J CTO score ≥3

EuroCTO 247 views 14 slides Sep 19, 2018
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 14
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14

About This Presentation

J CTO score ≥3
Pietro Mazzarotto, Lodi, Italy

10th Experts „Live“ CTO Workshop - Day1


Slide Content

AL1 7 Fr, EBU 4.0 7 Fr Ambiguous cap: 1 ≥ 20 mm: 1 Calcium: 1 Re-try: 1 Bending: 0 JCTO Score 4 Male pt , 73-year-old RCA-CTO found in 2009 - MVD Stress-CMR: viability and ischemia, LVEF 40%

SEPTAL CC0 ATRIAL CC2 from LCx Collateral channels EPICARDIAL CC1 from OM

Tazuna 1.25 to open stent cells Caravel First approach: 2 nd septal branch In-stent take off Corsair Pro does not cross

Tip injection Sion, Sion Blue Septal branch perforation Tip Injection Sion Black for surfing Surfing unsuccessful

Suoh 03 Straight, good landing in PL Second approach: e picardial from OM

Caravel Prolapse Finecross ok

Step-up UB3 >>> Conquest Pro 12 Subintimal Antegrade Gaia Third Subintimal Reverse CART CTO uncrossable for retrograde Finecross

Tip-in CTO uncrossable for antegrade Caravel (no chance for anchoring) Purpose: to cross with the antegrade Micro

Antegrade Caravel – Retrograde Finecross Intracoronary Rendezvous Purpose: to cross with a low-profile balloon CTO uncrossable for Caravel Finecross Tazuna 1.25

BAM with Tazuna 1.25 Tornus 2.6 Fr Further techniques Unsuccessful Unsuccessful

Last bailout: Rota Rotawire placement Burr 1.25

2.75 x 38 2.75 x 38 3.0 x 38 Ultimaster IVUS-guided stenting Remodeling and calcific disease Severe disease Ostial disease Calcific stenosis Subintimal tracking

Final result

Devices Microcatheters have different structures, and therefore different performances in a given setting Insights from the case Techniques A step-up workflow optimizes the use of a variety of technical options for “ uncrossable ” CTO