40 Debra Higgs Strickland
of Simon of Saint-Quentin.
19
These reports assert that Tartars are small,
filthy, and unattractive, with large, slanted eyes, wide faces, and wide
and flat noses. They wear odd clothing; their speech is rapid, guttural,
and horrible; and their women are extremely ugly. They live in tents
rather than in villages or cities, and because they are pastoralists, they
have no bread. Instead they eat unspeakable things, such as lice and
the afterbirth of mares. Usurious, oversexed, and idolatrous, they had
no place in western courtly or mercantile culture.
Or did they? Although the western view of Mongols was a decid-
edly negative one based on a combination of myth and polemical
accounts, it could be argued that Italians might have been better
informed, as Italian merchants maintained regular contact with them
in the course of business transactions. Moreover, there were many Asi-
atic immigrants in Italy during Marco’s time who were sold in slave
markets in key cities, including Venice, for distribution to the rest of
Italy (Olschki, ‘Asiatic Exoticism’; Origo). Marco himself kept one such
slave, known as Peter the Tartar, whose freedom after Marco’s death
was a condition of his master’s will (Moule and Pelliot 1: 539). How-
ever, it is unlikely that fifteenth-century French and English aristocratic
patrons drew any meaningful connection between Mongolian slaves in
Italy and the dreaded Tartars of lore. As was the case with most ethnic
and religious outsiders, such as Black Africans, Jews, and Muslims,
there were at least two different types of medieval Mongols: one
informed by reality, and the other by the Christian imagination.
To late medieval courtly readers, Tartars were a de facto Monstrous
Race, ideologically comparable to Anthropophagi, Panotii (huge-eared
people), and Cynocephali (Dogheads). Literary as well as pictorial evi-
dence supports this view. Both Monstrous Races and Tartars functioned
symbolically in didactic western Christian literature. In moralizing bes-
tiaries and exempla, Monstrous Races were held up as either positive or
negative examples of Christian behaviour. For example, the Panotii
were said to use their large ears to hear evil, or else to hear the word of
God, depending on the particular slant the preacher needed for his ser-
mon. Pygmies were compared to the humble, Giants to the proud, and
Cynocephali to nay-sayers.
20
The imaginary Tartars sometimes figured into Christian sermons,
where they, too, provided either positive or negative examples for
Christian edification. In the mid-thirteenth century, Berthold of
Regensburg preached that even the polygamous, pagan Tartars still
punish each other severely for adultery, while Christian adultery runs