GROUP DYNAMICS and Participatory learning in medical and Dental education .pdf

ShubhangiMhaske7 104 views 62 slides Jul 20, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 62
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62

About This Presentation

group Dynamics in Medical education describes about Stages of group formation and performance .Also discuss in brief the theoretical part of group success


Slide Content

Strategy for positive
Group Dynamics
1
Resource /Guest faculty for
-UGC National Seminar on Medical Education
-NAAC sponsored National Seminars and Conferences
-DHPER ,People’s University ,
(Department of Health Professionals and Education,People’s University)
-Author NAAC publication on books Education - Flipped Classroom
Dr.SHUBHANGI MHASKE
MDS (Oral Pathology), PhD (pursuing)
Fellowship in Forensic Odontology,
Fellowship in Dental education (FIDE) - Program Director and Convener
Professor and Head,
People’s College of Dental sciences and Research Centre,
People’s University,
Bhopal

Contents
•Learning Objectives
•Understanding Group Dynamics –Concept
•Theoretical background -Types of groups
•Stages of group development
•Dynamics of stages
•Task and Behavioural Challenges and Limitations
•Strategies for positive group dynamics
•Benefits of Effective group Dynamics
•Applications -Participatory learning concept
•Conclusion
2

Ice breaking

Why Group based learning??
•Lectures are learning strategies which are still popular and widely used for the delivery of
instruction —have little impact on ‘deep’ learning.
•A well‐structured lecture with explicit learning objectives may not help
•The Teaching Learning model design should be Student Centric
•Interactivity during lectures is an important adjunct to allow questioning and engagement
of the learners, which is likely to improve the learning experience.
5

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
7

Learning Objectives
At the end of the session, participants shall be able to:
•Understand and apply concepts of group dynamics while working in groups/
teams in teaching and learning
•Identify factors facilitating effective functioning in small groups
•Generate opportunities to use group dynamics in Dental education to enhance
students engagement in learning
8

CONCEPT
AND
TYPES OF GROUPS
9

GROUP
•DEFINITION
–Diverse group of people with complimentary abilities
(perspectives, ideas, knowledge, skills, techniques,
competencies)…
–who collaborate to…
–accomplish common goals for which….
–they are accountable together
10

TYPES OF GROUPS
11

UNDERSTANDING
STAGES OF GROUP DYNAMICS
12

STAGES OF GROUP
13
Tuckman, B. (1965) Bruce Tuckman’s Team Development Model.
https://www.lfhe.ac.uk/download.../3C6230CF-61E8-4C5E-9A0C1C81DCDEDCA2

Tuckman model -Stages
14

WHAT HAPPENS
15

STAGES AND THEIR DYNAMICS-
16

Stage 1 —
Forming Dynamics (getting acquainted)
Leader
Facilitator
Member
Member Member
Member
Member
Member Member
Member
FORMING
- Safe patterned behavior
- Dependence on group leader
- Avoid controversies
- Gathering data and
impressions about each other
- Serious discussions are
avoided
- Play in comfort zones
17

Stage 2 — Storming Dynamics
Leader
Facilitator
Member
MemberMember
Member
Member
Member Member
Member
STORMING
- Competition
- Conflicts over leadership,
structure, power and authority
- Swings in behavior
- Fear of exposure
- Attempt to organize
Mild enthusiasm to conflict transition (struggling forward)
18

Stage 3 — Norming Dynamics
Leader
Member
MemberMember
Member
Member
Member Member
Member
NORMING
Facilitator - Group becomes cohesive
- Member contributions are
acknowledged
- Trust is developed
- Contributes group Building
- Group is willing to change
predetermined ideas
Trust developing and cohesive group forms
19

- Interdependence in
personal relations and
problem solving task
situations
- Group is productive
Member
Member
Member
MemberMember
Member
Member
PERFORMING
Leader
Member
Facilitator
GOAL

Work group functioning
with self-confidence
Stage 4 — Performing Dynamics
20

Stage 5 –
Adjourning, Reforming
Unsuccessful TeamSuccessful Team

21

GROUP ACTIVITY
https://puibm-my.sharepoint.com/:wb:/g/personal/
shubhangi_pcds_puibm_in/
EWPM6jp6ChxKsihqeJGdoYAB55rfSuc80u4XuLlsrCmt1w?e=gXm2kC
22

FIDE BATCH
GROUPS
23

Groups in FIDE 2024
Group 3
Team Leader: Dr Srinivas P
Scribe: Dr Jigna Pathak
Initiator: Dr Jaya
Arbitrator: Dr Annette
Critic: Dr Vamsi
Group 4
1.Dr.Shubham Patel (Team Leader)
2.Dr.Priya Lahane
3.Dr.Vinod Sargaiyan
4.Dr.Charu Dixit
Group 1
Team Leader: Dr. Swapnil Parlani.
Facilitator: Dr Roopadevi.
Consultant: Dr. Anupama
Scriptor: Dr Varsha
Group 2
1. Dr.Srivalli (Team Leader)
2. Dr.Samata
3. Dr.Kiran Kumar
4. Dr.R.Piradhiba
5. Dr.Abilasha
24

GROUP SUCCESS-???
25

Cohesive Vs Non Cohesive group
26

27

Sources and Consequences of
Group Cohesiveness
28

FACTORS AFFECTING…
29

Factors responsible for an effective group
outcome
•Task Function -Goal/Objectives/Content of task
•Role Conflict - Learner experiences task overlap.
•Role Ambiguity -Learner is unclear of task definition;
•Task Behaviour
30

