EVOLUTION OF BRACKETS.ppt

3,387 views 168 slides Aug 01, 2022
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 168
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113
Slide 114
114
Slide 115
115
Slide 116
116
Slide 117
117
Slide 118
118
Slide 119
119
Slide 120
120
Slide 121
121
Slide 122
122
Slide 123
123
Slide 124
124
Slide 125
125
Slide 126
126
Slide 127
127
Slide 128
128
Slide 129
129
Slide 130
130
Slide 131
131
Slide 132
132
Slide 133
133
Slide 134
134
Slide 135
135
Slide 136
136
Slide 137
137
Slide 138
138
Slide 139
139
Slide 140
140
Slide 141
141
Slide 142
142
Slide 143
143
Slide 144
144
Slide 145
145
Slide 146
146
Slide 147
147
Slide 148
148
Slide 149
149
Slide 150
150
Slide 151
151
Slide 152
152
Slide 153
153
Slide 154
154
Slide 155
155
Slide 156
156
Slide 157
157
Slide 158
158
Slide 159
159
Slide 160
160
Slide 161
161
Slide 162
162
Slide 163
163
Slide 164
164
Slide 165
165
Slide 166
166
Slide 167
167
Slide 168
168

About This Presentation

Brackets are the basic components of fixed orthodontic appliances. They act as an intermediary between the teeth and the active components of the appliance.
However, design of brackets is an important factor for efficient tooth movement and control of the complex force system .


Slide Content

EVOLUTION OF BRACKET
SYSTEM
DR NIVYA KRISHNA
POST GRADUATE STUDENT
DEPT OF ORTHODONTICS
MAR BASELIOS DENTAL COLLEGE
,KOTHAMANGALAM
1

CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.
HISTORY OF BRACKETS
CLASSIFICATION OF BRACKETS.
EVOLUTION OF BRACKET MATERIAL.
EVOLUTION OF FIXED APPLIANCES &
BRACKETS.
EDGEWISE APPLIANCES.
MODIFICATIONS OF EDGEWISE
APPLIANCE.
UNIVERSAL BRACKETS.
LIGHT WIRE EDGEWISE TECHNIQUE.
ANDREWS SYSTEM.
ROTH SYSTEM.
MBT.
VARI SIMPLEX DISCIPLINE.
DUAL ENVIRONMENTAL BRACKETS.
ORIGINAL BEGG SYSTEM.
REFINED BEGG SYSTEM.
KAMEDINIZED BEGG.
RIBBON ARCH BUCCAL TUBES.
MODERNIZED BEGG COMBINATION
SYSTEM.
2

THE BEDDTIOT APPLIANCE.
CAT TECHNIQUE.
BRACS TECHNIQUE.
J-BRACKETS.
SELF-LIGATING BRACKETS.
LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS.
STRAIGHT WIRE APPLIANCE-NEXT GENERATION
CONCLUSION.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
3

INTRODUCTION
Bracketsarethebasiccomponentsoffixedorthodonticappliances.Theyactas
anintermediarybetweentheteethandtheactivecomponentsoftheappliance.
However,designofbracketsisanimportantfactorforefficienttoothmovement
andcontrolofthecomplexforcesystem.
ThetermbracketcameintouseinorthodonticswhenDr.Angleintroducedthe
“Ribbonarchappliance”in1916.
Bracketmaybedefinedasanorthodonticattachmentsecuredtoatoothforthe
purposeofengaginganarchwire.(Thurow)
Itactsasahandlethattransmitstheforcefromthe
activecomponentstotheteethandservestodeliverthenecessarytoothmoving
forces.
Thus,Orthodonticbracketsprovidethemeanstotransfertheforceappliedbythe
activatedarchwiretothetooth.
4

HISTORY OF BRACKETS
Anglewasfirsttodesignanduseabracket-likeattachmentby
introducinghispinandtubeappliance.
Initially,softgoldwasusedformanufacturingbracketswhichwas
replacedbyrigidstainlesssteel.
Later,thisattachmentwasmodifiedandintroducedas
RibbonarchAppliance.
Finally,AngleintroducedtheEdgewiseappliancewhichwas
designedtoallowtheorthodontiststoplacetheteethintoAngle’s
conceptofthe“lineofocclusion”.
Withfewexceptions,thefixedapplianceusedincontemporary
orthodonticsisbasedonAngle’sdesignsfromtheearly20thcentury.
5

Angle developed four major appliance system:
E-Arch.
Pin and tube.
Ribbon Arch Appliance.
Edgewise Appliance.
Overtheyears,bracketshaveundergonemanymodifications.
6

1728: Pierre Fauchard’sorthodontic appliance -Bandelette.
1849:DWINELLE:Jack Screw.
1889:John Farrar: Introduced concept of Lingual Removable Arch.
1905:E-ARCH.
1910:Pin and Tube.
1915:Ribbon Arch.
1928:Dr. Edward Angle: Edgewise Appliance.
1931: Dr. Spencer Atkin: Universal Appliance.
1933:Dr. Begg; Begg’s Bracket.
1952:Holdawayfirst used pre-adjusted brackets in order to reduce bending of archwires.
1952:Swain:IntroducedSiameseTwinBrackets.
7

1960s:JarabakandFizzel:TwinEdgewiseBrackets.
Early1960s:IvanLeeintroducedpre-torquedbracketdesigninordertoeliminatecomplicated
torquingbendsusedinconventionaledgewisearchwire.
1967:Dr.JackPerlow:ModifiedEdgewiseBracket.
1968:Jarabakintroducedpre-angulatedandpre-torquedbracketsforupperanteriors.
1968:P.C.Keslingintroducedtip-edgebracket.
1970:Dr.H.L.Eirew:BracketusingUnitekAlastiKtierings.
8

1970:Dr.F.FSchudyandG.F.Schudy:BimetricSystemofedgewise.
1971:AndrewsintroducedSWA(StraightWireAppliance)Technique.
1972:Dr.Kameda:KamedanizedBeggBrackets.
1972:Wildman:EdgelockAppliance.
1975:Dr.Kurz:Near-conventionaledgewiseapproachtolingual
mechanics.
1976:ROTH:IntroducedmodifiedSWAtechnique.
9

1976:R.M.Rickettsusedpre-angulatedandpre-torquedbracketsandintroducedBioprogressive
Technique.
1976:Dr.CravenCurz–LingualStraightwireappliance.
1980:HerbertHanson:SPEEDAppliance.
1981:W.J.Thompson:CombinationAnchorageTechniqueorModernBegg.
1982:WilliamThompsondevelopedCombinationbracketsthatinvolvedverticalandhorizontal
slots.
1982:Dr.KinyaFujita:MushroomArch(LingualOrthodontics).
1983:Dr.R.G.Alexander:VariSimplexDiscipline.
10

1985:Dr.RichardHocevar:BEDDTIOTTechnique.
1989:ThomasCreekmore:LingualMechanicalAppliance(CONCEAL).
1990:Dual Environmental Bracket.
1991: Dr. V. P. Jayade : J-Bracket
1992:Kazuto et al, 1994: Friction Free Bracket.
1993:Irwin Fletcher: ACTIVA Appliance.
11

