dynamics of love and their relation to ode

vikasrajpootiitg 4 views 14 slides May 16, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 14
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14

About This Presentation

the relation between ode andpde


Slide Content

Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology , Guwahati  MSc Project 2024 Siraj Ahmed Shaikh 222123050 Supervisor : Prof Jiten C. Kalita Dynamics of Love

Story Let's Visualize this R J NOTE  R > 0 : Love R < 0 : Hate Love at first side Both in love R start disliking J still love him But R start hating J is NOT in love   R  hates J They hate each other J hates R And R is indifferent to J R begin to express love BUT J continue to dislike R Romeo is fickle lover . The more Juliet loves him the more he begin to dislike her. But when she loses interest his feelings for her warmup . She on the other hand tends to echo him.

Mathematical Modeling 1 Solution Conclusion Feelings of R and J are periodic in nature . The sad outcome of their affairs is of never-ending cycle of LOVE and HATE R J

 Mathematical modeling 2 a, b > 0           Eager-Beaver ( Romeo is encouraged both by his own feelings and by Juliet’s.) a> 0 , b< 0     Narcissistic ( Romeo is encouraged by his own feelings , but responds negatively to Juliet’s. ) a< 0 , b> 0     Cautious Lover ( Romeo is discouraged by his own feelings but responds positively to Juliet’s.) a, b< 0            Hermit ( Romeo is discouraged both by his own feelings as well as Juliet’s. ) Fire and Ice situation c=-b & d=-a        Never Ending situation a=d=0 & bc <0    

Case 1 : |a|>|b| Eigen values : Real unequal with different signs. Nature of critical point (0,0) : Saddle point Stability : unstable If a>b>0 (0,0) critical point = unstable emotional state Mathematical description = real-life emotional dynamics Romeo = Eiger Beaver, Juliet = Hermit Exponential solution = emotions align along V2 over time Phase portrait shows transition from love to dislike or hate to love, reflecting hyperbolic, unstable critical point, symbolizing dynamic relationship as " Fire and Ice ".

Case 1 : |a|>|b| Eigen values : Real unequal with different signs. Nature of critical point (0,0) : Saddle point Stability : unstable If a>0>b

Case 2 : |b|>|a| Eigen values : Purely Imaginary Nature of critical point (0,0) : Centre Stability : Stable BUT not asymptotically  If b>a>0 Solution: Rotated ellipse centered at (0,0) Initial emotional states don't matter Emotions cycle between affection and disdain Trajectory resembles a roller coaster ride Cyclic return to initial states perpetuates indefinitely, termed " Eternal Oscillation of Affection "

Case 2 : |b|>|a| Eigen values : Purely Imaginary Nature of critical point (0,0) : Centre Stability : Stable BUT not asymptotically  If b>0>a

Summary

Mathematical Modeling 2 The above model doesn’t consider the effect of learning , adaptation and synergism after living together . Hence emotion may vary; we assume that it proportional to RJ. Summary Model assumptions lead to positive linear behavior Model exhibits remarkable properties aligned with common understanding Individual behavior influences community structure Main conclusion: Individual appeal drives order within the community

Mathematical Modeling 4 The coefficient is time dependent

References Mathematics magazine Vol 61 , Feb 1988         Steven H. Strogatz ( Harward University) 2.   Journal of Humanistic mathematics Vol 2 , July 2019        Differential Equations of Love and Love of differential Equation by Issac Elishakoff   ( Flordia Atlantic   university) 3.   Dynamics of Love and happiness : A mathematical Analysis , June 2012        Dharna Satsangi and Arun k. Sinha  4.   Phase diagram: https://www.geogebra.org/m/fYxXgbsU

Thank You
Tags