Moral vs. Non-moral Standards Presenters; Artuz , Emerald Dale E. ( Moral Standards ) Autor , Berlene Jane A. ( Non-Moral Standards )
Introduction Used or accepted as normal or average. An idea or thing used to measure, norm or model in comparative evaluation. What is a standard? ARTUZ
Why do we need to distinguish moral standards from non-moral one? Some values do have moral implications while others don’t. How do we address cultural conundrum? People have to understand the difference between moral standards and non-moral ones, to identify fundamental ethical values that may guide our actions. ARTUZ
MORAL VS. NON-MORAL MORAL NON-MORAL Force others to act accordingly. We have no right to impose on others Affect other people Do not affect other people ARTUZ
Moral Standard Based on natural Law , the consequence of one's action and sense of duty . Normally promote “the good”. Consistency of Moral Standards May differ from society to society and culture to culture. ARTUZ
Classification of Theories of Moral Standards Garner and Rosen ( 1967 ) classified the various moral standards formulated by moral philosophers as follows : Consequence Standard ( Teological ) - rightness or wrongness of the rule depends on the consequense or the good that is produced by following the rule . Not-only Consequence Standard ( Deontological ) - rightness or wrongness of an action do not only depend on the consequence of that action . ARTUZ
What makes standards Moral ? For Theist - God is the ultimate source of what is moral revealed to human person . For Non-theist- God is not the source of Morality . - moral standards are based on the wisdom of philosopheres like Confucius or Immanuel Kant . ARTUZ
Characteristics of Moral Standards Welfare of beings Relies on sound reasoning Overriding hegemony Impartial, fair and just Emotions and vocabulary ARTUZ
Origin of Moral Standards Theist : the theistic line of thought states moral standards are of divine origin . Non-theist : ( 20th century Thinkers ) claim that they simply evolve . .
Non-Moral Standards Originates from social rules , demands of etiquette , and good m manners. They are guide actions which should be followed as expected by the society . AUTOR
Non-Moral Standards Refer to standards by which we judge what is good or bad in a non-moral way. Are matters of taste or preference. Not linked to moral considerations. Manage and govern individual life, aspirations and desires that may decide a person’s place in a group. AUTOR
Non-Moral Standards Set of rules on how an individual should behave in society. Any violations that does not pose a serious threat to human well-being. Include independence, prestige, fame, popularity and wealth. AUTOR
Example of Non-moral Standards Standards of etiquette The law Standards of aesthetic AUTOR
Non-moral Characteristic Welfare of non-beings Relies on authority or law Religion, tradition Limits Hegemony Self Interest X emotions and vocabulary AUTOR
Examples of Non-moral Standards Standards of etiquette by which we judge manners as good or bad. Standards we call the law by which we judge legal right and wrong. Standards of aesthetics--- good and bad art. The athletic standards--- how well a game is being played. AUTOR