1996:Time Bracket.
1997:John C. Voudoris: Interactive Twin Bracket.
1997:Deva Devanthan and James Chudzynski:Nu-edge Bracket.
1998:Viazis : Viazis System.
12

CLASSIFICATION OF BRACKETS
ACCORDING TO THE TYPE OF SLOT .
ACCORDING TO THE MODE OF ATTACHMENT .
BASED ON THE MATERIAL USED .
BASED ON THE MORPHOLOGY OF THE BRACKET .
BASED ON THE TECHNIQUE FOR WHICH IT IS USED
13

ACCORDING TO THE TYPE OF SLOT :
Ribbon Arch brackets.
Edgewise brackets.
ACCORDING TO THE MODE OF ATTACHMENT :
Weldable brackets.
Bondable brackets.
A. with mesh and
B. with grooves
ACCORDING TO MATERIAL USED :
Metal Brackets
Stainless steel brackets.
Gold –coated brackets.
Platinum coated brackets.
Titanium brackets.
14

Plastic Brackets
PolyCarbonate brackets
Poly urethane –composite bracket
Thermoplastic –polyurethane bracket.
Ceramic Brackets
Monocrystalline Alumina(Sapphire).
Polycrystalline Alumina.
Polycrystalline Zirconia (YPSZ).
15

BASED ON THE TECHNIQUE FOR WHICH IT IS USED
Begglight wire appliance.
Edge wise appliance.
Straight wire appliance.
Tip Edge appliance.
Lingual force adjusted Edge wise appliance.
Varisimplex.
Butterfly system.
BASED ON THE MORPHOLOGY OF THE BRACKET
Siamese
Mini –twin
Single wing
Self ligating
16

EVOLUTION OF BRACKET MATERIAL
Initially soft gold was used to manufacture brackets but was soon
replaced by rigid stainless steel.
Later Plastics were introduced in late sixties followed by introduction of
Ceramics in mid eighties.
17

ANGLE’S ERA
Initially all attachments were made in noble metals and their alloys
-gold (75%)
-platinum
-iridium
-silver
In 1887 Angle tried replacing the noble metals with German silver (Cu, Ni, Zn) but
ultimately stainless steel replaced these materials.
18

METAL BRACKETS
Advantages of the metal brackets –
1.Excellent strength.
2.Reduced friction .
3.Smooth surface finish.
Disadvantages of the metal brackets –
1.Corrosion
2.Not biocompatible.
3.Unesthetic .
19

GOLD BRACKETS
Advantages;
Biocompatible.
Disadvantages:
Pure gold is soft and cannot be used to make rigid brackets.
Deform under prolonged forces due to low hardness and
stiffness.
Poor Esthetics.
20

STAINLESS STEEL BRACKETS
Mainly austenitic steel used.
Advantages:
Smooth surfaced brackets with decreased friction.
Good Bond Strength.
Disadvantages:
Un-esthetic.
Corrosion of metal brackets: failure of joint during treatment.
21

PLASTIC BRACKETS
Introduction of new materials like polycarbonates and
polysulfones .
Advantage –
Esthetically acceptable when compared to steel.
Disadvantages-
1.Staining and discoloration.
2.Poor dimensional stability.
3.Undue friction between the bracket slot and the wire,
making sliding mechanics difficult.
4.Need for compatible bonding resin.
5.Cannot be re-cycled.
22
Tooth colored or clear brackets.

Plastic brackets
Silkon/SilkonPlus (American Orthodontics)
Elation (GAC)
Spirit MB (Ormco)
Composite bracket
Aesthetikline/Brilliant (Forestadent)
23

MAGNETIC BRACKETS
Produce minimum stress that occurred as a result of tooth movement.
When applied to tooth movement, initially the forces are light and once tooth starts moving,
the forces increase as the distance between magnets decreases.
Advantages:
Decreased treatment time.
Bone remodeling due to production of electro-current.
Painless.
Disadvantages:
Increased cost .
Magnetic force alone is insufficient to move teeth more than 3mm. Elastic chain must be
added.
24
Aluminum-Nickel-Cobalt magnets used.

CERAMIC BRACKETS
These were introduced in early 1980’s
Zulauf’sbrackets:opaque and bulky .
Earlier ceramic brackets were made of alumina( Brittle)
Later Zirconia bracketswere introduced -
-Surface hardening treatment was done
-Lower Young’s modulus
-Higher overall strength
Disadvantage –
Increased coefficient of friction
25

Ceramic Brackets
Mystique/ In-ovation (GAC)
INVU (TP Orthodontics)
Clarity (3M Unitek)
Radiance (American Orthodontics)
Inspire Ice (Ormco)
Pure (Orthotech)
Signature (Rocky mountain)
26

Advantages of ceramic brackets over plastic-
1.Stain resistant.
2.Durable .
3.Good dimensional stability.
4.Custom moulded for individual teeth.
5.Allowed incorporation of the SWA
feature.
27

Disadvantages
1.Fracture
2.Hardness: low
3.Bulkier
4.High friction
5.Enamel damage at the time of removal
28

COMPOSITE BRACKET
Twoormorepolymers.
Thesehavepropertiesintermediatebetweenthoseoftheconstituents.
Materialsshouldbesochosenthatthepropertyofoneconstituentimprovesthe
deficientpropertyofothers.
29

30
TITANIUM BRACKETS
Alternative to stainless steel
-in patients who had sensitivity to Ni.
Advantages-
-Greatest Corrosion Resistance.
-Excellent biocompatibility.
-Small size
-Matte finish ,blends better
with the tooth.
-Low thermal conductivity
-No metallic taste.
.
REMATITAN BRACKETS

Disadvantages –
-Difficult to fabricate.
-Not as esthetic as stainless steel.
-Fluoridated toothpastes corrode titanium
31

EVOLUTION OF
FIXED APPLIANCES
&
BRACKETS
32

33
PIERRE FAUCHARD’S ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE(Bandellette) : 1728
DWINELLE’S JACK SCREW: 1849

34
ANGLE’S RETRACTION SCREW :1887

ANGLE SYSTEM
35
A standard appliance must have five important properties-
1.Simple
2.Stable
3.Efficiency
4.Delicate
5.Inconspicuous
Patient Orthodontist
Manufacturer / supplier

E Arch -1905
36
Basic E arch
•Used for tipping tooth crowns into proper
alignment.
Disadvantage:
Provides no axial tooth control.

Ribbed E –arch
37

E ARCH WITHOUT THREADED ENDS
38

E ARCH WITH HOOKS
39

PIN AND TUBE-1910
40
•Can precisely position each
tooth.
•Vertical Tube parallel to long axis
of tooth.
Disadvantages:
Limited mesio-distal crown
displacement.

THE RIBBON ARCH-1915
41

42
•First appliance to provide three axis control of tooth movement.
•A Light-wire appliance.
•Widest cross-section: 0.9mm.
•Had vertical slot .
•Held in place by a lock-pin in each bracket with arch ends in molar
tubes.
Advantages:
•Rotations were obtained.
•Offered control over occluso-gingival movements.
Disadvantages:
•Difficult mesio-distal axial movement .
•Poor stabilization or anchorage for posterior teeth.

