Mid-Year-Review-Form school year 2025-2026

for guide only

1. MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee:
Position:
Rating Period: AUGUST 2022 - FEBRUARY 2023
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review: FEBRUARY 10, 2023
MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
s
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
Basic
Educatio
n
Services
1. Content
Knowledge
and
Pedagogy
1. Applied
knowledge of
content within
and across
curriculum
teaching areas.
(PPST 1.1.2)
August -
Februar
y

7%
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
observer agreement form/s
done through onsite / face-to-
face / in-person classroom
observation.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,

●through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
●through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
Quality No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Efficiency No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Timeliness

2. MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
Basic
Educatio
n
Services
2. Used a range
of teaching
strategies that
enhance learner
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy skills.
(PPST 1.4.2)
August -
Februar
y
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
observer agreement form/s
done through onsite / face-to-
face / in-person classroom
observation.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,

●through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
●through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
Quality
No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Efficiency
Timeliness No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Basic
Educatio
n
Services
3. Applied a
range of
teaching
strategies to
develop critical
and creative
thinking, as well
as other higher-
order thinking
skills. (PPST
1.5.2)
August -
Februar
y
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
observer agreement form/s
done through onsite / face-to-
face / in-person classroom
observation.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,

●through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
Quality No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Efficiency No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Timeliness

3. MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
●through
observation of a
demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session
Basic
Educatio
n
Services
2. Learning
Environme
nt and
Diversity of
Learners
4. Managed
classroom
structure to
engage
learners,
individually or in
groups, in
meaningful
exploration,
discovery and
hands-on
activities within
a range of
physical
learning
environments.
(PPST 2.3.3)
August -
Februar
y
22.5%Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
observer agreement form/s
done through onsite / face-to-
face / in-person classroom
observation.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,

●through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
●through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Quality No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Efficiency No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Timeliness
Basic
Educatio
n
Services
5. Managed
learner behavior
constructively
by applying
positive and
non-violent
discipline to
August -
Februar
y
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
observer agreement form/s
done through onsite / face-to-
face / in-person classroom
observation.
Quality No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.

4. MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
ensure learning-
focused
environments.
(PPST 2.6.2)
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,

●through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
●through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
Efficiency No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Timeliness
Basic
Educatio
n
Services
6. Used
differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate
learning
experiences to
address
learners’
gender, needs,
strengths,
interests and
experiences.
(PPST 3.1.2)
August -
Februar
y
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
observer agreement form/s
done through onsite / face-to-
face / in-person classroom
observation.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,

●through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
Quality No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Efficiency No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.

5. MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
●through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Timeliness
Basic
Educatio
n
Services
3.
Curriculum
and
Planning
7. Planned,
managed and
implemented
developmentally
sequenced
teaching and
learning
processes to
meet curriculum
requirements
and varied
teaching
contexts. (PPST
4.1.2)
August -
Februar
y
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
observer agreement form/s
done through onsite / face-to-
face / in-person classroom
observation.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,

●through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
●through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
Quality No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Efficiency No available
MOVs as of
midyear
assessment.
Timeliness
8. Participated
in collegial
discussions that
use teacher and
learner
August -
Februar
y
1.Proof/s of attendance
in LAC sessions /
FGDs / meetings /
other collegial
discussions
Quality 5 Planned for
enriched
teaching
practice based
on LAC

6. MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
feedback to
enrich teaching
practice. (PPST
4.4.2)
2.Minutes of LAC
sessions / FGDs /
meetings / other
collegial discussions
on use of teacher and
learner feedback to
enrich teaching
practice
3.Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of
teaching practices
following participation
from LAC sessions /
FGDs / meetings /
other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with
proof/s of attendance
4.Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the
objective)
sessions / FGDs
/ meetings /
other collegial
discussions
attended, as
shown in MOV 3
Efficiency
Timeliness5 Presented
quarter 1 and
quarter 2
LAC/FGD/meeti
ng minutes of
the meeting,
proof of
attendance and
reflection
Basic
Educatio
n
Services
9. Selected,
developed,
organized and
used
appropriate
teaching and
learning
August -
Februar
y
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
observer agreement form/s
done through onsite / face-to-
face / in-person classroom
observation.
Quality No evidence
presented yet

7. MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
resources,
including ICT, to
address
learning goals.
(PPST 4.5.2)
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,

●through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
●through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
Efficiency No evidence
presented yet
Timeliness
Basic
Educatio
n
Services
4.
Assessmen
t and
Reporting
10. Designed,
selected,
organized and
used diagnostic,
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements.
(PPST 5.1.2)
August -
Februar
y
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
observer agreement form/s
done through onsite / face-to-
face / in-person classroom
observation.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,

