Povidone Iodine And Antiseptics
The importance of choosing the right antiseptic for an invasive procedure should not be
underestimated. In fact, there is a strong correlation between the choice of antiseptic and the risk of
infection (Al Maqbali, 2013; Kunkle, Marchan, Safadi, Whitman, Chmait, 2011; Levin et al., 2011;
Macias et al., 2013; Sviggum et al., 2012). Infection is something that healthcare providers, especially
nurses, can play a huge role in preventing. Therefore, it is important that nurses have knowledge of the
different antiseptics and which one would better serve his or her patient. There are two antiseptics in
particular, that have stood the test of time, chlorhexidine and povidone iodine. Both of these
antiseptics have their pros and cons. In clinical ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There have been several reports filed against povidone iodine of cases where the patient suffered
serious complications such as chemical burns and irritant contact dermatitis (Al Maqbali, 2013, p. 5).
While patients typically heal without significant scarring, burns subject the patient to unnecessary
pain, prolongs hospitalization and increases the risk for infection (Rees, Sherrod, Young, 2011, p.
414). In comparison, chlorhexidine gluconate has had some reports mild to severe anaphylaxis (Al
Maqbali, 2013, p. 5). Although anaphylactic reactions are potentially life threatening, the probability
of dying is very low, especially for those cases that involve ED or hospital attention ( Death from
anaphylaxis, 2013, p.
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...