EDGEWISE APPLIANCE & BRACKETS
43
EdgewiseAppliance:Itisafixed,multi-unitorthodonticapplianceusingarectangularlabial
archwireligatedtobracketscementedtoindividualteethortobandsencirclingtheteeth.
Socalledbecausethebracketismachinedsuchthattherectangulararchwireisinsertedwith
itslongcrosssectionhorizontalinsteadofverticalasintheribbonarchbracket.
ItwasintroducedbyEdwardAnglein1928.
Itofferscompletecontroloveraxialinclinationofallteethinalldirections.Thus,theappliance
controlshorizontaltoothmovementsofrootandcorrectsabnormalinclinationsofteeth.
Insteadofusinglockpins,thearchwirewasheldtoslotsusingligaturewire.
Both rectangular and round wires might be used for mesial or distal tipping but for bucco-
lingual tipping, rectangular wires are preferred.

EDGEWISE APPLIANCE
Slot=0.022”X0.028”
0.050 Inch wide
Gold bracket
Gold band
Ligature tie
44
ORIGINAL EDGEWISEATTACHMENTS
A. WINGLESS ANTERIOR BRACKET
B. PROTOTYPE OF PRESENT
EDGEWISE BRACKETS.
E. STAPLES.
G. WASHERS THAT CAN BE THREADED ON ARCH TO CONTROL SPACE.

EDGEWISE BRACKETS
Theyareusedonthelabialorbuccalsurfacesofeverytooth(exceptlastmolar).
Thebracketshavehorizontalslotsforthearchwire,withupperandlowerwings
forligation.
Thearchwireistiedtothebracketbymeansofasoftligaturewirewiththe
wings.
45

THREE DIMENSIONAL CONTROL OF
TOOTH
First order bends: In & Out.
Second order bends: Tip.
Third order bends: Torque.
46

MODIFICATIONS
IN
ORIGINAL EDGEWISE
47

1.SINGLE WIDTH.
2.TWIN BRACKET.
3.REVERSE BASE CURVED TWIN.
4.LEWIS BRACKET.
5.ANTI TIP LEWIS BRACKET
6.VERTICAL SLOT LEWIS BRACKET.
7.CURVED BASE LEWIS BRACKET.
8.STEINER.
9.BROSSAURD.
48

SINGLE WIDTH BRACKET
Angleadvisedsolderingofgoldeyeletswhichwereplacedonorthodonticbandtobringabout
toothrotation.
Ligaturewiresweretiedfromtheeyelettothearchwireandrotatedthetooth.
Disadvantage:
Therewasneedofrepeatedtyingofeyeletsthroughoutthetreatmentinordertoprevent
relapseofrotation.
49

TWIN BRACKETS
Two edgewise brackets were joined together on the same base during manufacturing
process.
They were named as ‘Siamese Twin Brackets’by Dr. Brainerd Swain:1952.
Space between two brackets: 0.050”i.e. equal to the width of one bracket.
Advantage:
Ability to bring about rotation without using auxiliary eyelet ties.
Initially, could be used only on maxillary central incisors and molars.
Later four more designs were introduced so that they could be used on all the teeth.
50

TWIN BRACKETS
51

52
TWIN BRACKETS
ADVANTAGES
•Effective tooth rotation.
•Good control on axial inclination.
•Once the tooth is rotated, mere tying of bracket ligature wire would maintain the
tooth in its corrected position rather that re-tying the ligature, in order to prevent the
relapse.
•Frictional resistance is more and tendency for forward tipping is decreased.
DISADVANTAGES
•Loss of inter-bracket distance creates insufficient space of first and second order
bends.
•Decreased resiliency of wire between brackets.

CURVED BASE TWIN BRACKETS
The base of twin bracket was curved to adapt to the curvatures of canines
and pre-molars.
53

LEWIS BRACKET
He soldered auxiliary
rotation armthat abutted
against the bracket itself
and thus offered a lever
arm to deflect arch wire
and rotate the teeth
54

LEWIS BRACKET
Advantages:
Does not interfere with resiliency ,closing loops &second order bends.
100% correction & over corrections.
Quick and easier method than twin brackets.
Disadvantage:
Less control of axial rotation than twin brackets.
55

ANTI-TIP LEWIS BRACKET
It has notches or slots in the ends of the wings of brackets and therefore attach to a
wider area of contact.
Used mainly adjacent to extraction spaces and maxillary lateral incisors.
Advantages:
Control over axial inclination good.
Available in both large and short sizes to
accommodate small and big teeth.
56

CURVED WING LEWIS BRACKET
Therewascurvingofthebaseand
wingsofthebrackettoadaptto
caninesandpre-molars.
ADVANTAGES
1.Increasecontactwithband.
2.Reducestrappingofthefood.
57

VERTICAL SLOT LEWIS BRACKET
Here further refinement was done by incorporating a .020 x .020 vertical slot.
Use of uprighting spring to correct axial inclination possible.
58

BURSTONE SEGMENTAL ARCH
TECHNIQUE BRACKETS
He modified canine brackets by inserting a vertical tube for insertion of
retraction assemblies.
Molar and Second Pre-molar brackets were designed.
59
Edgewiseslot:.022x.028.
AuxiliaryVerticalTube:.017x.025vertical
auxiliarytube.

Thisbracketincorporatedflexiblerotationarmsandthereforedidnotrely
entirelyontheresiliencyofarchwirefortoothrotation.
Itusesasinglewidthedgewisebracketandhastheinherentadvantageand
disadvantageofthesame.
60
STEINER BRACKET

BROUSSARD BRACKET
Designedby“GrayfordBroussard”,1978.
Modifiededgewisebracketinwhichthereisadditionof
0.0185x0.046slot–toaccept0.018auxiliarywire
specialtorquebrackets.-0,7˚,17˚,22˚
Features –
-quick wing .
-vertical slot.
-round corners, smooth surface.
-horizontal slot.
-insert pin.
61

THE UNIVERSAL BRACKET
DevelopedbyDr.SpencerR.Atkinson,1931.
Itisamulti-bandedappliancehavingbracketsandbuccaland
lingualsheathsasitsprincipalattachments.
IthasbeencalledUniversalsince,differenttechniquescan
beusedwithit.
Ithasbeendesignedtoproducetoothmovementinthe
threeplanesofspace.
Centralshafttoonarrowandshallow.
Appliancehasundergoneperiodicrefinementswithout
losingitsessentialfeatures.
62

Design-
-Vertical hollow shaft with two lateral welding tabs.
-Central shaft has two slot openings :
1.Horizontal –Opens labially at gingival third.
2.Vertical–opens incisally and extends gingivally
one third of the bracket height.
 Gingival slot can only hold round wire (.008 -.016)
Incisal slot can hold single round, double round, twisted bundle of round, single
ribbon flat wire (.008x.020 up to .016x.028)
Wider mesiodistally and deeper buccolingually.
63

