Literature Review.pptx presentasi literature re

ppt

1. Literature Review Group 1: Ricky Ilham Kurniawan (P2A423001) Berliana Sukma Tri Sukarno (P2A423002) Andy Basoka Iskandar (P2A423005) Sri Ade Fitria (P2A423006) Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

2. What is literature review? According to Jesson et al . (2011), literature review is an organized discussion of published information on a particular subject relevant to a specific area of research. It can serve as a standalone research method in its own right or be part of a larger research project , such as a dissertation or thesis. The focus is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions or new arguments like you would in a research paper. Presenter : Ricky Ilham Kurniawan (P2A423001)

3. Why do a literature review? Academic Requirement : Most students will be required to conduct a literature review at some point, making it a fundamental academic skill. Awareness and Interpretation : A literature review demonstrates your understanding and interpretation of existing knowledge, showcasing your ability to critically engage with previous research. Identifying Gaps and Contradictions : It helps in identifying gaps, inconsistencies, or contradictions in the existing literature, which can provide a basis for new research. Guidance for Research : It informs the development of your research question and methodology, ensuring your work is grounded in the existing body of knowledge. Presenter : Ricky Ilham Kurniawan (P2A423001)

4. Process Overview Survey : This step involves finding, reading, analyzing, and organizing, novel conclusions from the results of the chosen literature on a particular topic or field Summarize : summarize the prior research and present it as part of your analysis Synthesize : To integrate or combine separate readings, discussions, sources, etc. so that they make a connected discussion about a particular subject or topic Evaluation : To examine something complex in detail. This involves checking for gaps in the literature (are some sub-topics covered thoroughly but others not?) and for limitations (were the methods and findings from a particular piece questionable?). According to the University of North Texas at Dallas. (n.d.), there are 4 steps to conduct a literature review: Presenter : Ricky Ilham Kurniawan (P2A423001)

5. Evaluation and Synthesis Provenance What are the author's credentials? Are the arguments supported by solid evidence (e.g., primary sources, case studies, statistics)? Methodology Were the research methods appropriate for the study? Was the sample size sufficient, and were the results accurately interpreted? Objectivity Is the author impartial or biased? Does the author consider contrary data, or is there a selective presentation of information? Persuasiveness Which arguments are the most or least convincing? Value Do the arguments and conclusions significantly contribute to the field? A post from the University of North Texas at Dallas. (n.d.) further elucidated the aspects that need to be considered. Those are: Presenter : Ricky Ilham Kurniawan (P2A423001)

6. Types of Literature Reviews Traditional Literature Review : A narrative review that provides a summary of the existing research, often used to identify gaps in knowledge and set the context for a new study. Systematic Literature Review : A more structured approach that uses a defined methodology to comprehensively search, analyze, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific topic. Presenter : Ricky Ilham Kurniawan (P2A423001)

7. Traditional Literature Review Presenter : Berliana Sukma Tri Sukarno (P2A423002)

8. A narrative or traditional literature review is a comprehensive, critical and objective analysis of the current knowledge on a topic. They are an essential part of the research process and help to establish a theoretical framework and focus or context for our research. A literature review will help to identify patterns and trends in the literature. So, that we can identify gaps or inconsistencies in a body of knowledge. This should lead us to a sufficiently focused research question that justifies our research. Onwuegbuzie and Frels ( pp 24-25, 2016) define four common types of narrative reviews: General literature review  that provides a review of the most important and critical aspects of the current knowledge of the topic. This general literature review forms the introduction to a thesis or dissertation and must be defined by the research objective, underlying hypothesis or problem or the reviewer's argumentative thesis. Theoretical literature review  which examines how theory shapes or frames research. Methodological literature review  where the research methods and design are described. These methodological reviews outline the strengths and weaknesses of the methods used and provide future direction. Historical literature review  which focus on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research. Presenter : Berliana Sukma Tri Sukarno (P2A423002)

9. General Literature Review Theoretical Literature Review Presenter : Berliana Sukma Tri Sukarno (P2A423002)

10. General Literature Review A general literature review provides a broad overview of the existing research on a particular topic. It summarizes and synthesizes the findings from various studies without focusing on a specific theoretical framework or methodology. The purpose is to give readers a comprehensive understanding of the topic, highlighting key themes, trends, and gaps in the literature. This type of review is often used in the early stages of research to identify what has already been studied and to inform the direction of future research. Presenter : Berliana Sukma Tri Sukarno (P2A423002)

