, after being a disciple of John the Baptist, had begun to teach and heal. They were fascinated by this person who had a lot of common ssense ,

related warmly with people, mingled freely with the poor and the outcast, and spoke openly against the injustices of his time. Being with him was an inspiring experience for the

Disciples who, had been victims themselves of the discrimination and oppression in the Jewish society. They felt this man gave them back their dignity, their confidence

In life. In Jesus of Nazareth, the disciples experienced a very free man, caring for the concrete needs of the oppressed poor people because God, his father loved them.

This initial experience is very important. Future generations of Christians will come in contact with Jesus by recalling the experience of the disciples, which they will

then have to relate to their own search for meaning and salvation in a changed situation.

2. Jesus is Interpreted Jesus was crucified but in faith the disciples were convinced that he was alive; he has risen. The conviction that Jesus continued to live and inspire the community

added a new meaning to the disciples initial understanding of Jesus. They believed that Jesus’ spirit was challenging them to give a new answer to people search for happiness.

Jesus was the one bringing happiness and well being(salvation). History of early Christianity reveals three stages in the

development of the interpretation of Jesus and his ministry. Jesus was interpreted within the Jewish culture, and then gradually within the Graeco-Roman world. Later, Christians met with the cultures of the

Invading Germanic tribes. Christianity needed to be interpreted again with these new cultures. This resulted in what we call today Western Christianity.

For the first disciples who were all Jews. Jesus was a prophet of Yahweh, the merciful and faithful one, reaching out to his people who were suffering because of

poverty and oppression. Through Jesus, Yahweh was offering healing and forgiveness and well being. Using the titles which were found in their Jewish culture, Christians

described Jesus as the Son of God, the son of Man, Lord , Christ, Emmanuel, Servant-Messiah, Shepherd, bread of life. Christianity did not confine itself very long in the

Jewish homeland. An initial effort was made by Jewish Christian missionaries to reach out to the non-Jews around. Paul whom many call “the apostle to the gentiles”.

Together with companions, Paul brought Christianity to the gentile lands. Christianity was more the product of the Jewish life and culture, the early missionaries had to

make adjustments in the Christian message so that the non-Jewish communities could understand it better. During the next generations,

Christianity became the religion of the Roman Empire. In the Graeco-Roman world, Jesus had to be interpreted anew. Christianity came face to face with the Greek

Philosophy with a different idea of salvation. For the person educated in neo-platonic philosophy, salvation meant participation in the divine or divination. Christians

began to stress the divinity of Jesus. Since Jesus is divine, he can give us salvation or divinity. One cannot give what one does not have.

Church councils were convened to make sure people understood properly the teachings about Jesus, and to stop heretical teachings that started to divide the Church.

The Great Councils made use of the language of Greek philosophy to express clearly, the questioned teachings regarding Jesus and Christian faith. The Councils came up

with statements like “Jesus is consubstantial with the Father”, “Jesus is begotten not made”, “Jesus is consubstantial with us”.

The Graeco-Roman understanding of Jesus expressed in the language of the Councils later became the dominant view in Western Christianity. This view was not

understood immediately by the common people. This failure of understanding led to the development of the divine Savior image of popular Christianity.

3. RE-APPROPRIATING JESUS IN THE FILIPINO SITUATION. The experience of the disciples with Jesus had been interpreted and re-interpreted within different cultures in the past . There had been a need for this

constant re-interpretation because times and situation changed and so the message of Christianity had to be expressed in more understandable ways. To make

the Christian message relevant for our times, we may have to continue this process of re-interpretation within the Filipino culture.

C. LENSES FOR RECONSTRUCTING THE JESUS OF HISTORY 1. The Gospels as Developing Traditions Our sources are the New Testament as a whole and the four gospels in particular.

