EAPP_2nd QRTR_Lesson #2_DEFFENDING A STAND ON AN ISSUE.ppt

LuisaEchano 37 views 30 slides Aug 31, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 30
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30

About This Presentation

English for Academic and Professional Purposes


Slide Content

Lesson 2
English for Academic and Professional Purposes

Are you the type of person who likes
debating or arguing with friends?
Do you know someone who is like
that?

Directions: In this activity, you'll be
shown 4 photos in a grid, all of
which share a word in common.
Your goal is to figure out the
common word.

DEFEND/DEFENSE

CONVINCE

ARGUMENT

EVIDENCE

JUDGEMENT

1.Make Issue Criteria
2.Collect Evidences from Properly - Cited
Sources
3.Make an Appeal to Your Audience
Three major types of appeals
a. Logical Appeals
b. Emotional Appeals
c. Ethical Appeals
4. Organize your Viewpoints or Arguments

1.Make Issue Criteria
Questions to ensure that you will be able to present strong
arguments on the issues.
Is it a real issue with genuine controversy and
uncertainty?
Can I identify at least two distinctive positions?
Am I personally interested in advocating one of these
positions?
Is the scope of the issue narrow enough to be manageable

2. Collect Evidences from Properly - Cited
Sources.
List of Common Evidentiary Sources
Surveys
descriptive studies,
case studies,
academic journals,
popular magazines
biographical information

2. Collect Evidences from Properly - Cited
Sources.
List of Common Evidentiary Sources
quotes or summaries of work from
established authorities
Statistics
interview of an authority or ordinary
citizen
laboratory research
textual analysis

3. Make an Appeal to Your Audience
To convince a particular person that
your own views are sound, you have to
consider the audience way of thinking.
Appealing to the audience is another
important part of defending a stand on an
issue. This can help you strengthen your
position or claim.

Three Major Types of Appeals
a.Logical Appeals - This is the use of
facts in order to support and defend a
position.
Example: More than one hundred
peer-reviewed studies have been
conducted over the past decade,
and none of them suggests that
coconut milk is an effective treatment
for hair loss.

Three Major Types of Appeals
b. Emotional Appeals- This is the use of
the audience’s feelings for the subject of
the paper such as anger, pity, and
aversion in order to persuade.
Example:
How can you say that the government
shouldn’t censor the internet? Think of
the poor children who might be
exposed to inappropriate content.

Three Major Types of Appeals
c. Ethical Appeals - This is the use of
convincing an audience through the
credibility of the persuader, be it a
notable or experienced figure in the field
or even a popular celebrity.
Example:
As a doctor, I am qualified to tell you
that this course of treatment will
likely generate the best results..

4. Organize your Viewpoints or Arguments
In presenting arguments, you are
typically asked to take a position on an
issue or topic and explain and support
your position with research from reliable
and credible sources.
You will explain and support these
reasons. As with all academic writing,
you’ll need to cite any information that
you used from a source.

Sample Outline
I. Introduction
A. Introduce the topic
B. Provide background on the topic to explain why it is important
C. Assert the thesis (your view of the issue).
II. Your Arguments
A. Assert point #1 of your claims
1. Give your educated and informed opinion
2. Provide support/proof using more than one source
(preferably three)
B. Assert point #2 of your claims
1. Give your educated and informed opinion
2. Provide support/proof using more than one source
(preferably three)
C. Assert point #3 of your claims
1. Give your educated and informed opinion
2. Provide support/proof using more than one source
(preferably three
III. Counter Argument
A. Summarize the counterclaims
B. Provide supporting information for counterclaims
C. Refute the counterclaims
D. Give evidence for argument
IV. Conclusion
A. Restate your argument
B. Provide a plan of action but do not introduce new information

1.At a school board meeting, one of the members argues against the
change to a longer school day. She cites facts about the number of
students involved in after-school activities and estimates how many
hours of work it would require to adjust schedules.
2.A friend of yours tells her story: She works hard to keep up her
grades and also puts in long hours at home taking care of her
younger siblings. She says her opinion on the longer school day is
important because she is a hard-working individual who knows it
would mean trouble for many students like her.

3. Your social studies teacher gets into the fray. He cites case studies
about schools that have tried a longer day without seeing a rise in test
scores. He is against the extension.
4. You have dinner with a friend whose parent is a teacher. The parent
is in favor of the longer day and says you should agree with her. Her
experience teaching, administering, and counseling at schools all
over the country means that she really knows her stuff on this issue.

5. As a member of the newspaper staff, you are charged with researching
information that will help students decide whether a longer school day will be
helpful to them. You give them examples of the research you have conducted as you
have reached your conclusion. E

Directions: In this activity, you'll be
shown 4 photos in a grid, all of
which share a word in common.
Your goal is to figure out the
common word.

DEBATE RUBRICS SCORE/S
Points5 8 15 20  
1. Understanding of Topic
Unclear about debate topic Seemed to understand main
points
Understand topic in-depth Clearly understand topic in-depth
and presented information forcefully
and convincingly
 
2. Arguments
Debate lacked arguments that
support proposition
Less than 4 arguments raised
throughout debate to support
proposition
4 arguments clearly presented to
support proposition
5 or more arguments presented to
support proposition; arguments
complex and articulate
 
3. Organization
Unorganized data, evidence,
and presentation
Some moments of disorganization
of materials
Organized materials and
presentation
Well organized materials and
presentation
 
 
Points3 5 8 10  
4. Evidence
(statistics, facts, examples,
& testimony)
Few or no relevant supporting
evidence
Some relevant evidence given;
relevance somewhat
questionable
Debate adequately supported
with relevant evidence
Numerous support materials given
with every point addressed
throughout debate
 
5. Rebuttal
No effective counter arguments
made. Did not directly address
opponents’ arguments
Few effective counter-arguments
made directly addressing most of
opponents’ arguments
Some effective counter-
arguments made directly
addressing most of opponents’
arguments
Directly addressed each argument
raised by opponent. Offers extensive
evidence to refute opposing points.
 
6. Eyes, Body, and
Voice
Does not look at the opponent
or make
eye contact to the audience.
Lacks poise (appears nervous,
fidgety,
slouchy).
Speaks in a way that is hard to
understand.
Makes infrequent eye contact
with the opponent and the
audience. Shows some poise
(limited fidgeting or
nervousness). Speaks clearly
most of the time, but may be
difficult to understand or hear at
times.
Keeps eye contact with the
opponent and the audience most
of the time—only glances at notes
or slides. Shows poise and
confidence. Speaks clearly and is
easy to understand.
Keeps eye contact with the opponent
and the audience throughout. Shows
exceptional poise and confidence.
Speaks clearly and in an engaging
way that is interesting to listen to.
 
Points2 3 4 5  
7. Respect for the
opponent
Statements, responses and/or
body language were
consistently not respectful
Most statements and responses
were respectful and in
appropriate language, but there
was one sarcastic remark
Statements and responses were
respectful and used appropriate
language, but once or twice, the
body language was not
All statements, body language, and
responses were respectful and used
appropriate language
 
8. Timeliness
- Less than 3 minutes of
arguments.
- overtime due to presenting
unnecessary points.
- Less than 5 minutes of
arguments.
- overtime due to presenting
unnecessary points.
- Less than 8 minutes of
arguments.
- Maximize the time limit but
exceed a few minutes of time.
Maximize the time limit by following
proper format and rules of debate.
 
TOTAL SCORES
 
 
Tags