Combinationofverticalandhorizontalslotsprovidestheappliancewithfullcontrolinthree
planesofspace.
Incisalwire:
Rotations
Levelling
Torque
Guidingrailwhencoilspringsareusedatgingivallevel.
Gingivalwire:
M-Daxialinclinations
Guidewhenteetharemovedbodily
Fulcrumforlabio-lingualmovements
Leveling
64

To exert extra force, ‘Double action’type of
brackets can be used which have tabs or
wings between the occlusal and gingival
wire slots
Root Torquing type:Tabs extend outward to
allow extra ligation for excessive rotations
and provide extended leverage for mesio-
distal axial uprightingof teeth.
Two Curved brackets are used on maxillary
central incisors. In others, single curved
bracket is used.
65

Double Molar Sheaths : Used on molars to receive ribbon arch wires .
Horizontal Lingual Sheaths: Used on lingual surfaces of molars to receive ribbon
arch wires.
66

Thus,byexertingdoubleactionandwithboththewires(in
occclusal&gingivalslots)actingalongwitheachother,the
UniversalBracketsbecomeafourdimensionalappliancethat
offer:
Toothmovementandguidanceinamesio-distalandbucco-
lingualaspects;
Rotationonitsaxisand
Movementinaverticalplane.
67

LIGHT WIRE EDGEWISE TECHNIQUE
Jarabak and Fizzel: 1960.
It incorporated second and third order mechanics (tip and torque) in the
original edgewise appliance.
It controlled forces obtained from high deflection spring orthodontic
devices.
68

Itconsistsoftwoedgewisebrackets:
One;Long,cervicalwingtwinedgewisebracket.
Second:JarabakEdgewiseForceControlBracket:Long,edgewisebracketthatis
slottedverticallyatoneendandhorizontallyattheotherend.
HorizontalandVerticalbracketsareusedonlyonmaxillaryandmandibularanterior
teeth.
Advantages:
Exertsaccurateforcecontrolfortipping,rotationandbodilymovementofteeth.
Positiveaxialcontrolovercanineseliminatestheneedforuprightingmechanics.
69

ANDREWS SYSTEM
ANDREWS-father of preadjusted bracket system
The original SWA was introduced byAndrewsin 1972and it had the
features of Siamese edgewise bracket.
Study of 120 non-orthodontic normal cases, 1972
1
st
generation of preadjusted brackets
He recommended a wide range of brackets.
-For extraction cases, canine brackets with anti-tip, anti-rotation, and
power arms for control space closure.
-Three sets of incisor brackets with varying degrees of torque for different
clinical situation.

SWA BRACKET

However, early results with Straight-wire Appliance were disappointing.
Traditional heavy edgewise forces continued to be used
WAGONWHEEL EFFECT
Tip is lost as torque is added(1:4)

ROLLER COASTER EFFECT

Andrews described 3 system of brackets
Non programmed.
Partially programmed.
Fully programmed.
The fully programmed Bracket system represents the true pre-adjusted appliance
and consists of 2 series of bracket systems:
Standard brackets.
Translation / Extraction series brackets.
75

Features of standard brackets
1.Slot siting feature
2.Convenience feature
3.Auxiliary feature
76

1)SlotsitingfeatureTheyaredescribedin3planesofspace.
a)Midtransverseplane:Themidtransverseplaneofslotandcrownshould
bethesame.
Toachievethis,thefollowingsitingfeaturesarerequired–
Feature1:Themidtransverseplanesoftheslot,stemandcrownmustbethe
same.
77

Feature 2 :The base of the bracket for each tooth type must
have the same inclination as the facial plane of the crown at
the FA point.
78

Feature 3 :Each brackets inclined base must be contoured
occlusogingivallyto match the curvature of the crown.
79

b)MidSagittalplane:Themidsagittalplaneofeachslot
muchsuperimposeonafacialextensionofthecrownsmid
sagittalplane.
c)Midfrontalplane:Themidfrontalplaneofeachslot
mustsuperimposeonitscrown’sprominenceplane.
80

2) Convience feature :
These features make the appliance easier for the orthodontist to use and
sometimes more comfortable for the patient.
The gingival bases on posterior brackets are designed to extend laterally thus
facilitating ligation and eliminating gingival impingement.
81

Since the bases are inclined, the stem and the wings of mandibular
premolars and molars are directed more gingivally. This eliminates
occlusal interferences.
Identification : Fully programmed brackets are tooth types because they
are so much smaller than teeth, their differences are not always readily
visible without special markings.
82

3)Auxiliaryfeatures:
Thesecontributetothebiologicaspectoftreatment
ForEg:
Powerarms
hooks
facebowtubes
utilitytubes
rotationwings.
83

ANDREWS SYSYEM
Andrews described 3 system of brackets
Non programmed.
Partially programmed.
Fully programmed.
The fully programmed Bracket system represents the true pre-adjusted appliance
and consists of 2 series of bracket systems:
Standard brackets.
Translation / Extraction series brackets.
84

Translation/Extractionseries:
Translationisdefinedasuniformmotionofabodyinastraightline.Forsucha
movementtooccurtheforcemustbeappliedtotheobjectsCR.UnfortunatelyCR
oftoothisinrootsfromthestandardpointofphysics,bracketlocatedonthe
crownofatoothisinthewrongplacetobringabouttranslation.
Thebracketisocclusal/incisaltothetoothCR,sowhenaforceisapplied,tooth
insteadoftranslation,willtendtorotatearoundcenterofrotation.
Thuswhentheteethweretranslated,toovercomeproblemslikemesial/distaltip
androtationofteethadjacenttothesite,Andrewsintroducedthetranslation
seriesofbracketsin1972.
85

Thesebracketshadallqualitiesofstandardbracketsandsomeadditional
featureslike–
1)Counterrotation:
Thisfactorisbuiltbyrotationoftheslotarounditsverticalaxisinthe
directionithastobetranslated.
Foranefficienttransferofforcefromthebracketslottothecenterofthe
crownforrotation,themesialordistallengthofthebracketshouldbeequal
todistancefromtheslotpointtothetoothsverticalaxis.
<2mmMinimumtranslationbracket-2°
2-4mmMediumtranslationbracket-4°
>4mmMaximumtranslationbracket-6°
86

2)CounterMesiodistaltip:
Thiswasincorporatedtopreventthecrownfromrotatingwhentranslated.Itwas
donebyincreasingordecreasingtheangulationoftheslot.
Minimum translation 2°
Medium translation 3°
Maximum translation 4°
ThecounterMesiodistaltipofthebracketwillnotbesufficienttooppose
thetipoftheteethduringtranslation,becausethemesiodistalwidthofthe
bracketisnotequaltothedistancefromtheslotpointtotheCRoftooth.Thusa
gingivalextension(powerarm)isaddedfordeficientlengthofthebracket.
87

Identification:
BracketsarecolourcodedbasedonQuadrants.
U–RightQuadrantBlackdotondistogingivalwing.
U–LeftQuadrantGreendotondistogingivalwing.
L–RightQuadrantReddotondistogingivalwing.
L–LeftQuadrantWhitedotondistogingivalwing.
Lowercentralandlateralbracketsdonothavecoloreddots,butinsteadare
bevelledocclusally.
88