Many see these sources as historical narratives reporting exactly what Jesus said and did. They are viewed as video recordings of the Jesus’ event. This kind of reading

Delivers a problematic image of Jesus; a sort of all-knowing super-hero and magician. Jesus became the founder of the Church, institutes

S acraments , formulates the latest Christian doctrines. Like all other books in the Bible, the four gospels have a long history behind them. The various stories we now find in

Gospels had been developing and growing as the situation of the early Christian communities and their surroundings changed.

Much of the materials in the gospels did not remain as they originally were for some reasons. The stories and ideas about Jesus grew because of the new experiences the

believers had of Jesus as risen. This experience transformed and enriched how the community understood who Jesus was and the meaning of his words and deeds.

As developing traditions, the gospels contain two kinds of materials: 1. History remembered- that some of the things reported in

the gospels really took place. 2. History interpreted – that the writer of the gospels and the early Christians used symbolic language and stories

to express the meaning for them of what happened to Jesus.(The use of stories and metaphors was common among the Jews of Jesus’ time).

Metaphorical language is non –literal. Metaphor is not literally true; it can powerfully true in a non-literal sense. To say that Jesus is the bread of life (Jn 6:35)

does not mean that he is literally bread, but means that we see him as bread nourishing us in some sense other than in biological.

Materials in the gospels may be metaphorical in the sense that they are based on something that really happened but are interpreted in a symbolic way.

2. THE STUDY OF JUDAISM As a Jew, Jesus shared much of the way of thinking and behavior of his people. He was affected by the issues and problems of his society and responded to these issues and

problems as a typical Jew of his time would. But although he thought and behaved like most of his Jewish contemporaries, he differed from many of them in some

significant way. The following data about Jesus, the Jew: Name Place of birth

Civil Status Occupation Religion Age at time of death

3. THE STUDY OF SOCIAL WORLD OF JESUS The study of Jesus and Christianity has made great progress because of contributions coming from the human and social sciences.

The result of the cooperation between theology and the social and human sciences is a deeper understanding of the significance of Jesus and Christianity to what is

happening in our society today. The human and social sciences can help reveal the kind of social world Jesus lived in within which he had to think

and act. “Social world” refer to the total social environment of a people at a particular time in their history, which includes the material conditions.

Material conditions means as the type of economy, the level of technology, the degree of urbanization, the kind of government. Social world also

includes the non-material element of shared convictions , thought forms, and behavior patterns.. These make up what is commonly called culture.

4. THE CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY OF RELIGION AND OUR WORLDVIEW One of the important claims that we will make about Jesus is that he was a “spirit person”. It mean that he was constantly in touch with the “world spirit”.

The “world spirit” is another level of reality in addition to the visible world of our ordinary experience. To the visible material world, there is another level of reality

spoken in several ways – as the sacred and the profane, the holy and the mundane, God and the world, heaven and earth. The material world is permeated by the “world of

spirit.” This idea of two intersecting world is found at the heart of the Jewish tradition within which Jesus lived.

The notion of the “world spirit” and “spirit person” are not foreign to the Filipino culture. Like in many cultures, the “spirit world” and the material world are

interconnected in the Filipino understanding. The “spirit world” exerts influence upon the destiny of the world of our experience. By reason of this, it becomes necessary to make

make some contact with the “spirit world”. Spirit persons function as mediators between these two worlds. Our world view is important

because it dictates what we will accept and reject. It tells us what to consider as real or imaginary. It determines our choices of what is right or wrong, good or bad.

Chapter Two: JESUS OF NAZARETH A. JESUS IN VISUAL ARTS Artworks are effective toos of communication. They express a message in a way that mere words cannot.

Jesus had been one of the favorite subjects of artworks in the Christian world. Through the centuries, the visual arts that had been in charge of expressing how

Jesus looked like were painting and sculpture. Portrayal of Jesus in artworks is not serious all the time. We may have seen already the

picture of the Santo Nino clothed as a fisherman, a soldier or even dressed as a commercial model. Paintings and sculptures presenting Jesus as a European, American.

B. THE JESUS IN MUSIC Music had been of great help in preserving and communicating some “key emotions” associated with Jesus and his

story. Undying love, faithfulness till death, humility, sacrifice, and hope are common themes found in Christian hymns and songs.

