developing results and discussion in qualitative research.pptx

bereniceandriano1985 6 views 14 slides Oct 17, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 14
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14

About This Presentation

developing results and discussion in qualitative research method


Slide Content

Developing Results and Discussions in Qualitative Research (Meta synthesis )

Meta synthesis Framework of Qualitative Research

Meta synthesis Framework of Qualitative Research

Developing the Results Section To develop the results and discussion in a qualitative meta-synthesis, the results section should present overarching themes and a synthesis of findings from primary studies, often using translated concepts or a " Line of Argument " approach. 

Extract and Translate Concepts :  Read through the primary studies, extract the key metaphors, themes, and concepts from each.  Translate and Synthesize :  "Translate" these concepts from one study into another to find similarities and differences.  Identify Overarching Themes :  Group these translated concepts into overarching themes that emerge from the collection of studies. 

Present Findings :  Present these themes and synthesized findings, often using a combination of descriptive text and illustrative quotes from the primary studies to maintain their richness and context.  Consider Different Synthesis Methods :  Depending on the goal of the meta-synthesis (e.g., theory building, theory explication, or descriptive), different methods like a  Meta-Ethnography  or  Critical Interpretive Synthesis  can be used to structure the presentation of results. 

Developing the Discussion Section Summarize Main Findings :  Begin by briefly summarizing the key themes and insights synthesized from the results section.  Interpret the Findings :  Go beyond simple reporting to interpret the meaning of these findings in the context of the research question and the collected literature.  Develop a Theoretical Framework :  If your meta-synthesis is theory-building, create a new theoretical framework or model that integrates the synthesized themes and explains the phenomenon studied. 

Connect to Existing Literature :  Compare your synthesized findings and emerging theoretical framework with existing research and theory to highlight new insights, contradictions, or confirmations.  Discuss Implications :  Explore the practical, clinical, or policy implications of your findings.  Acknowledge Limitations :  Discuss the limitations of the meta-synthesis process itself and the body of literature included.  Suggest Future Research :  Identify any gaps in the existing research and propose specific directions for future studies based on your meta-synthesis. 

How to Synthesize Themes? -Unlike quantitative studies, metasynthesis results are interpretive themes, not numerical data. Describe the synthesis process: • Explain how studies were selected, coded, and analyzed. • Mention the method used (e.g., thematic synthesis, grounded theory, meta-ethnography). Present synthesized themes: • Group findings into overarching themes or categories. • Use subthemes to reflect nuanced insights.

3. Use rich, illustrative quotes: • Include direct quotes from original studies to support each theme. • Ensure quotes are properly cited and contextualized. 4. Visual aids: • Consider using conceptual

Discussion in a Meta synthesis: Interpreting Meaning Across Studies Interpret the themes : What do they reveal about the phenomenon? How do they deepen understanding? · Compare with existing literature : Highlight consistencies or contradictions with previous research. Discuss how your synthesis advances knowledge. Address limitations : Reflect on methodological constraints (e.g., study quality, cultural bias). Acknowledge gaps in the literature. Implications and recommendations : Suggest how findings can inform practice, policy, or future research. Link themes to theoretical frameworks if applicable. Reflective voice : Use a critical and reflexive tone to show awareness of your interpretive role.

Example Structure (RESULTS Section) Results: Theme 1: Navigating Identity in Chronic Illness Subtheme: Loss and reconstruction of self Supporting quote: “I no longer recognize who I am…” Theme 2: The Role of Social Support Subtheme: Family as anchor Supporting quote: “My sister was my lifeline…”

Discussion: (Sample structure) These themes suggest that identity reconstruction is central to coping with chronic illness, aligning with symbolic interactionist theory. The emphasis on family support echoes findings in collectivist cultures, though Western studies show more emphasis on peer networks. Limitations include lack of studies from low-income countries, suggesting a need for more inclusive research.

Effective qualitative meta-synthesis goes beyond summarizing findings—it involves a thoughtful integration of themes across studies to construct meaningful interpretations, generate new theoretical insights, and inform practice, policy, and future research. By embracing a reflective and critical approach, researchers can illuminate deeper understandings of complex phenomena and contribute significantly to the body of knowledge. Conclusions
Tags