89
Andrew’s prescription

PART 2
90

PART 2
CONTENTS
ROTH
MBT
TIP EDGE
ALEXANDER
DUAL ENVIRONMENTAL BRACKET
BEGG APPLIANCE
REFINED BEGG SYSTEM.
KAMEDINIZED BEGG.
RIBBON ARCH BUCCAL TUBES
.
MODERNIZED BEGG
COMBINATION SYSTEM
THE BEDDTIOT APPLIANCE.
CAT TECHNIQUE.
BRACS TECHNIQUE.
J-BRACKETS.
SELF-LIGATING BRACKETS.
LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS.
STRAIGHT WIRE APPLIANCE-NEXT
GENERATION
CONCLUSION.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
91

ROTH PRESCRIPTION
It was introduced in early 1970’s after a five year clinical evaluation
of the Andrews Straight Wire Appliance
WORK OF ROTH
To avoid inventory difficulties of multiple bracket system,
ROTH recommended a single appliance system to manage
both extraction and non-extraction cases.
92

Roth prescription
94

MBT SYSTEM
Rangeofbracket:Themodernorthodontistexpectstohave3mainbracket
systemavailabletomeettheneedsofatypicalcaseload.
Standardsizemetalbracketswherecontrolisthemainrequirement.
MidsizedbracketsGiveslesscontrol,usedonaveragesmallteeth.
Estheticbracketsneededforolderpatients,wheremetalappearanceisnot
acceptable.
Rhomboidalshape:
TheoriginalrectangularshapeisconvertedintoRhomboidalshapesothatthe
bulkofthebracketisreducedandallowsreferenceslinesinboththeHorizontal
andVerticalplanestherebyarrestingtheaccuracyofbracketplacement.
95

Standard
Midsize
esthetic

MBT SYSTEM
Work of Mclaughlin & Bennet between 1975 & 1993

WORK OF MCLAUGHLIN,BENNET& TREVISI
BETWEEN 1997 & 2001

99

100

101

MBT prescription
102

TIP EDGE
IntroducedbyPeterKesling,1988basedonhisexperienceswithdifferential
toothmovement
Bracketsdesignedtopromotedistalcrowntippingonallteethexceptthose
distaltotheextractionsite.
Theslotisprogrammedtobringaboutmesialordistalcrowntippingatthesame
timecontrolfinalcrowninclination.
However,thebracketexertsautomaticcontrolduetoitsslotdesignandalso
applicationofauniqueelastomerictip-edgering,
anuprightingspringandarectangulararchwire.
103

BASIC DESIGN
It has aunique arch wire slot: Bevelled diagonally opposed corners of the
conventional edgewise archwire slot.
-slot size is .022 x.028
-lateral extensions or wings
-vertical slot .020 x.020
-deep grooves
104
TS: TIPPING SURFACE
US: UPRIGHTING SURFACE
CR: CENTRAL RIDGES

AdvantagesofTip-EdgeBrackets
Canstopfreedistaltippingofcanines.
Providesautomaticmesio-distaltipcontrol.
Absenceofparallelsurfacesinarchwireslotreducestheactionofundesired
mesialordistalroottorquingforcesduringoverbitecorrection.
Permitsretractionofbothdentalarches,whereverrequired(ClassIbimaxillary
malocclusion).
Permitsclosureofextractionspaces.
Theuniqueslotcanstopmesialordistalcrowntippingatapre-determined
inclinationandthus,increasetheanchoragepotentialofteeth.
Theslotmayalsofunctionasshockabsorbertohighlevelsoftorqueandmesio-
distaluprightingforces
105

Tippingsurfaceslimitdegreeofinitialcrowntipping;uprighting
surfacescontrolfinaltipandtorque.
106

Molar tubes –
.036 round gingival tube.
.022 x .028 occlusal tube.
They are available with –
1.Extraction and non extraction kits.
2.Torque in base/ face.
3.Over rotation bracket.
4.Positioning jigs .
5.Tip edge rings.
107

108
TIP EDGE BRACKETS FOR DIFFERENT TEETH

THE ALEXANDER DISCIPLINE
(VARI SIMPLEX DISCIPLINE)
This system is based on Edgewise philosophy that was developed by
Dr. R.G. Alexander.
VARIrefers to the variety of bracket types used whereas
SIMPLEXrelates to the kiss principle (keep it simple, sir)
PHILOSOPHY OF THE VARI’S SIMPLEX DISCIPLINE:
Thesizesandshapesoftheteethespeciallythemesiodistalwidthandcurvatures
influencetheappropriateinterbracketwidth.
Thebracketsshouldbeselectedsothattheywillprovidefordentalrotationand
archlevelingwithoutthenecessityoftimeconsumingverticalsprings,multiloopsor
extraarchwires.
109

Bracket Selection
Specificbrackettypesareassociatedwithspecificteeth.
TwinBrackets:Flatandlargesurfaceofmaxillarycentralandlaterals
allowsfullarchwireengagementinthetwinbracket.
LangBrackets:IntroducedbyHowardLand
Usedonlargeroundsurfacedteethlocatedatthecornersofthearch,
themaxillaryandmandibularcuspids.
Thelangbracketisconstructedinthediamondform,butitisasingle
bracketwithflatrotationalcontrolwings,eachcontaininga
mandibularhole.Theholeincreasetheflexibilityofthewingandcould
beusedforligation.
LewisBracket:RedesignedLewisbracketareusedonround
surfacedteethnotlocatedatthecornersofthearches.(Maxillary
andMandibularbicuspids)aswellassmall,flatsurfacedteeth
(mandibularincisors).
110

DUAL ENVIRONMENTAL BRACKET
Introducedin1990.
Anewbracketwasdesignedtocapitalizeonthecomputermodelingthat
demonstratedtheadvantagesofsmallwiresandgreaterintra-bracketspace.
Thisnewbrackethasalargerouterslot,formaximumarchwireflexibilityin
theinitialphase,andasmallinnerslotthatacceptssmallrectangularwires
formaximumcontrollaterinthetreatment.
Theouterslotmeasures0.040”fortwinbracketsand0.030”forsingle
brackets.
Theinnerslotcanbeeither0.016”or0.018”.
111

Advantages:
Fasterlevelingofarcheswithfewerarchchanges.
Thelargeposteriorintrabracketspaceallowslessfrictionwithworkingarches,
permittingtheteethtomovemoreeasilybothverticallyandhorizontally.
Easiertorquingofteethwithlessdiscomfort.
Theworkingarchisnotcloselyheldintheposteriorbrackets;itflexeswithinthe
slotandactsasashockabsorbertopreventstrainonthewirefromchewing.
112

MODERN BEGG’S
TECHNIQUE.
113

BEGG APPLIANCE
It utilized the ribbon arch type
brackets and was manufactured to
accept 016’ round wire
Wire was held in position with the
lock pins .020 x .045 slot.
114
Dr P.R.Begg ,1956.