Music plays a special role in Christian worship and liturgy. Some would even see worship as primarily singing and dancing. Like paintings and sculptures, our songs package

Jesus in various ways. It is through many of our songs that much of what we think of Jesus is expressed and shared with others.

A. THE JEWISH SOCIETY DURING JESUS’ TIME 1. Small Country Palestine during the time of Jesus was a narrow strip of land by the Mediterranean Sea. It covered a relatively small area. At present,

the former land of Palestine is now shared by the states of Israel and Jordan. 2. A Farming Community Palestine was largely an

Agricultural and rural society composed of towns and small villages inhabited generally by farmers who walked each day to their fields. Farming centered on grain, vegetables,

fruits, wine, oil, dates, as well as sheep, goats and cattle. There were a number of cities, many of them established by Herod the Great and his

successors. In these cities, commerce was developing. This brought profound changes in the Jewish society. The rural areas tended to be Jewish, in contrast with the urban

(except perhaps Jerusalem), which had a mixture of population because of gentiles coming from neighboring areas.

3. Part of the Roman Empire Palestine became part of the Roman Empire in 63 BCE and was governed by rulers appointed by Rome. Until the

death of Herod the Great, the most famous of the kings who owed their kingship to Rome , it was administered as a single territory. After Herod’s death, it was divided into three parts,

each ruled by one of Herod’s sons. Judea(which included Jerusalem) later came under direct Roman rule governed by a series of Roman governors.

The period of direct Roman rule was characterized by widespread discontent and periodic uprising. People suffered under the heavy Roman taxation that was

made even heavier by tax farming. Villages that refused to pay their taxes were destroyed. Many had to give up their properties as payment or they were made slaves.

People protested but were repressed. Some took up arms but were immediately slaughtered. This situation led to more protests and finally rebellion.

The primary conflict in the Jewish society was not between the Roman and the Jews. It was between the Romans with many of the Jewish upper class on the

one hand, and the Jewish common people(peasantry) on the other. The Jewish ruling group came from the priestly and lay aristocracy of Jerusalem, although they had

supporters in the villages. These people make up the party of the Sadducees. They acted as dummies or collaborators of the Romans.

Because of this, they maintained partial control over the Jewish population.

4. Protest and Renewal Movements The abuses of the Romans and the Jewish elite gave rise to protest and renewal movements

was social banditry. People who were driven out of their land for failure to pay taxes joined brigand who roamed the country side, robbing people

and attacking collaborators of the Romans. Other movements that resulted from the worsening economic condition of the masses were the popular messianic movements.

These groups were inspired by the teachings of the prophets who condemned any form of domination and oppression as contradicting the kingship of Yahweh.

It was not only the common people who reacted very strongly to the corrupt system of the time. Some literate groups like the PHARISEES (“to be separated”; a party

consisting of some priests, scribes and landed gentry, mostly the teachers and leaders of the people in the country side) wanted renewal.

Although the gospels mostly portray them as strict interpreters of the law, they represented in reality a novel and somewhat revolutionary lay movement within Judaism.

They believed that they had to preserve the identity of Israel as God’s people. The task of preserving Israel’s identity would be accomplished through a

faithful following of the commandments of God contained in the Torah. Unlike the Pharisees, the ESSENES left the Jewish society

because they could no longer stand the corruption and injustice. They withdrew into the wilderness in order not to be corrupted and remain as the true people of God.

They formed several communities, in which they lived a disciplined life, holding all things in common. They called themselves “men of holiness” and required

separation from the “unholy society”. They claimed to be the “the children of light” and branded the Romans and other Jews as “children of darkness”.

