Cross faculty implementation of myprogress

myknowledgemap 264 views 27 slides Dec 18, 2014
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 27
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27

About This Presentation

Talk given by Luke Woodham at MyKnowledgeMap's Innovation in Practice Assessment day conference at St George's, University of London


Slide Content

Cross-faculty implementation of
Myprogress
Luke Woodham,
St. George’s, University of London

Medicine and Healthcare at
St.George’s, University of London
•Specialist health sciences
university – joint site with
hospital
•Joint faculty with Kingston
University
•Range of courses in medicine
and healthcare
•e-Learning Unit
–Provide and manage electronic
educational resources for the
curriculum
–Coordinate overall project for
Myprogress implementation

Medicine - WPBAs at SGUL
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Basic Science Transition Pre-Clinical Practice
Foundation
MBBS5
Year 1
Transitional
(T) Year
MBBS5
Year 2
MBBS4
Year 1
Penultimate
(P) Year
Final
(F) Year
Workplace-based
assessments•Key element in both learning
(formative) and summative
assessment of clinical
competency

E-Portfolio Aims
•Students “own” their own data
–Provide learners with real-time access to their
progress
–Ability to identify own opportunities for learning,
reflect upon own practice
–Evidence of own progress facilitates transition to
clinical practice
•Mechanisms for providing feedback
–Evidence submitted directly to academic tutors,
tools for returning comments
•Reduced administration load

Meeting Expected Challenges - Key
System Requirements
•Flexibility
–able to apply to range of courses
–able to adapt to future changes
•Robust
–Meeting support challenges across several courses
and many geographically disparate sites
•Appropriate to clinical environment
–Lack of access to traditional PC workstations
–Variable access to Wif
–Differing working practices across sites
–Usability – varying ability of assessors to embrace
new technology

MyProgress
•Web-based
–Hosted solution –
Commercially
developed by
MyKnowledgeMap
–All data stored
centrally
•Allows data input
from both the web
and mobile devices
–Cross-platform
•Works offline
–Downloads new
assessments for use
offline
–Uploads completed
assessments back to
system
www.myknowledgemap.com

Assessment functionality
•Free text
•MCQs
•File uploads
•Likert matrix
•Reflective
blog posts

Assessment Verifcation
•Email sent to clinical assessor once assessment
has been submitted
•Prevents students from using assessors’ email
addresses to verify an assessment without
their permission

Student-centred functionality
•Simple, real time access for students to keep
track of their own completed assessments and
their progress, both on desktop and mobile
devices.
•Allows academic tutors to give feedback
directly to students.
–Monitor on going student progress in real-time and
resolve potential issues before they arise.
•Assessments can be linked to a competency
framework to aid with monitoring progress

Pilots
•Series of pilots – Medicine and Radiography
–Iterative improvements based upon feedback
•Pilot 1 – Bring your own device (Smartphones)
•Pilot 2 and 3 – Provided device (7” Tablets)
–Expanding scope
•Multiple attachments and sites
•Increased participant numbers
•Feedback
–Online survey
•Students and Assessors
•Survey designed to be used for all attachments/courses
–Verbal and e-mailed feedback

Results
•Increase in number of assessments completed
– or at least submitted
•Improved feedback from using tablets

Feedback & Challenges
•“Faster, efficient, saves a bunch of paperwork”
–Addresses many issues of paper-based system
•“[Paper is] easier to carry and less time
consuming, but electronic devices are good for
monitoring progress”
–Paper has some perceived advantages
•“I was not sure whether my WBAs went
through the system even after synchronizing”
–Training students to fully realise the benefits

Feedback & Challenges
•“In terms of interface and actual usability of
the app, the only issue I had was I needed to
zoom out -would be nice to be able to zoom out
even more. Otherwise it's very easy to use and
understandable.“
–Usability tweaks
•“If I'm honest doing paper CBD and cexes is a
lot less complicated! I've forgotten to
charge/bring in the tablet a few times meaning
I can't get forms done, and I've also forgotten
to get the paper counterpart signed on some
occasions as well.”
–Changing the culture

Myprogress – current usage
•Rolled out
–Diagnostic Radiography – Apr 2014, 60 students
–2
nd
/3
rd
Year Medicine – Sept 2014, 300 students
–St. George’s Award for personal and community
development activities – Sept 2014, enrollment on
demand
•Prospective
–Therapeutic Radiography
–Paramedic Sciences
–PGCert in Healthcare Education
–Nursing

Transitional Year - Structure
•3 placements – Medicine, Surgery, GP –
interspersed with curriculum based around PBL
–5 week duration
–Multiple sites across South-West London and
beyond
•Students divided into two streams – at any one
time half on placement, half doing Problem-
Based Learning
•Workplace-based assessment schedule
–14 out of 16 types of DOPS across 2 years
–5 Essential Clinical Skills (DOPS)
–2 Mini-CEX per placement
–1 CBD per placement
•Performance and Professionalism sign-off after
each attachment
•Students are in charge of getting their own
assessments completed (except for sign-off)

Mobile Devices
•ASUS Memo Pad HD 7
–7 inch Android tablet
–Low cost
•Students given access
to additional resources
•Students advised to
SYNC REGULARLY –
Every day if possible!

Training
•Training materials have been primarily aimed at
students, since they are responsible for
completion of their portfolio
–Online materials – regularly updated
–Accessible on mobile device – though cannot be
viewed at same time as Myprogress
•Limited institutional access to assessors
–Website providing useful material
–In-person engagement where possible
–Primarily, students “train” the assessors

Support
•First-line support provided by Learning
Technology Services (LTS) team
–Dedicated helpdesk – email and in-person
–Created a series of videos and web based resources
•Dedicated web page with help materials linked
to from the home page of tablet
•Technical support from Computing Services

Support Website

Current and Future challenges
•Engaging with clinical tutors
–Communication and training
•Support
–How to effectively support multiple courses and sites
•How to structure system
–Cohorts and organisations
–Balance need for separation of courses with lack of
flexibility
•Adapting assessment strategies to suit the
system
–Developing reporting procedures
opportunities!

Thank you and Questions
[email protected]
www.elu.sgul.ac.uk