Functional movement screen and Performance Testing

Presentation on functional movement screen and performance testing

1. FMS AND PERFORMANCE TESTING

2. Scope REVIEW OF THE CURRENT LITERATURE AND PRACTICES APPLIED AT HANDS-ON CLINIC

3. CONTENT TESTING TERMINOLOGY SELECTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF TEST TYPES OF TESTS AND OCCASIONS FUTURE AREAS OF INTEREST WHAT IS FMS FMS SCORING VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF FMS IN INJURY PREDICTION FMS AND ITS PRACTICAL APPLICATION DEMONSTRATION

4. WHY PERFORM TESTS GOAL OF S&C = ASSIST TO SUSTAIN AND IMPROVE PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE = JUMP, SPEED, AGILITY, POWER EXPRESSION, SUSTAIN NOT A PREDICTOR OF TECHNIQUE OR SKILL ABILITY TESTING = CORE OF EVALUATION PROCESS IDENTIFY PHYSICAL CAPABLITIES , AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT GOAL SETTING

5. TESTING TERMINOLOGY FIELD AND LAB TEST TESTS CONDUCTED WITH MINIMAL EQUIPMENT TESTS DONE IN LAB USING EQUIPMENT AEROBIC CAPACITY (VO2 MAX) 3 MIN STEP TEST CPX Test CHOICE OF TEST GOLD STANDARD CONVERGENT CONCURRENT PRE TEST, MID TEST AND POST TEST

6. TESTING TERMINOLOGY VALIDITY – EXTENT TO WHICH A TEST MEASURES WHAT ITS SUPPOSED TO FACE VALIDITY – BMI OF AN ATHLETE HIGH FACE VALUE TO LAYMAN CONTENT VALIDITY – RELEVANT SPORTS COMPONENTS CERTIFIED BY EXPERTS CRITERION REFERENCED CONCURRENT CONVERGENT PREDICTIVE DISCRIMINATIVE

7. TESTING TERMINOLOGY RELIABILITY – DEGREEE OF CONSISTENCY AND REPEATABILITY OF RESULTS TEST-RETEST – CO RELATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT ADMINISTRATIONS MEASUREMENT ERROR INTRA SUBJECT – CONSISTENCY OF PERSON BEING TESTED INTRA RATER – CONSISTENCY OF PERSON ADMINISTERING TEST INTER RATER – CONSISTENCY BETWEEN DIFFERENT TESTERS

8. SELECTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF TESTS TEST SELECTION SPECIFICITY METABOLIC OR ENERGY SYSTEM AEROBIC, ANAEROBIC, ALACTIC PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOMECHANICAL POWER, STRENGTH, HYPERTROHPY POSITION AND MOVEMENT PATTERN EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING STATUS TRAINING HISTORY AND PROFILE BEGINNER OR ADVANCED AGE AND SEX PRE ADOLESCENTS CHIN UPS AND PUSH UPS FOR WOMEN ATHLETES

9. SELECTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF TESTS SEQUENCE OF ADMINISTRATION NON FATIGUING TESTS AGILITY TESTS MAXIMUM POWER AND STRENGTH SPRINT TESTS MUSCULAR ENDURANCE ANAEROBIC CAPACITY AEROBIC CAPACITY COMPARISON WITH NORMATIVE DATA PUSH UP AND CURL UP STANDARD 1.5 MILE RUN STANDARD

10. TYPES OF TESTS NON FATIGUING HEIGHT,WEIGHT,FLEXIBILITY AND VERTICAL JUMP AGILITY T TEST,PRO AGILITY,HEXAGON MAXIMUM POWER AND STRENGTH POWER CLEAN AND 1RM SQUAT SPRINT TEST – 30MTR,40MTR,40 YARD LOCAL MUSCULAR ENDURANCE PUSH UP,YMCA BENCH PRESS,CURL UP ANAERBOIC CAPACITY – 300 YARD DASH AERBOIC CAPACITY 1.5 MILE RUN,12 MIN RUN, YO-YO IRT

