HINOLASO DASHBOARD 3rd Grading(SY 2021-2022).pptx

dddd

1. DOLORES II DISTRICT QUARTER 1 HINOLASO ELEM. SCHOOL DASHBOARD (3 rd Grading) S.Y. 2021-2022 GLORIA A. ORAY Principal ___________________ Schools Division Superinte Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS SCHOOLS DIVISION OF EASTERN SAMAR

2. Public Schools LEVEL Total Number of Teacher Number of Teachers with Q2 ProMEDS Submission Percentage of Submission Elementary 8 8 100% Junior HS TOTAL 2022 Q1 TEACHERS ProMEDS SUBMISSION TRACKING Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS

3. ACCESS Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS

4. ENROLMENT PROGRESS TRACKING Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS LEVEL 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading Percentage of Enrolment GAIN GAP Reason for the Gap Kinder 27 26 96% 1 Transfer of residence Grade 1 24 24 100% Grade 2 22 23 104% 1 Grade 3 29 29 100% Grade 4 27 29 107% 2 Grade 5 13 13 100% Grade 6 20 21 104% 1

5. Back to MAIN LEARNING SUPPORT AIDES (LSA) PROVISION PROGRESS TRACKING- Public Schools Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS LEVEL Number of Learners Provided with: Total Number of Learners in Need with LSA (Q4 2021 Database) Percentage of LSA Provision LSA Volunteer Paid LSA TOTAL Kinder 26 1 27 27 100% Grade 1 20 1 21 20 100% Grade 2 12 1 13 12 55% Grade 3 6 1 7 6 21% Grade 4 8 8 8 30% Grade 5 2 2 2 15% Grade 6 6 6 6 30% TOT AL 81 4 84 81 95%

6. Number of Q1 (2 nd Grading) Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas by Grade levels for Quality Assurance Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS SPED Kindergarten G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 SPED       Kindergarten Mother Tongue IPEd ALIVE English Science Mathematics Filipino Aral. Pan. TLE MAPEH EsP

7. Number of Quality Assured Q1 (2 ND Grading) Audio-Video Materials across Learning Areas by Grade levels Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS12 SPED Kindergarten G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 SPED       Kindergarten Mother Tongue IPEd ALIVE English Science Mathematics Filipino Aral. Pan. TLE MAPEH EsP

8. Back to MAIN Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Learning Delivery Modality implemented by the school during the 1 ST Quarter of SY 2021-2022 (2 nd Grading) PUBLIC SCHOOLS Digital modular distance learning Online distance learning Educational TV Radio-based Instruction Blended distance learning Printed Modular Distance Learning Modular & Online Modular & TV/RBI Online & TV/RBI ELEMENTARY 3 163 JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS Refers to the number of implementing schools

9. QUALITY Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS

10. NUMBER OF ELEMENTARY LEARNERS WHO HAVE COMPLETELY COMPLIED WITH ALL THE MODULES AND LAS BY SUBJECT BY GRADE LEVEL . Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q4 ProMEDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS Kindergarten G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 TOTAL Kindergarten 26 28 Mother Tongue 24 23 29 73 IPEd ALIVE English 24 23 29 29 13 21 133 Science 29 29 13 21 87 Mathematics 24 23 29 29 13 21 133 Filipino 24 23 29 29 13 21 133 Aral. Pan. 24 23 29 29 13 21 133 TLE 29 13 21 60 MAPEH 24 23 29 29 13 21 133 EsP 24 23 29 29 13 21 133 TOTAL 28 24 23 29 29 13 21 163

11. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS NUMBER OF KINDERGARTEN LEARNERS PER PERFORMANCE CATEGORY BASED ON THE QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT Beginning Developing Consistent TOTAL 8 11 8 27 7 14 6 27 7 14 6 27 8 11 8 27 10 10 7 27 11 10 6 27 8 11 8 27 6 13 8 27 65 94 57 216 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading Beginning Developing Consistent TOTAL 5 12 9 26 5 14 7 26 5 12 9 26 8 10 8 26 8 11 7 26 5 12 9 26 7 10 9 26 4 12 9 26 47 93 67 208

12. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT 3 rd GRADING GRADE LEVEL 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading GAIN GAP Grade I 84.54 84.75 0.21 Grade II 85.00 85.00 - Grade III 82.72 83.11 0.39 MTB-MLE

13. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT 3 rd GRADING GRADE LEVEL 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading GAIN GAP Grade I - 82.33 - Grade II 80.00 81.25 1.25 Grade III 80.57 81.38 0.81 Grade IV 84.15 84.25 0.1 Grade V 80.00 81.30 1.30 Grade VI 78.00 79.00 1.00 ENGLISH

14. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT 3 rd GRADING GRADE LEVEL 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading GAIN GAP Grade III 81.83 82.04 0.21 Grade IV 83.96 84.00 0.04 Grade V 82.50 83.00 0.5 Grade VI 79.00 80.24 1.24 SCIENCE

15. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT 3 rd GRADING GRADE LEVEL 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading GAIN GAP Grade I 80.50 83.50 3.50 Grade II 80.00 82.50 2.50 Grade III 81.46 82.02 0.56 Grade IV 84.20 84.50 0.3 Grade V 80.50 80.90 0.4 Grade VI 79.00 81.00 2 MATHEMATICS

16. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT 3 rd GRADING GRADE LEVEL 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading GAIN GAP Grade I 81.85 83.20 1.35 Grade II 83.00 85.10 2.1 Grade III 82.60 83.58 0.98 Grade IV 86.00 86.01 0.01 Grade V 83.50 84.50 1 Grade VI 80.00 81.00 1 FILIPINO

17. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT 3 rd GRADING GRADE LEVEL 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading GAIN GAP Grade I 84.29 84.91 0.62 Grade II 82.00 83.15 1.15 Grade III 82.60 82.72 0.12 Grade IV 84.50 84.50 - Grade V 82.00 83.50 1.5 Grade VI 80.00 82.00 2 ARALING PANLIPUNAN

18. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT 3 rd GRADING GRADE LEVEL 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading GAIN GAP Grade IV 85.00 85.00 - Grade V 84.00 85.00 1 Grade VI 81.93 84.93 3.93 TLE

19. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT 3 rd GRADING GRADE LEVEL 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading GAIN GAP Grade I 84.08 84.95 0.87 Grade II 82.83 84.25 1.42 Grade III 83.00 83.13 0.13 Grade IV 83.69 84.48 0.79 Grade V 81.30 82.00 1.03 Grade VI 80.00 82.33 2.33 MAPEH

20. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT 3 rd GRADING GRADE LEVEL 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading GAIN GAP Grade I 84.66 85.00 0.34 Grade II 84.00 85.00 1 Grade III 84.57 84.89 0.32 Grade IV 86.61 86.89 0.28 Grade V 85.50 87.00 1.5 Grade VI 81.00 84.34 1.34 ESP

21. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT 3 rd GRADING SUBJECT 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading GAIN GAP MTB-MLE 84.15 84.26 0.11 ENGLISH 80.74 81.58 0.84 SCIENCE 82.13 82.32 0.19 MATHEMATICS 81.27 82.40 1.13 FILIPINO 82.99 83.89 0.09 ARAL PAN 83.00 83.46 0.46 TLE 84.64 84.97 0.33 MAPEH 83.14 83.52 0.38 ESP 85.00 85.52 0.52 AVERAGE MPS BY SUBJECT

22. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Number of Elementary Learners by Grade Range by Subject vs. Q1 Enrolment (3rd Grading Performance) GRADE 1 PUBLIC SCHOOLS Outstanding Very Satisfactory (85-89) Satisfactory (80-84) Fairly Satisfactory (75-79) Did not Meet Expectation (below 75) At Risk of Failing in the Next Quarter TOTAL (98-100) (95-97) (90-94) Mother Tongue 6 6 7 3 2 24 English 6 7 8 24 Science 8 15 1 24 Mathematics 1 11 2 8 2 24 Filipino 2 9 6 5 2 24 Aral Pan 3 10 4 5 2 24 TLE 24 MAPEH 5 7 6 4 2 24 ESP 7 6 6 2 2 24 TOTAL 24 49 31 27 10 167

23. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Number of Elementary Learners by Grade Range by Subject vs. Q1 Enrolment (2 nd Grading Performance) GRADE 2 PUBLIC SCHOOLS Outstanding Very Satisfactory (85-89) Satisfactory (80-84) Fairly Satisfactory (75-79) Did not Meet Expectation (below 75) At Risk of Failing in the Next Quarter Total (98-100) (95-97) (90-94) Mother Tongue 7 8 5 3 23 English 5 8 3 5 23 Science Mathematics 4 7 7 5 23 Filipino 8 7 6 2 23 Aral Pan 7 8 6 2 23 TLE MAPEH 4 10 7 2 23 ESP 6 10 5 2 23 Total 41 58 39 19 161

24. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Total of Elementary Learners by Grade Range by Subject vs. Q1 Enrolment (2 nd Grading Performance) GRADE 3 PUBLIC SCHOOLS Outstanding Very Satisfactory (85-89) Satisfactory (80-84) Fairly Satisfactory (75-79) Did not Meet Expectation (below 75) At Risk of Failing in the Next Quarter Total (98-100) (95-97) (90-94) Mother Tongue 3 6 9 5 5 29 English 4 9 4 7 29 Science 3 5 6 4 7 29 Mathematics 4 4 8 5 7 29 Filipino 4 4 9 4 7 29 Aral Pan 4 4 10 5 6 29 TLE MAPEH 3 6 10 6 5 29 ESP 4 7 8 5 4 29 Total 25 40 69 38 48 232

25. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Number of Elementary Learners by Grade Range by Subject vs. Q1 Enrolment (2 nd Grading Performance) GRADE 4 PUBLIC SCHOOLS Outstanding Very Satisfactory (85-89) Satisfactory (80-84) Fairly Satisfactory (75-79) Did not Meet Expectation (below 75) At Risk of Failing in the Next Quarter Total (98-100) (95-97) (90-94) Mother Tongue English 1 16 2 10 29 Science 1 17 2 9 29 Mathematics 2 16 1 10 29 Filipino 3 15 2 9 29 Aral Pan 2 17 3 7 29 TLE 1 17 1 10 29 MAPEH 1 17 2 9 29 ESP 9 9 7 4 29 Total 20 124 20 60 232

26. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Number of Elementary Learners by Grade Range by Subject vs. Q1 Enrolment (2 nd Grading Performance) GRADE 5 PUBLIC SCHOOLS Outstanding Very Satisfactory (85-89) Satisfactory (80-84) Fairly Satisfactory (75-79) Did not Meet Expectation (below 75) At Risk of Failing in the Next Quarter Total (98-100) (95-97) (90-94) Mother Tongue English 3 1 5 4 13 Science 3 2 5 3 13 Mathematics 2 2 4 5 13 Filipino 4 3 4 2 13 Aral Pan 4 2 4 3 13 TLE 4 2 5 2 13 MAPEH 4 2 4 3 13 ESP 4 3 5 1 13 Total 29 34 26 15 104

27. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Number of Elementary Learners by Grade Range by Subject vs. Q1 Enrolment (2 nd Grading Performance) GRADE 6 PUBLIC SCHOOLS Outstanding Very Satisfactory (85-89) Satisfactory (80-84) Fairly Satisfactory (75-79) Did not Meet Expectation (below 75) At Risk of Failing in the Next Quarter Total (98-100) (95-97) (90-94) Mother Tongue English 1 4 4 4 8 21 Science 6 7 6 2 21 Mathematics 1 5 4 8 3 21 Filipino 3 4 4 8 2 21 Aral Pan 6 7 8 21 TLE 5 3 13 21 MAPEH 4 4 10 2 21 ESP 5 3 13 21 Total 5 39 36 70 17 168

28. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Tracking on the Status of Learners’ Numeracy Level NUMERACY LEVEL Number of Learners by Numeracy Level by Grade G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 Highly Numerate 5 4 11 13 4 5 Moderately Numerate 15 14 13 12 8 15 Non-Numerate 4 4 5 2 1 2 nd Grading 3 rd Grading NUMERACY LEVEL Number of Learners by Numeracy Level by Grade G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 Highly Numerate 5 4 11 13 4 5 Moderately Numerate 15 14 13 13 9 15 Non-Numerate 4 4 5 1

29. QUALITY Situational Analysis Performance Indicator Identify learners who are 75 below and non numerates by every class adviser. Key Stage 1 Performance Gap 2 pupils below 75 and 14 non-numerates. Key Practices Rigid conduct of remedial instruction Learning & Development Teachers monitor the progress of the learners. ICT Provision of supplementary learning materials especially in Mathematics. Materials & Equipment Workbooks, tablets and radio based instruction Assessment Conduct assessment ( Performance Tasks) PSDS/School Head T.A. School Head provide technical assistance on the different strategies in teaching. External factor Family economic status

30. Characterization Based on the data presented there are 2 pupils in Grade 1 who did not meet the expectation (below 75). HES has a total of 14 non-numerates, 4 in Grade I, 4 in Grade II, 5 in Grade III, and 1 in Grade IV due to lack of learning support at home, poor study habits of some pupils and parents are busy in earning a living.