REFINED BEGG
Brackets used are TP-256-00,
With a depth of .020 and Height of .045
Molar tubes–
Round molar tubes .036 and 6 mm length.
Oval tubes .072 x .024 and 5mm length.
Combination tube (TP Lab)
They consist of a round gingival tube of .036 and 6.2 mm length.
Rectangular .025 x .018 -5.5mm long
115

BUILT IN ADJUSTMENTS
Anti rotational brackets
Built in torque.
Additional round tubes and pins used in Refined Begg
116

KAMEDANIZED BEGG
IntroducedbyDrAkira
Kameda,1983.
Heintroducedtorquingand
reversetorquingbracketsin
1983
Ribbonarchbuccaltubein
1986.
117

In 1983 , he introduced torquing and reverse torquing brackets .Built in torque
adjustments is obtained by raising the incisal or gingival edge of the bracket base
away from the tooth surface.
Advantage of using round buccal tube with a round wire .But it had its own pitfalls-
Free tooth movement is possible ,but anchor molars tend to roll in.
Correcting lingually inclined molars is difficult.
Directing the forces of anchorage bends and bite opening bends is difficult.
118

TO OVERCOME THIS PROBLEM KAMEDA INTRODUCED –
RIBBON ARCH BUCCAL TUBES -1986
119

RIBBON ARCH BUCCAL TUBES -1986
In 1992 JIOS –mentioned that efforts are going on to develop a new type of
KB bracket with a built in T-Pin.Also labiolingual thickness of these KB
brackets are same as non torque brackets, regardless of the 10 ˚ or 20˚built
in torque.
120
TORQUE REGULAR Reverse T

MODERNIZED BEGG-COMBINATION TECHNIQUE:
WILLIAM J. THOMPSON: 1981.
Therationalebehindthisapproachwastodevelopa
techniqueandabracketsystemthatusestheadvantagesofboth
BeggandStraightwireatthesametimeminimizingthe
disadvantages.
Tounderstandtherationalebehindthedevelopmentofthis
appliance,onemustunderstandtheadvantagesanddisadvantages
ofboththeBeggandStraightWireApplianceSystems.
121

TheBeggapplianceisrapidinearlytreatmentbutbecomesmorecumbersomeinthe
finishingstages.Thestraightwiresystemispronetocomplicationsinearlyperiodsof
treatmentbutisefficientinthefinalfinishingadjustments.
Anappliancethatcapturestheadvantagesofbothsystemsandreducesthe
disadvantagesofbothisthecombinationbracket.
Thenewapplianceenablestheorthodontisttocombineboththetippingandbodily
movementprinciplesofmechanics.
Thedualcapabilityoftheapplianceisduetothecombinationdesigninwhichthe
lowerthirdofthebracketisatype256Beggbracketandtheuppertwothirdsofthe
bracketisa.018”x.025”straightwireslotwithin-outpositioningandpre-angulated
andpre-torqued.
122

BEDDTIOTStandsforBeggEdgewiseDiagnosisDeterminedTotally
IndividualizedOrthodonticTechnique.
Thesebracketsarenarrow,single-width(0.050inchor1.3mm)edgewise
bracketswith0.022inchx0.028inchhorizontalarchwireslots.
Onthelingualsideofthebracketisa0.020x0.020inchverticalslot.
Exceptfortorque,thebracketsareallidentical.Therefore,theyare
interchangeable.
Thebracketsaresmallinalldimensionstoensureoptimalappearanceand
minimallipandcheekirritation.Thisalsolessensocclusalinterference,enamel
surfaceinvolvedinbonding,andproblemswithgingivalproximityandoral
hygiene.
.
123
THE BEDDTIOT APPLIANCE
RICHARD HOCEVAR: 1985

Theverticalcanaccommodateligatures,elastichooks,rotationdevices,and
variousotherauxiliaries.
Thebasicbuccaltubesareconventional4.5mmlong,0.022x0.028inch
"edgewise"tubeswith25°lingualcrowntorqueforlowerand10°forupper
firstmolars.
Anadditionalrectangulartube(outertube)iscarrieddiagonallyacrossthe
buccalsurfaceofthebasictube,itsmesialendpointinggingivally.Theouter
tubecrossestheinnertubeatanangleofapproximately15°andissomewhat
gingivaltotheinnertube.
124

COMBINATION ANCHORAGE TECHNIQUE
(CAT) BRACKETS:
WILLIAM J. THOMPSON: 1988
TheCATbracketiscomfortableandestheticallypleasingtothepatient.
Ithasa.022”x.035”gingivalorribbonarchslotandeithera.018”x.025”
or.022”x.028”straightwireedgewiseslot.
Anenclosedverticalslotisalsoincorporatedintothebracketforusewithup
rightingandrotatingsprings,elasticorsurgicalfixationhooksandfor
attachmentoftandemordoublearchwires.
Allbracketsareidentifiedbycolorcodingdotsatthedisto-gingivalaspect.
Maxillarybracketsareredandmandibularbracketsareblue.
Molarattachmentsnowhaveconvertibledoubletubestofacilitateextending
thestraightwireintosecondmolartubes.
125

BEGG-RIBBON ARCH COMBINATION SYSTEM (BRACS):
NIKHIL S. VASHI
TheBegg-RibbonArchCombinationSystemisanappliancethatcombinesthe
advantagesofBeggappliancelikerapidbiteopening,useoflighttippingforcesfor
retractionwiththoseofEdgewiseandpreadjustedapplianceslikeprecisefinishing
andtotalcontrolovertoothmovements.
Thebrackethasonegingivalribbon-wiseslot(.018”x.027”)forroundand
rectangulararchwiresandtwoverticalslotsforlockpinsandligaturewires.
Italsohasanincisalslot(.020”x.020”)forligaturewireorelasticmodules.This
slotcanalsobeusedforastabilizingarchwireifneeded.
126

Themolartubeisrectangularribbonwiseforribbonarch.Itisplacedata6
degreeoffsetfordistalrotationtoachievebettermolarcontrol.
Thebracketdesignissuchthatitwouldallowfreetipping,controlled
tippingorbodilytranslationofteethasrequired.
127

Advantages-
Rapid differential movements of teeth with better control and less friction.
Helps in proper finishing of the case.
Need for patient co-operation is minimal.
Eliminates the need for heavy elastics.
Reduced the treatment duration.
128

‘J’ BRACKET-A NEW DESIGN OF BEGG (COMBINATION) BRACKET
The‘J’bracketwasintroducedbyDr.V.P.Jayadein1991.Thisbracketattemptsto
harnesstheadvantagesofboththeribbonarchandedgewisebracketsatthe
sametimeeliminatingtheirdisadvantages.
AdvantagesofMultipleSlotBracketsoverSingleSlotBrackets:
Acombinationbracketwithmorethanoneslotismuchmoreefficientthana
singleslotbracketbecausemanyofourtreatmentrequirementsarediametrically
opposite
Theyofferthepossibilityofapplyingforcestotheteethatdifferentareaseg.One
canapplycrown-tippingforcesclosertotheincisalmarginandrootmovingforces
closertothecervicalmarginofthecrowns.
Switchingslotshelpsinalteringorreinforcinganchorage.
Segmentalwires,whichoffergreaterversatilityinforcedistributioncanbeused
whenevernecessary.
Tandemwirescanalsobeused
129

