Introduction
Mikael Males
T
he study of medieval etymology demands a leap of faith in the modern
scholar. The etymologies are often false, and medieval authors had no
qualms about lending equal support to several mutually contradictory
etymologies. The case of medieval wordplay is, if anything, even worse. The
use of imperfect homonyms to convey essential points of theology, not only
for rhetorical impact in sermons, but also in works of a theoretical nature, may
come across as both inappropriate and trivial. Whatever our modern opinions
on the epistemic value of etymology and wordplay may be, however, they hold
essential clues to medieval modes of reading, as well as to medieval views on the
acquisition of knowledge generally. Once the eye gets accustomed to looking,
furthermore, such devices appear to be near ubiquitous in medieval literature,
and they may often serve as helpful guides for arriving at interpretations that do
justice to the cultural expectations of the authors and their intended audience.
Based on these observations, the present book has a threefold purpose. First,
it is intended to give a broad — if necessarily incomplete — overview of the
many medieval uses of etymology and wordplay, and how these can serve as
guides to textual interpretation. Some of these uses may appear alien to the lin
-
guist or even to the medievalist who is coming to this subject for the first time,
in which case the overviews by Vivien Law as well as Rita Copeland and Ineke
Sluiter may be highly recommended.
1
Second, it sets out to investigate how
1
Law, The History of Linguistics in Europe; Medieval Grammar & Rhetoric, ed. by Copeland
and Sluiter.
Mikael Males (
[email protected]) is Associate Professor of Old Norse Philology at the
University of Oslo.
Etymology and Wordplay in Medieval Literature, ed. by Mikael Males, DISPUT 30 (Turnhout: Brepols
2018), pp. 1–13
BREPOLS
PUBLISHERS 10.1484/M.DISPUT-EB.5.115595