31. QUALITY Situational Analysis Strength Full cooperation of parents in school activities Weekly home visitation by the teachers Availability of SLMs Dedicated teachers. Four PPT’s who assist the struggling learners Opportunities Pupils are mostly 4P’s grantees Strong partnership with the Brgy . Officials and other Stakeholders Rigid remedial instruction Weaknesses Overlapping of school activities Lack of time of parents in assisting their children in answering the modules. Threats Pupils depends on the answers key provided in the module. Child labor Poverty

32. Report on the identified Strategic Options Strategic Option Capacity of the School/ District to Implement Technical Assistant (TA) Needed Responsible Office to provide TA B. Provide Quality Basic Education 1. Conduct home visitation focusing on the struggling learners. The school head supervise the every home visitation conducted by the teachers. Differentiated learning School 2. Provision of learning support materials to utilize at home. Supervision in the utilization of learning materials Assistance in crafting learning support materials. School 3. Cooperation of between teachers and parents to assist and motivate learners to study and answer their Self Learning Modules (SLM’s) Conference with the parents Let the Provincial Paid Teachers assist in answering their modules Schools

33. GOVERNANCE Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS

34. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Status on the Provision of Instructional Supervision (IS) in the Quarter IS Providers Total Number of IS Provided Total Number of IS Provider ELEM JUNIOR HS ELEM JUNIOR HS School Head 35 1 PSDS/DICs/PICs 2 1 EPSs Head Teachers Master Teachers

35. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Status on the Implementation of Capability Buildings (CBs) in the Quarter CBs Total Number of CBs conducted Total Number of Teachers Trained Total Number of Parents Trained ELEM JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS CLC ELEM JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS CLC ELEM JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS CLC School LAC Sessions 2 8 INSET on: Content and Pedagogy Assessment Contextualization of LRs Learning Delivery Program/System Implementation

36. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Status on the MOOE Utilization in the Quarter Q1 ProMEDS Data Data from Division Finance Section Total Amount Downloaded Total amount Liquidated % of Liquidation Total Amount Downloaded Total amount Liquidated % of Liquidation ELEMENTARY 71,250 On process JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS

37. SERVICES ENGAGED: PINTAKASI Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Status on Stakeholders’ Donation (Partnership) Total Cash Donation Total Amount of In Kind Donation Converted to Cash ELEMENTARY 5,000 10,000 JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS CLC TOTAL

38. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS SMEA Result ( Based on LCP/SIP Implementation) PUBLIC SCHOOLS Physical Accomplishment Financial Accomplishment Quarter Physical Targets Actual Accomplishment % of Accomplishment Financial Target Amount Utilized % of Utilization ELEMENTARY 5 4 80% 50,000 44,200 88% JUNIOR HS SENIOR HS CLC

39. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Status on the Implementation of Limited Face-to-Face in Public Schools PUBLIC SCHOOLS Kindergarten G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 G12 Number of Learners engaged 27 24 22 29 29 13 20 Number of Teachers involved 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Number of Public Schools implementing limited Face to Face learning sessions with IATF approval Elementary Junior HS Senior HS Total 1

40. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS ISSUES and CONCERNS Issues and Concern Intervention School buildings need major repair. Lack of toilets, health essentials, school clinic equipment, computer room and equipment. Stage, School pathways, covered walk, school fence needs construction. No DCP package available in school Request for school buildings repair Request for financial support to stakeholders. Seek support from the stakeholders Request for DCP equipment.

41. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS MOV’s

42. ACCESS

43. QUALITY

44. HOME VISITATION AND REMEDIAL READING

45. INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION

46. GATE CONSTRUCTTION WATER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT AND OTHER SUPPLIES

47. MILK DISTRIBUTION PINTAKASI

48. SMEA TEACHERS CONFERENCE

49. PORTFOLIO DAY

50. Data Source: BOSY EBEIS and Q2 ProMEDS Thank You…