Twin slot arrangement also has its peculiar disadvantages:
They drastically reduce mesiodistal tipping due to increased width
They reduce the inter-bracket wire span which reduces the working range of the inter-bracket
section of the wire
Net effect of the changed orientation of the slots:
Permits adequate mesio-distal crown tipping but restricts excessive crown tipping
Affords good rotational control
Allows to fully utilize the torquing abilities of rectangular wires
130

SELF-LIGATING BRACKETS
131

RUSSELL ATTACHMENT
The first self-ligating bracket, the Russell attachment, was developed by
Dr. Jacob Stolzenberg in 1935.
Design–
-A flat-head screw seated snugly in a circular ,threaded opening in the
face of the bracket.
-The horizontal screw could be loosened or tightened .
132

EDGELOCK BRACKET
1971-Dr Jim Wildman.
This was the first “passive” self-ligating bracket
Design –
-Bracket had a round body with a rigid labial sliding cap
-A special tool was used to move the slide occlusally to facilitate arch wire
insertion.
133

MOBIL-LOCK BRACKET
About 2 years later, in 1973, Dr. Franz Sanderintroduced the Mobil-lock
bracket.
Design-
-Semi circular labial disc .
-A special tool was used to rotate the disc into its closed or open position
134

SPEED BRACKET
“Speed” bracket introduced by Dr Herbert Hanson in 1976
and became available in the market in 1980.
Stands for-
S -Spring loaded
P -Precision
E -Edgewise
E -Energy
D -Delivery
135

Bracket Design-
Consists of a narrow single width bracket body.
Multislottedwith 3 horizontal slots:
1.Arch wire slot
2.Auxiliary slot
3.Spring retainer slot
136

Curved, flexible “Super-Elastic Spring Clip”
that wraps occluso-gingivally around the
bracket body.
Opens and closes in a vertical manner.
Labial arm of the spring clip forms the
flexible fourth wall.
137

TheSpeedApplianceFunction-
Thehighlyresilientspringclipcontrolstoothmovementinallthethree
planesofspace
RotationalControl:
Onarchwireengagement,thespringclipisactivatedbydisplacementfrom
therestingposition
-Rotational correction is achieved through torsional component of the
deflection.
-Deflection creates a rotational couple consisting of a fulcrum and spring clip
force.
138

Tipcontrol:
Tipcorrectionisachievedthroughthelabialdeflectionandsubsequent
returnofthespringcliptoitsrestingposition.
139

TorqueControl:
Residesincombinationofthemechanicalactionofthearch
wireintheslotwithconstantforceapplicationfromthespring
clip.
140

Further enhanced with the use of beveled SPEED arch wires.
Helps the operator in saving as much as 5 minutes per arch wire
change .
Offers full control even with the most undersized arch wires.
141

ACTIVA
In 1986, Dr. Erwin Pletcherintroduced the Activabracket
Had an inflexible curved arm that rotated occluso-gingivally around the cylindrical
bracket body.
Arm could be moved into a “slot-open” or “slot-closed” position with finger
pressure alone
Drawbacks:
1.Ease with which patients could open the bracket.
2.Large mesiodistal width
142

TIME BRACKET
In1995,DrWolfgangHeiserintroducedtheTime
bracket.
Design-
Rigid,curvedarmthatwrapsocclusogingivally
aroundthelabialaspectofthebracketbody
Aspecialinstrumentisusedtopivotthearm
gingivallyintotheslotopenpositionorocclusally
intotheslotclosedposition.
Stiffnessofthebracketarmpreventsinteraction
withthearchwire.
143

TWIN LOCK BRACKET
TheTwinLockbracketwasintroducedbyDr.JimWildman,in1998.
Ithadaflat,rectangularslide,housedbetweenthetiewingsofan
edgewisetwinbracket.
Theslideisopenedocclusallywithauniversalscaler.
144

DAMON SL I AND DAMON SL II
Between1996and1999,Dr.DwightDamonintroducedtheDamonSLIand
DamonSLIIbrackets
Thebasicdifferenceisthatthefirsthadalabialcoverthatstraddledthetiewings,
whilethesecondincorporatesaflat,rectangularslidebetweenthetiewings.
Slide moves incisally on the maxillary and gingivally on the mandibular brackets.
Special opening and closing pliers are required.
145

IN-OVATION BRACKET
Introduced in year 2000.
►Itisaself-ligatingbracketsystemconsistingofatwinbracketfor
rotationalcontrolandhasan“active”clipforseatingarchwire.
►Thebracketdesignnotonlycombinesalltheimportantfeaturesofan
effectiveself-ligatingsystem,itgoesevenfurthertoprovidethehighest
levelofversatility,functionandcomfort
Advantages:
►Shorter office visits.
►Shorter overall treatment time.
►Use of lighter forces.
►Increased patient comfort.
146

Four full tie wings.
Slot blocker.
Horizontal V Slot .
Compound contoured base.
Torque in base .
147

Recent advances in self ligating
brackets
Damon 3 brackets (2004)
Smart clip( 2004)
Damon 3MX brackets (2005)
Smart clarity SL
bracket(2007)
Discovery brackets(2007)
Damon Q (2009)
Smart clip SL3 (2009)
Harmony lingual self-ligating
bracket system (2011)
Sensation active ceramic
self-ligating bracket(2012)
BioQuick self-ligating bracket
(2014)
Carriere SLX self-ligating
bracket system (2014)
Empower 2(2016)
In-Ovation X (2017)
148

Brackets Used in Lingual
Orthodontics
149

Lingual Light Wire Technique
StephenFPaige–Aug,1982
Fujitaconfirmedthatorthodontictreatmentwithbracketsplacedonthe
lingualispossible.
Anobviousdisadvantagetothelingualapplianceisthedifficultyofinsertion
andremovalofarchwires.
150

Bracket Design Criteria:
1.Interbracketdistanceisreducedonthelingual.Therefore,the
bracketmustbedesignedtobeasnarrowaspossiblemesiodistally.
2.Mesiodistalrootcontrolbecomesmoredifficult–verticalslotforarch
auxiliaries.
3.Topographyofthelingualsurfacesofthemaxillaryandmandibular
anteriorteethvaryagreatdeal.
151

ArchwireDesign
Archwiresofapprox..002"
smallerdiameter.
Generalshapeofthe
archwiresresemblesthe
mushroomshape.
152

Molar Tube Design
-Ovaltubewithmesiogingivalhook.
-Increasespatientcomfort,allowsmolarcontrol,andwill
acceptaribbonarch
153

Lingual BeggLight Wire Technique
PeterKYen,Nov1986.
DevelopedatechniquethatusesregularBegglabialbrackets.
TP256-500mini-meshlowerincisorlabialbrackets,areusedforboth
upperandlowerincisors.
Upperlateralincisorlabialbracketsareadaptedtothecuspids,andthe
curveduppercuspidlabialbracketstothebicuspids.
.036”tubewithamesio-gingivalhook.
Themushroom-shapedarchwireshouldhavehorizontalloopsdistalto
thecuspids.
154