Once in a while there were violent attacks that were waged against the Romans and their collaborators by various groups in the Jewish society. Some commentators

put these groups under one name: ZEALOTS (movement of zealous Jews who took the revolutionary option of resisting the Roman rule. The zealots formed a distinct group at the

time of the great revolt against Rome in 67-68 CE). 5. Common Inspiration One thing in common: the expectation that God will soon

Intervene to free Israel from oppression and foreign domination. The groups interpreted this expectation with some differences in emphasis. Some messianic

movements and zealots believed that God would help his people through armed revolution. The ESSENES left society in order to maintain their being God’s chosen people

until God’s intervention. The PHARISEES decided not to run away but stay and renew society by insisting on obedience to the commandments.

This common inspiration tells something about the Jewish society. Making a distinction between political, economic, and social problems on the one hand, and religious on the

Other . In the Jewish society, such a distinction did not exist. The Jews believed that God involved himself in all aspects of the life of society, whether political, social,

economic, or religious. Everything was political and religious at the same time. The Roman taxation, was not only a political problem. It was also a

Religious offense. One did not pay taxes to the emperor because the true ruler of Israel was Yahweh. The Jewish society was a THEOCRATIC(“God-rule”, a

view of government that acknowledges God as the supreme ruler. Kings or priests only rule as representatives of God) society – God was its king.

Today, we still have a few theocratic societies that give us an idea of the religious atmosphere of the Jewish society in Jesus’ time.

B. THE WOODWORKER, JESUS OF NAZARETH We do not have historically certain stories about Jesus before about age thirty. He was probably born near the end of Herod the Great’s reign(around 4 BCE). He grew

up in Nazareth in Galilee, about 150 kilometers north of Jerusalem. Several places in Galilee were thriving business centers. Trade with other parts of Mediterranean world was

extensive. Foreign traders brought with them their goods and cultures. The environment of Jesus was therefore not as rural as we usually think. Jesus was not a typical probinsiano .

Jesus probably went to school in synagogue of Nazareth where he learned to read and write, with the Torah as the main text. He probably became a woodworker ( tekton

in Greek). For the most part, buildings in Palestine were not made of wood. Hence a tekton did not necessarily build houses but rather made wood products: doors, roof beams

even yokes and plows. Economic standing divided the Jewish community during the time of Jesus into the “haves” and the “have nots”.

The “haves” made up a very small percent of the population. The vast majority constituted the “have nots”. This group is usually called the common people or the

peasantry. A great divide separated these two groups- a divide not unlike the chasm that existed between Lazarus and the rich man.

We do not know exactly the place Jesus and his family occupied in the socio-economic ladder. Scholars tell us that they belonged to the second group. But this does

not imply that Jesus and his family were living like slaves. The gospels hint at a family trade that Jesus learned to take care of – woodworks. The trade could have been a steady

source of income. Since Nazareth was basically an agricultural community, it is most probable that Jesus family may have cultivated a piece of land to augment the family

income. Bible scholars assume that Jesus’ family could have been a devout. He would learned the stories, hymns, and prayers of the Jewish tradition. He would have observed and

celebrated the great Jewish holidays. He no doubt observed the sabbath for Torah study and prayer. Jesus must have become a

serious religious seeker. This may explain one of the most certain facts we know about him; in his late twenties, he left Nazareth and became a

Follower of a wilderness prophet named John.

C. JESUS AS SPIRIT PERSON Jesus as a spirit person, Jesus as a man of faith. Jesus having an exceptionally intimate relationship with God. Spirit persons are people have

vivid and frequent experiences of another level of reality. Sometimes the person has visions. Sometimes he/she is experiences journeying to this other reality.

Spirit persons are also communicators of the Spirit or God or the Sacred. They do this in varied ways. Sometimes they speak the

word or the will of God. Sometimes they heal and exorcise. Sometimes they tell people where to find missing objects or persons.

Finally, the spirit persons do not consider the Spirit(God, the Sacred) as “out there”, separate from our world. Rather, it is all around us, and we are in it.

The central figures in Biblical tradition are spirit persons. Abraham and Jacob had a series of visions and experiences of God. Moses had intimate experience of

the sacred.(Deut.34:10). The prophets of Israel had a similar intimate experiences of the sacred. Jesus too, was a spirit person.

