G2 NORMATIVE EDUCATION PHILOSOPHY edng.pptx

masteral

1. Normative educational philosophy By: Group 2

2. TOPICS TO BE DISCUSSED Introduction Major Schools of the Philosophy Application in Education Criticisms 2

3. What is Normative Educational Philosophy?

4. Normative educational philosophy focuses on what education should be like, including the goals, values, and methods that guide teaching and learning. It explores what is important to teach and how to teach it effectively to shape students' development. Essentially, it answers questions about the ideal purpose and approach of education.

5. Although Normative Educational Philosophy doesn't have a single founder, it has been shaped by many influential thinkers throughout history. Key figures include Plato , who believed education should develop virtue and wisdom; John Dewey , who emphasized education as a tool for democracy and social progress; and Immanuel Kant , who focused on moral development through education. These philosophers, along with others, contributed to defining what education should aim for and how it should be practiced.

6. Major schools involved 6

7. SOME MAJOR SCHOOLS INVOLVED ARE THE FOLLOWING: THESE 5 ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ONES WHO EMBODY THE NORMATIVE EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY THE MOST ALTHOUGH EACH SCHOOL DIFFERS FROM EACH OTHER ON HOW THEY INTERPRET THE NORMATIVE EDUCATION APPROACH. 7

8. PERENNIALISM Perennialism is a normative educational philosophy that advocates for the teaching of timeless knowledge, enduring truths, and classic works of civilization. It is based on the belief that certain ideas and principles have stood the test of time and are therefore essential for students to learn to develop their intellectual and moral faculties. Following Key Principles: TIMELESS TRUTHS INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT MORAL EDUCATION TEACHER-CENTERED APPROACH FOCUS ON CLASSICALS 8

9. ESSENTIALISM Essentialism is a normative educational philosophy that emphasizes the teaching of foundational knowledge and skills deemed essential for all students. Rooted in the belief that there is a core body of knowledge and intellectual skills that students must master to become productive, responsible citizens, essentialism advocates for a structured, disciplined, and teacher-centered approach to education. 9 KEY PRINCIPLES OF ESSENTIALISM ARE: CORE KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS TEACHER CENTERED DISCIPLINE AND ORDER RIGOROUS ACADEMIC STANDARDS PRACTICAL KNOWLEDGE

10. progressivism​ Progressivism is a normative educational philosophy that emphasizes experiential learning, student-centered instruction, and the development of critical thinking skills. This philosophy is grounded in the belief that education should focus on the whole child, including their emotional, social, and intellectual development. Progressivism arose in response to more traditional, authoritarian forms of education, advocating for a more democratic, inclusive, and flexible approach to teaching and learning. KEY PRINCIPLES: STUDENT CENTERED EXPEIRENCE BASED CRITICAL THINKING DEMOCRATICE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT INTERGRATED CURRICULUM 10

11. RECONSTRUCTIONISM Constructionism is an educational philosophy that builds on the foundational ideas of constructivism, which asserts that learners construct their own understanding and knowledge of the world through experiences and reflecting on those experiences. It is a student-centered philosophy that promotes learning through hands-on, creative, and project-based activities, typically involving technology or other interactive tools. KEY PRINCIPLES STUDENT CENTERED LEARNING BY MAKING ACTIVE ENGAGEMENT SOCIAL COLLABORATION INTEGRATED USE OF TECHNOLOGY 11

12. EXISTENTIALISM 12 KEY PRINCIPLES ARE: EMPHASIS ON CHOICE INDIVIDUALIZED LEARNING PATHS EXPERIENCE BASED LEARNING AUTHENTICITY Existentialism as a normative educational philosophy is rooted in the ideas of existentialist thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre, Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Martin Heidegger. Existentialist education is often characterized by its focus on the individual learner, promoting an environment where students can explore their own values, beliefs, and identities. The goal is to empower students to make meaningful choices and to take responsibility for those choices.

13. Criticisms on normative education philosophy 13 Despite its contributions, normative educational philosophy faces several criticisms. These critiques primarily revolve around its perceived abstractness, lack of practicality, cultural bias, and potential to stifle individuality. LACK OF PRACTICALITY CULTURAL BIAS IMPOSITION OF SINGLE WORLDVIEW RESISTANCE TO CHANGE OVEREMPHASIS ON IDEALS VS REALITY

14. CONCLUSION 14 Normative educational philosophy plays a crucial role in shaping the aims and ideals of education, offering a framework for understanding what education ought to achieve for individuals and society. It provides educators, policymakers, and scholars with guiding principles for cultivating ethical, intellectual, and social values in students. However, despite its strengths, normative educational philosophy also faces challenges. It is often criticized for being too abstract and idealistic, sometimes disconnected from the practical realities of diverse educational contexts. Additionally, it can reflect cultural biases and may be slow to adapt to the changing needs of modern societies. There is also the risk of imposing a single worldview, stifling individuality and creativity in the pursuit of predefined educational goals. Overall, normative educational philosophy continues to offer valuable insights for shaping educational policy and practice, particularly in its emphasis on ethical development, critical thinking, and human flourishing. However, its application must be flexible, inclusive, and responsive to the complexities of contemporary educational systems, ensuring that it serves both individual needs and societal goals in a balanced and meaningful way.

15. THANK YOU Christian Roy B. Libao Mary Leony Petty Jen A. Loyola Marjorie M. Pejoto Angelica G. Berondo