FINAL DEFENSE ABUNDA GROUP.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

educational purposes

1. ‘’ DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF INDIGENOUS FOOD STAND ’’

2. PRESENTED BY: DELIA FLOR M. ABUNDA SANDRA JAY B. BANTAYAN EMELIZA BANSAG JESSIE JEFF AMPO In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirement for the Degree of BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY AND LIVELIHOOD EDUCATION MAJOR IN INDUSTRIAL ARTS  

3. CHAPTER 1

4. INTRODUCTION The existin g design in cooking a loot of indigenous people are disadvantageous, and those who practice them are uncomfortable due to the design of the device or equipment that must be used while cooking. The issue is that when it comes to cooking indigenous foods, people frequently run into difficulties.

5. Cooking is the art and science of preparing food for consumption via the use of heat. Cooking includes the full range of culinary techniques preparing raw and cooked for the tables; final dressing of meats, fish and fowl; cleaning garnishing dishes; decorating desserts; and planning meals ( Groller Encyclopedia of Knowledge ,1998).

6. Indigenous people have contributed in preserving the natural environment. Most of them resist change. They continue to practice and treasure indigenous knowledge from long evolved culture and pattern of living. Their method of preparing and cooking is surprisingly simple. There is no special tools and utensils needed. They can produce cooking tools and eating utensils by making use of what is in their surroundings even during special occasions.

7. Total product (total output FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY The study is supported by theory of Newton’s fourth Law of motions which states that if you add a number of such motions, that item will continue to move at zero gravity with all of them, Mithra (2019). Because the device indigenous food stand it required the effort of the motor which implies that the food stands movement will be determined by the force of motor. This device was so helpful because it serves to make the work easy and fast and it has a design to prevent in any kind of hazardous during for our cooking.

8. Statement of the Problem The research entitled ‘Design and fabrication of Indigenous Food Stand. Sought to determine problems that usually happen during cooking. Most indigenous people face difficulties in cooking a loot. Most problems that are being encountered by cooking a loot are; How to cook a loot with no hassle?   2.How to cook a loot comfortable and can’t face difficulties?

9. Objectives of the study Determine the project in terms of the following: a. Technical Feasibility b. Economic and Financial Viability c. Environmental Soundness d. Political Acceptability e. Social Acceptability

10. CHAPTER 2

11. METHODOLOGY RESEARCH DESIGN This study used developmental experimental type of research utilizing quantitative approach which deals with mathematical or competition techniques.

12. Sources of Data The researchers conducted the evaluation using a survey questionnaire with twenty (20) respondents. Our respondents are particularly an indigenous people who are used an existing design to evaluate the Technical Feasibility, Economic and Financial Viability, Environmental Soundness, Political Acceptability, social Acceptability..

13. Materials and Procedures In this portion, the actual design of the product is presented. It contains the project profile of the project presents.  

14. Data gathering procedure The researcher gathered data based on the following The researchers made a letter of permission towards the respondents. The survey questionnaire was adopted from DOST-TAP and conducted it to the respondents of this study Upon the approval of the letter, the researchers individually distributed the survey questionnaire and explained the primary instructions for an achievable of the questionnaire. For instant, all respondents have completed answering the survey questionnaires. The data gathered were tabulated and collated and subjected it for statical treatment.

15. Statistical treatment The study utilized descriptive statistics particularly the mean. According to Hayes(2021, descriptive statistics are brief descriptive coefficients that summarize a given data set, which can be either a representation of the entire or sample of population.

16. CHAPTER 3

17. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION   This chapter covers presentation, analysis, and interpretation of data. It generally indicates the operation and description of the technology. The process describes briefly the series of suggestions and operation required for the effective and efficient utilization of the device, this includes the operating procedures, maintenance, safety control measure structure of the developed technology.

18. Presentation of Data Table 2 below shows an Assessment on Technical Feasibility of design and fabrication of Indigenous Food Stand device. Most of the respondents found that indigenous food stand device Furthermore, based on the respondent’s collected data that indigenous food stand is technically feasible which it obtained a total mean of 4.48. This means that indigenous food stand device can be protected by patents, has unique features, safe, and capable to be manufactured in a large scale.