Group Functions
▪Task behaviours
▪Maintenance behaviours (Positive Impact)
▪Self-interest behaviours. (Negative Impact)
31

Task Behaviours-Team leader
▪Initiating
▪Information seeking/giving
▪Clarifying ideas
▪Bringing closure and Consensus
32

Maintenance Behaviours-members
▪Encouraging
▪Harmonizing
▪Compromising
33

Self-interest Behaviours-members
▪Dominating/controlling
▪Blocking
▪Manipulating
▪Belittling
▪Splitting hairs
34

Reactions
•I’m OK - You’re OK
•I’m OK - You’re not OK
•I’m not OK - You’re OK
•I’m not OK - You’re not OK

STRATEGIES FOR POSITIVE
GROUP DYNAMICS

The “how” of getting the group work completed
1.Set goals and objectives
2.Develop procedures
3.Get information and data
4.Prepare
5.Select idea generation methods
6.Clarify tasks
12

7. Set time frames
8. Select decision-making methods
9. Test agreement/reality
10. Use problem-solving steps
11. Coordinate individual assignments
12. Summarize activities
The “how” of getting the group work completed

The “how “ of getting the psychosocial needs
of the group satisfied and maintained
1.Provide psychological and social support if
required.
2.Encourage participation
3.Give support and motivation
4.Evaluate & assess meetings/teamwork
08

Cont’d
5.Settle differences
6.Facilitate inclusion of all members.
7.Intervene with dysfunctional behaviours.
8.Ask and give feedback

DECISION MAKING

➢How to improve group decision making.
•Brainstorming.
•Nominal group technique.
•Delphi technique.
•Computer-mediated decision making.
Cabrerizo, F. J., Martínez, M. Á., López-Gijón, J., Cascón-Katchadourian, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2019). Group decision making and soft
consensus: Analyzing citation classics by means of H-Classics. Procedia Computer Science, 162, 251-259.

Brainstorming
•Group members actively generate as many ideas and
alternatives as possible, and they do so relatively
quickly and without inhibitions.
•Brainstorming rules.
–All criticism is ruled out.
–Free-wheeling is welcomed.
Cabrerizo, F. J., Martínez, M. Á., López-Gijón, J., Cascón-Katchadourian, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2019). Group decision making and soft consensus: Analyzing citation
classics by means of H-Classics. Procedia Computer Science, 162, 251-259.

•A form of structured group decision making that enables
everyone to participate and have his/her ideas heard
without hostile criticism or distortions.
•A structured voting procedure is used to prioritize
responses to the nominal question.
Nominal group technique
Cabrerizo, F. J., Martínez, M. Á., López-Gijón, J., Cascón-Katchadourian, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2019). Group decision making and soft consensus: Analyzing citation
classics by means of H-Classics. Procedia Computer Science, 162, 251-259.

Delphi technique
•The process.
–A series of questions is distributed to a panel.
–Panel members send in their responses
–The decision coordinator summarizes the responses, and sends the summary
along with a follow-up questionnaire to the panel.
–The process is repeated until a consensus is reached.

TYPES OF LEARNERS-CHALLENGE

Lunn, B., 2015. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice (2nd edn), Tim Swanwick (ed.) Wiley-Blackwell, 2013,£ 46.99, pb, 520 pp. ISBN:
9781118472408. BJPsych Bulletin, 39(2), pp.103-103.

TEAM MATURITY

TEN CRITERIA FOR MEASURING THE MATURITY OF A
GROUP
1.Feedback mechanisms
2.Decision-making methods
3.Group loyalty/cohesion
4.Operating procedures
5.Use of member resources
6.Communications
7.Goals
8.Authority relations
9.Participation in leadership
10.Acceptance of minority views
Immature group
Poor
Dysfunctional
Low
Not flexible
Poor
Unclear
Not accepted
Independent
Low
Low
Mature group
Excellent
Functional
High
Flexible
Excellent
Clear
Accepted
Interdependent
High
High

APPLICATIONS
Student Centric Learning
Participatory Learning

PROJECT BASED LEARNING
Image Courtesy- Peoples College Of Dental College and Research Centre,Bhopal

CASE BASED LEARNING
Image Courtesy- Peoples College Of Dental College and Research Centre,Bhopal

PROBLEM BASED LEARNING
Image Courtesy- Saveetha Dental College ,Chennai

Small group teaching
Image Courtesy- Saveetha Dental College ,Chennai

Experiential learning

Peer Assisted Learning (PAL)
Image Courtesy- Vishnu Dental College ,Bhimavaram

FLIPPED CLASSROOM
Pre-class and In-class
Activity

FLIPPED CLASSROOM
Image Courtesy- Vishnu Dental College ,Bhimavaram

Flipped classroom
Image Courtesy- Vishnu Dental College ,Bhimavaram

CONCLUSION..

Take away
-5 stages group dynamics -Bruce model
-Behavioural modification is also a major factor in cognition and competency
learning
-Participatory learning is one of the best method for a better outcome based
education.
-
Paradigm shift -we as teachers must undergo a major role change in instructional
process -teacher centred >student centred learning
From Mastership>Apprentice to partnership >Bonding learning..

Thank you
62
Tags