According to the Gospels, he had visions including one at his baptism in which, like Ezekiel, he “saw heaven opened before him and he saw the Spirit coming down on him

like a dove”.(M.1:10). Jesus also used spiritual practices like fasting, and long hours of prayer (meditation) typical of spirit persons. His intimate communion with God is

indicated by his use of the word ABBA. He called God Abba, a term signifying closeness and familiarity. It is equivalent to the word tatay .

The gospels describe Jesus as “speaking with authority.” While the other teachers began by saying “Thus says the Lord…” to back up their teachings. Jesus started with

the words “I tell you…” This authority in his teaching can only come from his experience of God. Jesus’ experience of the Spirit is

dramatically expressed in Luke’s text of Jesus’ speech in the synagogue at the start of his ministry. The Spirit of the Lord is upon me”(Lk 4:18). Jesus’ life shows a deep

relationship with the Spirit.

D. JESUS’ MINISTRY: FOUR BROAD STROKES The main aspects of his ministry under the four broad strokes. These four areas of his ministry place him firmly within the Jewish religious culture and situation.

Jesus continued the tasks that other Jewish spirit persons before him had taken up in order to remind Israel of the presence of Yahweh in their history.

1. JESUS AS HEALER AND EXORCIST Jesus both healed and exorcised. Not all spirit persons become healers and exorcists, but some do and Jesus was among them. His contemporaries and he himself

viewed these abilities as the result of the Spirit’s power working through him. (Lk 7:1-10; 22-23, Lk 11:14-23) The gospels refer to healings

and exorcisms in summary form as frequent and typical occurrences(Mk.1:32-39). They also contain many individual stories of exorcisms and healings.

What role did Jesus’ healing and exorcisms play in his public activity? Jesus discovered he had the ability to heal and exorcise.

He used this ability to help people because he was a compassionate and forgiving. Two other reasons why Jesus healed people:

1. Jesus associated healing and miracles with the coming of the Kingdom of God and a time of deliverance. Jesus saw them as the result of the Spirit’s power inaugurating

the Kingdom of God. 2. Healing also pointed to a direct relationship to God, apart from experiencing God through the rules and rituals

prescribed by religion. Jesus’ healing activity flowed out of and affirmed the immediacy of access to God. The Priests and Scribes felt

threatened by this direct manifestation of God’s spirit and ascribed the healing to the power of Satan, an accusation that Jesus repeatedly refuted.(Mk.3:20-30)

2. Jesus as a Teacher of Transformative Wisdom Jesus was regularly addressed as teacher during his lifetime by followers, opponents and curious inquiries. Some thoughts that he was primarily a teacher of right belief

needed for salvation. Others emphasize that he was a teacher of right morals. But he was not primarily a teacher of either of true belief or good behavior. Rather, he was a

Teacher of a way of transformation. He did not stress believing or being good as the primary thing. Instead, he invited people to a new way of life.

As a teacher, Jesus attracted a good following. This is implicit in the gospels. Perhaps one of the reasons for this was the way he communicated his ideas.

Jesus must have been a very interesting speaker. People listened to him and followed him. The teaching of Jeus usually did not take the form of elaborating the teaching of

Torah as was commonly done by the teachers of his time. He most often appealed to ordinary human experience and observations from nature. He used the usual form of

earlier wisdom traditions like proverbs and parables. Proverbs are short but insightful sayings. “No one can serve two masters”; “a city built on a hill cannot be hidden”; and “Many

are called but few are chosen” are proverbs. A parable is a short imaginative story designed to communicate one central idea that usually reverses a prevailing notion.

Jesus often used stories and analogies from nature, “consider the lilies of the fields; they neither toil nor spin…”; “A good tree bears good fruit; “even the hairs of

your head are counted”. Common to all these forms of traditional wisdom as used by Jesus was an invitation to see differently, to have a transformed

Perception of the things and events in one’s own life and in society in general. Jesus attacked the conventional wisdom of his society. The

Jewish society had five central values: family, wealth, honor, purity, and religion. Jesus speaks against treating these values as everything in human life.