19. Table 3. presented the Economic and Financial Viability of indigenous food stand device . This technology is economically and financially variable which obtained with a highest mean of 4.68 this means that indigenous food stand device can be an alternative/substitute product over the existing arts, can have potential investors and operators, affordable, able to meet the needs of everyone and has stable supply of raw materials.

20. Table 4 presented the Environmental Soundness of indigenous food stand device. Indigenous food stand device has environmental soundness which obtained a total mean of 4.59 and evaluated as environmentally friendly. This showed that the indigenous food stand does not pose threats to the environment, does not pose hazardous effects to plants, animals and human welfare, no harmful threats direct and indirect to the works, does not produce negative impacts on noise in the vicinity, does not produce alarming chemical content and does not produce waste that are not manageable.  

21. Table 5 presented the Political Acceptability of Indigenous Food Stand device . The respondents found that indigenous food stand was Politically Acceptable which obtained the total mean of 4.57 . This showed that the technology is compliant with consumer laws, supported by government programs, compliant with safety regulations, service provider that matches the objectives and interest of the target end user and meets the regulatory requirements and standards for its utilization.

22. Table 6 The respondents found that indigenous food stand device was Socially Acceptable which had obtained the total mean of 4.48 . This primary means that the technology is compatible with social practices, does not oppose traditions or cultural practices, can be operated by both sexes with ease and precision, can serve the need of the majority of those whom it seeks benefits and it is acceptable to all consumers.

23. T able 8 presents the functionality in terms of Effectiveness of indigenous food stand. As evaluated by the researchers that the total mean of effectiveness indigenous food stand was 4.26 which describes that this technology is effective. This means that the technology has high quality standard, durability and sustainability. The materials used to fabricate the project are appropriate for the intended function and is locally available and can be made by any person. The technology is affordable enough for the consumers and it is economically friendly.

24. TABLE 9 It shows the result of performance ,and most of the answer of the respondents we found out that the technology was very easy to use, user friendly, durable, applicable to some certain users, has an accurate contribution towards the product of this project which obtained a highest mean of 4.4.

25. Table 10 presented the functionality in terms of safety of the Indigenous food stand. The total mean in terms of Safety of the was 4.15 which evaluated and described the technology as safe. This means that the technology was appropriate and convenient to all users, the design considers the safety of the user, has good quality and practical application, properly fabricated, provides durability, simple operational function and the design is ergonomically inspired.

26. Capabilities This technology can carry 10kg of food, consist 1kgs. that you need to put in every bamboo tube. It is multifunctional because it can carry bamboo tube with the size of 3 inches in width and 29 inches in length.

27. Longevity The longevity of the innovated technology will last up to 8-10 years with proper care and maintenance. the technology was made of metal bar with plane sheet that is why it can last long. V

28. Operating Procedures Prepare your roasted food consisting of any kind of dishes that you wanted to cook with some spices contained in a bamboo tube. Before you put the plug on the outlet make sure your roasted food inside the bamboo tube was already put in the guide bar. Place the wood charcoal under the placed bamboo tube and light it. Put the plug in the outlet so that the electric motor washing will start to move and the rotation of the guide bar will be occurred. When the roasted food is about to cooked, you may slowly pull the plug to off the technology. V

29. SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATION   In this chapter presents summary of findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the project entitled Design and Fabrication of Indigenous Food Stand.  

30. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS This technology had undergone different test for validity, such as functionality, cost effectiveness aesthetic and design. As validated, it was found out that the device is a necessary device to improve individuals’ abilities. And this device was made up of essential parts in terms of supplies, tools and equipment to be used. The device was easy to operate, efficient, has a good appearance and can save more effort and time rather than the existing design. 1. The tool is composed of different parts: angle bar, flat bar, sprocket engine, electric motor washing, polya belt, chain, guide bar, plain sheet, bamboo tube, bearing, plug, and wire. 2. The technology found out as perceived by the respondents to be technical feasibility, economic and financial viability, environmental soundness’, political acceptability and social acceptability with the total mean of 4.48,4.68,4.59, 4.57 and 4.48.

31. CONCLUSION Based on the data and results of the assessment and findings of this study, the technology is therefore: The technology technical feasibility, economic and financial viability, environmental soundness, political acceptability and social acceptability. The technology tends to work according to it serve various functions. The technology carries a heavy food up to 10kg.

32. Thank You!