CONCEAL SYSTEM
Aug1989-ThomasCreekmore.
DevelopedbyUnitekCorp.
Anacceptablelingualorthodonticappliancesystemmust
includethefollowingkeyelements-
◦Itshouldalignteethfromthelingualsideasefficientlyasfromthe
labialside.
◦Ameansofpositioningbracketspreciselytocreatea“near”SWAon
thelingualside.
155

Thefoundationofthedesignistheopeningofthewireslottotheocclusal
aspectratherthantothelingualaspect.
156

Decreaseininterbracketdistanceonthe
lingualsidenecessitatestheuseofsmaller
archwires.Hence,slotsizeis.016”x.022”.
AnteriorbracketshaveaYconfiguration
withasingletiewingprojectinggingivally
andtwintiewingsprojectingocclusally
157

Friction Free Bracket
Kazutoetal,1994.
Basicideaofthedesignwastoreducefrictionbetweenthe
bracketslotandthearchwire.
LigaturedoesnotpressagainstthearchwireintheFFbracket
158

Recent advances in lingual brackets
Fujita lingual Bracket(Forstadent)
Stealth Brackets (American orthodontics)
Philippe self ligating lingual bracket -Massimo Ronchinin 1994
Kelly Bracket
Kurz lingual bracket
In –ovation l bracket (GAC)
Braces(Incognito)
159

Straight Wire: The Next Generation
IntroducedbyCreekmoreandRandyin1993.
Frequently,anticipatedresultsarenotachievedbyusingpreadjusted
appliancesandstraightwires.
There are at least five reasons –
1.Inaccurate bracket placements
2.Variations in tooth structure
3.Variations in antero-posterior and vertical jaw relationsrequire
variations in the position of the maxillary and mandibular incisors
4.Need for overcorrection
160

5. Mechanical deficiencies of the edgewise appliance
a. Force application away from C
Res.
b.Playbetweenarchwireandslot
c.Forcediminution.
161

THE SLOT MACHINE
ThomasCreekmorehasdesignedtheslotmachineinsuchawayforplacementof
bothconventionalandlingualbracketsdirectlyontothemalocclusionmodel
Eachtoothwillbedesignatedwithspecifictipandtorquevalue.
Thebracketslotisorientedtothemachine.
Theplacementofbracketshavingeitherhorizontalorverticalaccessarchwire
slotsisdonebytheslotmachine
162

CONCLUSION
Understandinganduseofhistoricevolutionofbracketsaidinbetterunderstandingof
present-dayBracketsandpredicttheirfuturedevelopments.
Presently,fivebracketshavewithstoodthetestoftime:
a.)StandardEdgewiseBracketb.)Pre-adjustedEdgewiseBracketc.)Beggd.)
CombinationEdgewiseorModernBegge.)TipEdge.
Today’spreferencesaretowardspre-adjusted,machined,fourcomponenttwin
bracketswithroundedformsandcertainaidingfeaturesliketorque,in-and–outsand
counter-rotationfeatures.
Thus,withneweraprecisionbracketsareevolvingthatinvolveefficientforce
distributiontothetoothtobringaboutdifferenttoothmovementsinlesstime
163

BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. BeggPRandKeslingPC.OrthodonticAppliances.Begg’sOrthodonticTheoryandTechnique,edn2,
Philadelphia,Saunders,1971,158-174.
2. RaymondThurow,EdgewiseOrthodontics,Edn3,Mosby,1972,16-20,145-151,160-189.
3. GraberTM.Orthodonticapplianceandtreatmentphilosophy;OrthodonticPrinciplesandPractice,edn3,
Philadelphia,Saunders,1995:535-539.
4. DevnathanDandChudzynskiJ.Technicalevaluationofaneworthodonticbracket.JCO,1997;31.
5. GraberandSwain:BiomechanicalPrinciplesandReactions:OrthodonticcurrentPrinciplesand
Techniques,1stedn.,JayPeePublishers,1991:150-168.
6. CreekmoreT.LingualOrthodontics-Itsrenaissance,AmJOrthodDentofacOrthop1989(96):120-137.
7. ProffitWR,MechanicalPrinciplesinOrthodonticforcecontrol;ContemporaryOrthodontics.Edn
2,Mosby,1993:385-391,410-414.
8.DewelBF.TheRibbonArch–ItsinfluenceinthedevelopmentofOrthodonticAppliances.AngleOrthod1981;
51:264-68.
164

9.HocevarRA.Begg-edgewiseDiagnosis-DeterminedTotallyIndividualizedOrthodonticTechnique:
Foundation,DescriptionandRationale.AmJOrthodDentofacOrthop,1985(88):31-46.
10.ThompsonW.J:CombinationAnchorageTechnique:AnUpdateofCurrentMechanism,AmJ
OrthodDentofacOrthop,1988;93;363-79
11.KamedaA.KBTechnique-ItstheoryandPractice:PartI,J.I.OrthodSoc,1992;23:51-56.
12.HamulaDW,HamulaWandSernetzF:PureTitaniumOrthodonticBracket,JClinOrthod,1996(30)
:140-144.
13.LindquistJT.Theedgewiseappliance,InGraberTM:OrthodonticsCurrentPrinciplesand
Techniques,Edn3,C.V.Mosby,1985:456-460,676-687.
14.Kesling:ExpandingthehorizonsofedgewiseArchwireslot,AmJOrthodDentofacOrthop,1988
(94):26-37.
15.SwartzML.CeramicBrackets.JClinOrthod,1988(22):82-88.
165

16. Alexender, Gorman, Hilger; Lingual orthodontics: a status report: part 5-lingual mechano-
therapy, J Clin Orthod, 1983, 17 (1): 99-115.
17. Milton Rabine: The Rationale of Begg Therapy; J Clin Orthod, 1968, 2 (9) : 338-341.
18. Wofgang Heiser: TIME: A New Orthodontic Therapy; J Clin Orthod, 1998, 32 ( 1): 44-53.
19. Alexander: The Vari Simplex Design: Part 1-Concept and Appliance Design; J Clin Orthod,
1983, 17 (6) : 380-392.
20. Stephen H. Paige: The lingual Light Wire Technique; J Clin Orthod, 1982, 16 (2) : 534-544.
21. Broussard, Shia: The Broussard Hook and Eye Clasp Fixed-Removable Appliance; J Clin Orthod,
1978, 12 (6): 412-420.
22. Jorge Fastlicht: The Universal Appliance Today-Part 1; J Clin Orthod, 1969, 3 (1) : 582-589.
23. Swain and Ackerman: An Evaluation of Begg Technique; Am J Orthod, 1969 ( ) : 122-141.166

24. Thompson: Combination Anchorage Technique: An Update of Current Mechanics; Am J
Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1988, 93 (5) : 363-379.
25. Hocevar: BEDDTIOT: Introduction to Clinical Applications; Am J. Orthod Dentofac Orthop,
1987, 92 (1): 50-69.
26. Harradine: The clinical use of Activa self-ligating bracket; Am J. Orthod Dentofac Orthop,
1996, 109 (3) : 319-328.
27. RH Roth: The Straight Wire Appliance: 17 yrs later; J Clin Orthod, 1987, 24 (2 ) : 632-642.
167

168