MORAL-VS.-NON-MORAL (1).pptx

andrew699052 2,396 views 17 slides Nov 19, 2022
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 17
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17

About This Presentation

MORAL VS NON MORAL STANDARDS.


Slide Content

Moral vs. Non-moral Standards Presenters; Artuz , Emerald Dale E. ( Moral Standards ) Autor , Berlene Jane A. ( Non-Moral Standards )

Introduction Used or accepted as normal or average. An idea or thing used to measure, norm or model in comparative evaluation. What is a standard? ARTUZ

Why do we need to distinguish moral standards from non-moral one? Some values do have moral implications while others don’t. How do we address cultural conundrum? People have to understand the difference between moral standards and non-moral ones, to identify fundamental ethical values that may guide our actions. ARTUZ

MORAL VS. NON-MORAL MORAL NON-MORAL Force others to act accordingly. We have no right to impose on others Affect other people Do not affect other people ARTUZ

Moral Standard Based on natural Law , the consequence of one's action and sense of duty . Normally promote “the good”. Consistency of Moral Standards May differ from society to society and culture to culture. ARTUZ

Classification of Theories of Moral Standards Garner and Rosen ( 1967 ) classified the various moral standards formulated by moral philosophers as follows : Consequence Standard ( Teological ) - rightness or wrongness of the rule depends on the consequense or the good that is produced by following the rule . Not-only Consequence Standard ( Deontological ) - rightness or wrongness of an action do not only depend on the consequence of that action . ARTUZ

What makes standards Moral ? For Theist - God is the ultimate source of what is moral revealed to human person . For Non-theist- God is not the source of Morality . - moral standards are based on the wisdom of philosopheres like Confucius or Immanuel Kant . ARTUZ

Characteristics of Moral Standards Welfare of beings Relies on sound reasoning Overriding hegemony Impartial, fair and just Emotions and vocabulary ARTUZ

Origin of Moral Standards Theist : the theistic line of thought states moral standards are of divine origin . Non-theist : ( 20th century Thinkers ) claim that they simply evolve . .

Non-Moral Standards Originates from social rules , demands of etiquette , and good m manners. They are guide actions which should be followed as expected by the society . AUTOR

Non-Moral Standards Refer to standards by which we judge what is good or bad in a non-moral way. Are matters of taste or preference. Not linked to moral considerations. Manage and govern individual life, aspirations and desires that may decide a person’s place in a group. AUTOR

Non-Moral Standards Set of rules on how an individual should behave in society. Any violations that does not pose a serious threat to human well-being. Include independence, prestige, fame, popularity and wealth. AUTOR

Example of Non-moral Standards Standards of etiquette The law Standards of aesthetic AUTOR

Non-moral Characteristic Welfare of non-beings Relies on authority or law Religion, tradition Limits Hegemony Self Interest X emotions and vocabulary AUTOR

Examples of Non-moral Standards Standards of etiquette by which we judge manners as good or bad. Standards we call the law by which we judge legal right and wrong. Standards of aesthetics--- good and bad art. The athletic standards--- how well a game is being played. AUTOR

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING <3 END OF PRESENTATION