(5 ta yo. Sr
e
9 a (ED
DB mudan RE aa
> rr à LE wkileap? Tune | f
ESA Tet edi
CNG y ae
(aw) Law of Evidence same in CIVIL & CRIMINAL a
Mere preponderance of Case must be proved ;
evidence is enough beyond reasonable doubt TY ! a /
eae en
al} NY 4
3 Fundamentals/basic principles of IEA
(aw) IEA 1872 Regulates
24
Gs)
A
1 I Preliminary 1-4
Relevancy
nee u „[relevaney of Facts 5-55
lll. ¿Facts which need not be Proved 56-58
u Iv Oral Evidence 59-60
On Proof V Documentary Evidence 61-90A
vi Exclusion of Oral by Doc. Evidence 91-100
M Vil__| Burden of Proof 101-114A
Production, _ VII |Estoppel 115-117
&Effectof| IX |Witnesses 118-134
Coins X _|Examination of Witnesses 135 - 166
XI Rey Buen 167
RELEVANCY OF FACTS EVIDENCE/PROOF
GP of Facts | | Admission | | Confession
5-16 17-23 24-31
32(1) 45-51 52-55 101-104-General Provisions | 118-120- Who may be
A 105-111- Specific Provisions |} witness
111A-114A- Proof in form of ff 122-129-Privileged
Pr. Evd Pub Eva ff Prvt. Evd ~
presumptions communication
= 7 75 133- Accomplice
135-138-Examination- Meaning & Order
Presumptions 139-140-Cross Examination
141-143-Leading Questions
—— 143,146,148- Types of Questions
148-152-Protection of witness
Facts which need be | | Exclusion of OE by || Munters una)
1134, 114 1138, 1144 162 - 164- Production of documents
165 - 166- Power of Judee/Jurv
N.
De cris (HH
A Y
Al Sucre, court mueshall
proc pad 7
in 5 ony
|
what is a Court ? 4 under IEA
—
polo le
NA 295, 206,297
Bony Ads
Au force AE
Indie Naug dicupline Ack
- Naval discipline Ac
Ses ws [nl& pretation Clause
(Court) — ¡ndudo All
LTD =5 ges take euden
MDPC ESE
— —+ exapt- ARBITRATOR
———————
> (GS —
J
malt —> ExPReMeD ox DESCRIBED
Upon oy — Sesance
mean 4 —> LeTas, mosks
ns Lee
buno E %
Va
Ls ar Gadence o) feb mur”
— sean is “Reading 4 That male"
Coun
AL 1897
. Awriting
. Words printed lithographed or photographed
. A map or plan
. Aninscription on a metal plate or stone
._A caricature
. Ring
. Banner with an inscription a musical composition
. Letters or marks impr ontrees 4
Video recording Y A
! 110. Tape recording
111, Electronic mails
What is Evidence
es (G \- aoû)
J
— Al staGmen & 7
— Atl Dovuwent- +
> ut - pamat] quiso US Eleuomi texords —> Ce qa — ee
un ae —_ produced fos inspections
Ma uit”
= te mallas +
= ia ming /
y »
FAT —> Heans 3 inctudeo —
A
- 14 mental mitten peson
= = 4 Hung / $ 4 pico pason N conscious 7
d
Cepuble 1 D, uud jé
TASTE SMELL HEARING SIGHT TOUCH
TATEN
ñ
! (a)That there are certain objects arranged in a cert:
I order in a certain place, is a fact.
ı
bol
1
b)That a man heard or saw something, is a fact. or
c)That a man said certain words, is a fact.
d)That a man holds a certain opinion, has a certain! ows
intention, acts in good faith or fraudulently, or uses a !
particular word in a particular sense, or is or was at a!
specified time conscious of a particular sensation, is}
a fact.
e)That a man has a certain reputation, is a fact.
Result >
— One fast —— is said do be relevant +o>— > Anatnck
_+ Wuhan One is — ¡Comccren) ren] muta —— ote
in enables ach In promos ces) — 4 pd
Gee s eS
— A
= (rad Ga Gr) low Us) G2)
Be ty de a Shliment sáimunt Sodyment
En nn under het
cdd Cnfurion Dee, quel ne pu Gate
with Citar
u Evidence
de in
(hue
> Nue LiAgiutTY is
— extend, DisASluiry = ae N
PROOF => Fact ue + Relevant fale
(A
pere 2
JA Gers
—/
uns. y HER =
> Non-Exisince Riqur =
is accused o
following facts may be in issue:—
e murder o!
1
f
1
1
H
That A caused B's death / À H
That A intended to cause B’s death 1
. That A had received grave and sudden provocation}
from B 1
. That A, at the time of doing the act which caused B’s!
death, was, by reason of unsoundness of mind, ı
incapable of knowing its nature. h
A fact is said to be
proved when,
after considering the
matters before it,
the Court either
believes it to EXIST,
or considers its
EXISTENCE SO
PROBABLE Y
that a prudent man
ought, under the
circumstances of the
particular case, to act
upon the supposition
that it exists.
A fact is si
disproved when,
to be
after considering the
matters before it,
the Court either
believes that it does
NOT EXIST,
or considers its NON-
EXISTENCE SO
PROBABLE
that a prudent man
ought, under the
circumstances of the
particular case, to act
upon the supposition
that it does not exist.
when it is NEITHER
“PROVED
*NOR DISPROVED. A
Pretuniy
PRESUMPTION
<= zZ 1
ln LE PA
infaence
yo ence dial 030) [paola Preaum|
The. vous,
“a Mario alu whi de not allowed
euidance to aupa to he contodictrd. ot
obleg et tence
|
re] pure
Whenever it is | Whenever it is|When one fact is
PROVIDED by this Act D DIRECTED by this Act DECLARED by this Act
that the Court that the Court to be conclusive proof
may presume a fact shall presume a fact of another —————
AAA aa
it may either regard | it shall regard such fact | the Court en
such fact as proved, as proved, proof of the one fact,
regard the other as
proved, = —
unless and until it is|unless and until it is} and shall (us) sion
disproved, or may call | disproved. evidence to be given for
for proof of it. DC the purpose y
disproving it.