Eco Math Park Challenge: Engaging Students Through Collaboration, Exploration, and Real-World Mathematics

leosonia 2 views 13 slides Sep 22, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 13
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13

About This Presentation

The Eco Math Park Challenge is a project-based mathematics experience designed to immerse students in authentic, real-world problem solving. In this project, students act as junior city planners tasked with designing a sustainable community park within specific constraints: a 10,000-square-foot land...


Slide Content

“Eco Math Park Challenge: Engaging Students Through Collaboration, Exploration, and Real-World Mathematics”

Why Collaboration & Exploration? Mathematics is more meaningful when students work together. Collaboration builds communication, teamwork, and shared problem-solving. Exploration encourages creativity, multiple solution paths, and resilience. These skills mirror real-world practices in civic planning and STEM careers .   Collaboration ensures that every voice contributes, whether that’s calculating costs, sketching layouts, or analyzing data. Exploration, on the other hand, allows them to try out different ideas, test their limits, and revise when something doesn’t work. This combination not only deepens mathematical understanding but also develops 21 st -century skills such as communication, creativity, and critical thinking. And as educators, designing these kinds of tasks helps us grow professionally by moving beyond procedural teaching toward authentic, student-centered learning.”

Project Overview Students act as junior city planners working within real-world constraints: – 10,000 sq. ft. land allocation – $25,000 construction budget Use community survey data to guide design decisions Deliver a final presentation 3

Geometry (Spatial Design) Calculate areas & perimeters of features Apply symmetry, repetition, proportional allocation Ensure features fit within 10,000 sq ft Learning Outcome: Students will demonstrate spatial reasoning and efficient layout design using geometric principles. Critical Thinking: Students compare multiple layouts, analyze efficiency, and decide which structure best meets requirements.

Fixed $25,000 cap Algebraic expressions & inequalities Balance fixed & variable costs Learning Outcome: Students will construct algebraic models to manage financial constraints. Critical Thinking: Students consider trade-offs (e.g., benches vs. trees), optimize within limits, and defend their budget allocations. Algebra (Budget & Costs)

Statistics (Community Data) Survey analysis: mean, median, mode Visuals: bar graphs, pie charts Justify design choices with data Learning Outcome: Students will interpret and represent data to guide decisions. Critical Thinking: Students must resolve conflicts in data preferences, prioritize features, and justify inclusion/exclusion logically. 6

Collaboration & Exploration in Action Team roles & responsibilities Peer feedback & revisions Multiple solution paths Learning Outcome: Students will engage in peer learning and iterative problem-solving. Critical Thinking: Students critique peer designs, reflect on revisions, and adapt strategies for improved outcomes. 7

Professional Growth for Educators Practice in project-based design Facilitation of inquiry-based learning Differentiation & multiple entry points Learning Outcome (Teachers): Teachers expand PBL strategies and deepen integration of collaboration and exploration in math classrooms. Critical Thinking (Teachers): Teachers reflect on their own instructional choices and evaluate how to shift from procedural to authentic learning design . 8

Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking Learning Outcomes Apply geometry, algebra, and statistics to real-world design. Communicate mathematically and collaborate effectively. Develop problem-solving strategies through iteration and reflection. Critical Thinking Evaluate trade-offs and constraints in decision-making. Justify design choices with data and evidence. Compare multiple approaches and determine the most effective solution . 9

Differentiation in the Eco Math Park Challenge Multiple entry points: simple → advanced tasks Choice in strategy: equations, tables, graphs, visuals Flexible grouping for peer collaboration Scaffolds and teacher prompts for support Open-ended design tasks for advanced learners 10

Growth Mindset in the Eco Math Park Challenge 11 A growth mindset, as defined by Carol Dweck (2006), is the belief that abilities and intelligence can be developed through effort, perseverance, and learning from mistakes. This principle is deeply embedded in the EcoMath Park Challenge. As students design, analyze, and revise, they will encounter challenges and errors just like real planners do. These moments become learning opportunities, not failures. The game is structured around multiple drafts and peer discussions, encouraging students to revisit and improve their work based on feedback and reflection .

Conclusion Eco Math Park Challenge integrates geometry, algebra, and statistics. Collaboration and exploration drive deeper student engagement. Students develop real-world problem-solving and critical thinking skills. Educators expand strategies for project-based and inquiry-driven teaching. Together, we prepare students to imagine and design better futures. 12

Thank you
Tags