●through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
●through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
Quality No evidence
presented yet

8. MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
Efficiency No evidence
presented yet
Timeliness
Basic
Educatio
n
Services
11. Monitored
and evaluated
learner progress
and
achievement
using learner
attainment data.
(PPST 5.2.2)
August -
Februar
y
Any one (1) of the
following:
● Individual Learning
Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
● Peer assessment data
● Sample of learners’
output with reflection / self-
assessment
● Progress
charts/anecdotal records
● Class/e-class
record/grading sheets
● Lesson plans showing
Quality 5 Involved
learner/s in
monitoring and
evaluation of
their own
progress and
achievement
through quarter
1 and quarter 2
Daily Lesson
Log showing
index of mastery
and quarter 1
and quarter 2
grade sheets

9. MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
index of mastery
● Frequency of errors with
identified least/most
mastered skills
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
(e.g., Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
● Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Efficiency
Timeliness5 Presented 1
Daily Lesson
Log each from
quarter 1 and
quarter 2
showing index of
mastery and
quarter 1 and
quarter 2
mathematics 7
grade sheet
Basic
Educatio
n
Services
12.
Communicated
promptly and
clearly the
learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to
key
stakeholders,
including
parents/guardia
ns
(PPST 5.4.2)
August -
Februar
y
Any one (1) of the
following:
● A sample of corrected
test paper of a learner in a
learning area with parent’s
or guardian’s signature
and date of receipt
● Minutes of meetings with
key stakeholders (e.g.,
PTA, SGC, SPT, CPC)
with proof of attendance
● Report card with
Quality 5 Sustained
engagement
through regular
communication
of learners’
needs, progress
and
achievement to
key
stakeholders,
including
parents/guardia
ns , as shown in
the corrected

10. MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of
meeting
● Communication with key
stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities
● Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
● Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
test paper of a
learner in a
learning area
with parent’s or
guardian’s
signature and
date of receipt
Efficiency
Timeliness5 Presented
quarter 1 and
quarter 2
corrected test
paper of a
learner in a
learning area
with parent’s or
guardian’s
signature and
date of receipt
5. Personal
Growth and
Professiona
l
Developme
nt
13. Applied a
personal
philosophy of
teaching that
is learner-
centered.
(PPST 7.1.2)
August -
Februar
y
A reflection/journal entry
that highlights the
application of a learner-
centered teaching
philosophy in the lesson
plan or community work
Quality 4 Presented
quarter 1 and
quarter 2
reflection that
showed
involvement of
learners in the
teaching-
learning process

11. MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
resulting from
the application
of a personal
philosophy of
teaching that is
learner-centered
Timeliness5 Presented
quarter 1 and
quarter 2
reflection on a
learner-centered
approach
14. Set
professional
development
goals based
on the
Philippine
Professional
Standards for
Teachers.
(PPST 7.5.2)
August -
Februar
y
1. Certification from the
ICT Coordinator / School
Head / Focal Person in
charge of e-SAT
2. IPCRF-DP
3. Mid-year Review Form
(MRF)
4. Updated IPCRF-DP
from Phase II
Quality 4 Discussed
progress on
professional
development
goals with the
rater during the
mid-year review
as evidenced by
Mid-Year review
form
Efficiency3 Presented e-sat
certification and
ipcrf-dp and
mid-year review
form
Timeliness4 Three (3) of the
submitted MOVs
were
accomplished
within the
prescribed
RPMS Phase
Basic
Educatio
n
Plus Factor15. Performed
various
related
August -
Februar
y
Any one (1) proof of:
● committee involvement;
● involvement as
Quality 4 Performed at
least one (1)
related work

12. MFOs KRAs Objectives
Timelin
e
Weigh
t per
KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
year
Revie
w
Result
Performanc
e Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Ratin
g
Remarks
Ratin
g
Remark
s
Services works /
activities that
contribute to
the teaching-
learning
process
module/learning material
writer/validator;
● involvement as a
resource
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based
instruction;
● book or journal
authorship/ co-
authorship/contributorshi
p;
●
advisorship/coordinatorsh
ip/ chairpersonship;
● participation in
demonstration teaching;
● participation as
research presenter in a
forum/conference;
● mentoring of pre-
service/in-service
teachers;
● conducted research
within the rating period;
● others (please specify)
1.with annotation on how it
contributed to the
teaching-learning
process.
/ activity that
contributed to
the teaching-
learning process
within the school
/ Community
Learning Center
(CLC) as
evidenced by
the submitted
MOV.
Efficiency4 Submitted MOV
that details the
perceived
positive
contribution to
the teaching-
learning
process, as
evidenced by
the annotation
provided.
Timeliness

13. APHRODITE EDITHA O. DIZON
Rater Ratee Approving Authority