11. Theoretical Literature Review A theoretical literature review focuses specifically on the theories and conceptual frameworks that underpin a particular area of research. It examines existing theories, models, and frameworks, discussing their relevance and application to the topic. This type of review aims to clarify theoretical constructs and may propose new theoretical perspectives or modifications to existing theories. Theoretical literature reviews are essential for establishing a solid foundation for research, as they help to situate the study within the broader academic discourse and justify the research questions or hypotheses. Presenter : Berliana Sukma Tri Sukarno (P2A423002)

12. Example: "Social Media's Impact on Mental Health." Aspect General Literature Review Theoretical Literature Review Example Review of studies on social media's effects on anxiety and depression Analysis of theories explaining social media's impact on mental health Step 1 Define the research question Define the research question Step 2 Conduct a comprehensive search Identify relevant theories Step 3 Select relevant studies Conduct a literature search Step 4 Organize the literature by themes Critically analyze each theory Step 5 Synthesize findings Compare and contrast theories Step 6 Identify gaps and future research directions Identify gaps in theoretical frameworks Step 7 Write the review Write the review Presenter : Berliana Sukma Tri Sukarno (P2A423002)

13. Aspect General Literature Review Theoretical Literature Review Focus Summarizes empirical findings on a specific topic Examines and critiques theoretical frameworks Content Includes a variety of studies and reports Discusses specific theories and their applications Structure Thematic sections based on findings Detailed discussion of theories and comparisons Objective Provide an overview and identify research gaps Analyze theoretical constructs and suggest improvements THE KEY DIFFERENCES Both general and traditional literature reviews play important roles in academic research. While a general literature review provides a broad overview of existing knowledge (wide range), a traditional literature review offers a critical analysis that can help identify gaps and contradictions in the literature (more focused). Presenter : Berliana Sukma Tri Sukarno (P2A423002)

14. Methodological Literature Review Historical Literature Review Presenter : Sri Ade Fitria (P2A423006)

15. Methodological Literature Review A methodological literature review is a specific type of literature review that focuses on the methods used in existing research rather than the content of the studies. A methodological literature review is like taking a close look at how different research studies were done. Instead of focusing on what the studies found, it looks at how they were done. Purpose: Spot patterns in how research is done. Point out what’s good and what’s not so good about current methods. Offer ideas for making methods better or trying new ones. Presenter : Sri Ade Fitria (P2A423006)

16. Methodological Literature Review Example: "Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines“ . This review explains how to use literature reviews to gather and understand information from different fields. It looks at how different research methods affect what we learn from studies and gives tips on using these methods effectively. Steps to Conduct a Methodological Literature Review Define the Research Question Search for Relevant Literature Evaluate the Methodologies Synthesize Findings Draw Conclusions Presenter : Sri Ade Fitria (P2A423006)

17. Historical Literature Review A Historical Literature Review looks at how ideas and research on a topic have changed over time. It shows how theories, concepts, and discoveries have developed. Example: Reviewing the evolution of theories on climate change from early 20 th -century observations to contemporary models. This review explains how early thoughts were developed, questioned, and improved over time. The article titled "A Historical Review of Theories and Research on Human Memory“ is about exploring how ideas and research on human memory have changed over timeIt looks at how ideas about memory have changed from early times to today. Presenter : Sri Ade Fitria (P2A423006)

18. Historical Literature Review Steps to conduct a historical literature review: Pick Your Topic and Time Frame Find Relevant Studies Review and Summarize Organize Your Review Explain the Impact Spot Research Gaps Presenter : Sri Ade Fitria (P2A423006)

19. A methodological literature review focuses on the "how" of research, while a historical literature review focuses on the "what" and "when" of research, providing context for understanding the current state of knowledge on a topic. Both types of reviews can contribute to advancing research by identifying areas for improvement. Presenter : Sri Ade Fitria (P2A423006)

20. Systematic Literature Review: Focus on META-ANALYSIS A comprehensive overview of SLR with emphasis on Meta-Analysis Presenter : Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

21. What is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR)? • A methodical and comprehensive approach to literature review. • Purpose: To generate a thorough summary of existing evidence. • Rooted in Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) theory by Archie Cochrane. • Key Steps (as per Petticrew & Roberts, 2006): 1. Formulating the research question. 2. Defining inclusion/exclusion criteria. 3. Conducting a systematic literature search. 4. Assessing study quality. 5. Synthesizing the findings. Presenter : Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

22. What is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR)? Approaches of SLR: Meta-Analysis Meta Synthesis Presenter : Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

23. DEFINITION OF ANALYSIS A quantitative approach within SLR. Combines results from multiple studies to identify patterns, inconsistencies, or other interesting insights. Why meta-analysis is crucial in fields like medicine, social sciences, etc. Presenter : Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