11. FUTURE AREAS OF INTEREST NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT SPORTS HOW TO CONDUCT ATHLETE ANALYSIS AND GOAL SETTING INTERPRETATION OF TESTING DATA PROGRAM DESIGN VARIABLES EXERCISE SELECTION AND TECHNIQUE CORRECTION NUTRITION GUIDANCE FOR ATHLETES

12. WHAT IS FMS PRE PARTICIPATION SCREENING TOOL COMPRISES 7 INDIVIDUAL TESTS WITH INDIVIDUAL AND OVERALL SCORING DESIGN TO REVEAL COMPENSATORY MOVEMENT PATTERN SACRIFICING EFFICIENT MOVEMENTS FOR INEFFICIENT ONES SEQUENCE OF MOVEMENTS DEVIATING FROM LEAST INJURIOUS TEMPLATE LOW SCORE PREDICTS GREATER RISK OF INJURY* RELIABLE TOOL FOR MEASURING MID TEST OUTCOME RESCREEN FEEDBACK 4-6 WEEK COMPENSATION IMPROVEMENT EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION METRIC

13. FMS SCORING TOTAL OF 7 TESTS DEEP SQUAT,HURDLE STEP,INLINE LUNGE,SHOULDER MOBILITY,ACTIVE STRAIGHT LEG RAISE,TRUNK STABILITY PUSH UP AND ROTARY STABILITY EACH RATED TO BETWEEN 0 AND MAXIMUM OF 3 0 – PAIN 1 – UNABLE TO PERFORM 2- PERFORMS WITH COMPENSATION 3 – PERFORMS WITHOUT COMPENSATION PERFECT SCORE OF 21 CUT OFF 14 POINTS

14. COMPENSATIONS DETECTED OVERHEAD SQUAT SHOULDER, HIP AND ANKLE MOBILITY STABILITY IN SCAPULA, THORACIC HURDLE STEP STEP & STRIDE MECHANICS SINGLE LEG CLOSED CHAIN STABILITY HIP STABILITY INLINE LUNGE SPINE STABILITY HIP MOBILITY SHOULDER MOBILITY EXTERNAL & INTERNAL ROTATION ACTIVE STRAIGHT LEG RAISE CORE STABILITY HIP FLEXOR/EXTENSOR MOBILITY

15. COMPENSATIONS DETECTED TRUNK STABILITY PUSH UP CORE STABILITY STABILIZE SPINE IN SAGITAL PLANE ROTARY STABILITY NEUROMUSCULAR COORDINATION PELVIC AND SHOULDER GIRDLE STABILITY

16. FMS SCORING AND RELIABILITY CUTOFF SCORE OF 14 – BASED ON STUDIES IDENTIFYING THE SCORE CORELATED WITH CORRECT PREDICITON OF INJURY BY A STATISTICAL METHOD MOST UNTRAINED HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS ABOVE CUTOFF STUDIES CONDUCTED SHOWED MODERATELY ACCEPTABLE RELIABILITY

17. FMS VALIDITY FOR PREDICTING INJURY BENEFICIAL AND NON BENEFICIAL VALIDITY UNDESIRABLE HIGH LEVEL OF FACE VALIDITY PARTICIPANTS CAPABLE OF OUTCOME MANIPULATION LOW ON CONTENT VALIDITY UNABLE TO DEFINE OBJECT OF MEASUREMENT APART FROM COMPENSATION IDENTIFYING COMPENSATORY MOVEMENTS CAN NOT BE RELATED TO INJURY OR PERFORMANCE PREDICTION COMPENSATORY PATTERNS DISPLAYED DURING SCREEN DIFFERED FROM THOSE DISPLAYED DURING SPORTING MOVEMENTS POOR CORELATION BETWEEN OUTCOMES OF VARIOUS TESTS ATHLETE MAY HAVE ABOVE CUT OFF SCORE BUT LOW SCORE ON A TEST

18. FMS AND ITS PRACTICAL APPLICATION Athletes with score >14 better change in performance Improvement in FMS feasible via exercise Tangible monitoring and key motivator for promoting exercise adherence Cost benefit and Trade off Face validity in absence of availability of other tests Moderate reliability and inter staff Prediction in early loading evaluations (Back squat and Lunge) Cost effective test

19. DEMO