AL1 7 Fr, EBU 4.0 7 Fr Ambiguous cap: 1 ≥ 20 mm: 1 Calcium: 1 Re-try: 1 Bending: 0 JCTO Score 4 Male pt , 73-year-old RCA-CTO found in 2009 - MVD Stress-CMR: viability and ischemia, LVEF 40%
SEPTAL CC0 ATRIAL CC2 from LCx Collateral channels EPICARDIAL CC1 from OM
Tazuna 1.25 to open stent cells Caravel First approach: 2 nd septal branch In-stent take off Corsair Pro does not cross
Tip injection Sion, Sion Blue Septal branch perforation Tip Injection Sion Black for surfing Surfing unsuccessful
Suoh 03 Straight, good landing in PL Second approach: e picardial from OM
Caravel Prolapse Finecross ok
Step-up UB3 >>> Conquest Pro 12 Subintimal Antegrade Gaia Third Subintimal Reverse CART CTO uncrossable for retrograde Finecross
Tip-in CTO uncrossable for antegrade Caravel (no chance for anchoring) Purpose: to cross with the antegrade Micro
Antegrade Caravel – Retrograde Finecross Intracoronary Rendezvous Purpose: to cross with a low-profile balloon CTO uncrossable for Caravel Finecross Tazuna 1.25
BAM with Tazuna 1.25 Tornus 2.6 Fr Further techniques Unsuccessful Unsuccessful
Last bailout: Rota Rotawire placement Burr 1.25
2.75 x 38 2.75 x 38 3.0 x 38 Ultimaster IVUS-guided stenting Remodeling and calcific disease Severe disease Ostial disease Calcific stenosis Subintimal tracking
Final result
Devices Microcatheters have different structures, and therefore different performances in a given setting Insights from the case Techniques A step-up workflow optimizes the use of a variety of technical options for “ uncrossable ” CTO