24. FOCUS OF Meta-ANALYSIS Summarize research findings. Increase statistical power by combining results. Resolve uncertainty when individual studies disagree. Presenter : Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

25. ProCEDURES of Meta-ANALYSIS Main Steps (as per Hedges & Olkins , 1985): Formulating the Research Question: Importance of a clear, focused question. Search Strategy: Developing comprehensive search criteria to gather relevant studies. Selection of Studies: Inclusion and exclusion criteria to maintain consistency. Data Extraction: Gathering relevant data from each study. Statistical Analysis: Techniques like effect size estimation, heterogeneity testing. Synthesis of Results: Combining results to draw overall conclusions. Presenter : Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

26. Application of Meta-Analysis Fields of Application: Medicine: Combining results of clinical trials. Psychology: Aggregating findings from behavioral studies. Education: Assessing the effectiveness of different teaching methods. Case Examples: Brief examples demonstrating meta-analysis in action Presenter : Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

27. Advantages of ANALYSIS Statistical Power: Increased by pooling data from multiple studies. Comprehensive: Covers a wide range of studies, leading to more generalizable results. Clarity: Helps clarify the overall impact of a variable across different studies. Presenter : Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

28. Challenges of Meta-Synthesis Common Challenges: Heterogeneity: Variability in study populations, interventions, outcomes. Publication Bias: Tendency to publish positive results over negative or null results. Data Quality: Dependence on the quality of the original studies. Biases: Discuss how biases can affect the validity of meta-analytic findings. Methods to detect and address biases (e.g., sensitivity analysis). Presenter : Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

29. Performing a Sensitivity Analysis Definition: A method to test the robustness of the meta-analysis results by altering certain criteria or assumptions. Importance: Helps in understanding the impact of biases and the stability of the results. Presenter : Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

30. Conclusion Summary: Recap the importance, application, advantages, and challenges of meta-analysis within the context of systematic literature review. Final Thoughts: Emphasize the role of careful planning and rigorous methods in conducting a successful meta-analysis. Presenter : Raju Kurniawan (P2A423017)

31. Systematic Literature Review: Focus on Meta-Synthesis A comprehensive overview of SLR with emphasis on Meta-Synthesis Presenter : Andy Basoka Iskandar (P2A423005)

32. Focus on Meta-Synthesis • A qualitative approach within SLR. • Integrates and interprets findings from multiple qualitative studies. • Based on Meta-Ethnography by Noblit & Hare (1988). • Purpose: To develop new theories or deepen the understanding of a phenomenon. Presenter : Andy Basoka Iskandar (P2A423005)

33. Process of Meta-Synthesis • Main Steps (as per Sandelowski & Barroso, 2007): 1. Identifying relevant qualitative studies. 2. Evaluating study quality and relevance. 3. Combining findings to identify common themes or patterns. 4. Interpreting results to build new theories or models. 5. Validating results by connecting with existing literature. Presenter : Andy Basoka Iskandar (P2A423005)

34. Examples of Meta-Synthesis Applications • Education : Synthesizing research on teachers' experiences with new technology. • Sociology : Integrating studies on social integration of immigrants in urban areas. Presenter : Andy Basoka Iskandar (P2A423005)

35. Advantages of Meta-Synthesis • Qualitative and Interpretative: Provides deep insights into complex subjects. • Theory Development: Contributes to the literature by linking findings across studies. • Holistic Context: Considers nuances and details often lost in individual studies. Presenter : Andy Basoka Iskandar (P2A423005)

36. Challenges of Meta-Synthesis • Integration Difficulty : Combining findings from diverse studies can be challenging. • Contextual Loss : The original context of individual studies may be overlooked. • Varied Study Quality : Differences in study quality can impact the final synthesis. Presenter : Andy Basoka Iskandar (P2A423005)

37. Conclusion • Meta-Synthesis offers rich, qualitative insights into complex phenomena. • Important for producing reliable and valid findings through a systematic approach. Presenter : Andy Basoka Iskandar (P2A423005)

38. References Baker, J. D. (2016). The purpose, process and methods of writing a literature review: Editorial. AORN Journal, 103(3), 265-269. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2016.01.016 Borenstein , M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage. Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE Publications. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein , M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. John Wiley & Sons. Sandelowski , M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage. University of North Texas at Dallas. (n.d.). Literature reviews. University of North Texas at Dallas. https://www.untdallas.edu/learning/writing/academic-writing/literature-reviews.php Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204-211.

39. Thank you Any questions?