In the Jewish society, the family(which patriarchal)was the person’s source of identity and security. For the Jew, a “good” family was on of the blessings of God.

Jesus’ contemporaries saw wealth as a reward from God for having lived wisely. What then is the alternative wisdom or path that Jesus taught?

First of all, an invitation to see God as gracious and compassionate rather than a lawmaker who demand strict compliance with his order.

Secondly, it is an invitation to a life that is more and more centered in God. The Jesus path is the way of transformation. The Jesus path is the way of transformation.

Two imageries that explain what is involved in transformation: 1. the imagery of the heart- represented the true self of

Self of the person. The heart that can only be open to change if it is centered in the compassionate God. 2. the imagery of death -

Called to die to family, wealth, honor, purity, and religion, and even to self as the center of one’s concern.

3. Jesus as an Initiator of a Renewal Movement The movement initiated by Jesus was intended for Israel. Like other Jewish movements, it saw itself as a way for Israel, a way out of the crisis

facing the Jewish society. Jesus ministry points to the concern with Israel; the choice of the twelve. “Twelve” is the number of the twelve tribes of Israel.

Jesus saw the twelve as representing the “new” or “true” Israel. Jesus saw primarily concerned about renewing his own deteriorating society.

The movement was marked by joy. The gospel reflect the joy of the disciples in the presence of Jesus. If the movement was joyful, it was because the initiator was a

joyful person. He had the capacity to enjoy the simple pleasure of life. The core spirit of the movement was compassion.

An important quality of God in Scripture. Jesus stressed the compassion of God. The father of the prodigal son “had compassion”, the Samaritan was the one who “showed

compassion”, the unmerciful servant did not act with compassion, the tax collector in the Parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector begged for God’s compassion.

Jesus saw compassion as the true solution to the growing internal division within the Jewish society and the worsening conflict with the Romans.

The most remarkable feature of the Jesus’ movement was its implicit universalism. As a Jew, Jesus stepped a number of times beyond the boundaries of Judaism to

that God offered the Kingdom to all people. Jesus did not only include the hated tax collectors as recipient of God’s offer of the Kingdom.

4. JESUS AS A PROPHET The classical prophets are those who have books named after them. There are 15 classical prophets. The prophets of Israel were seen primarily as God’s messenger.

The name of the last of them, Malachi, literally means “my messenger”. The prophets of Israel arose during periods of crisis when Israel was facing destruction from foreign powers.

Three-fold pattern that usually marked the message of the prophets: 1. Accusation – The prophets accused the leaders of directing

Israel in the wrong way. The leadership seemed to be only concerned with wealth, power, and religious purity instead of focusing on the needs of the suffering poor.

Israel had become a “prostitute”, leaving God, her husband, and entrusting herself to alliances with foreign rulers.

2. Threat – The prophets warned their society of judgment by God that can take the form of military conquest and destruction. Amos and Hosea, for example

warned the leaders of the northern kingdom of an impending destruction by Assyria as God’s judgment upon them unless they changed. Jeremiah and Ezekiel. a

hundred years after, announced a similar threat to the southern kingdom. 3. Call to Change – The prophets called Israel to repent

which meant to turn or return, and which referred primarily to a change in society as a whole, not just individual change. The threat is made for the purpose of transforming society so that

the future would be different. Jesus condemned the system of his society that favored the wealthy, the powerful, those who were obedient to the

Commandments . This system rejected the poor, the powerless, and those unable to keep the law. Jesus used images to voice his accusation. Israel was like the

Caretakers of the vineyard who refused to do their duty by giving the owner his share of the produce. Israel was like the unfruitful fig tree that is given one last chance to bear

fruit. Israel with its flourishing religious culture sought to be holy like God but unable to show compassion. The parable of the Good Samaritan shows Israel’s love for the law but

disregard for compassion (Lk 10:29-37).